⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
321–340 · Page 17 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 872 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 289
Issue arose as regards the interpretation of s.32-B of the NDPS Act by the High Court that u/s.32-B minimum punishment is considered as maximum punishment.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 871 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1221
Matter pertains to the expunction of strictures passed by the High Court against the Judicial Officer.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
321–340 · Page 17 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 872 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 289
Issue arose as regards the interpretation of s.32-B of the NDPS Act by the High Court that u/s.32-B minimum punishment is considered as maximum punishment.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 871 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1221
Matter pertains to the expunction of strictures passed by the High Court against the Judicial Officer.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 870 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1208
Issue arose as to correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellants, seeking quashing of FIR.
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 87 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 834
Whether an employee in an establishment is entitled to claim promotion on a post for which he does not fall in the feeder cadre and the post is required to be filled up 100% by way of direct recruitment; whether a vacancy meant for direct recruitment can be filled up merely by issuing a circular in the establishment and not by issuing an advertisement calling application from the eligible candidates from public at large.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 869 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2161
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, in the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing of the FIR lodged by the Respondent No.4-complainant for offences punishable u/ss.60(b), 316(2) and 318 (2), BNS, 2023, and directing the parties to go for mediation and also directing the appellant to hand-over a demand draft of Rs.25 Lakh to the Respondent No.4 for the mediation; whether the impugned FIR against the appellant ought to be quashed as the dispute between the parties is of a civil nature.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 868 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1183
Whether the High Court erred in convicting the appellant-accused no.1 u/s.120B, IPC and ss.7, 13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by reversing the finding of acquittal of the Trial Court.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 866 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 257
Issue arose as to whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the courts below and holding the Will was vitiated due to existence of suspicious circumstances, non-mention of the existence of wife and failure to give reasons for her disinheritance in the Will.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 865 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 272
Issue arose whether a tribal woman or her legal heirs would be entitled to an equal share in her ancestral property or not.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 864 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1144
(i) Whether the Limitation Act applies to conciliation proceedings u/s.18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), and even if not, whether time-barred debts can be referred to conciliation; (ii) Whether the Limitation Act applies to arbitration proceedings u/s.18 of the MSMED Act, and whether time-barred debts can be referred to arbitration. Further, what is the effect of disclosure of the unpaid amount in the buyer’s financial statements as mandated u/s.22 on extending the limitation period.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 862 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 550
Issue arose as regards commutation of the death sentence awarded to the appellant for committing brutal murder of his wife, sister-in- law and his three children.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 861 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 243
Allegation against the appellant herein that he committed a forceful rape and strangulated a 10 year old girl child. The punishment handed down to the appellant by the Courts below was of death penalty. Whether the conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court, as affirmed by the High Court, are sustainable in law or not.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 860 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 229
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court quashing the summons issued against respondent u/s.319 CrPC by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 86 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 825
Whether the appellant, can be charged with abetment of suicide of the deceased, under Section 306 of the Penal Code (IPC).
Supreme Court of India25 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 858 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 607
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal passed by the trial court and convicting the appellants for offence u/s.302, Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing them to life imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 857 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1104
The primary issues arising for consideration are: first, whether the CERC Regulations, 2019 bar respondent no. 1 from supplying free power to the appellant-State beyond 13%; and second, whether respondent no. 1 could have invoked the High Court’s writ jurisdiction for aligning the Implementation Agreement with the CERC Regulations, 2019.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 856 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1070
Whether the courts below erred in convicting the appellant for offences u/ss.302, 308 and 325, Penal Code, 1860 and imposing death sentence on him, when the prosecution had failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 855 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 221
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant is entitled to family pension of her late husband, and whether a denial of such relief was justified.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 854 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 541
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash FIR against the appellants-officials of the Municipal Corporation and the builder u/s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and s.120-B IPC, wherein the builder in conspiracy with the officials constructed a commercial structure in a prohibited zone under the garb of the renovation permission.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 853 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1053
The petitioner-mother has preferred the instant review petitions primarily on the ground that the news of the imminent separation of the minor child (aged 11 years old at that time) from his mother, who has been his primary guardian since he was an infant, has caused an immense negative impact on the mental health of the child.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 852 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 534
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court dismissing the matrimonial appeal filed by the appellant-husband refusing to grant divorce to the parties.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 870 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1208
Issue arose as to correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellants, seeking quashing of FIR.
Supreme Court of India20 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 87 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 834
Whether an employee in an establishment is entitled to claim promotion on a post for which he does not fall in the feeder cadre and the post is required to be filled up 100% by way of direct recruitment; whether a vacancy meant for direct recruitment can be filled up merely by issuing a circular in the establishment and not by issuing an advertisement calling application from the eligible candidates from public at large.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 869 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2161
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned order, in the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing of the FIR lodged by the Respondent No.4-complainant for offences punishable u/ss.60(b), 316(2) and 318 (2), BNS, 2023, and directing the parties to go for mediation and also directing the appellant to hand-over a demand draft of Rs.25 Lakh to the Respondent No.4 for the mediation; whether the impugned FIR against the appellant ought to be quashed as the dispute between the parties is of a civil nature.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 868 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1183
Whether the High Court erred in convicting the appellant-accused no.1 u/s.120B, IPC and ss.7, 13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by reversing the finding of acquittal of the Trial Court.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 866 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 257
Issue arose as to whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the courts below and holding the Will was vitiated due to existence of suspicious circumstances, non-mention of the existence of wife and failure to give reasons for her disinheritance in the Will.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 865 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 272
Issue arose whether a tribal woman or her legal heirs would be entitled to an equal share in her ancestral property or not.
Supreme Court of India17 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 864 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1144
(i) Whether the Limitation Act applies to conciliation proceedings u/s.18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), and even if not, whether time-barred debts can be referred to conciliation; (ii) Whether the Limitation Act applies to arbitration proceedings u/s.18 of the MSMED Act, and whether time-barred debts can be referred to arbitration. Further, what is the effect of disclosure of the unpaid amount in the buyer’s financial statements as mandated u/s.22 on extending the limitation period.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 862 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 550
Issue arose as regards commutation of the death sentence awarded to the appellant for committing brutal murder of his wife, sister-in- law and his three children.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 861 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 243
Allegation against the appellant herein that he committed a forceful rape and strangulated a 10 year old girl child. The punishment handed down to the appellant by the Courts below was of death penalty. Whether the conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court, as affirmed by the High Court, are sustainable in law or not.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 860 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 229
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court quashing the summons issued against respondent u/s.319 CrPC by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 86 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 825
Whether the appellant, can be charged with abetment of suicide of the deceased, under Section 306 of the Penal Code (IPC).
Supreme Court of India25 Jun 2025Full text
2025 INSC 858 · [2025] 6 S.C.R. 607
Whether the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal passed by the trial court and convicting the appellants for offence u/s.302, Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing them to life imprisonment.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 857 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1104
The primary issues arising for consideration are: first, whether the CERC Regulations, 2019 bar respondent no. 1 from supplying free power to the appellant-State beyond 13%; and second, whether respondent no. 1 could have invoked the High Court’s writ jurisdiction for aligning the Implementation Agreement with the CERC Regulations, 2019.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 856 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1070
Whether the courts below erred in convicting the appellant for offences u/ss.302, 308 and 325, Penal Code, 1860 and imposing death sentence on him, when the prosecution had failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 855 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 221
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant is entitled to family pension of her late husband, and whether a denial of such relief was justified.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 854 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 541
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash FIR against the appellants-officials of the Municipal Corporation and the builder u/s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and s.120-B IPC, wherein the builder in conspiracy with the officials constructed a commercial structure in a prohibited zone under the garb of the renovation permission.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 853 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1053
The petitioner-mother has preferred the instant review petitions primarily on the ground that the news of the imminent separation of the minor child (aged 11 years old at that time) from his mother, who has been his primary guardian since he was an infant, has caused an immense negative impact on the mental health of the child.
Supreme Court of India15 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 852 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 534
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court dismissing the matrimonial appeal filed by the appellant-husband refusing to grant divorce to the parties.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis