⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,821–2,840 · Page 142 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 979 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 669
[2022] 9 S.C.R. 669 669 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA A v. ABHIJIT RAJAN (Civil Appeal No. 563 of 2020) SEPTEMBER 19, 2022 B [INDIRA BANERJEE AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 – Regulation 3(i) r/w Regulation 4 – Securities an…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,821–2,840 · Page 142 of 500
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 979 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 669
[2022] 9 S.C.R. 669 669 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA A v. ABHIJIT RAJAN (Civil Appeal No. 563 of 2020) SEPTEMBER 19, 2022 B [INDIRA BANERJEE AND V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ.] Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 – Regulation 3(i) r/w Regulation 4 – Securities an…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 977 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 115
With B Civil Appeal No. 9203 of 2019. Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv., Keane Sardinha, Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Ram Naresh Yadav, Swetank Shantanu, Pratap Shanker, Ankit Kumar, Jyoti Kumar Singh, R. Ayyam Perumal, Advs. for the appearing parties. C The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. The …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 976 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 797
G From the Judgment and Order dated 16.12.2008 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Trade Tax Revision Nos.664 and 667 of 1999. R. K. Raizada, Sr. Adv., Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Vikas Bansal, Advs. for the Appellant. H 797 798 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 12 S.C.R. A Dhruv Agarwal, Shwetank Sailakwal, Nishit Ag…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 975 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 516
516 M/S TRIMURTHI FRAGRANCES (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS DIR. SHRI 517 PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL v. GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE) of a Bench of lesser strength, irrespective of the number of Judges A constituting the majority – Per Hemant Gupta, J. (Concurring): A decision delivered by a Bench…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 974 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 110
2. The High Court has awarded Rs. 25,000/- only towards pain, shock, and suffering. However, it is required to be noted that the right hand below elbow of the claimant was amputated. During prolonged hospitalization, he was operated five times. Looking to the serious injuries, the claimant was required to be F shifted …
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 973 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 218
Rs. 3,76,236/- – This shall be treated as full and final settlement of his claim towards compensation with interest for the disability suffered – Order passed by the High Court set aside. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: It is true that the Medical Board in its report dated 09.11.2017 has opined that the a…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 970 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 634
his/her contention – He/she must make out a case that making him/ her stand the trial would be an abuse of process of Court – Abuse of Court. Notice – Statutory Notice – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – s.138 and 141 – Partnership firm – Cheque dishonour case against Ca partner of the firm – No reply given by respond…
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 97 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 990
3. Even otherwise, the High Court has also not considered the relevant considerations while grant of bail as observed and held by this Court in the case of Anil Kumar Yadav case. In the G said decision, it is observed and held by this Court that while granting bail, the relevant considerations are (i) nature of serious…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 969 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 207
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6538 G of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 12.02.2020 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Revision Petition No. CR-3172 of 2018 (O&M). H 207 208 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Shehbaz Thind, Mrs. Naresh Bakshi, M/s Bakshi & Assoc…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 967 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 50
Words & Phrases – ‘component’ – Meaning of – Discussed. G Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that in the case of supplier, ‘Guide Car’ was classified under Chapter sub-heading 8603.00. Classification of a product done at the consignor’s end shall be final and that …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 966 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 835
441, 323, 506, 447, 307, 302 and 34. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. This Court have gone through the allegations made in the FIR. The land dispute between respondent No. 2-H 835 836 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. A original accused and informant-complainant side is the motive. It is alleged in the FIR t…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 965 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 61
[2022] 12 S.C.R. 61 61 PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA A v. RAJEEV COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6681 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 B [B. R. GAVAI AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.] Constitution of India – Article 19(1)(g) – Right to establish an educational institution – Reasonable restrictions imposed the…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 964 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 367
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1. At the outset, the subsequent denial by the appellant of the statement attributed to her is of relevance. It further appears that PWs 1 & 5, appellant’s husband who is also the complainant, and her father-in-law, have both turned hostile. However, the Sessions Judge brushed asi…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 963 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 519
THE BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA v. CRICKET 521 ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR curiae. BCCI has submitted that the disqualification from holding A any office or post in a sports or athletic association or federation apart from cricket needs to be modified since several cricketers of eminence are associated with other sp…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 962 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 418
Commission – CAT vide order dated 7 July, 2010, quashed and set aside the order of Joint Secretary dated 2 September, 2008 and directed to pass order strictly in accordance with the observations made in its order dated 26 May, 2008 – High Court set aside the order dated 7 July, 2010, passed by the CAT – The Supreme Cou…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 960 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 242
aforesaid amendment –Also, since the duration of the default of non-compliance committed by both the appellants was over a period of 100 days from the date of issue of the summons in each case, the AO rightly applied s.15A(a), more specifically in regard to the maximum limit of penalty that could be imposed under the p…
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 96 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 182
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.401 – In a case where E no appeal is brought though appeal lies under the Code, whether revision application still is to be entertained at the instance of the party who could have appealed – Held: In a case where the victim and/or the complainant, as the case may be, has not preferre…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 959 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 323
– Dismissed – On appeal, held: High Court rightly did not interfere E with the proceedings at the stage of the Show Cause Notice – Petitioner was permitted to inspect the opinion formed u/r.3 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules – There is apparently no rule which requires SEBI to furnish the opinion u/r.3 to the noticee in …
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 958 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 1
Constitution of India – Article 243-ZA(1), 324(1) – Held: The language and tenor of Article 243-ZA(1) is in pari materia with Article 324(1) – Interpretation of Article 324(1) to confer wide powers on B the Election Commission to issue directions in respect of elections to Parliament and State legislatures would apply …
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 957 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 1001
Bench – On appeal, held: Obligations under a contract cannot be assigned, without consent of the counterparty – Novation of contract or set off is not allowed in respect of a corporate entity undergoing CIRP without the consent of the Resolution Professional – In the present case, admittedly, the CIRP of Essar Steel co…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2022 INSC 977 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 115
With B Civil Appeal No. 9203 of 2019. Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv., Keane Sardinha, Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Ram Naresh Yadav, Swetank Shantanu, Pratap Shanker, Ankit Kumar, Jyoti Kumar Singh, R. Ayyam Perumal, Advs. for the appearing parties. C The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. The …
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 976 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 797
G From the Judgment and Order dated 16.12.2008 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Trade Tax Revision Nos.664 and 667 of 1999. R. K. Raizada, Sr. Adv., Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Vikas Bansal, Advs. for the Appellant. H 797 798 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 12 S.C.R. A Dhruv Agarwal, Shwetank Sailakwal, Nishit Ag…
Supreme Court of India19 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 975 · [2022] 15 S.C.R. 516
516 M/S TRIMURTHI FRAGRANCES (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS DIR. SHRI 517 PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL v. GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE) of a Bench of lesser strength, irrespective of the number of Judges A constituting the majority – Per Hemant Gupta, J. (Concurring): A decision delivered by a Bench…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 974 · [2022] 18 S.C.R. 110
2. The High Court has awarded Rs. 25,000/- only towards pain, shock, and suffering. However, it is required to be noted that the right hand below elbow of the claimant was amputated. During prolonged hospitalization, he was operated five times. Looking to the serious injuries, the claimant was required to be F shifted …
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 973 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 218
Rs. 3,76,236/- – This shall be treated as full and final settlement of his claim towards compensation with interest for the disability suffered – Order passed by the High Court set aside. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court F HELD: It is true that the Medical Board in its report dated 09.11.2017 has opined that the a…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 970 · [2022] 9 S.C.R. 634
his/her contention – He/she must make out a case that making him/ her stand the trial would be an abuse of process of Court – Abuse of Court. Notice – Statutory Notice – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – s.138 and 141 – Partnership firm – Cheque dishonour case against Ca partner of the firm – No reply given by respond…
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 97 · [2022] 1 S.C.R. 990
3. Even otherwise, the High Court has also not considered the relevant considerations while grant of bail as observed and held by this Court in the case of Anil Kumar Yadav case. In the G said decision, it is observed and held by this Court that while granting bail, the relevant considerations are (i) nature of serious…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 969 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 207
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6538 G of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 12.02.2020 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Revision Petition No. CR-3172 of 2018 (O&M). H 207 208 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. A Shehbaz Thind, Mrs. Naresh Bakshi, M/s Bakshi & Assoc…
Supreme Court of India16 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 967 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 50
Words & Phrases – ‘component’ – Meaning of – Discussed. G Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that in the case of supplier, ‘Guide Car’ was classified under Chapter sub-heading 8603.00. Classification of a product done at the consignor’s end shall be final and that …
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 966 · [2022] 4 S.C.R. 835
441, 323, 506, 447, 307, 302 and 34. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. This Court have gone through the allegations made in the FIR. The land dispute between respondent No. 2-H 835 836 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. A original accused and informant-complainant side is the motive. It is alleged in the FIR t…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 965 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 61
[2022] 12 S.C.R. 61 61 PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA A v. RAJEEV COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 6681 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 B [B. R. GAVAI AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.] Constitution of India – Article 19(1)(g) – Right to establish an educational institution – Reasonable restrictions imposed the…
Supreme Court of India15 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 964 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 367
Allowing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1. At the outset, the subsequent denial by the appellant of the statement attributed to her is of relevance. It further appears that PWs 1 & 5, appellant’s husband who is also the complainant, and her father-in-law, have both turned hostile. However, the Sessions Judge brushed asi…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 963 · [2022] 14 S.C.R. 519
THE BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA v. CRICKET 521 ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR curiae. BCCI has submitted that the disqualification from holding A any office or post in a sports or athletic association or federation apart from cricket needs to be modified since several cricketers of eminence are associated with other sp…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 962 · [2022] 7 S.C.R. 418
Commission – CAT vide order dated 7 July, 2010, quashed and set aside the order of Joint Secretary dated 2 September, 2008 and directed to pass order strictly in accordance with the observations made in its order dated 26 May, 2008 – High Court set aside the order dated 7 July, 2010, passed by the CAT – The Supreme Cou…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 960 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 242
aforesaid amendment –Also, since the duration of the default of non-compliance committed by both the appellants was over a period of 100 days from the date of issue of the summons in each case, the AO rightly applied s.15A(a), more specifically in regard to the maximum limit of penalty that could be imposed under the p…
Supreme Court of India25 Jan 2022Full text
2022 INSC 96 · [2022] 8 S.C.R. 182
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.401 – In a case where E no appeal is brought though appeal lies under the Code, whether revision application still is to be entertained at the instance of the party who could have appealed – Held: In a case where the victim and/or the complainant, as the case may be, has not preferre…
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 959 · [2022] 19 S.C.R. 323
– Dismissed – On appeal, held: High Court rightly did not interfere E with the proceedings at the stage of the Show Cause Notice – Petitioner was permitted to inspect the opinion formed u/r.3 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules – There is apparently no rule which requires SEBI to furnish the opinion u/r.3 to the noticee in …
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 958 · [2022] 12 S.C.R. 1
Constitution of India – Article 243-ZA(1), 324(1) – Held: The language and tenor of Article 243-ZA(1) is in pari materia with Article 324(1) – Interpretation of Article 324(1) to confer wide powers on B the Election Commission to issue directions in respect of elections to Parliament and State legislatures would apply …
Supreme Court of India14 Sep 2022Full text
2022 INSC 957 · [2022] 11 S.C.R. 1001
Bench – On appeal, held: Obligations under a contract cannot be assigned, without consent of the counterparty – Novation of contract or set off is not allowed in respect of a corporate entity undergoing CIRP without the consent of the Resolution Professional – In the present case, admittedly, the CIRP of Essar Steel co…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis