⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
461–480 · Page 24 of 57
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11245-DB · WP/4844/2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4844 of 2026 [M/s. Mehadia & Sons C & F Division, through its Partner Mr. Sharda R. Mehadia vs. Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Nagpur-II, Nagpur and ors.] ---------------------------------------------------------------…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
461–480 · Page 24 of 57
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11245-DB · WP/4844/2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4844 of 2026 [M/s. Mehadia & Sons C & F Division, through its Partner Mr. Sharda R. Mehadia vs. Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Nagpur-II, Nagpur and ors.] ---------------------------------------------------------------…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
FA/2271/2026
. Present appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in order to challenge Judgment and Decree dated 21.04.2026 passed by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur in Hindu Marriage Petition No.68/2023, which is a petition filed for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38962 · WP/8979/2015
2026:BHC-AUG:38962 89 WP No.8979.2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8979 OF 2015 HAMIDKHAN SARWARKHAN PATEL VERSUS OSMANKHAN SARWARKHAN PATEL AND OTHERS *** Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. B. R. Kedar *** CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 28th August, 2026 PER…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
ARBAP/231/2026
A) Lizum. Wangdi, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of and in connection with the Agreements referred to above; Office Address:- 205, 2nd Floor, Arcadia, NCPA Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021. Email – [email protected] B) A cop…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/10941/2025
Akash 48-WP-10941-2025.DOC indicates the entire 1003 brass earth is used on the same plot of land for levelling purposes. 3. Considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Promoters & Builders Associates v/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors1. particulary the observations made in Para 11 thereof, no penalty can…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11417 · WP/5087/2014
1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Chandrapur, dated 02.08.2014 in Appeal No.STC-12/2011, whereby the learned Tribunal set aside the termination of respondent no.1-employee, dated 31.05.2011 and directed the petitioners-management to reinstate her on he…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:35467 · WP/13446/2025
2) I have heard Mr. Parsurampuria, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners in WP. No. 13446/2025 and Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in WP. No. 10023/2026., Mr. Sakhadeo, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in WP No. 10023 of 2026 and Respondent No. 3 in WP. No. 13446 of 2025, Mr. Vishwakarma, the learned…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/60/2026
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, at the admission stage. 2. Perused the record and the judgment relied upon by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner in Rajnesh v. Neha and Anr.1 (for short “Rajnesh”). 3. The Petitioner, being …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
REVN/354/2018
“1. The crime has been registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The present Revision Application is filed by original accused No.3, challenging the order rejecting the discharge application filed by the present applicant. 2. At the request of Mr. Patil holding for the learned ad…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/9016/2025
Sameer 1 of 6 21-WP-160-2026.doc 2. Misc. Appeal No.88/2025 was iled by the Respondent Bank before the DRAT being aggrieved by the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Presiding Oicer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Pune (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DRT’), in Securitisation Application No.388/2025. The DRT, by the said o…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39543 · CA/9503/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39543 1 935.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9503 OF 2026 IN FAST/8831/2022 SHIVRAM BHAURAO BHOGADE. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY, C.S.T., MUMBAI AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant K. AGP f…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38794 · CA/9463/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:38794 1 21-CA-9463-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9463 OF 2026 IN FA/535/2019 CHAYA KAILAS JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS SUNIL RAJCHAND PANJABI AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rajendra K. Temkar Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. M. B. Sa…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
REVN/135/2026
901-Revn 94 of 2026 and ors..doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2026 VAISHALI WITH ANIL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2026 TIKAM WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2026 Digitally signed by VAISHALI WITH ANIL TIKA…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
IA/5927/2026
2/3 902 IA.5927.2026.doc father to avail access on 09.08.2026, and we directed the Respondent-wife to allow the access. The Applicant was permitted to pick up the child at 10:00 a.m. from the residence of the Respondent and drop him back at 05:00 p.m. without creating any ruckus. 2. Today, when we have kept the matter …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1755 · WPCR/359/2026
1. The Petitioner impugns Order dated 12.08.2026 passed by the Sessions Court in Sessions Case (Ors). No.3/2020 thereby rejecting his application for cancellation of proclamation and allowing application for cancellation of bail moved by prosecution. The Petitioner further seeks directions to enlarge him on bail. 2. Th…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1751 · MCA/547/2023
2. According to the Applicant, the Judgment of the District Court, having been passed on 29.08.2022, limitation in terms of Article 116 of the Limitation Act, which is 90 days, would expire on 26.11.2022 and the Appeal came to be filed on 28.11.2022. According to the learned Advocate for the Applicant, since the applic…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39965 · CA/9606/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39965 1 945.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9606 OF 2026 IN FA/616/2026 MANIK LAXIMAN TOTARE VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant Kondiram AGP for Respondent No. 3…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1729/2026
13-WP-1729-2026 (C).doc Tikam and she has not produced bank account statements. Both parties intend to lead evidence in support of their case, as impugned order was not passed on merit. Hence, I find it is a fit case to remand back for fresh hearing by giving opportunity to both the parties and I pass following order: …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2893/2025
2. In view of the statement, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Needless to clarify that the proceedings bearing R.C.C. No. 47 of 2013 have been pending before the learned Trial Court for more than 10 years, i.e. since the year 2013. Similarly, from the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bar…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
IA/4393/2023
16-IA-4393-2023 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4393 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2021 Vaijayanata Ramchandra Kadam (deceased) Sou. Tarabai Tanaji More ...Applicant VERSUS Pralhad Anna Kadam(deceased) Bhimrao Pralha…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
FA/2271/2026
. Present appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in order to challenge Judgment and Decree dated 21.04.2026 passed by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur in Hindu Marriage Petition No.68/2023, which is a petition filed for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38962 · WP/8979/2015
2026:BHC-AUG:38962 89 WP No.8979.2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8979 OF 2015 HAMIDKHAN SARWARKHAN PATEL VERSUS OSMANKHAN SARWARKHAN PATEL AND OTHERS *** Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. B. R. Kedar *** CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 28th August, 2026 PER…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
ARBAP/231/2026
A) Lizum. Wangdi, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of and in connection with the Agreements referred to above; Office Address:- 205, 2nd Floor, Arcadia, NCPA Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021. Email – [email protected] B) A cop…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/10941/2025
Akash 48-WP-10941-2025.DOC indicates the entire 1003 brass earth is used on the same plot of land for levelling purposes. 3. Considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Promoters & Builders Associates v/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors1. particulary the observations made in Para 11 thereof, no penalty can…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11417 · WP/5087/2014
1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Chandrapur, dated 02.08.2014 in Appeal No.STC-12/2011, whereby the learned Tribunal set aside the termination of respondent no.1-employee, dated 31.05.2011 and directed the petitioners-management to reinstate her on he…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:35467 · WP/13446/2025
2) I have heard Mr. Parsurampuria, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners in WP. No. 13446/2025 and Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in WP. No. 10023/2026., Mr. Sakhadeo, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in WP No. 10023 of 2026 and Respondent No. 3 in WP. No. 13446 of 2025, Mr. Vishwakarma, the learned…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/60/2026
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, at the admission stage. 2. Perused the record and the judgment relied upon by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner in Rajnesh v. Neha and Anr.1 (for short “Rajnesh”). 3. The Petitioner, being …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
REVN/354/2018
“1. The crime has been registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The present Revision Application is filed by original accused No.3, challenging the order rejecting the discharge application filed by the present applicant. 2. At the request of Mr. Patil holding for the learned ad…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/9016/2025
Sameer 1 of 6 21-WP-160-2026.doc 2. Misc. Appeal No.88/2025 was iled by the Respondent Bank before the DRAT being aggrieved by the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the Presiding Oicer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Pune (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DRT’), in Securitisation Application No.388/2025. The DRT, by the said o…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39543 · CA/9503/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39543 1 935.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9503 OF 2026 IN FAST/8831/2022 SHIVRAM BHAURAO BHOGADE. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY, C.S.T., MUMBAI AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant K. AGP f…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:38794 · CA/9463/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:38794 1 21-CA-9463-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9463 OF 2026 IN FA/535/2019 CHAYA KAILAS JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS SUNIL RAJCHAND PANJABI AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rajendra K. Temkar Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. M. B. Sa…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
REVN/135/2026
901-Revn 94 of 2026 and ors..doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2026 VAISHALI WITH ANIL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2026 TIKAM WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2026 Digitally signed by VAISHALI WITH ANIL TIKA…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
IA/5927/2026
2/3 902 IA.5927.2026.doc father to avail access on 09.08.2026, and we directed the Respondent-wife to allow the access. The Applicant was permitted to pick up the child at 10:00 a.m. from the residence of the Respondent and drop him back at 05:00 p.m. without creating any ruckus. 2. Today, when we have kept the matter …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1755 · WPCR/359/2026
1. The Petitioner impugns Order dated 12.08.2026 passed by the Sessions Court in Sessions Case (Ors). No.3/2020 thereby rejecting his application for cancellation of proclamation and allowing application for cancellation of bail moved by prosecution. The Petitioner further seeks directions to enlarge him on bail. 2. Th…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-GOA:1751 · MCA/547/2023
2. According to the Applicant, the Judgment of the District Court, having been passed on 29.08.2022, limitation in terms of Article 116 of the Limitation Act, which is 90 days, would expire on 26.11.2022 and the Appeal came to be filed on 28.11.2022. According to the learned Advocate for the Applicant, since the applic…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39965 · CA/9606/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:39965 1 945.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9606 OF 2026 IN FA/616/2026 MANIK LAXIMAN TOTARE VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shinde Chandrakant Kondiram AGP for Respondent No. 3…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/1729/2026
13-WP-1729-2026 (C).doc Tikam and she has not produced bank account statements. Both parties intend to lead evidence in support of their case, as impugned order was not passed on merit. Hence, I find it is a fit case to remand back for fresh hearing by giving opportunity to both the parties and I pass following order: …
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
WP/2893/2025
2. In view of the statement, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Needless to clarify that the proceedings bearing R.C.C. No. 47 of 2013 have been pending before the learned Trial Court for more than 10 years, i.e. since the year 2013. Similarly, from the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bar…
Bombay High Court28 Aug 2026Full text
IA/4393/2023
16-IA-4393-2023 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4393 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2021 Vaijayanata Ramchandra Kadam (deceased) Sou. Tarabai Tanaji More ...Applicant VERSUS Pralhad Anna Kadam(deceased) Bhimrao Pralha…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis