⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
281–300 · Page 15 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 92 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 902
Whether a suit for recovery of money filed by partners of an unregistered partnership firm against a partner of the same firm is maintainable.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 918 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 305
Whether the Courts below erred in declaring the Respondent No.2 as a ‘juvenile’ under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, on the date of the incident.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
281–300 · Page 15 of 500
Supreme Court of India17 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 92 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 902
Whether a suit for recovery of money filed by partners of an unregistered partnership firm against a partner of the same firm is maintainable.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 918 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 305
Whether the Courts below erred in declaring the Respondent No.2 as a ‘juvenile’ under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, on the date of the incident.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 917 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1928
Whether any criminal offence in the background of the factual position is made out to justify criminal proceedings against the appellants and whether the same should proceed; whether on the same cause of action, based on the facts, both civil and criminal proceedings can simultaneously go on.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 916 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1969
Issue arose as to whether the criminal proceedings against the appellants for conducting rally and dharna against the State Government, allegedly causing obstruction to the free flow of traffic, inconvenience, annoyance and risk to passengers, punishable u/ss.290, 341 and 171F r/w s.34 IPC and s.34 of the Police Act, 1861, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 915 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1956
Issue arose as regards correctness of the impugned order passed by the High Court dismissing the application filed by the appellants u/s.482 CrPC to quash the complaint u/ss.419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC pending before the magistrate.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 913 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1980
Whether the bail granted to the appellant-accused on the basis of his undertaking to deposit Rs.25,00,000/- was rightly cancelled by the High Court on his failure to deposit the same.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 912 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1879
The matters herein present a challenge to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court whereby the judgment dated 09.09.2024 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court in a batch of Writ Petitions was set aside. Whether the Division Bench erred in interfering with the order of the Single Judge of the High Court, as Single Judge had only asked the Speaker to fix a schedule of hearing (filing of pleadings, documents, personal hearing etc.) within a period of four weeks.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 911 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1823
Whether the Tribunals below were justified in holding that the s.7 application under the IBC filed by the appellant on 15.01.2024 was barred by time; does the entry in the Balance Sheet of F.Y. 2019-20 constitute a valid acknowledgement of debt by the respondent u/s.18, Limitation Act, 1963; will Para 5(I) or 5(III) of the order dated 10.01.2022 passed by the Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No. 3 of 2020 govern the situation.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 910 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1808
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court upholding the University and State’s stance that government Notification dated 24.02.2021 extending the retirement age from 60 to 65 years is inapplicable to the appellant due to non-satisfaction of the 10-year continuous teaching condition in a university situated in West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 91 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 880
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable against an order passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) in exercise of power under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and if yes, under what circumstances.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 909 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1858
Issue arose as to whether the usage of electronic communication can also be extended to the procedure governing the service of a notice, contemplated u/s.35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 908 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1851
Lending banks/secured creditors, if under an obligation, in terms of the notification dated 29.05.2015 containing the “Framework For Revival And Rehabilitation Of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises” (Framework), to identify “incipient stress” in the loan account of the MSMEs prior to classifying the loan account as NPA.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 907 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1768
The core issue in the present matter revolves around determining the appropriate forum for the adjudication of disputes arising out of the Concession Agreement dated 05.01.2012 entered into between the appellant and respondent no.1.
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 905 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1736
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court reducing the compensation awarded to the appellant- engineering student in a motor accident, resulting in amputation of his leg and 100% functional disability.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 904 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1706
The primary question that arises for consideration in this case is whether the accident which caused the death of the deceased could be said to have arisen out of and in the course of employment. Also, certain incidental questions also arise for consideration: (i) Does s.51E of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) have retrospective effect so as to cover an accident that has taken place on 22.04.2003 when the Section was enacted on 01.06.2010; (ii) Assuming Section 51E of the ESI Act applies, would the said interpretation enure to the benefit of the appellants whose claim arises
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 903 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1697
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court declining to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against the appellants-accused on the allegations relating to falsification of birth records for securing benefits and selections in age-restricted badminton tournaments.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 902 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1756
Whether the repudiation of the insurance claim by the first Respondent-Insurer was valid in light of the terms of the Marine Open Policy and the factual matrix of the case; construction of Clause 5 of the Inland Transit (Rail/Road) Clause A and the insured’s obligations under Clause 8 thereof.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 901 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1744
Matter pertains to the legality of having parallel and continuation of adjudication proceedings and criminal proceedings against the appellants.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 900 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1675
Whether the impugned judgment passed by the High Court dismissing the First Appeals filed by the Appellants-farmers is sustainable or not.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 90 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 869
Whether the appellant's act of causing the death of the deceased fell within the scope of "grave and sudden provocation" under Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Penal Code (IPC), thereby reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 917 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1928
Whether any criminal offence in the background of the factual position is made out to justify criminal proceedings against the appellants and whether the same should proceed; whether on the same cause of action, based on the facts, both civil and criminal proceedings can simultaneously go on.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 916 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1969
Issue arose as to whether the criminal proceedings against the appellants for conducting rally and dharna against the State Government, allegedly causing obstruction to the free flow of traffic, inconvenience, annoyance and risk to passengers, punishable u/ss.290, 341 and 171F r/w s.34 IPC and s.34 of the Police Act, 1861, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 915 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1956
Issue arose as regards correctness of the impugned order passed by the High Court dismissing the application filed by the appellants u/s.482 CrPC to quash the complaint u/ss.419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC pending before the magistrate.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 913 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1980
Whether the bail granted to the appellant-accused on the basis of his undertaking to deposit Rs.25,00,000/- was rightly cancelled by the High Court on his failure to deposit the same.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 912 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1879
The matters herein present a challenge to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court whereby the judgment dated 09.09.2024 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court in a batch of Writ Petitions was set aside. Whether the Division Bench erred in interfering with the order of the Single Judge of the High Court, as Single Judge had only asked the Speaker to fix a schedule of hearing (filing of pleadings, documents, personal hearing etc.) within a period of four weeks.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 911 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1823
Whether the Tribunals below were justified in holding that the s.7 application under the IBC filed by the appellant on 15.01.2024 was barred by time; does the entry in the Balance Sheet of F.Y. 2019-20 constitute a valid acknowledgement of debt by the respondent u/s.18, Limitation Act, 1963; will Para 5(I) or 5(III) of the order dated 10.01.2022 passed by the Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition No. 3 of 2020 govern the situation.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 910 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1808
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court upholding the University and State’s stance that government Notification dated 24.02.2021 extending the retirement age from 60 to 65 years is inapplicable to the appellant due to non-satisfaction of the 10-year continuous teaching condition in a university situated in West Bengal.
Supreme Court of India22 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 91 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 880
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would be maintainable against an order passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) in exercise of power under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and if yes, under what circumstances.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 909 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1858
Issue arose as to whether the usage of electronic communication can also be extended to the procedure governing the service of a notice, contemplated u/s.35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 908 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1851
Lending banks/secured creditors, if under an obligation, in terms of the notification dated 29.05.2015 containing the “Framework For Revival And Rehabilitation Of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises” (Framework), to identify “incipient stress” in the loan account of the MSMEs prior to classifying the loan account as NPA.
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 907 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1768
The core issue in the present matter revolves around determining the appropriate forum for the adjudication of disputes arising out of the Concession Agreement dated 05.01.2012 entered into between the appellant and respondent no.1.
Supreme Court of India29 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 905 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1736
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court reducing the compensation awarded to the appellant- engineering student in a motor accident, resulting in amputation of his leg and 100% functional disability.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 904 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1706
The primary question that arises for consideration in this case is whether the accident which caused the death of the deceased could be said to have arisen out of and in the course of employment. Also, certain incidental questions also arise for consideration: (i) Does s.51E of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) have retrospective effect so as to cover an accident that has taken place on 22.04.2003 when the Section was enacted on 01.06.2010; (ii) Assuming Section 51E of the ESI Act applies, would the said interpretation enure to the benefit of the appellants whose claim arises
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 903 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1697
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court declining to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against the appellants-accused on the allegations relating to falsification of birth records for securing benefits and selections in age-restricted badminton tournaments.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 902 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1756
Whether the repudiation of the insurance claim by the first Respondent-Insurer was valid in light of the terms of the Marine Open Policy and the factual matrix of the case; construction of Clause 5 of the Inland Transit (Rail/Road) Clause A and the insured’s obligations under Clause 8 thereof.
Supreme Court of India24 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 901 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1744
Matter pertains to the legality of having parallel and continuation of adjudication proceedings and criminal proceedings against the appellants.
Supreme Court of India28 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 900 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1675
Whether the impugned judgment passed by the High Court dismissing the First Appeals filed by the Appellants-farmers is sustainable or not.
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 90 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 869
Whether the appellant's act of causing the death of the deceased fell within the scope of "grave and sudden provocation" under Exception 1 to Section 300 of the Penal Code (IPC), thereby reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis