⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
341–360 · Page 18 of 500
Supreme Court of India15 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 85 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 110
Conviction for offences under section 468 r/w section 120(B), section 271 and section 465 r/w 120(B) and section 420 r/w section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”) as well as section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“PC Act”). He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a year for offences under ss.271 and 465 r/w section 120(B) and two years rigorous imprisonment for all other IPC offences. For offences under PC Act, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 3 years. The appeal against the conviction was dismissed by the High Court of
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
341–360 · Page 18 of 500
Supreme Court of India15 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 85 · [2025] 2 S.C.R. 110
Conviction for offences under section 468 r/w section 120(B), section 271 and section 465 r/w 120(B) and section 420 r/w section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”) as well as section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“PC Act”). He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a year for offences under ss.271 and 465 r/w section 120(B) and two years rigorous imprisonment for all other IPC offences. For offences under PC Act, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 3 years. The appeal against the conviction was dismissed by the High Court of
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 849 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 174
Whether the EPF Authorities were justified in treating the appellant and the Respondent No.3 as one unit for the purpose of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 848 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 523
The High Court upheld reduction of one-third of the pension payable to the appellant under the Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 847 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1041
Whether the High Court erred in directing the appellant to hand back the possession of the secured asset to the 1st respondent; whether the 1st Respondent failed to establish pre-existing tenancy in his favour.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 846 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 138
Whether interest on penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Officer is payable by the appellants, and if so, from which date- whether from the date of the adjudication orders passed by the Adjudicating Officer or the demand notices issued by the respondent-SEBI.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 845 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 984
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for offence punishable u/ss.302, 376 and 397 IPC.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 844 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 935
(A) Whether the order of the High Court enhancing compensation to Rs.5,00,000/- for the alleged violations committed against the appellant, while dismissing the complaint against respondent no.3, and partly allowing the complaint against respondent no.2, calls for interference by this Court; and (B) Whether adequate and appropriate facilities are being made available to prisoners with disabilities during incarceration in the prisons of Tamil Nadu, in compliance with the provisions of the RPwD Act, 2016 and UNCPRD.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 843 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 777
The matter pertains to allotment of residential plots/commercial sites to the Oustees-respondents pursuant acquisition of their land for the purpose of development of the residential sector. The issue arose whether the respondents entitled to claim plots as oustees at the rate prescribed by the 1992 policy or at the rate prescribed by the revised policy of 2016.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 842 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 103
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court that as some of the defendants before the first appellate court had passed away and their legal heirs were not brought on record in accordance with the provisions of Or.XXII r.4 CPC, the first appellate court could not have heard the first appeal on merits and decided the same in favour of the plaintiffs as it already stood abated.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 841 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 70
Whether the services of enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells, provided by the appellant fell within the scope of “Healthcare Services” during the disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 840 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 202
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in quashing the criminal proceedings, on the grounds of the chargesheet having been filed more than four years after the date of the alleged incident and lack of sanction; and whether r.214 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 has any application to stifle criminal proceedings for offences punishable under the IPC or the PC Act or any analogous law.
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 84 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1987
Whether while computing excise duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 on sale of petroleum products, price of the products can be considered as the sole consideration and whether the revenue was entitled to invoke extended period of limitation u/s.11A(1) of the Act and to levy a penalty u/s.11AC of the Act?
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 839 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 505
Issue arose as regards the designation of Senior Advocates by the Full Court by exercising its suo motu power.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 838 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 693
i) Whether any individual can invoke the jurisdiction of a State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERC) on the plea of public interest. In other words, whether an ERC has the jurisdiction to consider matters in public interest; ii) Whether the Act, 2003 confers jurisdiction on the State ERCs to consider and adjudicate the efficacy of a distribution franchisee agreement entered between a distribution licensee and a distribution franchisee. In other words, whether ERCs have the jurisdiction to review the functioning of a distribution licensee to supply the electricity through a franchisee.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 835 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 497
Whether the Administrative Tribunal was correct in its refusal to grant the appellant, permission to compromise proceedings with the private respondents in terms of Article 154 (3) of the Code of Comunidades.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 834 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 34
The matter pertains to legality of recruitment/selection of Assistant Professors and Librarians in Government Degree colleges of Punjab. The Division Bench of the High Court has reversed the findings of the Single Judge and has thereby upheld the selections made by the State. Whether there is a gross illegality in the recruitment process.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 833 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 11
Did the appellants-manufacturers cause to effect the entry of goods into the local area as required u/s.3(1)(a) r/w ss.2(1)(aa), 2(1)(b) and 2(3), M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, rendering them liable for entry tax for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008; is there an inseverable link between the manufacturers and the ultimate retailers.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 832 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court rightly upheld the mandamus issued by the Single Judge directing the IOCL to maintain the supply of kerosene to the respondent No.1-partnership firm till it is reconstituted or its dealership agreement is terminated.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 831 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 655
Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the complaint on the ground that the name of the partnership firm was not mentioned in the statutory notice issued by the appellant/complainant to the respondents u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was also not arraigned as an accused in the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 830 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 859
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the conviction of the appellants by the High Court u/s.302 read with s.120-B, IPC and additionally, s.201, IPC for A-4 alone, is justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 849 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 174
Whether the EPF Authorities were justified in treating the appellant and the Respondent No.3 as one unit for the purpose of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 848 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 523
The High Court upheld reduction of one-third of the pension payable to the appellant under the Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 847 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1041
Whether the High Court erred in directing the appellant to hand back the possession of the secured asset to the 1st respondent; whether the 1st Respondent failed to establish pre-existing tenancy in his favour.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 846 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 138
Whether interest on penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Officer is payable by the appellants, and if so, from which date- whether from the date of the adjudication orders passed by the Adjudicating Officer or the demand notices issued by the respondent-SEBI.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 845 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 984
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for offence punishable u/ss.302, 376 and 397 IPC.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 844 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 935
(A) Whether the order of the High Court enhancing compensation to Rs.5,00,000/- for the alleged violations committed against the appellant, while dismissing the complaint against respondent no.3, and partly allowing the complaint against respondent no.2, calls for interference by this Court; and (B) Whether adequate and appropriate facilities are being made available to prisoners with disabilities during incarceration in the prisons of Tamil Nadu, in compliance with the provisions of the RPwD Act, 2016 and UNCPRD.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 843 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 777
The matter pertains to allotment of residential plots/commercial sites to the Oustees-respondents pursuant acquisition of their land for the purpose of development of the residential sector. The issue arose whether the respondents entitled to claim plots as oustees at the rate prescribed by the 1992 policy or at the rate prescribed by the revised policy of 2016.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 842 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 103
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court that as some of the defendants before the first appellate court had passed away and their legal heirs were not brought on record in accordance with the provisions of Or.XXII r.4 CPC, the first appellate court could not have heard the first appeal on merits and decided the same in favour of the plaintiffs as it already stood abated.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 841 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 70
Whether the services of enrolment, collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells, provided by the appellant fell within the scope of “Healthcare Services” during the disputed period and thus, whether eligible for exemption from payment of service tax during the said period.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 840 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 202
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in quashing the criminal proceedings, on the grounds of the chargesheet having been filed more than four years after the date of the alleged incident and lack of sanction; and whether r.214 of the Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 has any application to stifle criminal proceedings for offences punishable under the IPC or the PC Act or any analogous law.
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 84 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1987
Whether while computing excise duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 on sale of petroleum products, price of the products can be considered as the sole consideration and whether the revenue was entitled to invoke extended period of limitation u/s.11A(1) of the Act and to levy a penalty u/s.11AC of the Act?
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 839 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 505
Issue arose as regards the designation of Senior Advocates by the Full Court by exercising its suo motu power.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 838 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 693
i) Whether any individual can invoke the jurisdiction of a State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERC) on the plea of public interest. In other words, whether an ERC has the jurisdiction to consider matters in public interest; ii) Whether the Act, 2003 confers jurisdiction on the State ERCs to consider and adjudicate the efficacy of a distribution franchisee agreement entered between a distribution licensee and a distribution franchisee. In other words, whether ERCs have the jurisdiction to review the functioning of a distribution licensee to supply the electricity through a franchisee.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 835 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 497
Whether the Administrative Tribunal was correct in its refusal to grant the appellant, permission to compromise proceedings with the private respondents in terms of Article 154 (3) of the Code of Comunidades.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 834 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 34
The matter pertains to legality of recruitment/selection of Assistant Professors and Librarians in Government Degree colleges of Punjab. The Division Bench of the High Court has reversed the findings of the Single Judge and has thereby upheld the selections made by the State. Whether there is a gross illegality in the recruitment process.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 833 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 11
Did the appellants-manufacturers cause to effect the entry of goods into the local area as required u/s.3(1)(a) r/w ss.2(1)(aa), 2(1)(b) and 2(3), M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, rendering them liable for entry tax for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008; is there an inseverable link between the manufacturers and the ultimate retailers.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 832 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court rightly upheld the mandamus issued by the Single Judge directing the IOCL to maintain the supply of kerosene to the respondent No.1-partnership firm till it is reconstituted or its dealership agreement is terminated.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 831 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 655
Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the complaint on the ground that the name of the partnership firm was not mentioned in the statutory notice issued by the appellant/complainant to the respondents u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and was also not arraigned as an accused in the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 830 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 859
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the conviction of the appellants by the High Court u/s.302 read with s.120-B, IPC and additionally, s.201, IPC for A-4 alone, is justified.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis