⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
341–360 · Page 18 of 57
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11558 · ABA/744/2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [ABA] NO. 744 OF 2026. Akash Lalmoham Gupta -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocat…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
341–360 · Page 18 of 57
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11558 · ABA/744/2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [ABA] NO. 744 OF 2026. Akash Lalmoham Gupta -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocat…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AS:36801 · CRA/173/2019
1. Learned counsel for the respondents, i.e. the original plaintiffs submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the consent terms is already filed in execution proceedings. He, therefore, submits that nothing survives in the civil revision application. 2. The civil revision application is disposed o…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11642 · CAO/262/2026
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.S.S.Deshpande,AdvocatefortheApplicant. Mr.H.D.Dubey,A.G.P.forNon-ApplicantNos.1to3. CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 2 nd SEPTEMBER, 2 026. By the present application, the applicant is seeking extension of time for …
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40332-DB · WP/3976/2025
(C) By issuance of writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or orders in the like nature quash and set aside the impugned G.R. dtd.6/11/2018 to the extent of petitioners herein with further directions to confer the 100% grant-in-aid towards salary and non-salary grants forthwith; and for that purpose issue nece…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2027/2021
[ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1099/2025
2. Vide order dated 1st February 2023 the Interim Application No. 375 of 2023 filed by the Applicants in Criminal Appeal No. 85 of 2023, was allowed by passing the following order: “1. to 8. … VRJ 1 915 - CRI IA - 1099 - 2025.docx 8.(i) During pendency and final disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.85 of 2023, the Applic…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
REVN/213/2025
3. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicants that the proclamation has been issued against the Applicants without following the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. Learned Sessions Judge has passed the impugned order, which does not mention about the place or time requiring the A…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40518 · WP/11517/2026
WITH 950 WRIT PETITION NO. 11402 OF 2026 Laxmi Mata Sheli Mendhi Palan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Gangadhar V Chavhan VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Principal Secretary And Others WITH 951 WRIT PETITION NO. 11403 OF 2026 Gayatri Sheli Mendhi Palan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Nana…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1253/2026
ORDER (i) Petition is allowed. (ii) Trial Court is directed to dispose of the trial as early as possible, preferably within one year after receipt of this order. (iii) Writ Petition is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Page 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39961-DB · APPLN/3046/2023
3. In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as having become infructuous. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp criapln3046.24.odt 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40369 · APPLN/2701/2019
- 2 - Advocate for the Applicants, the learned Sessions Court as well as the Trial Court has not considered the evidence in proper perspective. He submits that the prosecution tries to justify it’s case on the basis of testimony of witnesses, who have not coroborated to each other. He, therefore, submits that by going …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11571 · WP/5796/2016
1. Heard this matter with valuable assistance of Senior Counsel Shri C.S. Kaptan assisted by Shri R.S. Kalangiwale, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri C.B. Dharmadhikari, wp 5796-2016.odt 3 learned Counsel for respondents. 2. In the present matter, dispute is revolving around Section 34 of the Maharashtra Land Rev…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40091-DB · WP/11045/2026
4. Respondent No.1 is further directed to communicate the decision to the petitioner within two weeks. 2 63.doc 5. Learned advocate for petitioner undertakes to furnish copy of the Writ Petition along with the copy of this order to the concerned authority, within a period of two weeks from today. 6. Accordingly, the Wr…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/2628/2021
67-FA(ST)-92397-2020.doc Sayali Digitally signed by SAYALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYSAYALI DEEPAK UPASANIDEEPAK Date: 2026.09.01 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONUPASANI 19:51:14 +0530 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 92397 OF 2020 Executive Engineer, Nandur Madhyameshwar Project, Division, Nashik … Appellant V/s. Shiv…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/13806/2024
Digitally signed by ARUNA ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 2026.09.02 17:19:20 +0530 32.WP13806.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13806 OF 2024 Vyankatesh Maruti Pawar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents. -------…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39693 · WP/4868/2014
2026:BHC-AUG:39693 100 WP4868.2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 100 WRIT PETITION NO. 4868 OF 2014 MUKUNDA GOKUL BORSE VERSUS SUNIL LAXMAN SHINDE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. H. A. Karad h/f. Mr. Hon Ashwin V. ... CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 01.09.2026 …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CAW/1562/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. M. M. Dandekar, Advocate for applicant-respondent. Mr. A. V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for non applicant-State. Ms Kirti Satpute, Advocate for non a…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39720-DB · WP/10168/2026
8. It is made clear that, this order is passed only in the peculiar facts of this case without touching to other aspects of the matter. This order shall not be treated as precedent and shall not be cited as precedent. This order is restricted to these p…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11506-DB · WP/6764/2026
Shri. R. S. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. S. S. Jachak, Addl. G. P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATE : 1 st SEPTEMBER, 2026 . 1. Shri. Nikhil Gaikwad, learned counsel, appeared and waived service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3 - State Common Entrance Test …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2508/2018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -Shri R.S. Khobragade, Advocate for petitioners Shri Atharv Doye, Advocate h/f Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Deepali…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-AS:36801 · CRA/173/2019
1. Learned counsel for the respondents, i.e. the original plaintiffs submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the consent terms is already filed in execution proceedings. He, therefore, submits that nothing survives in the civil revision application. 2. The civil revision application is disposed o…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11642 · CAO/262/2026
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.S.S.Deshpande,AdvocatefortheApplicant. Mr.H.D.Dubey,A.G.P.forNon-ApplicantNos.1to3. CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 2 nd SEPTEMBER, 2 026. By the present application, the applicant is seeking extension of time for …
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40332-DB · WP/3976/2025
(C) By issuance of writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or orders in the like nature quash and set aside the impugned G.R. dtd.6/11/2018 to the extent of petitioners herein with further directions to confer the 100% grant-in-aid towards salary and non-salary grants forthwith; and for that purpose issue nece…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2027/2021
[ JITENDRA JAIN ] [ KISHORE C. SANT ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1099/2025
2. Vide order dated 1st February 2023 the Interim Application No. 375 of 2023 filed by the Applicants in Criminal Appeal No. 85 of 2023, was allowed by passing the following order: “1. to 8. … VRJ 1 915 - CRI IA - 1099 - 2025.docx 8.(i) During pendency and final disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.85 of 2023, the Applic…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
REVN/213/2025
3. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicants that the proclamation has been issued against the Applicants without following the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. Learned Sessions Judge has passed the impugned order, which does not mention about the place or time requiring the A…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40518 · WP/11517/2026
WITH 950 WRIT PETITION NO. 11402 OF 2026 Laxmi Mata Sheli Mendhi Palan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Gangadhar V Chavhan VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Principal Secretary And Others WITH 951 WRIT PETITION NO. 11403 OF 2026 Gayatri Sheli Mendhi Palan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Thr Its Chairman Nana…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
WP/1253/2026
ORDER (i) Petition is allowed. (ii) Trial Court is directed to dispose of the trial as early as possible, preferably within one year after receipt of this order. (iii) Writ Petition is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Page 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court2 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39961-DB · APPLN/3046/2023
3. In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as having become infructuous. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp criapln3046.24.odt 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40369 · APPLN/2701/2019
- 2 - Advocate for the Applicants, the learned Sessions Court as well as the Trial Court has not considered the evidence in proper perspective. He submits that the prosecution tries to justify it’s case on the basis of testimony of witnesses, who have not coroborated to each other. He, therefore, submits that by going …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11571 · WP/5796/2016
1. Heard this matter with valuable assistance of Senior Counsel Shri C.S. Kaptan assisted by Shri R.S. Kalangiwale, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri C.B. Dharmadhikari, wp 5796-2016.odt 3 learned Counsel for respondents. 2. In the present matter, dispute is revolving around Section 34 of the Maharashtra Land Rev…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40091-DB · WP/11045/2026
4. Respondent No.1 is further directed to communicate the decision to the petitioner within two weeks. 2 63.doc 5. Learned advocate for petitioner undertakes to furnish copy of the Writ Petition along with the copy of this order to the concerned authority, within a period of two weeks from today. 6. Accordingly, the Wr…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
IA/2628/2021
67-FA(ST)-92397-2020.doc Sayali Digitally signed by SAYALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYSAYALI DEEPAK UPASANIDEEPAK Date: 2026.09.01 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONUPASANI 19:51:14 +0530 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 92397 OF 2020 Executive Engineer, Nandur Madhyameshwar Project, Division, Nashik … Appellant V/s. Shiv…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/13806/2024
Digitally signed by ARUNA ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 2026.09.02 17:19:20 +0530 32.WP13806.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13806 OF 2024 Vyankatesh Maruti Pawar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents. -------…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39693 · WP/4868/2014
2026:BHC-AUG:39693 100 WP4868.2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 100 WRIT PETITION NO. 4868 OF 2014 MUKUNDA GOKUL BORSE VERSUS SUNIL LAXMAN SHINDE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. H. A. Karad h/f. Mr. Hon Ashwin V. ... CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 01.09.2026 …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
CAW/1562/2026
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. M. M. Dandekar, Advocate for applicant-respondent. Mr. A. V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for non applicant-State. Ms Kirti Satpute, Advocate for non a…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:39720-DB · WP/10168/2026
8. It is made clear that, this order is passed only in the peculiar facts of this case without touching to other aspects of the matter. This order shall not be treated as precedent and shall not be cited as precedent. This order is restricted to these p…
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11506-DB · WP/6764/2026
Shri. R. S. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. S. S. Jachak, Addl. G. P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATE : 1 st SEPTEMBER, 2026 . 1. Shri. Nikhil Gaikwad, learned counsel, appeared and waived service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3 - State Common Entrance Test …
Bombay High Court1 Sep 2026Full text
WP/2508/2018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -Shri R.S. Khobragade, Advocate for petitioners Shri Atharv Doye, Advocate h/f Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Deepali…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis