⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 57
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:12152-DB · WP/716/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. S. D. Sahoo, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. N. R. Tripathi, APP for State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 11/09/20…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
101–120 · Page 6 of 57
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:12152-DB · WP/716/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. S. D. Sahoo, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. N. R. Tripathi, APP for State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 11/09/20…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
IA/13956/2023
3. In view of the same, Interim Applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 Iresh…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:37648-DB · WP/4094/2021
Part Particulars Paragraph Nos. I Preface 3 II Facts 4 to 17 III Reply Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No.1-VVMC 18 to 19 IV Orders passed by the Court on the present proceedings 20 to 22 V Submissions on behalf of the Petitioners 23 to 26 VI Submissions on behalf of the Respondents 27 to 28 VII Analysis 29 to 44 VII…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10620/2026
ca10620.26- -2- I. Whether Exh.65 sell deed of the suit property is valid agreement to sell? II. Whether the trial court and the first appellate court erred in ignoring sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act? 3. Admit. Call for record and proceedings. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 09.10.2026. 4.…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
APPA/1734/2017
301.APP 1734-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.638 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1734 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2018 Sachin Manohar Khambe @ Lucky … Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra And Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL NO.433 OF 2015 …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
MCA/174/2024
RAGHOBA SAZU SINAI NADKARNI (DECEASED) AND 22 ORS. … APPLICANTS Versus GOVERNMENT OF GOA THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 9 ORS. … RESPONDENTS Mr Yash Kunde, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr P. Arolkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED: 11th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : 1. As …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
AO/930/2026
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.26392 OF 2026 Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, B/2, Mahalaxmi Chambers, 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Mumbai-400026 through Authorized Representative MrDinkar Nigam Appellant versus 1. Mahalakshmi Enterprises, Survey No.351/1, Ground Floor, Corporation Door No.2 By-pass road, Avaniyapur…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42391 · CA/10656/2026
2. In view of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, the claimants/applicants are allowed to withdraw entire deposited amount with accrued interest by the Acquiring Body subject to furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 3. Civil Applications stand disposed of. 4…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10520/2026
2. Perused the application. Heard learned advocates for both ca10520.26 -2- sides. Considering the fact that the appeal was dismissed on 6.7.2006 and therefore, learned advocate for the cross objectors submitted that the since the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution, learned advocate for the respondents-cross …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42378 · CA/10650/2026
2. In view of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, the claimants/applicants are allowed to withdraw entire deposited amount with accrued interest by the Acquiring Body subject to furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 3. Civil Applications stand disposed of. 4…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1905/2026
14-WP.1905.2026.doc Salunke IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2026 Ramesh Purshottam Sakhare & Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Director, Town Planning and Valuation } Department & Ors. } Respondents JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed byJAYANT VISHWANA…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10668/2026
2 951 CA 10668 OF 2026 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay caused in filing the application stands condoned. The order passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is hereby quashed and set aside. 3. The First Appeal and Civil Application are restored to their origin…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1749/2026
4. In State of Harayana vs Bhajan Lal1 the Supreme Court laid down model categories and guidelines in paragraph No. 102 of the said judgment in which the FIRs can be quashed. The Supreme Court has further asserted that power under Section 482 is an acknowledgment of "powers inherent" and not the source of powers additi…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
FA/2274/2025
1. The present First Appeal is filed by the Appellant, being aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 29th April 2017 passed by the learned Bombay City Civil Court in City Civil Court Suit No. 7708 of 2000, whereby the following order came to be passed: “ORDER 1. The Suit No. 7708 of 2008 (H.C. Suit No. 164 of 2000)…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
REVN/346/2004
23-REVN-346-2004.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAFNADAF Date: 2026.09.11 19:52:34 +0530 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 346 OF 2004 Smt. Urvi Vithal Thakkar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respo…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
IA/427/2026
1. By this petition, the petitioner, a secured creditor, is seeking to quash the auction sale dated 7th April 2018 conducted by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 with respect to the sale of the parcel of land bearing Survey No. 43/1/B. Inter alia, the petitioner is also seeking directions to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to restore th…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
APEAL/949/2009
901-APEAL-949-2009 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 949 OF 2009 Jyoti Jayprakash Patil ..… Appellant VERSUS Balaso Tukaram Aitwade & Anr ..… Respondents ... Mr. Rahul Kasbekar a/w Mr. Amol A. Kanaki, Advocates for Appellant.…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5610/2024
2. In view of this, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, instant Writ Petition is disposed of as Page 1 of 2 11th September 2026 940-WP(C)-5610.2024 W CP(C)-286-2024.ODT withdrawn. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2024 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Specia…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CP/286/2024
2. In view of this, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, instant Writ Petition is disposed of as Page 1 of 2 11th September 2026 940-WP(C)-5610.2024 W CP(C)-286-2024.ODT withdrawn. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2024 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Specia…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2324/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2324 OF 2026 Vijay Shripad Kale & anr. .Petitioners Vs. ANAND The Senior Inspector of Police, Economic .Respondents SUDHAKAR SUDAME Offences Wing, Banking – 2 & ors Digitally signed by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME WITH Date: 2026.09.19…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
IA/13956/2023
3. In view of the same, Interim Applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 Iresh…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:37648-DB · WP/4094/2021
Part Particulars Paragraph Nos. I Preface 3 II Facts 4 to 17 III Reply Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No.1-VVMC 18 to 19 IV Orders passed by the Court on the present proceedings 20 to 22 V Submissions on behalf of the Petitioners 23 to 26 VI Submissions on behalf of the Respondents 27 to 28 VII Analysis 29 to 44 VII…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10620/2026
ca10620.26- -2- I. Whether Exh.65 sell deed of the suit property is valid agreement to sell? II. Whether the trial court and the first appellate court erred in ignoring sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act? 3. Admit. Call for record and proceedings. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 09.10.2026. 4.…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
APPA/1734/2017
301.APP 1734-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.638 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1734 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2018 Sachin Manohar Khambe @ Lucky … Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra And Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL NO.433 OF 2015 …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
MCA/174/2024
RAGHOBA SAZU SINAI NADKARNI (DECEASED) AND 22 ORS. … APPLICANTS Versus GOVERNMENT OF GOA THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 9 ORS. … RESPONDENTS Mr Yash Kunde, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr P. Arolkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED: 11th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : 1. As …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
AO/930/2026
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.26392 OF 2026 Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, B/2, Mahalaxmi Chambers, 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Mumbai-400026 through Authorized Representative MrDinkar Nigam Appellant versus 1. Mahalakshmi Enterprises, Survey No.351/1, Ground Floor, Corporation Door No.2 By-pass road, Avaniyapur…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42391 · CA/10656/2026
2. In view of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, the claimants/applicants are allowed to withdraw entire deposited amount with accrued interest by the Acquiring Body subject to furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 3. Civil Applications stand disposed of. 4…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10520/2026
2. Perused the application. Heard learned advocates for both ca10520.26 -2- sides. Considering the fact that the appeal was dismissed on 6.7.2006 and therefore, learned advocate for the cross objectors submitted that the since the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution, learned advocate for the respondents-cross …
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42378 · CA/10650/2026
2. In view of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, the claimants/applicants are allowed to withdraw entire deposited amount with accrued interest by the Acquiring Body subject to furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 3. Civil Applications stand disposed of. 4…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1905/2026
14-WP.1905.2026.doc Salunke IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2026 Ramesh Purshottam Sakhare & Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Director, Town Planning and Valuation } Department & Ors. } Respondents JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed byJAYANT VISHWANA…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CA/10668/2026
2 951 CA 10668 OF 2026 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay caused in filing the application stands condoned. The order passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is hereby quashed and set aside. 3. The First Appeal and Civil Application are restored to their origin…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1749/2026
4. In State of Harayana vs Bhajan Lal1 the Supreme Court laid down model categories and guidelines in paragraph No. 102 of the said judgment in which the FIRs can be quashed. The Supreme Court has further asserted that power under Section 482 is an acknowledgment of "powers inherent" and not the source of powers additi…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
FA/2274/2025
1. The present First Appeal is filed by the Appellant, being aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 29th April 2017 passed by the learned Bombay City Civil Court in City Civil Court Suit No. 7708 of 2000, whereby the following order came to be passed: “ORDER 1. The Suit No. 7708 of 2008 (H.C. Suit No. 164 of 2000)…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
REVN/346/2004
23-REVN-346-2004.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAFNADAF Date: 2026.09.11 19:52:34 +0530 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 346 OF 2004 Smt. Urvi Vithal Thakkar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respo…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
IA/427/2026
1. By this petition, the petitioner, a secured creditor, is seeking to quash the auction sale dated 7th April 2018 conducted by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 with respect to the sale of the parcel of land bearing Survey No. 43/1/B. Inter alia, the petitioner is also seeking directions to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to restore th…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
APEAL/949/2009
901-APEAL-949-2009 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 949 OF 2009 Jyoti Jayprakash Patil ..… Appellant VERSUS Balaso Tukaram Aitwade & Anr ..… Respondents ... Mr. Rahul Kasbekar a/w Mr. Amol A. Kanaki, Advocates for Appellant.…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5610/2024
2. In view of this, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, instant Writ Petition is disposed of as Page 1 of 2 11th September 2026 940-WP(C)-5610.2024 W CP(C)-286-2024.ODT withdrawn. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2024 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Specia…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
CP/286/2024
2. In view of this, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, instant Writ Petition is disposed of as Page 1 of 2 11th September 2026 940-WP(C)-5610.2024 W CP(C)-286-2024.ODT withdrawn. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2024 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Specia…
Bombay High Court11 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2324/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2324 OF 2026 Vijay Shripad Kale & anr. .Petitioners Vs. ANAND The Senior Inspector of Police, Economic .Respondents SUDHAKAR SUDAME Offences Wing, Banking – 2 & ors Digitally signed by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME WITH Date: 2026.09.19…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis