⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,541–2,560 · Page 128 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 303 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 476
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Banking Regulation Act, G 1949 – Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 – Principle of Natural Justice – Civil consequences to borrowers – Whether the classification of a borrower’s account as fraudulent under the …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 302 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 357
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,541–2,560 · Page 128 of 500
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 303 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 476
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Banking Regulation Act, G 1949 – Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 – Principle of Natural Justice – Civil consequences to borrowers – Whether the classification of a borrower’s account as fraudulent under the …
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 302 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 357
358 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 7 S.C.R. A Dismissing the writ petition, the Court HELD: Rule 39-AA of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 1. The rationale for the introduction of the provision for voting by open ballot in elections to the Council of States has been examined in a decision of the Constitution Bench in K…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 300 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 688
“D-Cube Construction (P) Ltd.” and other was in the name of “D-Cube Construction” – Also, appellant-bank had received a letter from D-Cube Construction (P) Ltd. giving “no objection” for opening the current account in the name of “D-Cube Construction” – The two demand drafts in question were issued in the name of “D-F …
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 30 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 985
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Considering second part of Clause 9 of the F insurance policy, in case company is unable to reinstate or repair the property insured, the insurance company shall be liable to pay such sum as would be requisite to reinstate or repair such property if the same could lawfully be rei…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 3 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 800
800 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 800 [2023] 5 S.C.R. A PREM SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2023) B JANUARY 02, 2023 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 201 and s.84 – Murder – Disappearance of evidence – Circumstantial evidence – Appreciation of – Pl…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 298 · [2023] 6 S.C.R. 1055
– The review petition filed by appellant was also dismissed – The appellant (in detention for more than 28 years) filed present application under s. 9(2) of the Act of 2015, requesting Supreme Court to hold that the applicant was a juvenile on the date of commission of the offence – In 2019 by order, the Supreme Court …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 297 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 673
(2022) 7 SCC 470 – relied on. Government (NCT of Delhi) v. Manav Dharam Trust F and Anr. (2017) 6 SCC 751 : [2017] 4 SCR 232 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2017] 4 SCR 232 referred to Para 2 G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1784 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 06.08.2018 of the High Court…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 296 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 666
emergency/interim parole has to be excluded for the purpose of actual imprisonment – Petitioner not entitled to any relief prayed in the writ petition – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302/34 – Constitution of India – Art. 32. Rohan Dhungat Etc. v. The State of Goa & Ors. Etc. F Special Leave Petition (Crl) Nos. 12574-77/2022 : …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 295 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 649
With H 649 650 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 1755 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016. M. Y. Deshmukh, Ms. Manjeet Kripal, Adweetiya Sharma, Amitkumar Pathak, Satyajit A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Satya Kam Sharma, Gajanan N. Tirthkar, Saurabh Anand, Dharmendra Kumar …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 293 · [2023] 9 S.C.R. 1301
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos.4678-4681 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 16.03.2018 and 21.03.2018 G of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in Misc. Application No.02 of 2018 and IRDA Appeal No.02 of 2018. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Gopal Jain, Sr. Advs., Indranil Deshmukh, Raunak Dhil…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 292 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 496
– Without noticing the differences in American Laws and the Indian laws, the Supreme Court in the cases of Arup Bhuyan (two Judge Bench decision) and Raneef erred in straightway and directly C following the US Supreme Court decisions – Before following the American decisions, the Indian Courts are required to consider …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 290 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 660
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1787 of 2023. F From the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2022 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in SCA No. 14592 of 2021. Rajeev Sharma, Sr. Adv., Sahil Bhalaik, Tushar Giri, Sohan Patil, Saket Chandra, Pranav Giri, Ms. Gulshan Jahan, Advs. for the Appellants. G Har…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 29 · [2023] 10 S.C.R. 289
290 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 10 S.C.R. A of old Indian settlers, who have settled in Sikkim prior to the merger of Sikkim with India on 26.04.1975 from the definition of “Sikkimese” in s.10(26AAA) is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 – The exclusion has no nexus with the object and purpose of enact…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 289 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 653
With Civil Appeal Nos. 4936 and 4935 of 2022. G Sibo Sankar Mishra, Debabarta Dash, Ms. Kanika C., Rajesh Kr. Nayak, Uma Kant Mishra, Advs. for the Appellants. Shubhranshu Padhi, Ashish Yadav, Vishal Banshal, Ms. Rajeshwari Shankar, Anirudh Sanganeria, Advs. for the Respondent. H 653 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 287 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1150
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, Somil Aggarwal, Advs. H for the Appellants. 1150 ANIL MINDA AND OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 1151 TAX Balbir Singh, ASG, Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., Rupesh Kumar, Prahlad A Singh, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Prashant Singh, Shradha Deshmukh, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advs. for the Respondent. The…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 286 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1100
1100 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS3 S.C.R. 1100 [2023] 3 S.C.R. A MAH. ADIWASI THAKUR JAMAT SWARAKSHAN SAMITI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2502 of 2022) B MARCH 24, 2023 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND MANOJ MISRA, JJ.] Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimu…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 285 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 887
– Different time-limits are, therefore, set out therein – Once the order D in original sanctioning the refund came to be set aside in a proceeding under Section 35E of the Act and the proceedings under Section 35E was initiated within the time prescribed under Section 35E of the Act, thereafter there is no question of …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 284 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1134
hiring vehicles by ONGC, GAIL, FCI in favour of writ petitioners-suppliers of the vehicle – Writ petitioners challenging vires of r. 3A(2) and for refund of the amount so deducted as sales tax on transfer of the right to use goods – Single Judge held r.3A(2) as ultra vires the TST Act which was upheld by the Division B…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 283 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 950
act of the Court shall prejudice no one and in such a fact situation, the Court is under an obligation to undo the wrong done to a party by the act of the Court – Any undeserved or unfair advantage gained by a party invoking the jurisdiction of the Court must be neutralized, as the institution of litigation cannot be p…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 282 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 676
676 THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. KAMLESH 677 RANI BHATLA order of rejection, did not take the stand that once accepted, a A resignation cannot be withdrawn – Appellants also did not reason their rejection order with the ground that there was no compelling reason for the respondent to tender her resignation …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
358 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 7 S.C.R. A Dismissing the writ petition, the Court HELD: Rule 39-AA of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 1. The rationale for the introduction of the provision for voting by open ballot in elections to the Council of States has been examined in a decision of the Constitution Bench in K…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 300 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 688
“D-Cube Construction (P) Ltd.” and other was in the name of “D-Cube Construction” – Also, appellant-bank had received a letter from D-Cube Construction (P) Ltd. giving “no objection” for opening the current account in the name of “D-Cube Construction” – The two demand drafts in question were issued in the name of “D-F …
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 30 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 985
Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Considering second part of Clause 9 of the F insurance policy, in case company is unable to reinstate or repair the property insured, the insurance company shall be liable to pay such sum as would be requisite to reinstate or repair such property if the same could lawfully be rei…
Supreme Court of India2 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 3 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 800
800 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS5 S.C.R. 800 [2023] 5 S.C.R. A PREM SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2023) B JANUARY 02, 2023 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND SUDHANSHU DHULIA, JJ.] Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 201 and s.84 – Murder – Disappearance of evidence – Circumstantial evidence – Appreciation of – Pl…
Supreme Court of India27 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 298 · [2023] 6 S.C.R. 1055
– The review petition filed by appellant was also dismissed – The appellant (in detention for more than 28 years) filed present application under s. 9(2) of the Act of 2015, requesting Supreme Court to hold that the applicant was a juvenile on the date of commission of the offence – In 2019 by order, the Supreme Court …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 297 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 673
(2022) 7 SCC 470 – relied on. Government (NCT of Delhi) v. Manav Dharam Trust F and Anr. (2017) 6 SCC 751 : [2017] 4 SCR 232 – referred to. Case Law Reference [2017] 4 SCR 232 referred to Para 2 G CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1784 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 06.08.2018 of the High Court…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 296 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 666
emergency/interim parole has to be excluded for the purpose of actual imprisonment – Petitioner not entitled to any relief prayed in the writ petition – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302/34 – Constitution of India – Art. 32. Rohan Dhungat Etc. v. The State of Goa & Ors. Etc. F Special Leave Petition (Crl) Nos. 12574-77/2022 : …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 295 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 649
With H 649 650 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 1755 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016. M. Y. Deshmukh, Ms. Manjeet Kripal, Adweetiya Sharma, Amitkumar Pathak, Satyajit A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Satya Kam Sharma, Gajanan N. Tirthkar, Saurabh Anand, Dharmendra Kumar …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 293 · [2023] 9 S.C.R. 1301
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos.4678-4681 of 2018. From the Judgment and Order dated 16.03.2018 and 21.03.2018 G of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in Misc. Application No.02 of 2018 and IRDA Appeal No.02 of 2018. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Gopal Jain, Sr. Advs., Indranil Deshmukh, Raunak Dhil…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 292 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 496
– Without noticing the differences in American Laws and the Indian laws, the Supreme Court in the cases of Arup Bhuyan (two Judge Bench decision) and Raneef erred in straightway and directly C following the US Supreme Court decisions – Before following the American decisions, the Indian Courts are required to consider …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 290 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 660
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1787 of 2023. F From the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2022 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in SCA No. 14592 of 2021. Rajeev Sharma, Sr. Adv., Sahil Bhalaik, Tushar Giri, Sohan Patil, Saket Chandra, Pranav Giri, Ms. Gulshan Jahan, Advs. for the Appellants. G Har…
Supreme Court of India13 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 29 · [2023] 10 S.C.R. 289
290 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 10 S.C.R. A of old Indian settlers, who have settled in Sikkim prior to the merger of Sikkim with India on 26.04.1975 from the definition of “Sikkimese” in s.10(26AAA) is arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 – The exclusion has no nexus with the object and purpose of enact…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 289 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 653
With Civil Appeal Nos. 4936 and 4935 of 2022. G Sibo Sankar Mishra, Debabarta Dash, Ms. Kanika C., Rajesh Kr. Nayak, Uma Kant Mishra, Advs. for the Appellants. Shubhranshu Padhi, Ashish Yadav, Vishal Banshal, Ms. Rajeshwari Shankar, Anirudh Sanganeria, Advs. for the Respondent. H 653 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 287 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1150
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, Somil Aggarwal, Advs. H for the Appellants. 1150 ANIL MINDA AND OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 1151 TAX Balbir Singh, ASG, Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., Rupesh Kumar, Prahlad A Singh, Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Prashant Singh, Shradha Deshmukh, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advs. for the Respondent. The…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 286 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1100
1100 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS3 S.C.R. 1100 [2023] 3 S.C.R. A MAH. ADIWASI THAKUR JAMAT SWARAKSHAN SAMITI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2502 of 2022) B MARCH 24, 2023 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA AND MANOJ MISRA, JJ.] Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimu…
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 285 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 887
– Different time-limits are, therefore, set out therein – Once the order D in original sanctioning the refund came to be set aside in a proceeding under Section 35E of the Act and the proceedings under Section 35E was initiated within the time prescribed under Section 35E of the Act, thereafter there is no question of …
Supreme Court of India24 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 284 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 1134
hiring vehicles by ONGC, GAIL, FCI in favour of writ petitioners-suppliers of the vehicle – Writ petitioners challenging vires of r. 3A(2) and for refund of the amount so deducted as sales tax on transfer of the right to use goods – Single Judge held r.3A(2) as ultra vires the TST Act which was upheld by the Division B…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 283 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 950
act of the Court shall prejudice no one and in such a fact situation, the Court is under an obligation to undo the wrong done to a party by the act of the Court – Any undeserved or unfair advantage gained by a party invoking the jurisdiction of the Court must be neutralized, as the institution of litigation cannot be p…
Supreme Court of India23 Mar 2023Full text
2023 INSC 282 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 676
676 THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. KAMLESH 677 RANI BHATLA order of rejection, did not take the stand that once accepted, a A resignation cannot be withdrawn – Appellants also did not reason their rejection order with the ground that there was no compelling reason for the respondent to tender her resignation …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis