⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,481–3,500 · Page 175 of 500
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 152 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 523
Case Law Reference [2006] 3 SCR 48 relied on Para 3.1 [1994] 4 Suppl. SCR 617 relied on Para 6 E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.813 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 14.11.2018 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ-C No.33482 of 2018. F Vishal Yadav, Ajay Pal, Advs. for the Appell…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,481–3,500 · Page 175 of 500
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 152 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 523
Case Law Reference [2006] 3 SCR 48 relied on Para 3.1 [1994] 4 Suppl. SCR 617 relied on Para 6 E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.813 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 14.11.2018 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ-C No.33482 of 2018. F Vishal Yadav, Ajay Pal, Advs. for the Appell…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 151 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 308
rectification/ amendment of the judgment dated 03.07.2019 – Appellant stated in the said application that the Settlement Agreement pertains only to trademark “FX-991ES PLUS’/ ‘FX-991" – However, there was an inadvertent typographical error of the trademark in the Settlement Agreement as “FX-991ES PLUS/FX/991” – F Appli…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 150 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 212
212 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 212 [2022] 2 S.C.R. A M/S CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED v. M/S HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED B (Civil Appeal No. 2839 of 2020) FEBRUARY 04, 2022 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] C Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: ss.5(20)…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 15 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 394
purchase of the land belonging to a Scheduled Caste person of State of Rajasthan, which was given to original allottee as Scheduled Caste landless person and therefore sale transaction in favour of appellant was in clear breach and/or in violation of s.42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act – Even otherwise, in the facts and …
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 149 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1130
limitation of three years provided in Art. 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act – That apart, grant of selection grade was not a matter of right and was subject to terms and conditions which were stipulated – In terms of Clause 7 of the scheme of Selection Grade only those employees whose service record was satisf…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 148 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 967
Evidence Act, 1972: s. 3 – “Evidence” – Explained. B Appreciation of “evidence” – Explanation of – Held: While appreciating evidence, evidence can be divided into three categories, wholly reliable, wholly unreliable and neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable – If evidence, along with matters surrounding it, make…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 147 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 203
Court on the ground that that he was promoted as Head Constable in year 2000 and thus, the penalties imposed prior to 2000 have to be ignored while determining the suitability to be retained in service – On appeal, held: High Court has not only misread the judgment of Supreme Court in Baikuntha Nath Das and Another v. …
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 146 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 826
D Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Before the Reference Court, the Chief Administrative Manager of the appellant, who was a qualified Civil Engineer was examined as PW-1, and a retired Director of Town Planning was examined as PW-15. Both these witnesses referred E to the quotations given by Hindustan S…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 145 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 376
376 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS19 S.C.R. 376 [2022] 19 S.C.R. A OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. THE PRESIDENT, OIL FIELD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ORS. B (Civil Appeal No. 1033 of 2022) FEBRUARY 04, 2022 [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: If irregularity or illegality committ…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 144 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 638
Union of India v. Avtar Singh, (2006) 6 SCC 493 : [2006] B 3 Suppl. SCR 666 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2006] 3 Suppl. SCR 666 referred to Para 14 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 909 of C 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur Bench in W.…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 142 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 923
[2022] 11 S.C.R. 923 923 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT A AUTHORITY (NOIDA) v. YUNUS & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 901 of 2022) B FEBRUARY 03, 2022 [K. M. JOSEPH AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.] Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 – ss.20-22 – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.28A, 26 – Whether the Award passed by C a…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 141 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 509
Ashok Kumar Sharma, Pramod Kumar Dubey, Sr. Advs., Parmanand Gaur, Vikalp Mudgal, Ekansh Bansal, Vaibhav Mishra, Ajay Singh, Amit Kumar, Anurag Andley, Rahul Pratap Singh, Ms. Alka Sinha, Abhishek Atrey, Advs. for the Appellants. R. K. Raizada, AAG, Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Shreesh Kumar F Mishra, Santosh Kumar, Ms. Priya…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 140 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 498
all requirements as existed in law for maintaining an appeal. [Para 23][515-C-D] 2. Equally, without substance is the contention of the appellant based on Section 19(3) of the Act. It constituted a special law within the meaning of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act. It Cmust be noticed that the Family Courts Act itse…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 14 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 975
- as fee, in addition to the expenses, appears to be reasonable – Before the Supreme Court, the appellant submitted that both NCLT and NCLAT erroneously have not scrutinized the factual position G and awarded the ad hoc amount – On appeal, held: Considering the respondent’s reply to the letter of appellant and absence …
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 139 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 1
1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 2 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. It is quite clear that PW-12 and PW-15 were not aware of the identity of the assailants. Their source of information was rumours, on the basis of which an assertion about the identity of the appellant was made in the first information r…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 137 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 898
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Rule 11 of the Rajasthan Educational H Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 provides that candidate should 898 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. v. ANJU RINI SAINI 899 possess the qualifications as provided thereunder besides A possessing the experience provided. Rule 266-A is the very p…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 136 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 198
parties – What was done by APTEL was only to direct the State Electricity Regulatory Commission to dispose of the said two O.Ps on merits – Appeal dismissed with costs, quantified at Rs.5,00,000/ - – State Electricity Regulatory Commission to decide the said two O.Ps, expeditiously, within six months. E Constitution of…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 135 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 514
VASUDEV v. STATE of M.P. 515 station and not on spot – Three independent witnesses, PW-7, PW-8 A and PW-13 did not supported the case of prosecution – Further, as per FSL report, the right barrel of 12 bore gun, fire could not be done and the empty catridges, which were received were not fired from the left barrel – Th…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 134 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1057
[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1057 1057 THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS. A v. SURJAKUMAR OKRAM & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 823-827 of 2022) FEBRUARY 01, 2022 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Repeal: There is no question of repeal of a statute which has been declared unconstitutional by the Court – In Bimolangshu …
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 133 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163
[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163 1163 STATE OF U.P. A v. VEERPAL & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2022) FEBRUARY 01, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Evidence Act, 1872 – s.32 – Dying declaration – Appreciation of – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate in which deceased specifically stated that due to feud ov…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 151 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 308
rectification/ amendment of the judgment dated 03.07.2019 – Appellant stated in the said application that the Settlement Agreement pertains only to trademark “FX-991ES PLUS’/ ‘FX-991" – However, there was an inadvertent typographical error of the trademark in the Settlement Agreement as “FX-991ES PLUS/FX/991” – F Appli…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 150 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 212
212 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS2 S.C.R. 212 [2022] 2 S.C.R. A M/S CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED v. M/S HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED B (Civil Appeal No. 2839 of 2020) FEBRUARY 04, 2022 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] C Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: ss.5(20)…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 15 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 394
purchase of the land belonging to a Scheduled Caste person of State of Rajasthan, which was given to original allottee as Scheduled Caste landless person and therefore sale transaction in favour of appellant was in clear breach and/or in violation of s.42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act – Even otherwise, in the facts and …
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 149 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1130
limitation of three years provided in Art. 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act – That apart, grant of selection grade was not a matter of right and was subject to terms and conditions which were stipulated – In terms of Clause 7 of the scheme of Selection Grade only those employees whose service record was satisf…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 148 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 967
Evidence Act, 1972: s. 3 – “Evidence” – Explained. B Appreciation of “evidence” – Explanation of – Held: While appreciating evidence, evidence can be divided into three categories, wholly reliable, wholly unreliable and neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable – If evidence, along with matters surrounding it, make…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 147 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 203
Court on the ground that that he was promoted as Head Constable in year 2000 and thus, the penalties imposed prior to 2000 have to be ignored while determining the suitability to be retained in service – On appeal, held: High Court has not only misread the judgment of Supreme Court in Baikuntha Nath Das and Another v. …
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 146 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 826
D Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 Before the Reference Court, the Chief Administrative Manager of the appellant, who was a qualified Civil Engineer was examined as PW-1, and a retired Director of Town Planning was examined as PW-15. Both these witnesses referred E to the quotations given by Hindustan S…
Supreme Court of India4 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 145 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 376
376 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS19 S.C.R. 376 [2022] 19 S.C.R. A OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. THE PRESIDENT, OIL FIELD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ORS. B (Civil Appeal No. 1033 of 2022) FEBRUARY 04, 2022 [L. NAGESWARA RAO AND ANIRUDDHA BOSE, JJ.] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: If irregularity or illegality committ…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 144 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 638
Union of India v. Avtar Singh, (2006) 6 SCC 493 : [2006] B 3 Suppl. SCR 666 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2006] 3 Suppl. SCR 666 referred to Para 14 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 909 of C 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur Bench in W.…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 142 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 923
[2022] 11 S.C.R. 923 923 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT A AUTHORITY (NOIDA) v. YUNUS & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 901 of 2022) B FEBRUARY 03, 2022 [K. M. JOSEPH AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.] Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 – ss.20-22 – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.28A, 26 – Whether the Award passed by C a…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 141 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 509
Ashok Kumar Sharma, Pramod Kumar Dubey, Sr. Advs., Parmanand Gaur, Vikalp Mudgal, Ekansh Bansal, Vaibhav Mishra, Ajay Singh, Amit Kumar, Anurag Andley, Rahul Pratap Singh, Ms. Alka Sinha, Abhishek Atrey, Advs. for the Appellants. R. K. Raizada, AAG, Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Shreesh Kumar F Mishra, Santosh Kumar, Ms. Priya…
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 140 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 498
all requirements as existed in law for maintaining an appeal. [Para 23][515-C-D] 2. Equally, without substance is the contention of the appellant based on Section 19(3) of the Act. It constituted a special law within the meaning of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act. It Cmust be noticed that the Family Courts Act itse…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 14 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 975
- as fee, in addition to the expenses, appears to be reasonable – Before the Supreme Court, the appellant submitted that both NCLT and NCLAT erroneously have not scrutinized the factual position G and awarded the ad hoc amount – On appeal, held: Considering the respondent’s reply to the letter of appellant and absence …
Supreme Court of India3 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 139 · [2022] 2 S.C.R. 1
1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 2 S.C.R. A Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. It is quite clear that PW-12 and PW-15 were not aware of the identity of the assailants. Their source of information was rumours, on the basis of which an assertion about the identity of the appellant was made in the first information r…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 137 · [2022] 13 S.C.R. 898
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Rule 11 of the Rajasthan Educational H Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 provides that candidate should 898 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. v. ANJU RINI SAINI 899 possess the qualifications as provided thereunder besides A possessing the experience provided. Rule 266-A is the very p…
Supreme Court of India2 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 136 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 198
parties – What was done by APTEL was only to direct the State Electricity Regulatory Commission to dispose of the said two O.Ps on merits – Appeal dismissed with costs, quantified at Rs.5,00,000/ - – State Electricity Regulatory Commission to decide the said two O.Ps, expeditiously, within six months. E Constitution of…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 135 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 514
VASUDEV v. STATE of M.P. 515 station and not on spot – Three independent witnesses, PW-7, PW-8 A and PW-13 did not supported the case of prosecution – Further, as per FSL report, the right barrel of 12 bore gun, fire could not be done and the empty catridges, which were received were not fired from the left barrel – Th…
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 134 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1057
[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1057 1057 THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS. A v. SURJAKUMAR OKRAM & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 823-827 of 2022) FEBRUARY 01, 2022 B [L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Repeal: There is no question of repeal of a statute which has been declared unconstitutional by the Court – In Bimolangshu …
Supreme Court of India1 Feb 2022Full text
2022 INSC 133 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163
[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163 1163 STATE OF U.P. A v. VEERPAL & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2022) FEBRUARY 01, 2022 B [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Evidence Act, 1872 – s.32 – Dying declaration – Appreciation of – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate in which deceased specifically stated that due to feud ov…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis