⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
561–580 · Page 29 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court18 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:30097 · CWPOA/1159/2019
2. The facts as emerge from the pleadings are that the petitioner was engaged on Daily Wage in the year 1980 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:30097 and thereafter, his services were regularized as Forest Worker, vide office order dated 03.02.1998 (Annexure P-1), w.e.f. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
561–580 · Page 29 of 47
Himachal Pradesh High Court18 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:30097 · CWPOA/1159/2019
2. The facts as emerge from the pleadings are that the petitioner was engaged on Daily Wage in the year 1980 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:30097 and thereafter, his services were regularized as Forest Worker, vide office order dated 03.02.1998 (Annexure P-1), w.e.f. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/17002/2026
Application stands disposed of. CWP No. 5317 of 2024 Reply stands filed. Rejoinder thereto be filed within two weeks. List for consideration on 17.08.2026. CMP No. 8852 of 2024 Heard. In order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed in Civil Appeal No.4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer v. Tej Partap Singh, the Apex…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11668/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1153/2026
I. The petitioner will join the investigation as and when directed to do so. II. The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever. III. The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29358 · CWP/7209/2026
2 2026:HHC:29358 CWP No. 7209 of 2026 as permissible under law, if so desired and required. Prayer has not been opposed. 2. In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 17th July,…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11743/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11688/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/17025/2026
CMP No.17025 of 2026 The present application has been moved on behalf of applicants Shakuntala Devi and Sonu, who are the legal representatives of appellant Desh Raj, in FAO No. 1 of 2019, which was decided by this Court, vide judgment dated 10.07.2025. The present application, has been filed, for release of the amount…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/16151/2026
Madan Lal vs Shammi & Ors. CMPMO No.549 of 2024 17.07.2026 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.S Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. CMP No.16151 of 2026 Request made by the Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan, H.P for extension of time to decide the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11640/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 17, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11733/2026
2. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondent-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in this petition shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra). Ordered accordingly. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1194/2026
3. Close scrutiny of record made available to this Court reveals that on 18.04.2026 at 05:15 PM, Police, after having received secret information that person namely Tapender Singh, who has a grocery shop at Kolar, indulges in illegal sale of prohibited drugs and in case his shop is raided, huge quantity of contraband c…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/17224/2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, submitted that she doesn't intend to file any reply to the present applications and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4, namely, Anjana Devi, Ajay Kumar and Vishal Singh, have now attained the age of majori…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CR.R/582/2025
and pay compensation to the tune of Rs.2,10,000/- to respondents No.1 to 4-complainants (hereinafter ‘complainants’). 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings as well as other material adduced on record are that complainants filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act in the competent court …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11675/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11725/2026
3. This petition is thus disposed of with the observation that the directions passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra), shall mutatis mutandis be read to have been passed in this petition also. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29382 · COPC/831/2026
2. The matter was listed on 16.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General had sought a day’s time to have instructions. Today, he has placed on record instructions dated 16.07.2026 along with other subsequent orders, whereby the Deputy Director, School (Elementary) Education, Bilaspur, H.P. h…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/13914/2026
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 07.11.2025 passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-dat…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11678/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29356 · CWP/6699/2026
2 2026:HHC:29356 CWP No. 6699 of 2026 remedy, as permissible under law, if so desired and required. Prayer has not been opposed. 2. In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 1…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
CMP/17002/2026
Application stands disposed of. CWP No. 5317 of 2024 Reply stands filed. Rejoinder thereto be filed within two weeks. List for consideration on 17.08.2026. CMP No. 8852 of 2024 Heard. In order dated 10.04.2026 [Annexure A-2] passed in Civil Appeal No.4716 of 2026, titled Income Tax Officer v. Tej Partap Singh, the Apex…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11668/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1153/2026
I. The petitioner will join the investigation as and when directed to do so. II. The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever. III. The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of th…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29358 · CWP/7209/2026
2 2026:HHC:29358 CWP No. 7209 of 2026 as permissible under law, if so desired and required. Prayer has not been opposed. 2. In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 17th July,…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11743/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11688/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/17025/2026
CMP No.17025 of 2026 The present application has been moved on behalf of applicants Shakuntala Devi and Sonu, who are the legal representatives of appellant Desh Raj, in FAO No. 1 of 2019, which was decided by this Court, vide judgment dated 10.07.2025. The present application, has been filed, for release of the amount…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/16151/2026
Madan Lal vs Shammi & Ors. CMPMO No.549 of 2024 17.07.2026 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.S Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. CMP No.16151 of 2026 Request made by the Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan, H.P for extension of time to decide the…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11640/2026
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 17, 2026 (Vinod)…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11733/2026
2. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondent-Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in this petition shall be subject to the right of the State to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra). Ordered accordingly. …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CRMPM/1194/2026
3. Close scrutiny of record made available to this Court reveals that on 18.04.2026 at 05:15 PM, Police, after having received secret information that person namely Tapender Singh, who has a grocery shop at Kolar, indulges in illegal sale of prohibited drugs and in case his shop is raided, huge quantity of contraband c…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/17224/2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, submitted that she doesn't intend to file any reply to the present applications and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4, namely, Anjana Devi, Ajay Kumar and Vishal Singh, have now attained the age of majori…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CR.R/582/2025
and pay compensation to the tune of Rs.2,10,000/- to respondents No.1 to 4-complainants (hereinafter ‘complainants’). 2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings as well as other material adduced on record are that complainants filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act in the competent court …
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11675/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11725/2026
3. This petition is thus disposed of with the observation that the directions passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra), shall mutatis mutandis be read to have been passed in this petition also. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goe…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29382 · COPC/831/2026
2. The matter was listed on 16.07.2026 and on the said date, the learned Additional Advocate General had sought a day’s time to have instructions. Today, he has placed on record instructions dated 16.07.2026 along with other subsequent orders, whereby the Deputy Director, School (Elementary) Education, Bilaspur, H.P. h…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CMP/13914/2026
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 07.11.2025 passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-dat…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
CWP/11678/2026
?…
Himachal Pradesh High Court17 Jul 2026Full text
2026:HHC:29356 · CWP/6699/2026
2 2026:HHC:29356 CWP No. 6699 of 2026 remedy, as permissible under law, if so desired and required. Prayer has not been opposed. 2. In view of above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 1…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis