⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,101–3,120 · Page 156 of 500
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 638 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 358
buildings, which are existing and the constructions which are necessary for providing basic facilities like drainage, toilets, water supply and distribution of electricity should be kept out of the rigour of requirement of statutory permissions – The argument that the said provision is only to enable a person who resid…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 637 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 737
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,101–3,120 · Page 156 of 500
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 638 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 358
buildings, which are existing and the constructions which are necessary for providing basic facilities like drainage, toilets, water supply and distribution of electricity should be kept out of the rigour of requirement of statutory permissions – The argument that the said provision is only to enable a person who resid…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 637 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 737
wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. When the witness is “wholly reliable”, the Court should not have any difficulty inasmuch as conviction or acquittal could be based on the testimony of such single witness. Equally, if the Court finds that the witness is “wholly unreliable”, there would be no difficulty inasmuch as…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 636 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 577
[2022] 7 S.C.R. 577 577 VALLAL RCK A v. M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LIMITED AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 1811-1812 of 2022) B JUNE 03, 2022 [B. R. GAVAI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: s. 12A – Withdrawal of application admitted u/s. 7 – On facts, application u/s. 12A r/w C Regulation 3…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 635 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 1122
is already being undertaken within the one kilometre or extended buffer zone (ESZ) of any wildlife sanctuary or national park that does not come within the ambit of prohibited activities, such activities may continue with permission of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests of each State or Union Territory – The mi…
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 634 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 863
863 864 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 5 S.C.R. A evidence is inadmissible’ and only when such an evidence is direct and is validated through cross-examination, is it considered to be trustworthy. Evidence Act, 1872 – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate – Credibility of – Discussed. B Allowing the appeal, the Co…
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 633 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 810
– On facts, it was not appropriate on the part of the NGT to have continued with the proceedings before it, specifically, when it was pointed that the High Court was also in seisin of the matter and had passed an interim order permitting the construction – Conflicting E orders passed by the NGT and the High Court would…
Supreme Court of India30 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 630 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 1072
for initiation of the CIRP, within three years from the date of the judgment and/or decree – Liability in respect of a claim arising out of a Recovery Certificate would be a “financial debt” within the meaning of clause (8) of s. 5 and a holder of the Recovery Certificate would be a “financial creditor” within the mean…
Supreme Court of India27 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 629 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 366
G Evidence: Extra-judicial confession – Evidentiary value – Held: Extra-judicial confession is a weak kind of evidence – Unless it inspires confidence or is fully corroborated by some other evidence of clinching nature, ordinarily conviction for offence of murder should not be made only on the basis of extra-judicial c…
Supreme Court of India26 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 628 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 817
specifically applied its mind to the impact of manipulation of the price of scrips – Impact of a manipulation cannot be assessed only in terms of the gain caused to the participants themselves, but in terms of the wider consequences of the action on the securities market – In view thereof, the order passed by the WTM c…
Supreme Court of India26 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 627 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 1060
were neither subsidiaries nor holding companies of the companies which were to be investigated; and thirdly, orders did not furnish the reasons or circumstances which compelled the Central Government to form opinion – Aggrieved, Union government filed instant appeal – Issue limited to whether the High Court was justifi…
Supreme Court of India24 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 626 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 548
E HELD: The High Court while granting bail, failed to notice the crucial aspects which has bearing on whether or not a case for the exercise of the jurisdiction to grant bail under Section 439 of CrPC was established. Since the trial is presently underway, this Court is not entering upon a discussion of the material wh…
Supreme Court of India23 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 625 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 779
106 : [2009] 11 SCR 1026 – relied on. Case Law Reference [2009] 11 SCR 1026 relied on Para 8 H 779 780 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 847 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 25.03.2022 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Suo Motu Crl. Contemp…
Supreme Court of India23 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 624 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 743
at the time of their interview and even the originals were later on submitted within a few days – It is not the case of the respondent that any of these certificates referred to were found incorrect – It is only this technical ground of not producing the original certificate at the time of the interview that the candid…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 623 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 1067
1068 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court has committed a patent error in not taking the matter to its logical conclusion. Without considering the material before it, and by merely relying on the submissions made by the State, the High Court made B sweeping…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 622 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 362
retired at the age of 58 years, however, since they approached the High Court belatedly, they would not be entitled to any salary/back wages for the period of two extra years they would have got in service; that though they would be entitled to the pension, but would not be entitled to any arrears of pension; and that …
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 621 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 290
shall be proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits treating the same as a cognizable and non-bailable offence. [Paras 6, 7][295-G-H; 296-A-B] Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. State of Assam (2017) 15 SCC 67 : [2017] 8 SCR 785 – held inapplicable. D Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau vs. Sambhu Son…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 620 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 260
retired Armed Force personnel upon re-appointment in government service – Whether entitled to his basic pay being fixed at par with his last drawn pay, in view of Para 8 of the CCS Order – Held: Para 8 of the CCS Order does not provide that on re-employment in government service, a retired Armed Force personnel would b…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 619 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 563
GURMEL SINGH v. BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL 565 INSURANCE CO. LTD. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.4071 A of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 03.08.2021 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in Revision Petition No.2898 of 2015. B Anand Shankar Jha, Arpit Gupta, Ms. Meenak…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 618 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 1128
504 IPC – The appellant having remained out of reach, a proclamation was issued u/s 82 of the CrPC r/w. s.20(3) of MCOCA, declaring him as an ‘absconder’ – ADGP and Commissioner of Police after examining the proposal of Assistant Commissioner of Police for according sanction in terms of s.23(2) of MCOCA, D granted the …
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 617 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 707
G 1.3 There was no fault and/or delay and/or negligence on the part of the appellant at all. He was fulfilling all the conditions for appointment on compassionate grounds under the 1990 Rules. For no reason, his application was kept pending and/or no order was passed on one ground or the other. Therefore, when there H …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. When the witness is “wholly reliable”, the Court should not have any difficulty inasmuch as conviction or acquittal could be based on the testimony of such single witness. Equally, if the Court finds that the witness is “wholly unreliable”, there would be no difficulty inasmuch as…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 636 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 577
[2022] 7 S.C.R. 577 577 VALLAL RCK A v. M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LIMITED AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal Nos. 1811-1812 of 2022) B JUNE 03, 2022 [B. R. GAVAI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: s. 12A – Withdrawal of application admitted u/s. 7 – On facts, application u/s. 12A r/w C Regulation 3…
Supreme Court of India3 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 635 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 1122
is already being undertaken within the one kilometre or extended buffer zone (ESZ) of any wildlife sanctuary or national park that does not come within the ambit of prohibited activities, such activities may continue with permission of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests of each State or Union Territory – The mi…
Supreme Court of India2 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 634 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 863
863 864 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 5 S.C.R. A evidence is inadmissible’ and only when such an evidence is direct and is validated through cross-examination, is it considered to be trustworthy. Evidence Act, 1872 – Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate – Credibility of – Discussed. B Allowing the appeal, the Co…
Supreme Court of India1 Jun 2022Full text
2022 INSC 633 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 810
– On facts, it was not appropriate on the part of the NGT to have continued with the proceedings before it, specifically, when it was pointed that the High Court was also in seisin of the matter and had passed an interim order permitting the construction – Conflicting E orders passed by the NGT and the High Court would…
Supreme Court of India30 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 630 · [2022] 5 S.C.R. 1072
for initiation of the CIRP, within three years from the date of the judgment and/or decree – Liability in respect of a claim arising out of a Recovery Certificate would be a “financial debt” within the meaning of clause (8) of s. 5 and a holder of the Recovery Certificate would be a “financial creditor” within the mean…
Supreme Court of India27 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 629 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 366
G Evidence: Extra-judicial confession – Evidentiary value – Held: Extra-judicial confession is a weak kind of evidence – Unless it inspires confidence or is fully corroborated by some other evidence of clinching nature, ordinarily conviction for offence of murder should not be made only on the basis of extra-judicial c…
Supreme Court of India26 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 628 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 817
specifically applied its mind to the impact of manipulation of the price of scrips – Impact of a manipulation cannot be assessed only in terms of the gain caused to the participants themselves, but in terms of the wider consequences of the action on the securities market – In view thereof, the order passed by the WTM c…
Supreme Court of India26 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 627 · [2022] 16 S.C.R. 1060
were neither subsidiaries nor holding companies of the companies which were to be investigated; and thirdly, orders did not furnish the reasons or circumstances which compelled the Central Government to form opinion – Aggrieved, Union government filed instant appeal – Issue limited to whether the High Court was justifi…
Supreme Court of India24 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 626 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 548
E HELD: The High Court while granting bail, failed to notice the crucial aspects which has bearing on whether or not a case for the exercise of the jurisdiction to grant bail under Section 439 of CrPC was established. Since the trial is presently underway, this Court is not entering upon a discussion of the material wh…
Supreme Court of India23 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 625 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 779
106 : [2009] 11 SCR 1026 – relied on. Case Law Reference [2009] 11 SCR 1026 relied on Para 8 H 779 780 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. A CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 847 of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 25.03.2022 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Suo Motu Crl. Contemp…
Supreme Court of India23 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 624 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 743
at the time of their interview and even the originals were later on submitted within a few days – It is not the case of the respondent that any of these certificates referred to were found incorrect – It is only this technical ground of not producing the original certificate at the time of the interview that the candid…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 623 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 1067
1068 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The High Court has committed a patent error in not taking the matter to its logical conclusion. Without considering the material before it, and by merely relying on the submissions made by the State, the High Court made B sweeping…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 622 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 362
retired at the age of 58 years, however, since they approached the High Court belatedly, they would not be entitled to any salary/back wages for the period of two extra years they would have got in service; that though they would be entitled to the pension, but would not be entitled to any arrears of pension; and that …
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 621 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 290
shall be proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits treating the same as a cognizable and non-bailable offence. [Paras 6, 7][295-G-H; 296-A-B] Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. State of Assam (2017) 15 SCC 67 : [2017] 8 SCR 785 – held inapplicable. D Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau vs. Sambhu Son…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 620 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 260
retired Armed Force personnel upon re-appointment in government service – Whether entitled to his basic pay being fixed at par with his last drawn pay, in view of Para 8 of the CCS Order – Held: Para 8 of the CCS Order does not provide that on re-employment in government service, a retired Armed Force personnel would b…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 619 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 563
GURMEL SINGH v. BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL 565 INSURANCE CO. LTD. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.4071 A of 2022. From the Judgment and Order dated 03.08.2021 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in Revision Petition No.2898 of 2015. B Anand Shankar Jha, Arpit Gupta, Ms. Meenak…
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 618 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 1128
504 IPC – The appellant having remained out of reach, a proclamation was issued u/s 82 of the CrPC r/w. s.20(3) of MCOCA, declaring him as an ‘absconder’ – ADGP and Commissioner of Police after examining the proposal of Assistant Commissioner of Police for according sanction in terms of s.23(2) of MCOCA, D granted the …
Supreme Court of India20 May 2022Full text
2022 INSC 617 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 707
G 1.3 There was no fault and/or delay and/or negligence on the part of the appellant at all. He was fulfilling all the conditions for appointment on compassionate grounds under the 1990 Rules. For no reason, his application was kept pending and/or no order was passed on one ground or the other. Therefore, when there H …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis