⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,561–2,580 · Page 129 of 500
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 280 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 639
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (2019) 5 SCC 480 : [2019] 6 SCR 307 – E referred to. Case Law Reference [2019] 6 SCR 307 referred to Para 15 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. F 1711 of 2011. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.01.2010 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryan…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 28 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 689
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,561–2,580 · Page 129 of 500
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 280 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 639
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (2019) 5 SCC 480 : [2019] 6 SCR 307 – E referred to. Case Law Reference [2019] 6 SCR 307 referred to Para 15 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. F 1711 of 2011. From the Judgment and Order dated 15.01.2010 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryan…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 28 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 689
Partly allowing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. As regards, the levy of the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act is held in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The assessee is not liable to pay the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act. To that extent the imp…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 278 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 453
DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. The Supreme Court Bar Association1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Union Ministry of Urban Development to E (i) grant permission for the conversion into a chamber block for lawyers of an entire …
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 277 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 803
– If the final bill cannot be overridden by any factors known to law then the clauses relied upon by the appellants in this case would operate – There was no finding by the Arbitrator that the final bill and the no claims certificate were vitiated – The clauses in the contract were binding not only on the parties but a…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 276 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 631
Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority – The facts admitted on record it is evident that the possession of the land was taken after the acquisition of land was complete – However, compensation was not paid – There is nothing on record to suggest as to what action was taken by the person who claimed …
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 275 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1069
history of the previous litigation which the NGT was seized with reveals that the land forming part of Khasra No. 1248, owned by the Society was directly in issue in a litigation to which the State was a party, and in which it lost – That decree was affirmed by all the courts –However, NGT chose to ignore this fact–Thu…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 274 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 618
Union of India & Others v. Atic Industries Ltd. [1984] 3 SCR 930; Union Of India & Ors v. Hind Lamp Ltd. [1989] 2 SCR 1023; Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Detergents India Ltd. [2015] 6 SCR 886; C Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/s Kwality Ice Cream Co. [2010] 14 SCR 409 – relied on. Commis…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 273 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1084
G Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators(Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 – Object & purpose of – The Act has been enacted with an object to provide for the forfeiture of illegally acquired properties of smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto – At the…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 272 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 587
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. As far as the Appellant No.2 is concerned, the remarks made by the High Court against him seem to be unreasonable and without justification. The Appellant No.2 is merely a government employee of the department that is Gconducting the investigation and has no personal involvemen…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 271 · [2023] 6 S.C.R. 731
[2023] 6 S.C.R. 731 731 ORISSA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BAR ASSOCIATION A v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No 6805 of 2022) MARCH 21, 2023 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Odisha Administrative Tribunal-OAT – Abolition C of, by Notification No. GSR 552(E…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 27 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 879
[2023] 5 S.C.R. 879 879 THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS A v. GOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU ETC. ETC. (Civil Appeal No(S). 5534-5594 of 2011) JANUARY 13, 2023 B [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Motor Vehicles – Himachal Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1972 – s.3A(3) [introduced vide Amending…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 269 · [2023] 14 S.C.R. 457
LIST OF CITATIONS AND OTHER REFERENCES Khema alias Khem Chandra etc. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2022 SCC-OnLine SC 991: Vadivelu Thevar vs. State of Madras [1957] SCR 981 – relied on. OTHER CASE DETAILS INCLUDING IMPUGNED ORDER AND APPEARANCES CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 886 of 2023. From the J…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 268 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1147
G Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 A bare perusal of Section 4(A) of the Act and the Jayanti Food Processing judgment would show that to attract a MRP based valuation of goods under the Central Excise Act, the goods should be notified under Section 4(A) of the Act and H 1147 1148 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 2…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 266 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1135
– The very act of execution of this document was sufficient in itself to complete the breach of the lease condition and the statutory F mandate u/ss. 13(1)(e) and 15(1) – Therefore, judgment of High Court set aside – Judgment of trial Court and Appellate Court affirmed. Allowing the appeals and I.As, the Court HELD 1. …
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 265 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 598
Armed Forces Tribunal would be amenable to challenge in the writ jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India before any High Court – Held: The judgment in Major General Shri Kant Sharma & Anr. case does not lay down the correct law and is in conflict with judgments of the Constitution Benches rendered prio…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 264 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1016
appropriate to affirm the death sentence awarded to him – ‘Rarest of rare’ doctrine requires that the death sentence not be imposed only by taking into account the grave nature of crime but only if there is no possibility of reformation in a criminal – No mitigating circumstances were placed before any of the appellate…
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 262 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 737
With Civil Appeal No. 5636 of 2007. C Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Bhargava V. Desai, Rahul Gupta, Ms. Viddushi Shandilya, Ms. Bidya Mohanty, Amjid, Zubin M John, Ms. Pallavi Maurya, Ms. Devina Bhandari, Amit Annappa Pai, Ramesh Babu M. R., Ashish Bhakta, Advs. for the appearing parties. D The Judgment of the Court wa…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 261 · [2023] 14 S.C.R. 464
466 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 14 S.C.R. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 – Facilitation of a scribe to the candidates – Where the consortium provides scribe, at least two days’ time should be provided so as to enable the candidate to interact with the scribe: Held: In other words, candidates appearing f…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 260 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1053
[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1053 1053 BHASIN INFOTECH AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. (Transferred Case (Civil) No. 82 of 2022) MARCH 17, 2023 B [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND J. K. MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Lease: Conversion of land from leasehold to freehold in view of policy formulated by the State – Entitle…
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 26 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 375
Tripurari Ray, B. S. Billowria, Dinesh Kumar Garg, Dhananjay Garg, Abhishek Garg, Gurmeet Singh, Advs. for the Appellants. Shailesh Madiyal, Vaibhav Sabharwal, Akshay Kumar, Advs. for Bthe Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B. R. GAVAI, J. 1. Present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 5t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Partly allowing the appeals, the Court B HELD: 1. As regards, the levy of the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act is held in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The assessee is not liable to pay the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act. To that extent the imp…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 278 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 453
DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. The Supreme Court Bar Association1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Union Ministry of Urban Development to E (i) grant permission for the conversion into a chamber block for lawyers of an entire …
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 277 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 803
– If the final bill cannot be overridden by any factors known to law then the clauses relied upon by the appellants in this case would operate – There was no finding by the Arbitrator that the final bill and the no claims certificate were vitiated – The clauses in the contract were binding not only on the parties but a…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 276 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 631
Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority – The facts admitted on record it is evident that the possession of the land was taken after the acquisition of land was complete – However, compensation was not paid – There is nothing on record to suggest as to what action was taken by the person who claimed …
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 275 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1069
history of the previous litigation which the NGT was seized with reveals that the land forming part of Khasra No. 1248, owned by the Society was directly in issue in a litigation to which the State was a party, and in which it lost – That decree was affirmed by all the courts –However, NGT chose to ignore this fact–Thu…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 274 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 618
Union of India & Others v. Atic Industries Ltd. [1984] 3 SCR 930; Union Of India & Ors v. Hind Lamp Ltd. [1989] 2 SCR 1023; Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad v. Detergents India Ltd. [2015] 6 SCR 886; C Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/s Kwality Ice Cream Co. [2010] 14 SCR 409 – relied on. Commis…
Supreme Court of India22 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 273 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1084
G Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators(Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 – Object & purpose of – The Act has been enacted with an object to provide for the forfeiture of illegally acquired properties of smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto – At the…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 272 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 587
F Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. As far as the Appellant No.2 is concerned, the remarks made by the High Court against him seem to be unreasonable and without justification. The Appellant No.2 is merely a government employee of the department that is Gconducting the investigation and has no personal involvemen…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 271 · [2023] 6 S.C.R. 731
[2023] 6 S.C.R. 731 731 ORISSA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BAR ASSOCIATION A v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS (Civil Appeal No 6805 of 2022) MARCH 21, 2023 B [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Constitution of India: Art. 226 – Odisha Administrative Tribunal-OAT – Abolition C of, by Notification No. GSR 552(E…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 27 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 879
[2023] 5 S.C.R. 879 879 THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS A v. GOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU ETC. ETC. (Civil Appeal No(S). 5534-5594 of 2011) JANUARY 13, 2023 B [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND VIKRAM NATH, JJ.] Motor Vehicles – Himachal Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1972 – s.3A(3) [introduced vide Amending…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 269 · [2023] 14 S.C.R. 457
LIST OF CITATIONS AND OTHER REFERENCES Khema alias Khem Chandra etc. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2022 SCC-OnLine SC 991: Vadivelu Thevar vs. State of Madras [1957] SCR 981 – relied on. OTHER CASE DETAILS INCLUDING IMPUGNED ORDER AND APPEARANCES CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 886 of 2023. From the J…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 268 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1147
G Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 A bare perusal of Section 4(A) of the Act and the Jayanti Food Processing judgment would show that to attract a MRP based valuation of goods under the Central Excise Act, the goods should be notified under Section 4(A) of the Act and H 1147 1148 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 2…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 266 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 1135
– The very act of execution of this document was sufficient in itself to complete the breach of the lease condition and the statutory F mandate u/ss. 13(1)(e) and 15(1) – Therefore, judgment of High Court set aside – Judgment of trial Court and Appellate Court affirmed. Allowing the appeals and I.As, the Court HELD 1. …
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 265 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 598
Armed Forces Tribunal would be amenable to challenge in the writ jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India before any High Court – Held: The judgment in Major General Shri Kant Sharma & Anr. case does not lay down the correct law and is in conflict with judgments of the Constitution Benches rendered prio…
Supreme Court of India21 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 264 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1016
appropriate to affirm the death sentence awarded to him – ‘Rarest of rare’ doctrine requires that the death sentence not be imposed only by taking into account the grave nature of crime but only if there is no possibility of reformation in a criminal – No mitigating circumstances were placed before any of the appellate…
Supreme Court of India20 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 262 · [2023] 2 S.C.R. 737
With Civil Appeal No. 5636 of 2007. C Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv., Bhargava V. Desai, Rahul Gupta, Ms. Viddushi Shandilya, Ms. Bidya Mohanty, Amjid, Zubin M John, Ms. Pallavi Maurya, Ms. Devina Bhandari, Amit Annappa Pai, Ramesh Babu M. R., Ashish Bhakta, Advs. for the appearing parties. D The Judgment of the Court wa…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 261 · [2023] 14 S.C.R. 464
466 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 14 S.C.R. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 – Facilitation of a scribe to the candidates – Where the consortium provides scribe, at least two days’ time should be provided so as to enable the candidate to interact with the scribe: Held: In other words, candidates appearing f…
Supreme Court of India17 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 260 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1053
[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1053 1053 BHASIN INFOTECH AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. A v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. (Transferred Case (Civil) No. 82 of 2022) MARCH 17, 2023 B [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND J. K. MAHESHWARI, JJ.] Lease: Conversion of land from leasehold to freehold in view of policy formulated by the State – Entitle…
Supreme Court of India12 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 26 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 375
Tripurari Ray, B. S. Billowria, Dinesh Kumar Garg, Dhananjay Garg, Abhishek Garg, Gurmeet Singh, Advs. for the Appellants. Shailesh Madiyal, Vaibhav Sabharwal, Akshay Kumar, Advs. for Bthe Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B. R. GAVAI, J. 1. Present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 5t…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis