⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 57
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42062 · APPLN/3629/2023
(2) vide which, the applicant/husband has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent/wife and minor son. 2. The marriage between the applicant/husband and respondent No.1/wife took place on 06/06/2010. On 26/03/2012, respondent No.2/son was born. Thereafter, the dispute between the husb…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
261–280 · Page 14 of 57
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:42062 · APPLN/3629/2023
(2) vide which, the applicant/husband has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent/wife and minor son. 2. The marriage between the applicant/husband and respondent No.1/wife took place on 06/06/2010. On 26/03/2012, respondent No.2/son was born. Thereafter, the dispute between the husb…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40585-DB · CA/9979/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:40585-DB {1} 25-ca-9979-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9979 OF 2026 IN WP/3554/2024 The Competent Authority National Highway No 6 and The Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Dhule VERSUS Nilesh Dattatray Marathe And Others ... Mr. N.U. Yad…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41029 · REVN/116/2022
2. Hence, Revision Application is disposed of as infructuous as no cause of action survives. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] VishalK/909crirevn116.22 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
WP/10261/2024
2 913-wp-10261-2024 2. Mr. R. B. Bagul, learned advocate for respondent no.2 and also Mr. N. L. Chaudhari, learned advocate for respondent no.3 appearing through video conferencing submit that only due to pendency of this writ petition, respondent number 3 is deprived of his legitimate claim. 3. In view of the above, i…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41192-DB · CA/10189/2026
1. Affidavit in reply is filed by the Executive Engineer, to the Civil Application, filed by the Petitioner seeking amendment of {2} ca9763-26.doc the Writ Petition. In paragraph No. 7 of the said affidavit, following statements are made : “7. I say that, the answering respondent has considered the technical difficulty…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
APPR/128/2018
30-REVN-85-18.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2018 Shrikant Madhukar Sakhare ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharas…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
WP/4340/2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondents inally at the admission stage. 2. Impugned in the writ petition is the order dated 28th August 2026 passed by the Respondent No.2-Scrutiny Committee, invalidating the tribe claim of the Petitioner towards ‘Koli Mahadev’. Gaikwad RD …
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
COMFA/27/2026
1. Admit. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assails the ex-parte Judgment, Order and Decree dated 16th March 2026 (‘impugned Judgment’), passed by the learned Judge, City Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai in the Commercial Summary Suit No. 663 of 2024, by which the Appellant’s claim for damages against the Respondent, was rejected…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1154/2026
SAINATH, PA 2/3 2 REVW-5-26.DOC 4. Even if the said ground is taken at par, that issue touches the merits of the matter and that would not be a ground to review the order passed by this Court. Thus, there is no substance in the review petition. 5. The Review Petition stands dismissed. 6. In view of the dismissal of Rev…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/9036/2026
1/8 18-wp-1875-2026 Forest matters.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2026 Tushar Chintamani Mengale & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1879 OF 2026 Bhimsen Pandurang J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CP/56/2025
5. I have heard both learned counsel. Perused impugned judgment and order and documents produced on record. 6. In the impugned judgment the learned Judge has granted maintenance on the basis of the income of the Respondent-Husband, but there is no mention of rental income. It appears that the Respondent has deliberatel…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CA/9698/2026
1 1071.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13433 OF 2025 IN FAST/34345/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9698 OF 2026 IN FAST/34345/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13432 OF 2025 IN FAST/34345/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION, OMERGA,…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/3890/2021
Upon this aspect being brought to our notice, and a mandamus being sought in the petitions to strictly implement the N. S. Chitnis 2/16 S- 15-wp.3890.2021&3665.2022w.ia 90.doc provisions of the Act, we issued directions from time to time. One of the grievance of the petitioners was also about formulation of the mechani…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
BA/2039/2025
P.H. Jayani 910 WITH 911.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2039 of 2025 Mumtaj Abdul Jabbar Khan …. Applicant Vs. Union of India and anr. …. Respondents WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2481 of 2025 Saif Shamshad Khan …. Applicant Vs. Union of India and anr. …. …
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11742 · WP/1503/2026
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. V. A. Lohia, Advocate for the Petitioner(s). Mr. V.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE , J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11726 · WP/6785/2026
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Rahul J. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner(s). Mr. A.S. Fulzele, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent(s)/State. CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE , J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11683-DB · WP/8192/2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 8182 of 2019 [Ms. Iffat Vakil Ahmed vs. The Union of India and ors.] WITH Writ Petition No. 8183 of 2019 [Mr. Sanjay Surendrakumar Arora vs. The Union of India and ors.] WITH Writ Petition No. 8184 of 2019 [Mr. Altaf Ahmed vs. The Union…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40145 · APPLN/4630/2025
1. In this Appeal, there is challenge to the judgment and order of conviction rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad dated 19.04.2024 in Sessions Case No. 41 of 2021 (Old Sessions Case No. 29 of 2017), recording guilt of the appellants for offences under Sections 307 r/w 149, 324 r/w 149, 143 and 148 of I…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/9035/2026
1/8 18-wp-1875-2026 Forest matters.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2026 Tushar Chintamani Mengale & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1879 OF 2026 Bhimsen Pandurang J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11666 · CAO/286/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. S.S. Joshi, Counsel for the applicant. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : 3.9.2026. The applicant has filed this application for condonat…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-AUG:40585-DB · CA/9979/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:40585-DB {1} 25-ca-9979-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9979 OF 2026 IN WP/3554/2024 The Competent Authority National Highway No 6 and The Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Dhule VERSUS Nilesh Dattatray Marathe And Others ... Mr. N.U. Yad…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41029 · REVN/116/2022
2. Hence, Revision Application is disposed of as infructuous as no cause of action survives. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] VishalK/909crirevn116.22 1 of 1…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
WP/10261/2024
2 913-wp-10261-2024 2. Mr. R. B. Bagul, learned advocate for respondent no.2 and also Mr. N. L. Chaudhari, learned advocate for respondent no.3 appearing through video conferencing submit that only due to pendency of this writ petition, respondent number 3 is deprived of his legitimate claim. 3. In view of the above, i…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41192-DB · CA/10189/2026
1. Affidavit in reply is filed by the Executive Engineer, to the Civil Application, filed by the Petitioner seeking amendment of {2} ca9763-26.doc the Writ Petition. In paragraph No. 7 of the said affidavit, following statements are made : “7. I say that, the answering respondent has considered the technical difficulty…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
APPR/128/2018
30-REVN-85-18.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2018 Shrikant Madhukar Sakhare ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharas…
Bombay High Court4 Sep 2026Full text
WP/4340/2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondents inally at the admission stage. 2. Impugned in the writ petition is the order dated 28th August 2026 passed by the Respondent No.2-Scrutiny Committee, invalidating the tribe claim of the Petitioner towards ‘Koli Mahadev’. Gaikwad RD …
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
COMFA/27/2026
1. Admit. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assails the ex-parte Judgment, Order and Decree dated 16th March 2026 (‘impugned Judgment’), passed by the learned Judge, City Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai in the Commercial Summary Suit No. 663 of 2024, by which the Appellant’s claim for damages against the Respondent, was rejected…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
IA/1154/2026
SAINATH, PA 2/3 2 REVW-5-26.DOC 4. Even if the said ground is taken at par, that issue touches the merits of the matter and that would not be a ground to review the order passed by this Court. Thus, there is no substance in the review petition. 5. The Review Petition stands dismissed. 6. In view of the dismissal of Rev…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/9036/2026
1/8 18-wp-1875-2026 Forest matters.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2026 Tushar Chintamani Mengale & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1879 OF 2026 Bhimsen Pandurang J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CP/56/2025
5. I have heard both learned counsel. Perused impugned judgment and order and documents produced on record. 6. In the impugned judgment the learned Judge has granted maintenance on the basis of the income of the Respondent-Husband, but there is no mention of rental income. It appears that the Respondent has deliberatel…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
CA/9698/2026
1 1071.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13433 OF 2025 IN FAST/34345/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9698 OF 2026 IN FAST/34345/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13432 OF 2025 IN FAST/34345/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIVISION, OMERGA,…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/3890/2021
Upon this aspect being brought to our notice, and a mandamus being sought in the petitions to strictly implement the N. S. Chitnis 2/16 S- 15-wp.3890.2021&3665.2022w.ia 90.doc provisions of the Act, we issued directions from time to time. One of the grievance of the petitioners was also about formulation of the mechani…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
BA/2039/2025
P.H. Jayani 910 WITH 911.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2039 of 2025 Mumtaj Abdul Jabbar Khan …. Applicant Vs. Union of India and anr. …. Respondents WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2481 of 2025 Saif Shamshad Khan …. Applicant Vs. Union of India and anr. …. …
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11742 · WP/1503/2026
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. V. A. Lohia, Advocate for the Petitioner(s). Mr. V.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE , J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11726 · WP/6785/2026
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Rahul J. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner(s). Mr. A.S. Fulzele, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent(s)/State. CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE , J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11683-DB · WP/8192/2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 8182 of 2019 [Ms. Iffat Vakil Ahmed vs. The Union of India and ors.] WITH Writ Petition No. 8183 of 2019 [Mr. Sanjay Surendrakumar Arora vs. The Union of India and ors.] WITH Writ Petition No. 8184 of 2019 [Mr. Altaf Ahmed vs. The Union…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:40145 · APPLN/4630/2025
1. In this Appeal, there is challenge to the judgment and order of conviction rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambad dated 19.04.2024 in Sessions Case No. 41 of 2021 (Old Sessions Case No. 29 of 2017), recording guilt of the appellants for offences under Sections 307 r/w 149, 324 r/w 149, 143 and 148 of I…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
WP/9035/2026
1/8 18-wp-1875-2026 Forest matters.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2026 Tushar Chintamani Mengale & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH (SR. NO. 18) WRIT PETITION NO. 1879 OF 2026 Bhimsen Pandurang J…
Bombay High Court3 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11666 · CAO/286/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr. S.S. Joshi, Counsel for the applicant. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : 3.9.2026. The applicant has filed this application for condonat…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis