⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37799 · CWP/15498/2026
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from evicting, dispossessing, demolishing or otherwise preventing the petitioner from carrying on their existing limited vending activity until the identified vending zone is developed, made functional and physically allotted, except through the procedure prescri…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
141–160 · Page 8 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37799 · CWP/15498/2026
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from evicting, dispossessing, demolishing or otherwise preventing the petitioner from carrying on their existing limited vending activity until the identified vending zone is developed, made functional and physically allotted, except through the procedure prescri…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15149/2026
Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) in the respondent Education Department. He was posted at Government Model Girls Senior Secondary School Hamirpur. In terms of notification dated 18.02.2026, services of the petitioner alongwith 39 others, posted in the said school were transferred to Shaheed Capt…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1856/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 07, 2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15363/2026
respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15242/2026
2. Learned Assistant Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitio…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
COPC/1142/2026
Taking note of the aforesaid documents, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 redressal of …
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CRMPM/713/2026
2. Mr Lokender Kutlehria, learned Additional Advocate General, for the applicant, submitted that the delay occurred because various authorities had to be consulted before filing the appeal. The delay was not intentional, but due to the circumstances beyond the applicant's control. Hence, he prayed that the present appl…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CMP.M/1471/2025
IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Dibag and another CMP(M) No.1471 of 2025 07.09.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate vice Ms. Dhanwanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2, already ex parte. CMP(M) No.1471 of 2025 Heard. For the reasons sta…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15247/2026
the petitioners along with interest for the delay on part of the respondents. 2. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37786 · CRMPM/1640/2026
2026:HHC:37786 2. Pursuant to directions issued by this Court, respondent/State has filed status report and ASI Anil Kumar, has come present with record. Record perused and returned. 3. Close scrutiny of status report/record reveals that on 17.02.2026, police received secret information that person namely Amit Kumar @ …
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/12304/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 07,2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37779 · COPC/1255/2026
2026:HHC:37779 2 were directed to consider and decide the representation dated 25.10.2025 [Annexure P-3] annexed with the writ petition, after taking into consideration the judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. [CWP No.1638 of 2024], decided on 29.11.2024 within six weeks from the date…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15240/2026
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2 and Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15076/2026
2. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petiti…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
EX.PT/121/2026
respondent pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr. V.S. Kanwar, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15355/2026
3. Since application (Annexure P-4) having been filed by the petitioner, seeking therein permission to organize fair, as detailed herein above w.e.f 18.09.2026 to 27.09.2026, is still pending 3 consideration before the competent authority, coupled with the fact that petitioner has already deposited the requisite fee, t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37543 · EX.P./1516/2026
Ors. vs. HRTC & Ors., has duly been complied with in respect of petitioner, namely Sh. Shiv Ram, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 03rd September, 2026 …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/14836/2026
Since the main judgment passed in CWP No.8148 of 2022, titled, Yashwant Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench, the application for revival of the execution petition does not survive and the same is accordingly dismissed. September 03, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (a…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15306/2026
(Sandeep Sharma ) Judge September 03, 2026 (sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15181/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in ter…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CWP/15149/2026
Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) in the respondent Education Department. He was posted at Government Model Girls Senior Secondary School Hamirpur. In terms of notification dated 18.02.2026, services of the petitioner alongwith 39 others, posted in the said school were transferred to Shaheed Capt…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
EX.P./1856/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 07, 2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15363/2026
respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15242/2026
2. Learned Assistant Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitio…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
COPC/1142/2026
Taking note of the aforesaid documents, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 redressal of …
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CRMPM/713/2026
2. Mr Lokender Kutlehria, learned Additional Advocate General, for the applicant, submitted that the delay occurred because various authorities had to be consulted before filing the appeal. The delay was not intentional, but due to the circumstances beyond the applicant's control. Hence, he prayed that the present appl…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CMP.M/1471/2025
IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Dibag and another CMP(M) No.1471 of 2025 07.09.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate vice Ms. Dhanwanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2, already ex parte. CMP(M) No.1471 of 2025 Heard. For the reasons sta…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15247/2026
the petitioners along with interest for the delay on part of the respondents. 2. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37786 · CRMPM/1640/2026
2026:HHC:37786 2. Pursuant to directions issued by this Court, respondent/State has filed status report and ASI Anil Kumar, has come present with record. Record perused and returned. 3. Close scrutiny of status report/record reveals that on 17.02.2026, police received secret information that person namely Amit Kumar @ …
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/12304/2026
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 07,2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37779 · COPC/1255/2026
2026:HHC:37779 2 were directed to consider and decide the representation dated 25.10.2025 [Annexure P-3] annexed with the writ petition, after taking into consideration the judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. [CWP No.1638 of 2024], decided on 29.11.2024 within six weeks from the date…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15240/2026
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2 and Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15076/2026
2. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petiti…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
EX.PT/121/2026
respondent pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr. V.S. Kanwar, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondent, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15355/2026
3. Since application (Annexure P-4) having been filed by the petitioner, seeking therein permission to organize fair, as detailed herein above w.e.f 18.09.2026 to 27.09.2026, is still pending 3 consideration before the competent authority, coupled with the fact that petitioner has already deposited the requisite fee, t…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:HHC:37543 · EX.P./1516/2026
Ors. vs. HRTC & Ors., has duly been complied with in respect of petitioner, namely Sh. Shiv Ram, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 03rd September, 2026 …
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CMP/14836/2026
Since the main judgment passed in CWP No.8148 of 2022, titled, Yashwant Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench, the application for revival of the execution petition does not survive and the same is accordingly dismissed. September 03, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (a…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15306/2026
(Sandeep Sharma ) Judge September 03, 2026 (sunil)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CWP/15181/2026
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in ter…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis