Law on Tips. A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.
© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.
Subscribe Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.
+
Refine CourtAll courts Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (40,857) Supreme Court of India (12,705) Madras High Court (2,258) Karnataka High Court (1,440) Punjab & Haryana High Court (1,387) Calcutta High Court (1,307) Orissa High Court (1,156) Bombay High Court (1,131) Patna High Court (1,103) Chhattisgarh High Court (1,028) Himachal Pradesh High Court (939) Delhi High Court (840) Allahabad High Court (641) Jharkhand High Court (641) Andhra Pradesh High Court (610) Gauhati High Court (511) Rajasthan High Court (435) Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court (336) Uttarakhand High Court (284) Telangana High Court (193) Gujarat High Court (189) Manipur High Court (104) Central Administrative Tribunal (74) Meghalaya High Court (63) Tripura High Court (51) Kerala High Court (7)
2 judgments for “(1978) 1 SCC 248” SortMost relevant Newest first Oldest first Calcutta High Court · 16 Sep 2026 · Full text
FMA/898/2020
law of the land but supplement it. …” 33. In Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India reported in 1978 [1 ] SCC 248 / AIR 1978 SC 597, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia, observed: “It is well established that … take punitive or damaging action.” 34. In Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India, reported in (1981) 1
+
Refine CourtAll courts Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (40,857) Supreme Court of India (12,705) Madras High Court (2,258) Karnataka High Court (1,440) Punjab & Haryana High Court (1,387) Calcutta High Court (1,307) Orissa High Court (1,156) Bombay High Court (1,131) Patna High Court (1,103) Chhattisgarh High Court (1,028) Himachal Pradesh High Court (939) Delhi High Court (840) Allahabad High Court (641) Jharkhand High Court (641) Andhra Pradesh High Court (610) Gauhati High Court (511) Rajasthan High Court (435) Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court (336) Uttarakhand High Court (284) Telangana High Court (193) Gujarat High Court (189) Manipur High Court (104) Central Administrative Tribunal (74) Meghalaya High Court (63) Tripura High Court (51) Kerala High Court (7)
2 judgments for “(1978) 1 SCC 248” SortMost relevant Newest first Oldest first Calcutta High Court · 16 Sep 2026 · Full text
FMA/898/2020
law of the land but supplement it. …” 33. In Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India reported in 1978 [1 ] SCC 248 / AIR 1978 SC 597, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia, observed: “It is well established that … take punitive or damaging action.” 34. In Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India, reported in (1981) 1
Madhya Pradesh High Court (5)
Privy Council (5)
Sikkim High Court (5)
GST Appellate Tribunal (3)
Court of Appeal in Chancery (1)
Court of Appeal of England and Wales (1)
High Court of Calcutta (1)
House of Lords (1)
National Company Law Tribunal (1)
ActAny Act The Constitution of India (118) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (38) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (36) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (23) The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (19) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (17) The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (16) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (16) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (14) The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (13) The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (11) The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (8) The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (6) The Companies Act, 2013 (5) The Delhi High Court Act, 1966 (2) The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (1) The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (1) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (1) The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1)
Section or Article
Judge
Search tips Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248 , AIR 1973 SC 1461 . Name a provision: 302 IPC , Section 41A CrPC , Article 21 . Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare" . OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory .Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven.
SCC
664, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia, observed: “… if the statute conferring the power is silent with regard
Calcutta High Court · 10 Jul 2026 · Full text
CRR/29/2026
which different guidelines has been set. Reference may be made to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India [(1978 ) 1 SCC 248 ], Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak [(1992) 1 SCC 225]. 15. Coming to the case in hand
Matched in judgment text
Madhya Pradesh High Court (5)
Privy Council (5)
Sikkim High Court (5)
GST Appellate Tribunal (3)
Court of Appeal in Chancery (1)
Court of Appeal of England and Wales (1)
High Court of Calcutta (1)
House of Lords (1)
National Company Law Tribunal (1)
ActAny Act The Constitution of India (118) The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (38) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (36) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (23) The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (19) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (17) The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (16) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (16) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (14) The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (13) The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (11) The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (8) The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (6) The Companies Act, 2013 (5) The Delhi High Court Act, 1966 (2) The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (1) The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (1) The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (1) The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (1)
Section or Article
Judge
Search tips Citations work in any format: (1978) 1 SCC 248 , AIR 1973 SC 1461 . Name a provision: 302 IPC , Section 41A CrPC , Article 21 . Quotes for a phrase: "rarest of rare" . OR for alternatives, a minus sign to exclude: bail -anticipatory .Small spelling mistakes in case names are forgiven.
SCC
664, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia, observed: “… if the statute conferring the power is silent with regard
Calcutta High Court · 10 Jul 2026 · Full text
CRR/29/2026
which different guidelines has been set. Reference may be made to Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India [(1978 ) 1 SCC 248 ], Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak [(1992) 1 SCC 225]. 15. Coming to the case in hand
Matched in judgment text