⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,441–2,460 · Page 123 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 42 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 797
interfered with the order of removal passed by the authorities, thus, the order passed by the Division Bench is upheld – CISF Rules, 2001 – r. 36, 54. Dismissing the Special Leave Petition, the Court HELD : 1.1 The Single Bench of the High Court had F committed an error in interfering with the order passed by the respo…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 419 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 512
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
2,441–2,460 · Page 123 of 500
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 42 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 797
interfered with the order of removal passed by the authorities, thus, the order passed by the Division Bench is upheld – CISF Rules, 2001 – r. 36, 54. Dismissing the Special Leave Petition, the Court HELD : 1.1 The Single Bench of the High Court had F committed an error in interfering with the order passed by the respo…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 419 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 512
the court sitting in appeal governed thereby is required to call for the records of the case from the concerned court below – It is an obligation, power coupled with a duty, and only after the perusal of such records would an appeal be decided – Non-compliance with the mandate of the section, in certain cases contingen…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 417 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 899
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-3 901 v. ABHISAR BUILDWELL P. LTD. anything contained in sub-section (1) or section 153, the A assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to subsection (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 416 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 85
– Per M.M. Sundresh. J (Supplementing)‘any expenditure’ mentioned in s.37 takes in its sweep loss occasioned in the course of business, F being incidental to it – Thus, any loss incurred by way of an expenditure by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law is not deductible in terms …
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 415 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 829
Act, 1959 – s. 25(1)(1-b)(a) – Evidence Act, 1872 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 – Chapter XII. Penal Code, 1860:120-B – Charge of criminal conspiracy under – Basic requirement of – Held: For the charge of criminal conspiracy u/s. 120B, to be established, an agreement between the H 829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 413 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 531
Swadeep Hora, Mahesh Agarwal, Ankur Saigal, Anshuman Srivastava, Anirudh Bhatia, E. C. Agrawala, Advs. for the Petitioners. Arkaj Kumar, Padmesh Mishra, Annam Venkatesh, Zoheb Hussain, Sabarish Subramanian, Mrs. Shardha Deshmukh, Kanu Agarwal, G Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 412 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 748
748 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 748 [2023] 4 S.C.R. A VIKAS CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2276 of 2022) B APRIL 21, 2023 [K. M. JOSEPH AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing: Imposition of a fixed term sentence of 30 years, without C remission – Correctness of – Victim aged 18 y…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 411 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 887
R. Basant, Sr. Adv., G. N. Reddy, Manu Krishnan, V. Vishnoo C. Kashyap, Ravi Shankar, Advs. for the Appellants. E Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Polanki Gowtham, K V Girish Chowdary, Shaik Mohamad Haneef, T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Ms. Niti Richhariya, Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Ms. Y. Vismai Rao, Y. Ramesh, Dhuli…
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 41 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 1009
Omanakuttan K. K., Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.11.2021 passed by the High Court of Gauhati in WA No.305 of 2021 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 408 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 461
461 462 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 5 S.C.R. A R. Basant, Sr. Adv., M/s. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Tanmaya Mehta, Syed Ahmed Saud, Lalit Valecha, Daanish Ahmed Syed, Mohd Parvez Dabas, Uzmi Jameel Husain, Aqib Baig, Advs. for the Appellant. S. V. Raju, ASG, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Zoheb Hussain, Annam Venkatesh, Ashok Panigrah…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 406 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 230
the Cabinet Committee of the State of Rajasthan, and resulting instructions issued to the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (“RIICO”) to cancel a series of permissions and approvals granted/awarded to Respondent No.1 in respect of industrial land in Kota, Rajasthan, were set aside –…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 405 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 508
5440 of 2020 of the Supreme Court of India. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv. for the Petitioner. H 508 DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION DEHRADUN v. ISHWAR 509 SHANDILYA & ORS. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv., Ms. Radhika Gautam, Ms. Anjul A Dwivedi, Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Ms. Tatini Basu, Kumar Shashank, Sanjay Rastogi, Advs. for the Respon…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 404 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 511
Baijnath v. State of M.P (2017) 1 SCC 101 : [2016] 11 SCR 764 – referred to. H 511 512 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference [2016] 11 SCR 764 referred to Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 447 of 2012. B From the Judgment and Order dated 11.06.2010 of the High Court of Utt…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 403 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1095
1096 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 4 S.C.R. A 1.2 The communication dated 19.06.2013 Modification in Model FSA applicable for New Power plants in respect of Interplant transfer of coal refers to the decision of the CIL taken in its meeting held on 27th May 2013. A perusal thereof would reveal that the transfer of coal w…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 402 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 639
Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others (2017) 14 SCC 80; F Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML) and Others 2023 SCC OnLine SC 233 – referred to. Case Law Reference G (2017) 14 SCC 80 referred to Para 3 CIVIL APPELL…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 401 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 468
G Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 None of the documents placed on record would reveal that a representation was given by AP(M)L that its bid is based on 70% domestic and 30% imported coal. It could thus be H seen that what has been stated in the Executive Summary by 468 UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. …
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 40 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 207
was made from a common recruitment process,the dates of appointment orders of both the streamsought to be treated from a particular date and 30th January 1996 being the date on which the appointment letters of the promotee candidates were issued, would be such date – Thus, the seniority of the candidates including the …
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 399 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 648
1.2 The issue with regard to SHAKTI Policy is concerned, the same is considered by this Court in judgments of even date, in Civil Appeal Nos. 677-678 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No. 5684 H 648 MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. v. 649 ADANI POWER MAHARASHTRA LTD. of 2021, holding therein that the restitut…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 399 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 668
Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Darius J. Khambata, Vikram Nankani, Sajan Poovayya, Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Advs., Anup Jain, Udit Gupta, Ms. Prachi Gupta, Vyom Chaturvedi for M/s. Udit Kishan and Associates, Ms. Poorva Saigal, Shubham Arya, Nikunj Dayal, Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Ravi Nair, Ms. Shikha Sood, Ms. Reeha Singh, Ms. Anumeha Smit…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 398 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 183
changes occurring after the cut-off date – Revision of charges to be paid on Busy Season Surcharge, Development Surcharge and Port Congestion Charges from time to time by the ‘Railway Board’ would come within the ambit of ‘Change in Law’ – Notifications by which MoEF mandated power projects to use beneficiated coal wit…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
the court sitting in appeal governed thereby is required to call for the records of the case from the concerned court below – It is an obligation, power coupled with a duty, and only after the perusal of such records would an appeal be decided – Non-compliance with the mandate of the section, in certain cases contingen…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 417 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 899
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-3 901 v. ABHISAR BUILDWELL P. LTD. anything contained in sub-section (1) or section 153, the A assessment or reassessment relating to any assessment year which has abated under the second proviso to subsection (1), shall stand revived with effect from the date of receipt of…
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 416 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 85
– Per M.M. Sundresh. J (Supplementing)‘any expenditure’ mentioned in s.37 takes in its sweep loss occasioned in the course of business, F being incidental to it – Thus, any loss incurred by way of an expenditure by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law is not deductible in terms …
Supreme Court of India24 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 415 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 829
Act, 1959 – s. 25(1)(1-b)(a) – Evidence Act, 1872 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974 – Chapter XII. Penal Code, 1860:120-B – Charge of criminal conspiracy under – Basic requirement of – Held: For the charge of criminal conspiracy u/s. 120B, to be established, an agreement between the H 829 830 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 413 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 531
Swadeep Hora, Mahesh Agarwal, Ankur Saigal, Anshuman Srivastava, Anirudh Bhatia, E. C. Agrawala, Advs. for the Petitioners. Arkaj Kumar, Padmesh Mishra, Annam Venkatesh, Zoheb Hussain, Sabarish Subramanian, Mrs. Shardha Deshmukh, Kanu Agarwal, G Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 412 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 748
748 SUPREME COURT[2023]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 748 [2023] 4 S.C.R. A VIKAS CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2276 of 2022) B APRIL 21, 2023 [K. M. JOSEPH AND S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.] Sentence/Sentencing: Imposition of a fixed term sentence of 30 years, without C remission – Correctness of – Victim aged 18 y…
Supreme Court of India21 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 411 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 887
R. Basant, Sr. Adv., G. N. Reddy, Manu Krishnan, V. Vishnoo C. Kashyap, Ravi Shankar, Advs. for the Appellants. E Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Polanki Gowtham, K V Girish Chowdary, Shaik Mohamad Haneef, T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Ms. Niti Richhariya, Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Ms. Y. Vismai Rao, Y. Ramesh, Dhuli…
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 41 · [2023] 1 S.C.R. 1009
Omanakuttan K. K., Adv. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.11.2021 passed by the High Court of Gauhati in WA No.305 of 2021 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 408 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 461
461 462 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 5 S.C.R. A R. Basant, Sr. Adv., M/s. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Tanmaya Mehta, Syed Ahmed Saud, Lalit Valecha, Daanish Ahmed Syed, Mohd Parvez Dabas, Uzmi Jameel Husain, Aqib Baig, Advs. for the Appellant. S. V. Raju, ASG, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Zoheb Hussain, Annam Venkatesh, Ashok Panigrah…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 406 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 230
the Cabinet Committee of the State of Rajasthan, and resulting instructions issued to the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (“RIICO”) to cancel a series of permissions and approvals granted/awarded to Respondent No.1 in respect of industrial land in Kota, Rajasthan, were set aside –…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 405 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 508
5440 of 2020 of the Supreme Court of India. Ajai Kumar Bhatia, Adv. for the Petitioner. H 508 DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION DEHRADUN v. ISHWAR 509 SHANDILYA & ORS. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv., Ms. Radhika Gautam, Ms. Anjul A Dwivedi, Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Ms. Tatini Basu, Kumar Shashank, Sanjay Rastogi, Advs. for the Respon…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 404 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 511
Baijnath v. State of M.P (2017) 1 SCC 101 : [2016] 11 SCR 764 – referred to. H 511 512 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R. A Case Law Reference [2016] 11 SCR 764 referred to Para 6 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 447 of 2012. B From the Judgment and Order dated 11.06.2010 of the High Court of Utt…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 403 · [2023] 4 S.C.R. 1095
1096 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 4 S.C.R. A 1.2 The communication dated 19.06.2013 Modification in Model FSA applicable for New Power plants in respect of Interplant transfer of coal refers to the decision of the CIL taken in its meeting held on 27th May 2013. A perusal thereof would reveal that the transfer of coal w…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 402 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 639
Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others (2017) 14 SCC 80; F Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML) and Others 2023 SCC OnLine SC 233 – referred to. Case Law Reference G (2017) 14 SCC 80 referred to Para 3 CIVIL APPELL…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 401 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 468
G Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 None of the documents placed on record would reveal that a representation was given by AP(M)L that its bid is based on 70% domestic and 30% imported coal. It could thus be H seen that what has been stated in the Executive Summary by 468 UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. …
Supreme Court of India16 Jan 2023Full text
2023 INSC 40 · [2023] 3 S.C.R. 207
was made from a common recruitment process,the dates of appointment orders of both the streamsought to be treated from a particular date and 30th January 1996 being the date on which the appointment letters of the promotee candidates were issued, would be such date – Thus, the seniority of the candidates including the …
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 399 · [2023] 7 S.C.R. 648
1.2 The issue with regard to SHAKTI Policy is concerned, the same is considered by this Court in judgments of even date, in Civil Appeal Nos. 677-678 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No. 5684 H 648 MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. v. 649 ADANI POWER MAHARASHTRA LTD. of 2021, holding therein that the restitut…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 399 · [2023] 5 S.C.R. 668
Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Darius J. Khambata, Vikram Nankani, Sajan Poovayya, Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Advs., Anup Jain, Udit Gupta, Ms. Prachi Gupta, Vyom Chaturvedi for M/s. Udit Kishan and Associates, Ms. Poorva Saigal, Shubham Arya, Nikunj Dayal, Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Ravi Nair, Ms. Shikha Sood, Ms. Reeha Singh, Ms. Anumeha Smit…
Supreme Court of India20 Apr 2023Full text
2023 INSC 398 · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 183
changes occurring after the cut-off date – Revision of charges to be paid on Busy Season Surcharge, Development Surcharge and Port Congestion Charges from time to time by the ‘Railway Board’ would come within the ambit of ‘Change in Law’ – Notifications by which MoEF mandated power projects to use beneficiated coal wit…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis