⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 946 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1574
The present matter raised important questions of law relating to interpretation and interplay between Section 144C and Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The question for consideration was on the applicability of Section 153 to a proceeding under Section 144C namely, whether the period of eleven months as envisaged under Section 144C should be over and above the limitation period prescribed, particularly, under Section 153(1) or (3), as the case may be. In other words, whether the time consumed for concluding the proceeding under Section 144C has to be subsumed within the limitation p
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 500
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 946 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1574
The present matter raised important questions of law relating to interpretation and interplay between Section 144C and Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The question for consideration was on the applicability of Section 153 to a proceeding under Section 144C namely, whether the period of eleven months as envisaged under Section 144C should be over and above the limitation period prescribed, particularly, under Section 153(1) or (3), as the case may be. In other words, whether the time consumed for concluding the proceeding under Section 144C has to be subsumed within the limitation p
Supreme Court of India8 Aug 2025
2025 INSC 945 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 108
Reconsideration of the directions issued in the order dated 04.08.2025 in view of the request made by the Chief Justice of India.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 944 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 682
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which it declined to suspend the substantive order of sentence passed by the trial court against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 943 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1941
Issue arose as to whether the writ petition be entertained at all having regard to the conduct of the petitioner-High Court Judge; does the In-house Procedure have legal sanction; is an inquiry and the consequent report in terms of the Procedure (which could be unfavourable to the Judge under probe) a parallel and extra- constitutional mechanism; does paragraph 5(b) of the Procedure foul clauses (4) and (5) of Art.124 r/w. Arts.217 and 218 of the Constitution or abrogate any Fundamental Right of a Judge of a High Court; did the CJI/the Committee constituted by the CJI act in terms of the Proce
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 94 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1909
What are the essential conditions that must be satisfied to attract the provisions of Section 366 of the IPC? What are the essentials to constitute a trespass as criminal trespass? Whether the procedure provided under the general law will be attracted if the special law provides for a special procedure?
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 937 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1875
Legal position and status of a regulatory asset; its position in the regulatory regime for determination of tariff; the rights and liabilities of stakeholders; consequences of regulatory failure to manage the regulatory asset as a reasonable measure; the appellate and review powers of the APTEL and this Court to ensure accountability and restitution.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 936 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 599
Whether the conviction, as recorded by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court was totally based on conjectures and surmises; whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.302 IPC is sustainable in law.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 935 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 98
In the instant appeal, the father of the prosecutrix challenges the order of the High Court. By the said order, the sentence imposed on respondent no.2 herein was suspended till the final disposal of the appeal. Whether the High Court considered the relevant factors for suspension u/s.389 CrPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 934 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 91
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of conviction of the father u/s.6 POCSO Act and s.506 IPC and imposition of life imprisonment, for committing sexual assault of his own minor daughter.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 933 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1551
Whether the dispute between the respondents and the appellant arising out of the agreement incorporating the arbitration clause has become non-arbitrable in view of the initiation and pendency of the criminal cases; whether invocation of the Recovery Act by the appellant-Corporation bars initiation of proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; whether the application u/s.11(6), Arbitration Act is barred by limitation; whether the issue relating to legality and validity of invocation of arbitral proceedings u/s.11(6) is conclusively decided by the High Court in Sadhna Kumari
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 932 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 411
Issue arose as to whether the appellant Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 can be said to have fulfilled all the requirements stipulated u/s.92 CPC for the purpose of instituting a suit under the said provision.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 930 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 611
Whether the Court of Session, without itself recording evidence, can summon a person to stand trial in exercise of its powers u/s.193, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as an accused (along with others committed to it by a Magistrate) on the basis of materials in the form of statements and other documents as contained in the final report of the investigating officer u/s.173, CrPC independently of the provisions of s.319 of the said Code.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 93 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 592
Issue arose whether Village Police Patil is a Police Officer in terms of s. 25 of the Evidence Act; and whether the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of the offence of murder.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 929 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 395
The appellant came to be convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable u/ss.450 and 376(2) of the IPC and s.4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [POCSO Act]. Whether the High Court was justified in upholding and confirming the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant-convict, by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 928 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant u/Art.227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the civil proceedings and the orders passed by the Courts below regarding the computation of interest on the decretal amount and the consequential execution proceedings.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 927 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 568
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned judgment relying on the confessional FIR filed by the appellant-accused himself and the medical evidence to uphold his conviction, however, altering it from s.302, IPC to s.304 Part I.
Supreme Court of India3 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 923 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 362
Whether the regulatory boards can, in exercise of powers u/s.33A of the Water Act and s.31A of the Air Act, impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of monies or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage.
Supreme Court of India3 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 922 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 345
Whether the four respondent companies were entitled to approach the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC) for determination of the tariff for procurement of power by Appellant-GUVNL from their wind energy projects.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 921 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1998
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the claim raised for appointment by the appellant to the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 920 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 320
i) Whether the retirement of the appellant on medical grounds due to colour blindness, without offering alternative employment, is legally sustainable in light of applicable service regulations and binding settlements; ii) whether Clause 14 of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17.12.1979, executed u/s.12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, remains valid, binding, and enforceable despite the subsequent 1986 settlement and internal administrative circulars; iii) whether the respondents complied with their duty to make a bona fide assessment of alternative employment options for the appella
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 945 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 108
Reconsideration of the directions issued in the order dated 04.08.2025 in view of the request made by the Chief Justice of India.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 944 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 682
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court by which it declined to suspend the substantive order of sentence passed by the trial court against the appellant.
Supreme Court of India7 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 943 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1941
Issue arose as to whether the writ petition be entertained at all having regard to the conduct of the petitioner-High Court Judge; does the In-house Procedure have legal sanction; is an inquiry and the consequent report in terms of the Procedure (which could be unfavourable to the Judge under probe) a parallel and extra- constitutional mechanism; does paragraph 5(b) of the Procedure foul clauses (4) and (5) of Art.124 r/w. Arts.217 and 218 of the Constitution or abrogate any Fundamental Right of a Judge of a High Court; did the CJI/the Committee constituted by the CJI act in terms of the Proce
Supreme Court of India21 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 94 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1909
What are the essential conditions that must be satisfied to attract the provisions of Section 366 of the IPC? What are the essentials to constitute a trespass as criminal trespass? Whether the procedure provided under the general law will be attracted if the special law provides for a special procedure?
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 937 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1875
Legal position and status of a regulatory asset; its position in the regulatory regime for determination of tariff; the rights and liabilities of stakeholders; consequences of regulatory failure to manage the regulatory asset as a reasonable measure; the appellate and review powers of the APTEL and this Court to ensure accountability and restitution.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 936 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 599
Whether the conviction, as recorded by the trial Court and affirmed by the High Court was totally based on conjectures and surmises; whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.302 IPC is sustainable in law.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 935 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 98
In the instant appeal, the father of the prosecutrix challenges the order of the High Court. By the said order, the sentence imposed on respondent no.2 herein was suspended till the final disposal of the appeal. Whether the High Court considered the relevant factors for suspension u/s.389 CrPC.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 934 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 91
Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the order of conviction of the father u/s.6 POCSO Act and s.506 IPC and imposition of life imprisonment, for committing sexual assault of his own minor daughter.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 933 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1551
Whether the dispute between the respondents and the appellant arising out of the agreement incorporating the arbitration clause has become non-arbitrable in view of the initiation and pendency of the criminal cases; whether invocation of the Recovery Act by the appellant-Corporation bars initiation of proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; whether the application u/s.11(6), Arbitration Act is barred by limitation; whether the issue relating to legality and validity of invocation of arbitral proceedings u/s.11(6) is conclusively decided by the High Court in Sadhna Kumari
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 932 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 411
Issue arose as to whether the appellant Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 can be said to have fulfilled all the requirements stipulated u/s.92 CPC for the purpose of instituting a suit under the said provision.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 930 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 611
Whether the Court of Session, without itself recording evidence, can summon a person to stand trial in exercise of its powers u/s.193, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as an accused (along with others committed to it by a Magistrate) on the basis of materials in the form of statements and other documents as contained in the final report of the investigating officer u/s.173, CrPC independently of the provisions of s.319 of the said Code.
Supreme Court of India8 Jan 2025Full text
2025 INSC 93 · [2025] 1 S.C.R. 592
Issue arose whether Village Police Patil is a Police Officer in terms of s. 25 of the Evidence Act; and whether the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of the offence of murder.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 929 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 395
The appellant came to be convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable u/ss.450 and 376(2) of the IPC and s.4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [POCSO Act]. Whether the High Court was justified in upholding and confirming the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant-convict, by the trial court.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 928 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 1
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant u/Art.227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the civil proceedings and the orders passed by the Courts below regarding the computation of interest on the decretal amount and the consequential execution proceedings.
Supreme Court of India4 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 927 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 568
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned judgment relying on the confessional FIR filed by the appellant-accused himself and the medical evidence to uphold his conviction, however, altering it from s.302, IPC to s.304 Part I.
Supreme Court of India3 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 923 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 362
Whether the regulatory boards can, in exercise of powers u/s.33A of the Water Act and s.31A of the Air Act, impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of monies or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage.
Supreme Court of India3 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 922 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 345
Whether the four respondent companies were entitled to approach the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC) for determination of the tariff for procurement of power by Appellant-GUVNL from their wind energy projects.
Supreme Court of India16 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 921 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1998
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the claim raised for appointment by the appellant to the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service.
Supreme Court of India31 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 920 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 320
i) Whether the retirement of the appellant on medical grounds due to colour blindness, without offering alternative employment, is legally sustainable in light of applicable service regulations and binding settlements; ii) whether Clause 14 of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17.12.1979, executed u/s.12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, remains valid, binding, and enforceable despite the subsequent 1986 settlement and internal administrative circulars; iii) whether the respondents complied with their duty to make a bona fide assessment of alternative employment options for the appella
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis