⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
801–820 · Page 41 of 57
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:32439-FB · WP/9668/2007
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent-State submitted that for verifying father and son relationship between the petitioner–Sunil and his son-Suyash, the matter may be remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee. This was on the basis of the decision of the Na…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
801–820 · Page 41 of 57
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:32439-FB · WP/9668/2007
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent-State submitted that for verifying father and son relationship between the petitioner–Sunil and his son-Suyash, the matter may be remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee. This was on the basis of the decision of the Na…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34140 · APPLN/3292/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34140 939-ABA-682-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2026 Abdul Mukhtar Sattar Patel VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Mr. R. S. Deshmukh, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. P. P.. Rajapurkar i/by Mr. H. U. Nandre, Advocate for…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
BA/4678/2025
HEMANT H.C.SHIV 1.BA4678.25.DOC CHANDERSEN SHIV IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitally signed by HEMANT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.08.10 BAIL APPLICATION NO.4678 OF 202518:16:54 +0300 Aziz Mohd. Ismail Shaikh …. Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Fran…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2183/2024
O R D E R (I) The petition is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (A) & (B) which read as under: 2 of 4 8-2183-24-wp.doc “A) Call for relevant record and papers from the office of Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and after going through the same i) Hold and declare that Petitioner is governed by provisions of Maharashtra Civil Se…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34539-DB · WP/9413/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 5 912 to 919.WP.9413.26.odt 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. …
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CP/104/2020
2] Contempt Petitions, therefore, stand disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|2…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34152 · CA/6649/2015
2. Heard the learned Advocates for both the parties. Perused the impugned order and record. 3. Having heard the learned Advocates for both the parties and having gone through the record, the following point arises for 1 of 4 (2) 917fa1408.15.odt consideration; ‘whetherinterferenceisrequiredintheimpugnedorder’ 4. The le…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/217/2022
18. CAF 217-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 217 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15495 OF 2009 Vijay Bhagwan Lokhande & anr. ..Applicants Versus Rukhmini Pandurang Lokhande (since deceased) ..Respondents through legal heirs & ors. ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDA…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3840/2026
Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL (913) WP-3840.26.DOCX GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2026.08.06 20:54:22 lgc +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3840 OF 2026 Sandipan Subirkumar Chaudhari : Petitioner. Versus. State of Maharashtra and anr.…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34287 · CA/1630/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34287 983-ca-1630-2026.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2026 IN FAST/3617/2026 The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad VERSUS Dhondiba Maruti Mane And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhage Hemant Uttamrao AGP for R…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
FA/392/2007
4. It is clarified that interest under Section 28 will be calculated on the figure arrived at by adding the market value and interest under Section 1 (2001) 7 SCC 211 ppn 3 903.fa-395.07.doc 23(1A). After calculating interest on this addition, the claimants would not be entitled to claim interest again under Section 28…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34192-DB · WP/9502/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34192-DB ( 1 ) wp9502.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO. 9502 OF 2026 YASH RAJENDRA THAKUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER Mr. M.R. Wagh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for the respondent-State. CORAM : KISH…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10130 · SA/365/2025
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.D. Dangore, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. S.S. Sitini, Advocate for the Respondent sole. CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 6 th AUGUST, 2 026. On 7th April, 2026, this Court passed the following order : “1. The…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/9788/2026
11-28_WP_9750_26 & ors.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9750 OF 2026 Maruti Dharma Patil (deceased), Through LRs 1A. Madhukar Maruti Patil 1B. Lilabai Vishnu Tandel 1C. Gulab Ramesh Bhoir 1D. Narayan Maruti Patil 1E. Revati Aaba Patil … Petitioners vs. The Sta…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34553-DB · WP/9594/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 5 912 to 919.WP.9413.26.odt 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. …
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34113-DB · CA/7185/2020
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : 06.08.2026 1. Heard. 2. This is an application moved for condonation of delay of 246 days in filing review application. 3. The review is sought of the order dated 24.09.2019. 4. The applicant has stated the reasons for the delay in filing the review application, whi…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/1123/2005
2. By the impugned judgment and order, Learned Metropolitan Magistrate has acquitted Respondent No.1 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. It appears from the record of the Appeal that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present Appeal. The Criminal App…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/3055/2026
Registrar's orders Mr. S.S. Shingane, Advocate for Applicants/Appellants. Ms. H.S. Dhande, AGP for Respondents-State. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATED : 06th AUGUST 2026 1. Heard learned Advocate for the appellants. 2. This is an application for grant of permission to delete the name of applicant No. A viz. Smt. S…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10093-DB · WP/7579/2025
JUDGMENT (PER : NIVEDITA P. MEHTA) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner has instituted the present writ petition challenging the order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the respondent– Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrut…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34980 · WP/9246/2026
:: ORDER :: i. Writ Petition is partly allowed. ii. We direct Respondent No.2 to consider the proposal forwarded by Petitioner No.2 in respect of appointment of Petitioner No.1, without insisting on TET qualification, in view of Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others, (supra). (ABASAHEB D…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-AUG:34140 · APPLN/3292/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34140 939-ABA-682-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2026 Abdul Mukhtar Sattar Patel VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Mr. R. S. Deshmukh, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. P. P.. Rajapurkar i/by Mr. H. U. Nandre, Advocate for…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
BA/4678/2025
HEMANT H.C.SHIV 1.BA4678.25.DOC CHANDERSEN SHIV IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitally signed by HEMANT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.08.10 BAIL APPLICATION NO.4678 OF 202518:16:54 +0300 Aziz Mohd. Ismail Shaikh …. Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Fran…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2183/2024
O R D E R (I) The petition is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (A) & (B) which read as under: 2 of 4 8-2183-24-wp.doc “A) Call for relevant record and papers from the office of Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and after going through the same i) Hold and declare that Petitioner is governed by provisions of Maharashtra Civil Se…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34539-DB · WP/9413/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 5 912 to 919.WP.9413.26.odt 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. …
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CP/104/2020
2] Contempt Petitions, therefore, stand disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|2…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34152 · CA/6649/2015
2. Heard the learned Advocates for both the parties. Perused the impugned order and record. 3. Having heard the learned Advocates for both the parties and having gone through the record, the following point arises for 1 of 4 (2) 917fa1408.15.odt consideration; ‘whetherinterferenceisrequiredintheimpugnedorder’ 4. The le…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/217/2022
18. CAF 217-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 217 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15495 OF 2009 Vijay Bhagwan Lokhande & anr. ..Applicants Versus Rukhmini Pandurang Lokhande (since deceased) ..Respondents through legal heirs & ors. ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDA…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/3840/2026
Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL (913) WP-3840.26.DOCX GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2026.08.06 20:54:22 lgc +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3840 OF 2026 Sandipan Subirkumar Chaudhari : Petitioner. Versus. State of Maharashtra and anr.…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34287 · CA/1630/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34287 983-ca-1630-2026.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2026 IN FAST/3617/2026 The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad VERSUS Dhondiba Maruti Mane And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhage Hemant Uttamrao AGP for R…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
FA/392/2007
4. It is clarified that interest under Section 28 will be calculated on the figure arrived at by adding the market value and interest under Section 1 (2001) 7 SCC 211 ppn 3 903.fa-395.07.doc 23(1A). After calculating interest on this addition, the claimants would not be entitled to claim interest again under Section 28…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34192-DB · WP/9502/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:34192-DB ( 1 ) wp9502.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO. 9502 OF 2026 YASH RAJENDRA THAKUR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER Mr. M.R. Wagh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for the respondent-State. CORAM : KISH…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10130 · SA/365/2025
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.D. Dangore, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. S.S. Sitini, Advocate for the Respondent sole. CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 6 th AUGUST, 2 026. On 7th April, 2026, this Court passed the following order : “1. The…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
WP/9788/2026
11-28_WP_9750_26 & ors.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9750 OF 2026 Maruti Dharma Patil (deceased), Through LRs 1A. Madhukar Maruti Patil 1B. Lilabai Vishnu Tandel 1C. Gulab Ramesh Bhoir 1D. Narayan Maruti Patil 1E. Revati Aaba Patil … Petitioners vs. The Sta…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34553-DB · WP/9594/2026
2. Reliance is also placed on order dated 18th March, 2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Bombay in Writ Petition No. 15662 of 2025. 5 912 to 919.WP.9413.26.odt 3. For the reasons stated in the above mentioned orders, the Writ Petitions are partly allowed with following directions: a. …
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34113-DB · CA/7185/2020
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : 06.08.2026 1. Heard. 2. This is an application moved for condonation of delay of 246 days in filing review application. 3. The review is sought of the order dated 24.09.2019. 4. The applicant has stated the reasons for the delay in filing the review application, whi…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
APEAL/1123/2005
2. By the impugned judgment and order, Learned Metropolitan Magistrate has acquitted Respondent No.1 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. It appears from the record of the Appeal that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present Appeal. The Criminal App…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
CAF/3055/2026
Registrar's orders Mr. S.S. Shingane, Advocate for Applicants/Appellants. Ms. H.S. Dhande, AGP for Respondents-State. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATED : 06th AUGUST 2026 1. Heard learned Advocate for the appellants. 2. This is an application for grant of permission to delete the name of applicant No. A viz. Smt. S…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:10093-DB · WP/7579/2025
JUDGMENT (PER : NIVEDITA P. MEHTA) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner has instituted the present writ petition challenging the order dated 25.01.2024 passed by the respondent– Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrut…
Bombay High Court6 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:34980 · WP/9246/2026
:: ORDER :: i. Writ Petition is partly allowed. ii. We direct Respondent No.2 to consider the proposal forwarded by Petitioner No.2 in respect of appointment of Petitioner No.1, without insisting on TET qualification, in view of Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others, (supra). (ABASAHEB D…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis