⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,061–3,080 · Page 154 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 69 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 246
246 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 246 [2022] 1 S.C.R. A INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS. v. OM PRAKASH LAL SRIVASTAVA (Civil Appeal No. 267 of 2022) B JANUARY 19, 2022 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND M. M. SUNDRESH,JJ.] Service Law: Bank service – Disciplinary proceedings – Dismissal from service – Respondent employed in appel…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
3,061–3,080 · Page 154 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 69 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 246
246 SUPREME COURT[2022]REPORTS1 S.C.R. 246 [2022] 1 S.C.R. A INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS. v. OM PRAKASH LAL SRIVASTAVA (Civil Appeal No. 267 of 2022) B JANUARY 19, 2022 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND M. M. SUNDRESH,JJ.] Service Law: Bank service – Disciplinary proceedings – Dismissal from service – Respondent employed in appel…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 689 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 1070
the awards, connected awards which are the subject matter in these appeals are also set aside – Arbitration proceedings remanded – Stamp Act, 1899. National Highways Act – ss.3J, 3G(7) – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Gand Resettlement Act, 2013 – ss.26, 28 – Jurisdictio…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 688 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 458
460 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A in organising a maintenance agency. The overall obligation of a flat buyer to pay maintenance charges may be derived from interpretation of clause 20 of the main Agreement. But without any claim from the entity, who are to render maintenance services and charge for the same,…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 687 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 36
the IT Act, the assessee is required to fulfil the twin conditions, namely, (i) furnishing a declaration to the assessing officer in writing that the provisions of Section 10B (8) may not be made applicable to him; and (ii) the said declaration to be furnished before the due date of filing the return of income under su…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 685 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 430
5158/2016 as well as order dated 06.05.2021 passed in the present petition – They have rendered themselves liable for suitable punishment under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience – However, before any further order of punishment/conviction is passed, an additional opportunity is given …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 684 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 402
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A few basic factors related with the provisions Bof Order XV Rule 5 CPC are that in a suit by a lessor for eviction of a lessee after the determination of lease and for recovery of rent or compensation for use and occupation, the defendant is under the obligation: to deposit the…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 682 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 869
Contract – Interpretation of – Plain construction – Held: There is no reason why explicit grammatical connotation should not be applied to a contract unless it results in some absurdity – On facts, G the contract was negotiated by experts and they were expected to know all the ramifications of the language they use. Do…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 681 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 483
written statement was filed – However, at the same time they can be permitted to participate in the suit proceedings and cross-examine the witnesses – In that view of the matter the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsustainable and set aside. Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal AIR 1955 SC 425 F …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 680 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 948
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is not open for the Contractor to contend that the counter claim was without following the procedure as required in Clauses 26.1 and 26.2 of the Contract Agreement and, therefore, may not be taken on record. On a true and fair G interpretation of Clause 26, failure to resol…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 68 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 977
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The respondents filed writ petition before the High Court for a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities and more particularly the Village Officer to accept the basic tax leviable under section 5 of the 1961 Act with respect H 977 978 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 3 S.…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 679 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 1
ELECTRIC POWER CONST. CORP. engineer” under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994 and had A not considered any other issues/grounds raised in the Memo of Appeal before the CESTAT. Therefore, the matter is remanded to the CESTAT to examine and decide the appeal on other grounds. [Para 13][34-D-G] Commissioner of Custo…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 678 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 464
Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Akshita Katoch, Chitranshul A. Sinha, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy. AG, Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Padmesh Mishra, Prakhar Srivastav, Sneh Bairwa, Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Advs. for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. M…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 677 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 1
H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Tripurari Ray, Balwant Singh Billowria, Nithyananda Murthy P., Ms. Bhanu Prabha, Laxmi Narayan Sharma, Suresh Kumar Sharma, Anirudh Ray, Vishnu Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. Shyam Gopal, Ms. Suhashini Sen, Chinmayee Chandra, Siddhant Kohli, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mohit Paul,…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 676 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 819
E Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is noticed that the product in question KADIPROL was sold in a sachet/packet of 100 gm. It was not meant to be given as a food to the poultry. It was required to be mixed with the feed given to the poultry/birds. It cannot be F directly fed and/or given to the birds. Th…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 675 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 979
High Court erred by granting relief to the respondent no.1 – However, the emoluments paid to him should not be recovered – Furthermore, respondent no.1 not entitled to any pensionary benefit by virtue of his wrongful appointment. Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1 The pronouncement in Dattatray’s case clearly s…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 674 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 596
Romy Chacko, Sudesh Kumar, Advs. for the Appellant. Mathai M. Paikaday, Sr. Adv., Ms. Malini Poduval, Ms. Babita Sant, Sanjay Jain, Shishir Pinaki, Amit Singh, Alexander M. Paikaday, BAdvs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impu…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 673 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 905
Union of India v. M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos. 1481- G 1482 of 2021; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Limited and Anr. (2007) 15 SCC 649; Lunawat Construction Company v. Union of India & Anr. (2019) 5 SCC …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 672 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 930
– It is a right available to the judgment debtor after his property is sold in a court auction – Such a valuable right available to the judgment debtor to save his property should not be affected on the D technical ground and/or for the mistake and/or the bona fide mistake for which he was not at all responsible – On f…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 671 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 169
the Government of India that should a sentence be imposed higher than that is specified, the Government of India would take all m…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 670 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 275
With Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2018. G Siddharth Yadav, Avinash Sharma, Mrs. K. Sarada Devi, Advs. for the Appellant. Jayant K. Sud, ASG, Ms. Neela Kedar Gokhale, Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Kartik J., Randeep Sachdeva, Rajeev Wassan, Rajat Nair, Gurmeet Singh Makker, B. V. Balaram Das, Advs. for the Respondent. H SHISHPAL …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 689 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 1070
the awards, connected awards which are the subject matter in these appeals are also set aside – Arbitration proceedings remanded – Stamp Act, 1899. National Highways Act – ss.3J, 3G(7) – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Gand Resettlement Act, 2013 – ss.26, 28 – Jurisdictio…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 688 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 458
460 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 15 S.C.R. A in organising a maintenance agency. The overall obligation of a flat buyer to pay maintenance charges may be derived from interpretation of clause 20 of the main Agreement. But without any claim from the entity, who are to render maintenance services and charge for the same,…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 687 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 36
the IT Act, the assessee is required to fulfil the twin conditions, namely, (i) furnishing a declaration to the assessing officer in writing that the provisions of Section 10B (8) may not be made applicable to him; and (ii) the said declaration to be furnished before the due date of filing the return of income under su…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 685 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 430
5158/2016 as well as order dated 06.05.2021 passed in the present petition – They have rendered themselves liable for suitable punishment under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience – However, before any further order of punishment/conviction is passed, an additional opportunity is given …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 684 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 402
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A few basic factors related with the provisions Bof Order XV Rule 5 CPC are that in a suit by a lessor for eviction of a lessee after the determination of lease and for recovery of rent or compensation for use and occupation, the defendant is under the obligation: to deposit the…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 682 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 869
Contract – Interpretation of – Plain construction – Held: There is no reason why explicit grammatical connotation should not be applied to a contract unless it results in some absurdity – On facts, G the contract was negotiated by experts and they were expected to know all the ramifications of the language they use. Do…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 681 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 483
written statement was filed – However, at the same time they can be permitted to participate in the suit proceedings and cross-examine the witnesses – In that view of the matter the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsustainable and set aside. Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal AIR 1955 SC 425 F …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 680 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 948
F Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is not open for the Contractor to contend that the counter claim was without following the procedure as required in Clauses 26.1 and 26.2 of the Contract Agreement and, therefore, may not be taken on record. On a true and fair G interpretation of Clause 26, failure to resol…
Supreme Court of India19 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 68 · [2022] 3 S.C.R. 977
Allowing the appeal, the Court G HELD: 1. The respondents filed writ petition before the High Court for a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities and more particularly the Village Officer to accept the basic tax leviable under section 5 of the 1961 Act with respect H 977 978 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 3 S.…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 679 · [2022] 17 S.C.R. 1
ELECTRIC POWER CONST. CORP. engineer” under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994 and had A not considered any other issues/grounds raised in the Memo of Appeal before the CESTAT. Therefore, the matter is remanded to the CESTAT to examine and decide the appeal on other grounds. [Para 13][34-D-G] Commissioner of Custo…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 678 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 464
Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Akshita Katoch, Chitranshul A. Sinha, Advs. for the Appellant. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Dy. AG, Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Padmesh Mishra, Prakhar Srivastav, Sneh Bairwa, Ms. Himanshi Shakya, Advs. for the Respondent. F The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. M…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 677 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 1
H 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Tripurari Ray, Balwant Singh Billowria, Nithyananda Murthy P., Ms. Bhanu Prabha, Laxmi Narayan Sharma, Suresh Kumar Sharma, Anirudh Ray, Vishnu Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. Shyam Gopal, Ms. Suhashini Sen, Chinmayee Chandra, Siddhant Kohli, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mohit Paul,…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 676 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 819
E Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is noticed that the product in question KADIPROL was sold in a sachet/packet of 100 gm. It was not meant to be given as a food to the poultry. It was required to be mixed with the feed given to the poultry/birds. It cannot be F directly fed and/or given to the birds. Th…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 675 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 979
High Court erred by granting relief to the respondent no.1 – However, the emoluments paid to him should not be recovered – Furthermore, respondent no.1 not entitled to any pensionary benefit by virtue of his wrongful appointment. Allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: 1.1 The pronouncement in Dattatray’s case clearly s…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 674 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 596
Romy Chacko, Sudesh Kumar, Advs. for the Appellant. Mathai M. Paikaday, Sr. Adv., Ms. Malini Poduval, Ms. Babita Sant, Sanjay Jain, Shishir Pinaki, Amit Singh, Alexander M. Paikaday, BAdvs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impu…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 673 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 905
Union of India v. M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos. 1481- G 1482 of 2021; Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Limited and Anr. (2007) 15 SCC 649; Lunawat Construction Company v. Union of India & Anr. (2019) 5 SCC …
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 672 · [2022] 6 S.C.R. 930
– It is a right available to the judgment debtor after his property is sold in a court auction – Such a valuable right available to the judgment debtor to save his property should not be affected on the D technical ground and/or for the mistake and/or the bona fide mistake for which he was not at all responsible – On f…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 671 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 169
the Government of India that should a sentence be imposed higher than that is specified, the Government of India would take all m…
Supreme Court of India11 Jul 2022Full text
2022 INSC 670 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 275
With Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2018. G Siddharth Yadav, Avinash Sharma, Mrs. K. Sarada Devi, Advs. for the Appellant. Jayant K. Sud, ASG, Ms. Neela Kedar Gokhale, Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Kartik J., Randeep Sachdeva, Rajeev Wassan, Rajat Nair, Gurmeet Singh Makker, B. V. Balaram Das, Advs. for the Respondent. H SHISHPAL …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis