⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,661–2,680 · Page 134 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 174 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 184
K. M. JOSEPH, J. 1. The reliefs sought for by the petitioner are as follows: C “a) direct the Home Ministry to constitute a “Renaming Commission” to find out original names of ‘ancient historical cultural religious places’, named after barbaric foreign invaders in order to maintain Sovereignty and to secure ‘Right to D…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 173 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,661–2,680 · Page 134 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 174 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 184
K. M. JOSEPH, J. 1. The reliefs sought for by the petitioner are as follows: C “a) direct the Home Ministry to constitute a “Renaming Commission” to find out original names of ‘ancient historical cultural religious places’, named after barbaric foreign invaders in order to maintain Sovereignty and to secure ‘Right to D…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 173 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1
– The two civil suits filed by the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for C cancellation of sale deed and for prohibitory injunction were dismissed, the two other civil suits filed by her sisters seeking partition of respective properties were decreed – These four decisions were challenged by the respondent No.1 in the High Co…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 172 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 130
HELD: 1.1 The allotment made in favour of the appellant by HSIDC contains several conditions. The HSIDC and the G appellant entered into an agreement. Clause 4 (iii) of the agreement stipulates that the allottee would enjoy the right of possession as long as he complied with all terms and conditions of allotment contai…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 171 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 712
into force – It was not open to the State to continue passing successive order of this nature once the dispute over the period of resignation and the manner in which the resignation had to be treated had attained finality – Appellant not entitled to any consequential benefits only for the period between the date of sub…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 170 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 107
F (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 –followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference G [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.1353 of …
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 17 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 579
before the DRAT under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act – There was no breach of r. 8(1) & (2) of 2002 Rules as the possession notices were published in two leading newspapers and served upon borrowers – There was no breach of r. 9(3) of the 2002 Rules as the entire 25% of the sale proceed was deposited the very next …
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 169 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 91
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] G 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3 H 91 92 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A CIVIL APP…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 168 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 56
the facts so warrant – No proper investigation by the State investigating agency at the relevant time and even the material evidences were also not collected – High Court has committed a very serious error in not ordering and/or permitting the State police agency to further investigate into the FIR. H 56 ANANT THANUR K…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 167 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 18
which were never challenged demonstrates the arbitrary exercise of powers by the appellants in releasing the acquired lands which as such required for the public purposes – Consideration for future needs and expansion is to be taken into consideration – Except the small portion/plot in question, all other major chunk o…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 166 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 12
– Decision in the said case has been overruled by the Constitution Bench in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. – Applying the law laid down therein to the present case, the High E Court materially erred in declaring that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the entire land are deemed to have lap…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 165 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 7
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. vs. Harakchand G Misrimal Solanki & ors (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3.1 H 7 8 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 3 CIVIL APPELLATE…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 164 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 96
96 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS3 S.C.R. 96 [2023] 3 S.C.R. A R. K. JIBANLATA DEVI v. HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL AND OTHERS B (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1209 of 2021) FEBRUARY 24, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Service Law – High Court of Manipur Officers and Employees Recruitment and C…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 163 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 79
– Further, the impugned order is erroneous even on merits, set aside – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 – Exercise of E discretion under – Economic offences – Held: In case of economic offences having an impact on the society, the Court must be very slow in exercising t…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 162 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 35
exercising the discretionary power in favour of the respondent, that too with a delay of 853 days – High Court erred in upholding the same – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – s. 148 Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that by Han ex-parte judgment and decree dated 12.10.201…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 161 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 47
Corporation in respect of the pathway – High Court allowed the writ petition of the appellant on merits after considering a survey report – High Court discarded the survey report – Thereafter, the respondent filed the review petition before the High Court – High Court allowed the review petition after considering the s…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 16 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 1029
1030 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 1 S.C.R. A Court, the period of parole is also required to be excluded from the period of sentence while considering 14 years of actual imprisonment. [Para 7.1][1033-B-D] 3. If the submission on behalf of the prisoners that the period of parole is to be included while considering 14 ye…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 159 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1
Abhimanyu Jhamba, Ms. Thonpinao Thangal, Samir Ali Khan, B Ms. Hatneimawi, Shivam Prashar, Nikhil Jagotra, Ms. Richa Bharti, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 158 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 582
G From the Judgment and Order dated 09.08.2019 of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in RP No.8 of 2018 and dated 22.08.2016 in RSA No.270 of 2007. Abhimanyu Jhamba, Ms. Thonpinao Thangal, Samir Ali Khan, Ms. Hatneimawi, Shivam Prashar, Nikhil Jagotra, Ms. Richa Bharti, Advs. H for the Appellants. 582 THE STA…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 156 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 1118
referred to the principles governing the grant or refusal of temporary injunction and pointed out that the directions given by the Single Judge for convening the meeting only with the joint consent of Co-ordinator and Joint Co-ordinator was leading to a situation where the party as a whole would undergo irreparable har…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 154 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 560
by High Court –Held: High Court passed the impugned order setting aside the order of the appellantwithout affording it an opportunity of hearing and thus, is in violation of the principles of natural justice – Even on merits, High Court completely overlooked s.20(1) that empowers the Lokayukta, on receipt of a complain…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
– The two civil suits filed by the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for C cancellation of sale deed and for prohibitory injunction were dismissed, the two other civil suits filed by her sisters seeking partition of respective properties were decreed – These four decisions were challenged by the respondent No.1 in the High Co…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 172 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 130
HELD: 1.1 The allotment made in favour of the appellant by HSIDC contains several conditions. The HSIDC and the G appellant entered into an agreement. Clause 4 (iii) of the agreement stipulates that the allottee would enjoy the right of possession as long as he complied with all terms and conditions of allotment contai…
Supreme Court of India27 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 171 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 712
into force – It was not open to the State to continue passing successive order of this nature once the dispute over the period of resignation and the manner in which the resignation had to be treated had attained finality – Appellant not entitled to any consequential benefits only for the period between the date of sub…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 170 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 107
F (2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 –followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference G [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No.1353 of …
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 17 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 579
before the DRAT under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act – There was no breach of r. 8(1) & (2) of 2002 Rules as the possession notices were published in two leading newspapers and served upon borrowers – There was no breach of r. 9(3) of the 2002 Rules as the entire 25% of the sale proceed was deposited the very next …
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 169 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 91
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors. (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] G 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 2 [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3 H 91 92 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A CIVIL APP…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 168 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 56
the facts so warrant – No proper investigation by the State investigating agency at the relevant time and even the material evidences were also not collected – High Court has committed a very serious error in not ordering and/or permitting the State police agency to further investigate into the FIR. H 56 ANANT THANUR K…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 167 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 18
which were never challenged demonstrates the arbitrary exercise of powers by the appellants in releasing the acquired lands which as such required for the public purposes – Consideration for future needs and expansion is to be taken into consideration – Except the small portion/plot in question, all other major chunk o…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 166 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 12
– Decision in the said case has been overruled by the Constitution Bench in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. – Applying the law laid down therein to the present case, the High E Court materially erred in declaring that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the entire land are deemed to have lap…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 165 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 7
(2020) 8 SCC 129 : [2020] 3 SCR 1 – followed. Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. vs. Harakchand G Misrimal Solanki & ors (2014) 3 SCC 183 : [2014] 1 SCR 783 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2020] 3 SCR 1 followed Para 3.1 H 7 8 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A [2014] 1 SCR 783 referred to Para 3 CIVIL APPELLATE…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 164 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 96
96 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS3 S.C.R. 96 [2023] 3 S.C.R. A R. K. JIBANLATA DEVI v. HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL AND OTHERS B (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1209 of 2021) FEBRUARY 24, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Service Law – High Court of Manipur Officers and Employees Recruitment and C…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 163 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 79
– Further, the impugned order is erroneous even on merits, set aside – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 – Exercise of E discretion under – Economic offences – Held: In case of economic offences having an impact on the society, the Court must be very slow in exercising t…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 162 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 35
exercising the discretionary power in favour of the respondent, that too with a delay of 853 days – High Court erred in upholding the same – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – s. 148 Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 At the outset, it is required to be noted that by Han ex-parte judgment and decree dated 12.10.201…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 161 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 47
Corporation in respect of the pathway – High Court allowed the writ petition of the appellant on merits after considering a survey report – High Court discarded the survey report – Thereafter, the respondent filed the review petition before the High Court – High Court allowed the review petition after considering the s…
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 16 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 1029
1030 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 1 S.C.R. A Court, the period of parole is also required to be excluded from the period of sentence while considering 14 years of actual imprisonment. [Para 7.1][1033-B-D] 3. If the submission on behalf of the prisoners that the period of parole is to be included while considering 14 ye…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 159 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1
Abhimanyu Jhamba, Ms. Thonpinao Thangal, Samir Ali Khan, B Ms. Hatneimawi, Shivam Prashar, Nikhil Jagotra, Ms. Richa Bharti, Advs. for the Appellants. Ms. Radhika Gautam, Adv. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by C M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment…
Supreme Court of India24 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 158 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 582
G From the Judgment and Order dated 09.08.2019 of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in RP No.8 of 2018 and dated 22.08.2016 in RSA No.270 of 2007. Abhimanyu Jhamba, Ms. Thonpinao Thangal, Samir Ali Khan, Ms. Hatneimawi, Shivam Prashar, Nikhil Jagotra, Ms. Richa Bharti, Advs. H for the Appellants. 582 THE STA…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 156 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 1118
referred to the principles governing the grant or refusal of temporary injunction and pointed out that the directions given by the Single Judge for convening the meeting only with the joint consent of Co-ordinator and Joint Co-ordinator was leading to a situation where the party as a whole would undergo irreparable har…
Supreme Court of India23 Feb 2023Full text
2023 INSC 154 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 560
by High Court –Held: High Court passed the impugned order setting aside the order of the appellantwithout affording it an opportunity of hearing and thus, is in violation of the principles of natural justice – Even on merits, High Court completely overlooked s.20(1) that empowers the Lokayukta, on receipt of a complain…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis