⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
301–320 · Page 16 of 500
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 899 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1631
When can amendments to complaints be allowed after cognizance is taken; whether on facts, any prejudice would be caused to the accused-respondents if the amendment to the complaint, as prayed, is allowed.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 898 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1622
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court that in cases where a charge-sheet has been issued u/r.14 of the CCS CCA Rules, by authority empowered to inflict minor penalties, then the charge memo has to be approved by the authority competent to inflict major penalty.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
301–320 · Page 16 of 500
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 899 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1631
When can amendments to complaints be allowed after cognizance is taken; whether on facts, any prejudice would be caused to the accused-respondents if the amendment to the complaint, as prayed, is allowed.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 898 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1622
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court that in cases where a charge-sheet has been issued u/r.14 of the CCS CCA Rules, by authority empowered to inflict minor penalties, then the charge memo has to be approved by the authority competent to inflict major penalty.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 895 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1599
(i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its power u/s.482 of CrPC or under Art.226/227 of the Constitution is justified in refusing to quash the FIR No.380/2005, u/ss.420, 120-B and 34 of the IPC and the order dated 01.07.2005 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate directing for the registration of the aforesaid FIR; (ii) whether an application u/s.156(3) of the CrPC could have been filed without approaching the police authorities; (iii) whether the order dated 01.07.2005 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate is an order passed without application of mind, irrespective of the fact that it sta
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 894 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1579
(a) Whether the exclusion of the States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (or any other State), from the scope of delimitation under the Impugned Notifications and limiting it only to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is arbitrary and violative of Art.14 of the Constitution; (b) Whether the failure of the Union of India to give effect to s.26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 has frustrated the legitimate expectation of the electorates of these States, thereby giving rise to a justiciable cause of action.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 893 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1543
Issue of growing crisis of student suicides in educational institutions; need for a preventive, remedial, and supportive framework for mental health protection and prevention of suicides by students; whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in rejecting the appellant’s prayer for transfer of the investigation to the CBI in the suspicious death of his 17-year-old daughter, who was undergoing coaching for NEET examination.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 892 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1538
Matter pertains to the retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6 POCSO Act, to the incident which took place prior to the amendment.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 891 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1497
Issue arose whether the appellant, a tax resident of the UAE, has a Permanent Establishment-PE in India u/Art.5(1) of the Indo-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-DTAA, and consequently, whether its income derived under the Strategic Oversight Services Agreement-SOSA is taxable in India.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 890 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1462
Whether, upon payment of tax and penalty by the appellant within the time stipulated in the notice u/s.129(3), the proper officer is still mandatorily required to pass a final order u/s.129(3), or whether the deeming fiction u/s.129(5) dispenses with such requirement.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 889 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1530
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court was justified in directing the sale deed of the plot to be executed in favour of the respondent subject to the fulfilment of the condition stated.
Supreme Court of India23 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 888 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1451
Whether a second quashing petition u/s.482 CrPC would be maintainable on the grounds/pleas that were available to be raised even at the time of filing/decision of the first quashing petition.
Supreme Court of India23 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 884 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1371
Issue arose whether the impugned order having merged with this Court’s order in Reddy Veerana’s case, as claimed by R, renders the present appeal which lays a collateral challenge to an order of this Court itself not maintainable; whether the present writ petition is not maintainable, as it seeks to challenge a judicial order which, by its very nature, can never be said to violate Fundamental Rights; whether the appellant can pursue a civil appeal against the impugned order as well as a petition for review of the decision of this Court in which the impugned order has merged, as claimed, simult
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 881 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1642
Issue arose to determine whether an employee resigning from service citing mental depression, after having served his employer much in excess of the period stipulated to qualify for being entitled to pension, forfeits his right to opt for pension in terms of a specific provision in the Pension Regulations for all times to come, or, in view of pension being a social welfare measure for employees in the winter years of their life, adopting a beneficial approach is permissible.
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 880 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1361
Whether the courts below erred in convicting the appellants and sentencing them to life imprisonment for the murder of the deceased relying upon the testimonies of PW-1 and PW-2, who were interested witnesses being the son and wife of the deceased respectively.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 88 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 859
Whether the State is entitled to levy royalty on brick earth excavation, irrespective of the issue of ownership of the excavated land.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 879 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1341
Whether the High Court, manifestly erred while interfering with the well-reasoned judgment of the trial Court and substituting its own findings by reducing the share of plaintiff-LB in the suit schedule properties; whether the view taken by the trial Court was based on appreciation of the evidence and the prevailing legal principles.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 877 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1330
Allegations of torture and sexual exploitation against the respondent no.2-accused. She was granted bail by the High Court. Whether the grant of bail to the respondent no.2-accused has resulted into travesty of justice.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 876 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1295
Issue arose as to whether the facts and circumstances disclosed in the complaint, supported by compelling medical evidence of grievous injuries, including complete genital mutilation, mandatorily required registration of an FIR; whether the gravity of the alleged custodial torture, the systematic cover-up by local police machinery, and the inherent conflict of interest arising from the pendency of cases punishable under NDPS Act against the appellant necessitate transfer of investigation to the CBI; and whether FIR registered against the appellant u/s.309 IPC should be quashed.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 875 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1355
Issue arose whether the liberty granted to file a fresh suit by the High Court would enable the party to revive a cause of action and save limitation, so as to enable raking up all grounds earlier raised and rejected by concurrent findings of the trial court and the first appellate court, affirmed by the High Court in Second Appeal.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 874 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1275
(i) Whether the question of existence of an arbitration agreement should be left for the arbitral tribunal to decide; (ii) whether clause 13 of the General Terms and Conditions of the contract and relied upon by the appellant would constitute an arbitration agreement between the parties as contemplated u/s.7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; (iii) whether clause 32 of Instructions to Bidders negates the existence of an arbitration agreement.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 873 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1233
Whether the order rejecting application(s) seeking condonation of delay for setting aside abatement and substitution of legal representatives of deceased appellant suffers from any legal infirmity; if the answer to (a) is in the negative, whether the second appeal abated wholly or partially, or not at all, on account of non-substitution of LRs of deceased defendant-appellant no.2.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 895 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1599
(i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its power u/s.482 of CrPC or under Art.226/227 of the Constitution is justified in refusing to quash the FIR No.380/2005, u/ss.420, 120-B and 34 of the IPC and the order dated 01.07.2005 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate directing for the registration of the aforesaid FIR; (ii) whether an application u/s.156(3) of the CrPC could have been filed without approaching the police authorities; (iii) whether the order dated 01.07.2005 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate is an order passed without application of mind, irrespective of the fact that it sta
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 894 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1579
(a) Whether the exclusion of the States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (or any other State), from the scope of delimitation under the Impugned Notifications and limiting it only to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is arbitrary and violative of Art.14 of the Constitution; (b) Whether the failure of the Union of India to give effect to s.26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 has frustrated the legitimate expectation of the electorates of these States, thereby giving rise to a justiciable cause of action.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 893 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1543
Issue of growing crisis of student suicides in educational institutions; need for a preventive, remedial, and supportive framework for mental health protection and prevention of suicides by students; whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court erred in rejecting the appellant’s prayer for transfer of the investigation to the CBI in the suspicious death of his 17-year-old daughter, who was undergoing coaching for NEET examination.
Supreme Court of India25 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 892 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1538
Matter pertains to the retrospective application of the amended provision-s.6 POCSO Act, to the incident which took place prior to the amendment.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 891 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1497
Issue arose whether the appellant, a tax resident of the UAE, has a Permanent Establishment-PE in India u/Art.5(1) of the Indo-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-DTAA, and consequently, whether its income derived under the Strategic Oversight Services Agreement-SOSA is taxable in India.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 890 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1462
Whether, upon payment of tax and penalty by the appellant within the time stipulated in the notice u/s.129(3), the proper officer is still mandatorily required to pass a final order u/s.129(3), or whether the deeming fiction u/s.129(5) dispenses with such requirement.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 889 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1530
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court was justified in directing the sale deed of the plot to be executed in favour of the respondent subject to the fulfilment of the condition stated.
Supreme Court of India23 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 888 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1451
Whether a second quashing petition u/s.482 CrPC would be maintainable on the grounds/pleas that were available to be raised even at the time of filing/decision of the first quashing petition.
Supreme Court of India23 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 884 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1371
Issue arose whether the impugned order having merged with this Court’s order in Reddy Veerana’s case, as claimed by R, renders the present appeal which lays a collateral challenge to an order of this Court itself not maintainable; whether the present writ petition is not maintainable, as it seeks to challenge a judicial order which, by its very nature, can never be said to violate Fundamental Rights; whether the appellant can pursue a civil appeal against the impugned order as well as a petition for review of the decision of this Court in which the impugned order has merged, as claimed, simult
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 881 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1642
Issue arose to determine whether an employee resigning from service citing mental depression, after having served his employer much in excess of the period stipulated to qualify for being entitled to pension, forfeits his right to opt for pension in terms of a specific provision in the Pension Regulations for all times to come, or, in view of pension being a social welfare measure for employees in the winter years of their life, adopting a beneficial approach is permissible.
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 880 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1361
Whether the courts below erred in convicting the appellants and sentencing them to life imprisonment for the murder of the deceased relying upon the testimonies of PW-1 and PW-2, who were interested witnesses being the son and wife of the deceased respectively.
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 88 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 859
Whether the State is entitled to levy royalty on brick earth excavation, irrespective of the issue of ownership of the excavated land.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 879 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1341
Whether the High Court, manifestly erred while interfering with the well-reasoned judgment of the trial Court and substituting its own findings by reducing the share of plaintiff-LB in the suit schedule properties; whether the view taken by the trial Court was based on appreciation of the evidence and the prevailing legal principles.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 877 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1330
Allegations of torture and sexual exploitation against the respondent no.2-accused. She was granted bail by the High Court. Whether the grant of bail to the respondent no.2-accused has resulted into travesty of justice.
Supreme Court of India21 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 876 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1295
Issue arose as to whether the facts and circumstances disclosed in the complaint, supported by compelling medical evidence of grievous injuries, including complete genital mutilation, mandatorily required registration of an FIR; whether the gravity of the alleged custodial torture, the systematic cover-up by local police machinery, and the inherent conflict of interest arising from the pendency of cases punishable under NDPS Act against the appellant necessitate transfer of investigation to the CBI; and whether FIR registered against the appellant u/s.309 IPC should be quashed.
Supreme Court of India14 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 875 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1355
Issue arose whether the liberty granted to file a fresh suit by the High Court would enable the party to revive a cause of action and save limitation, so as to enable raking up all grounds earlier raised and rejected by concurrent findings of the trial court and the first appellate court, affirmed by the High Court in Second Appeal.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 874 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1275
(i) Whether the question of existence of an arbitration agreement should be left for the arbitral tribunal to decide; (ii) whether clause 13 of the General Terms and Conditions of the contract and relied upon by the appellant would constitute an arbitration agreement between the parties as contemplated u/s.7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; (iii) whether clause 32 of Instructions to Bidders negates the existence of an arbitration agreement.
Supreme Court of India18 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 873 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1233
Whether the order rejecting application(s) seeking condonation of delay for setting aside abatement and substitution of legal representatives of deceased appellant suffers from any legal infirmity; if the answer to (a) is in the negative, whether the second appeal abated wholly or partially, or not at all, on account of non-substitution of LRs of deceased defendant-appellant no.2.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis