Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Matched in judgment text
Karnataka High Court·28 Aug 2026
Judgment Library
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
argument, he has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another1. The impugned order passed by respondent No.1 is in violation of principles
Court went into the arbitrariness doctrine in some detail. It referred to Royappa [AIR 1974 SC 555) (supra), Maneka Gandhi [AIR 1978 SC 597) (supra) and Ajay Hasia (AIR 1981 SC 487) (supra) (and quoted from paragraph
argument, he has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another1. The impugned order passed by respondent No.1 is in violation of principles