⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 8 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 504
Headnotes† Suit – Recovery of service charges – A suit was instituted by respondent nos.1 and 2 against respondent no.3 for the recovery of service charges – Notice was served upon sole defendant i.e., respondent no.3 but no one appeared – The Court proceeded ex-parte – Thereafter, the appellant filed an application fo…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 500
Supreme Court of India5 Jan 2026Full text
2026 INSC 8 · [2026] 1 S.C.R. 504
Headnotes† Suit – Recovery of service charges – A suit was instituted by respondent nos.1 and 2 against respondent no.3 for the recovery of service charges – Notice was served upon sole defendant i.e., respondent no.3 but no one appeared – The Court proceeded ex-parte – Thereafter, the appellant filed an application fo…
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 999 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1040
Whether the judgment passed by the High Court places a reverse burden of proof upon the appellant and is thus, legally unsustainable; whether the conviction u/s.411, IPC for dishonestly receiving stolen property can be sustained in view of the fact that both the accused stand acquitted for the offence of theft punishable u/s.379 IPC.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 998 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1026
Whether the High Court erred in failing to adjudicate the appellants’ principal challenge to the State’s refusals to sanction posts and treating the matter as a mere plea for regularization, and, if so, given the appellants’ long and undisputed service, what appropriate relief ought to follow from this Court.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 997 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1997
(i) Whether denial of the report of preliminary inquiry prepared by the officer entrusted by Vijaya Bank (which merged with the respondent in the year 2019) to conduct such inquiry, who happened to be the sole management witness, was sufficient to vitiate the regular inquiry that followed against the appellant; (ii) whether the failure/omission of the Inquiry Officer to generally question the appellant on the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence, as per Regulation 6(17) of the Vijaya Bank Officer Employees’ (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1981, vitiated the inquiry; (iii) w
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 996 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1003
(i) Whether the paver blocks should be permitted to be laid on the road between the Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue, which is the main road that connects Matheran from Dasturi Railway Station to the last point inasmuch as most of the habitations are situated on this road; if the answer to issue (i) is in the affirmative, then which type of paver blocks should be permitted to be laid down; (iii) whether e-rickshaws should be permitted on the said road between Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue or not; (iv) if the answer to issue (iii) is in the affirmative, then it has to be consider
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 995 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2085
Issue arose whether the appellant, being a non-executive Director of the company, can be held vicariously liable and prosecuted for the alleged offences committed by the company.
Supreme Court of India18 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 994 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 178
The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which was upheld by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 993 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 987
Whether the Courts below erred in convicting the accused-appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.21(c) and 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 992 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1789
Issue arose whether the non-mentioning of the income shown in the income tax return for four financial years in the Form 26 Affidavit and its portrayal as “Nil” by the respondent no.1-returned candidate would amount to non-disclosure, thereby rendering the acceptance of his nomination as improper and making her election liable to be declared void u/s.100(1)(d)(i) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951; whether such non-disclosure constitutes a corrupt practice, rendering her election liable to be declared void u/s.100(1)(b); and does such non-disclosure amount to a violation of r.4A of
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 991 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2073
Whether the criminal proceedings filed against the appellants in-laws by respondent No.1-wife subsequent to the dissolution of the marriage between her and her husband and also when both the parties had agreed for an amicable compromise to settle all disputes, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India18 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 990 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 966
Whether every allegation or accusation levelled, a reprimand or rebuke made, an insinuation or insult voiced or even continuous acts of ill-treatment, harassment and defamation; as alleged in this case, would lead to a charge of abetment, if the person at the receiving end commits suicide.
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 989 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 183
Scandalous remarks made against a High Court Judge in a Transfer Petition. Suo moto contempt proceedings initiated against the lawyers involved in the filing of the petition.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 988 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 902
Issue arose as regards to whether a plea of estoppel in law can be permitted to be raised by a party ignoring its conduct that resulted in the other party altering its position to its detriment in view of such conduct.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 987 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 919
Issue arose whether the courts below were justified in convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.302/34 and 201/34 IPC for the alleged murder of the son of the informant.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 984 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 156
Whether applications filed u/ss.7(1) and (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 by the tenant without deposit of rent after lapse of statutory period of thirty days, along with an application u/s.5 of the Limitation Act, rejected by Court of Small Causes as not entertainable, confirmed by the High Court is justified.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 983 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 936
Issue arose whether the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or any other law in force permits issuance of a second provisional attachment order u/s.83(1) of the Act after the initial provisional attachment order issued thereunder ceases, by reason of efflux of a year from the date of its issuance, in terms of sub-section (2) thereof.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 982 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1727
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner herein, and declined from interdicting the summons dated 16.01.2025 and 23.01.2025 respectively, issued to the petitioner u/s.70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) by the Commissioner, Central Good and Services Tax, Delhi East Commissionerate (respondent no.1).
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 981 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 805
Appellants, engaged in the manufacture and distribution of wines, liquors, and spirits, sell whisky under the brand names ‘BLENDERS PRIDE’ and ‘IMPERIAL BLUE’, both of which are registered trademarks. The appellants also hold a registered trademark for ‘SEAGRAM’S’, which serves as the house mark of Appellant No.1, and is used both in India and internationally across various product lines. Respondent was marketing whisky under the mark ‘LONDON PRIDE. The issue was whether the appellants were entitled to grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent from using the impugned trademark, ge
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 980 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 799
This appeal is by widow of the deceased convict against the judgment and order of the High Court whereby conviction of her husband, u/ss.7, 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has been upheld.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 979 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 194
Whether the order of the High Court granting bail to the respondents-accused persons in a case involving serious charges u/ss.302, 120B, and 34 IPC is perverse and legally unsustainable, warranting cancellation of bail.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2025 INSC 999 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1040
Whether the judgment passed by the High Court places a reverse burden of proof upon the appellant and is thus, legally unsustainable; whether the conviction u/s.411, IPC for dishonestly receiving stolen property can be sustained in view of the fact that both the accused stand acquitted for the offence of theft punishable u/s.379 IPC.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 998 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1026
Whether the High Court erred in failing to adjudicate the appellants’ principal challenge to the State’s refusals to sanction posts and treating the matter as a mere plea for regularization, and, if so, given the appellants’ long and undisputed service, what appropriate relief ought to follow from this Court.
Supreme Court of India19 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 997 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1997
(i) Whether denial of the report of preliminary inquiry prepared by the officer entrusted by Vijaya Bank (which merged with the respondent in the year 2019) to conduct such inquiry, who happened to be the sole management witness, was sufficient to vitiate the regular inquiry that followed against the appellant; (ii) whether the failure/omission of the Inquiry Officer to generally question the appellant on the circumstances appearing against him in the evidence, as per Regulation 6(17) of the Vijaya Bank Officer Employees’ (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1981, vitiated the inquiry; (iii) w
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 996 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1003
(i) Whether the paver blocks should be permitted to be laid on the road between the Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue, which is the main road that connects Matheran from Dasturi Railway Station to the last point inasmuch as most of the habitations are situated on this road; if the answer to issue (i) is in the affirmative, then which type of paver blocks should be permitted to be laid down; (iii) whether e-rickshaws should be permitted on the said road between Dasturi Naka to Shivaji Maharaj Statue or not; (iv) if the answer to issue (iii) is in the affirmative, then it has to be consider
Supreme Court of India22 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 995 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2085
Issue arose whether the appellant, being a non-executive Director of the company, can be held vicariously liable and prosecuted for the alleged offences committed by the company.
Supreme Court of India18 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 994 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 178
The Family Court awarded Rs.15,00,000/- as permanent alimony, which was upheld by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India5 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 993 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 987
Whether the Courts below erred in convicting the accused-appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.21(c) and 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 992 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1789
Issue arose whether the non-mentioning of the income shown in the income tax return for four financial years in the Form 26 Affidavit and its portrayal as “Nil” by the respondent no.1-returned candidate would amount to non-disclosure, thereby rendering the acceptance of his nomination as improper and making her election liable to be declared void u/s.100(1)(d)(i) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951; whether such non-disclosure constitutes a corrupt practice, rendering her election liable to be declared void u/s.100(1)(b); and does such non-disclosure amount to a violation of r.4A of
Supreme Court of India30 Jul 2025Full text
2025 INSC 991 · [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2073
Whether the criminal proceedings filed against the appellants in-laws by respondent No.1-wife subsequent to the dissolution of the marriage between her and her husband and also when both the parties had agreed for an amicable compromise to settle all disputes, ought to be quashed.
Supreme Court of India18 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 990 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 966
Whether every allegation or accusation levelled, a reprimand or rebuke made, an insinuation or insult voiced or even continuous acts of ill-treatment, harassment and defamation; as alleged in this case, would lead to a charge of abetment, if the person at the receiving end commits suicide.
Supreme Court of India11 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 989 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 183
Scandalous remarks made against a High Court Judge in a Transfer Petition. Suo moto contempt proceedings initiated against the lawyers involved in the filing of the petition.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 988 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 902
Issue arose as regards to whether a plea of estoppel in law can be permitted to be raised by a party ignoring its conduct that resulted in the other party altering its position to its detriment in view of such conduct.
Supreme Court of India6 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 987 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 919
Issue arose whether the courts below were justified in convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss.302/34 and 201/34 IPC for the alleged murder of the son of the informant.
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 984 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 156
Whether applications filed u/ss.7(1) and (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 by the tenant without deposit of rent after lapse of statutory period of thirty days, along with an application u/s.5 of the Limitation Act, rejected by Court of Small Causes as not entertainable, confirmed by the High Court is justified.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 983 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 936
Issue arose whether the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or any other law in force permits issuance of a second provisional attachment order u/s.83(1) of the Act after the initial provisional attachment order issued thereunder ceases, by reason of efflux of a year from the date of its issuance, in terms of sub-section (2) thereof.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 982 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1727
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner herein, and declined from interdicting the summons dated 16.01.2025 and 23.01.2025 respectively, issued to the petitioner u/s.70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) by the Commissioner, Central Good and Services Tax, Delhi East Commissionerate (respondent no.1).
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 981 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 805
Appellants, engaged in the manufacture and distribution of wines, liquors, and spirits, sell whisky under the brand names ‘BLENDERS PRIDE’ and ‘IMPERIAL BLUE’, both of which are registered trademarks. The appellants also hold a registered trademark for ‘SEAGRAM’S’, which serves as the house mark of Appellant No.1, and is used both in India and internationally across various product lines. Respondent was marketing whisky under the mark ‘LONDON PRIDE. The issue was whether the appellants were entitled to grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent from using the impugned trademark, ge
Supreme Court of India13 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 980 · [2025] 8 S.C.R. 799
This appeal is by widow of the deceased convict against the judgment and order of the High Court whereby conviction of her husband, u/ss.7, 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has been upheld.
Supreme Court of India14 Aug 2025Full text
2025 INSC 979 · [2025] 9 S.C.R. 194
Whether the order of the High Court granting bail to the respondents-accused persons in a case involving serious charges u/ss.302, 120B, and 34 IPC is perverse and legally unsustainable, warranting cancellation of bail.
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis