⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
41–60 · Page 3 of 70
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4085/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.02.19 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4085-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
41–60 · Page 3 of 70
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4085/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.02.19 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4085-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/25952/2024
119. The respondents-revenue wwould be, however, at lliberty to follow the procedure aas laid down under the AAct, 1961 and proceed accordinggly, if so advised. 220. All the writ petitions are allowed. The interim oorder passed by the Court shall stand merged with the ppresent order.” PARUL 2024.10.14 10:37 I attest to…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/33487/2025
103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-33487-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Sukhbir Singh @ Saminder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/41447/2026
AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-414477-2026 (O&M) (2) 3. Leearned State counsel filed status report dated 09.09.2026 and on instructions states that the petitioners have joined the investigation on 06.08.2026 andd weapon of offence has alsso been recover…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4008/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.03.03 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4008-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/10322/2025
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notices dated 24.03.2025 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLIS…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/22318/2021
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 10, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/49514/2026
CRM-M-49514-2026 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49514-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Bablu @ Jashan Thakur ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..….Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Parminder Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravind…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/206/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. Gaurav Arora 2025.01.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-206-2025 2 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dat…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/31717/2026
AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-317117-2026 (O&M) 2 off the victim, have been produceed on record and the same showw thhat none of them has made aany deposition as against thee p etitioner. However, since neitheer of them was an eye-witness too thhe murd…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/45160/2026
2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he was on anticipatory bail. The challan was presented without his knowledge, due to which, he could not appear before the learned trial Court, which resulted into declaring him a proclaimed person/absconder. His absence before the Court was neither deliberate …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/11372/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 28.03.2025 issued Gaurav Arora 2025.05.01 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/6293/2025
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jas…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/11800/2019
IOIN stands disposed of accordingly. CM Nos.16815- 16820-CWP of 2026 These applications have been filed by the applicants/petitioners under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 of VINAY 2026.09.10 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment IOIN-CWP-11800-2019 in/and CWP-11800-2019 (O&M) -2-…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/14329/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 251 CRM-M-14329-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 SANTOKH SINGH AND ANOTHER ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:- Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Hardeep Singh Wad…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15534/2025
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 29.08.2024 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/12613/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 06.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and all consequential actions, for AY Gaurav …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4488/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.02.25 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4488-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/45955/2026
Dismissed as withdrawn. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 10.09.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.09.10 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/21447/2025
(i) CWWP-15745-2024, titled Jatinder Sinngh Bhangu vs. Union of Inddia and others, decided on 19.07.20024; and (ii) CWWP-21509-2023, titled Jasjit Singhh vs. Union of India and oothers, decided on 29.07.2024. 3. Learnned counsel for the respondents ddoes not dispute the fact that the case of the petitiooner is covered …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/25952/2024
119. The respondents-revenue wwould be, however, at lliberty to follow the procedure aas laid down under the AAct, 1961 and proceed accordinggly, if so advised. 220. All the writ petitions are allowed. The interim oorder passed by the Court shall stand merged with the ppresent order.” PARUL 2024.10.14 10:37 I attest to…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/33487/2025
103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-33487-2025 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 Sukhbir Singh @ Saminder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/41447/2026
AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-414477-2026 (O&M) (2) 3. Leearned State counsel filed status report dated 09.09.2026 and on instructions states that the petitioners have joined the investigation on 06.08.2026 andd weapon of offence has alsso been recover…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4008/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.03.03 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4008-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/10322/2025
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notices dated 24.03.2025 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLIS…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/22318/2021
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) SEPTEMBER 10, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.09.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/49514/2026
CRM-M-49514-2026 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49514-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 Bablu @ Jashan Thakur ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..….Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Parminder Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravind…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/206/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. Gaurav Arora 2025.01.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-206-2025 2 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dat…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/31717/2026
AMIT SHARMA 2026.09.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-317117-2026 (O&M) 2 off the victim, have been produceed on record and the same showw thhat none of them has made aany deposition as against thee p etitioner. However, since neitheer of them was an eye-witness too thhe murd…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/45160/2026
2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he was on anticipatory bail. The challan was presented without his knowledge, due to which, he could not appear before the learned trial Court, which resulted into declaring him a proclaimed person/absconder. His absence before the Court was neither deliberate …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/11372/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 28.03.2025 issued Gaurav Arora 2025.05.01 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/6293/2025
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jas…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/11800/2019
IOIN stands disposed of accordingly. CM Nos.16815- 16820-CWP of 2026 These applications have been filed by the applicants/petitioners under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 of VINAY 2026.09.10 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment IOIN-CWP-11800-2019 in/and CWP-11800-2019 (O&M) -2-…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/14329/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 251 CRM-M-14329-2026 Date of decision: 10.09.2026 SANTOKH SINGH AND ANOTHER ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present:- Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Hardeep Singh Wad…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15534/2025
2. In the light of the above consensus, the petition is allowed in terms of Jyoti Sareen’s case (supra), resulting in quashing of the impugned notice dated 29.08.2024 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 alongwith consequential proceedings, if any. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (SUNISH BINDLISH…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/12613/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 06.03.2024 issued under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and all consequential actions, for AY Gaurav …
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/4488/2025
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not disputed the same. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the Gaurav Arora 2025.02.25 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4488-2025 2 whole records of the case. 5. The petitioner has challenged the notice da…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CRM-M/45955/2026
Dismissed as withdrawn. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 10.09.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.09.10 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh…
Punjab & Haryana High Court10 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/21447/2025
(i) CWWP-15745-2024, titled Jatinder Sinngh Bhangu vs. Union of Inddia and others, decided on 19.07.20024; and (ii) CWWP-21509-2023, titled Jasjit Singhh vs. Union of India and oothers, decided on 29.07.2024. 3. Learnned counsel for the respondents ddoes not dispute the fact that the case of the petitiooner is covered …
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis