⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 57
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/7012/2026
6-ia-7012-2026.doc Shabnoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7012 OF 2026 IN SHABNOOR WRIT PETITION NO.1938 OF 2020 AYUB PATHAN Digitally signed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. … Applicant SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN In the matter between: Date: 2026.09.07 16:24…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
221–240 · Page 12 of 57
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/7012/2026
6-ia-7012-2026.doc Shabnoor IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7012 OF 2026 IN SHABNOOR WRIT PETITION NO.1938 OF 2020 AYUB PATHAN Digitally signed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. … Applicant SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN In the matter between: Date: 2026.09.07 16:24…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41925 · CA/5600/2013
4. In the month of April 2026 the advocate for the applicants informed the applicants that in other first appeals this honourable court has awarded market value at the rate of Rs. 123 per sq ft. The applicant's land is also acquired by the same notification for the same purpose as in those first appeals. On the ground …
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/2011/2019
Digitally signed by 1/2 28-IA-2011-2019 (OS).DOC VAIBHAV VAIBHAV NAMDEV NAMDEV BARE BARE Date:2026.09.08 17:38:25 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2011 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3376 OF 2018 Ramesh Moreshwar Patil ...Applicant/Petitioner…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11990-DB · WP/1724/2025
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Sandeep Marathe, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. A. Sonak, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. B. A. Abhyankar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CP/535/2012
1. Learned advocate Mr. Paikrao holding for learned advocate Mr. Suryawanshi for the petitioner, submits that the order under contempt was passed in Writ Petition No. 283 of 2012 and now the writ petition itself is disposed of. 2. Hence, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is disposed of. (VAISHALI P…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41920 · FA/687/2010
2 Senior Division, Osmanabad in LAR Nos. 487/1994, 507/1994, 492/1994 and 486/1994, whereby the learned reference court has refused to enhance the compensation to the extent claimed by the claimants. 3. The land of the claimant in LAR No. 486/1994 admeasuring 1 H. 40 R. from Gat/Survey No. 16/3 and 5 R. from Gat/Survey…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
APPLN/3418/2026
contacting any other, he broke his Cell Phone. Due to the assault caused by the applicants, the informant sustained injury to his head and forearm and it is alleged that the eye witness, who came to rescue the informant, was also assaulted on his forearm. The informant was then carried to the hospital and in the hospit…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
BA/3495/2026
4. Mr. Pathan, learned Advocate for Applicant would submit that Applicant was arrested at 1:50 a.m. however grounds of arrest were furnished to Applicant only at 8:00 a.m therefore Applicant’s arrest was gross, brazen and an unconstitutional deprivation of his fundamental rights as Respondent failed to comply with safe…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11820 · ABA/758/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicant. Shri H.R. Dhumale, APP for the non-applicant/State. CORAM: M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : 07.09.2026. Heard.…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41522 · WP/11857/2026
3. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ( SMT. MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE, J.) mkd/- 1/1…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41319 · CA/5955/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:41319 50 CA5955.2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5955 OF 2026 IN FAST/14973/2026 RUSHIKESH DEVIDAS PAWAR VERSUS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC DHULE DHULE DEPOT ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. V. Gavhane h/.f Mr. Pramod C. Mayure ... CORAM : S…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5086/2025
sbw 6-wp-5086-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5086 OF 2025 Sai Education Society … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents Mr. J.S.Kini a/w Mr. Aum Kini and Mr. Parth Kini i/by Ms. Sapna Krishnappa for the Petitioner. Mr. Ashish I. Sa…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/7333/2026
58-wp 7333-26.doc have been violated, there is no consideration of any of the contentions of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents tried to point out that the impugned order is a reasoned order and has been passed after taking into consideration all the materials. 4. On perusal of the impugned order, w…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11835-DB · WP/7083/2026
Mr N.D. Jambhule, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr A.A. Madiwale, AGP for the respondent/State. Mr. Nikhil Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 07.09.2026. By this petition, the petitioner has made a limited prayer seeking direction to respondent No.1-T…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
APEAL/823/2007
2. By the impugned order, the learned Magistrate has dismissed the complaint filed by the present appellants for want of prosecution and acquitted respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. This appeal is pending since 2007 and no steps are taken to s…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41220 · WP/1160/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:41220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1160 OF 2026 SUBHASH SHAKHARAM SHEJWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Avinash Rangnathrao Salve, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JO…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/572/2021
12 Cri.WP-572.2021.odt the petitioner, and therefore, nothing is remained in this petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by pointing out some portion of the aforesaid order submits that it was open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps for the prosecution. However, it is only an opinion expressed by th…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5966/2016
1 20-wp-5966-2016.doc 4. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of. No costs. 5. The Revisional Authority shall decide the revision application within a period of six months from today, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/8756/2025
35-IA-8756-2025=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8756 OF 2025 IN Digitally FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17704 OF 2025 signed by UDAY UDAYSHIVAJI SHIVAJI JAGTAP Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mumbai … Applicant JAGTAP Date:2026.09…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41175 · APPLN/296/2026
1. This Criminal Revision Application has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the CrPC') challenging the judgment and order dated 27.10.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Jalna, in Criminal Appeal No.30/ 2022, whereby the learn…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
2026:BHC-AUG:41925 · CA/5600/2013
4. In the month of April 2026 the advocate for the applicants informed the applicants that in other first appeals this honourable court has awarded market value at the rate of Rs. 123 per sq ft. The applicant's land is also acquired by the same notification for the same purpose as in those first appeals. On the ground …
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/2011/2019
Digitally signed by 1/2 28-IA-2011-2019 (OS).DOC VAIBHAV VAIBHAV NAMDEV NAMDEV BARE BARE Date:2026.09.08 17:38:25 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2011 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3376 OF 2018 Ramesh Moreshwar Patil ...Applicant/Petitioner…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11990-DB · WP/1724/2025
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Sandeep Marathe, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. A. Sonak, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. B. A. Abhyankar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
CP/535/2012
1. Learned advocate Mr. Paikrao holding for learned advocate Mr. Suryawanshi for the petitioner, submits that the order under contempt was passed in Writ Petition No. 283 of 2012 and now the writ petition itself is disposed of. 2. Hence, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is disposed of. (VAISHALI P…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41920 · FA/687/2010
2 Senior Division, Osmanabad in LAR Nos. 487/1994, 507/1994, 492/1994 and 486/1994, whereby the learned reference court has refused to enhance the compensation to the extent claimed by the claimants. 3. The land of the claimant in LAR No. 486/1994 admeasuring 1 H. 40 R. from Gat/Survey No. 16/3 and 5 R. from Gat/Survey…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
APPLN/3418/2026
contacting any other, he broke his Cell Phone. Due to the assault caused by the applicants, the informant sustained injury to his head and forearm and it is alleged that the eye witness, who came to rescue the informant, was also assaulted on his forearm. The informant was then carried to the hospital and in the hospit…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
BA/3495/2026
4. Mr. Pathan, learned Advocate for Applicant would submit that Applicant was arrested at 1:50 a.m. however grounds of arrest were furnished to Applicant only at 8:00 a.m therefore Applicant’s arrest was gross, brazen and an unconstitutional deprivation of his fundamental rights as Respondent failed to comply with safe…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11820 · ABA/758/2026
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Shri A.C. Jaltare, Advocate for the applicant. Shri H.R. Dhumale, APP for the non-applicant/State. CORAM: M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : 07.09.2026. Heard.…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41522 · WP/11857/2026
3. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ( SMT. MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE, J.) mkd/- 1/1…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41319 · CA/5955/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:41319 50 CA5955.2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5955 OF 2026 IN FAST/14973/2026 RUSHIKESH DEVIDAS PAWAR VERSUS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC DHULE DHULE DEPOT ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. V. Gavhane h/.f Mr. Pramod C. Mayure ... CORAM : S…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5086/2025
sbw 6-wp-5086-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5086 OF 2025 Sai Education Society … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents Mr. J.S.Kini a/w Mr. Aum Kini and Mr. Parth Kini i/by Ms. Sapna Krishnappa for the Petitioner. Mr. Ashish I. Sa…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/7333/2026
58-wp 7333-26.doc have been violated, there is no consideration of any of the contentions of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents tried to point out that the impugned order is a reasoned order and has been passed after taking into consideration all the materials. 4. On perusal of the impugned order, w…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-NAG:11835-DB · WP/7083/2026
Mr N.D. Jambhule, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr A.A. Madiwale, AGP for the respondent/State. Mr. Nikhil Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 07.09.2026. By this petition, the petitioner has made a limited prayer seeking direction to respondent No.1-T…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
APEAL/823/2007
2. By the impugned order, the learned Magistrate has dismissed the complaint filed by the present appellants for want of prosecution and acquitted respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. This appeal is pending since 2007 and no steps are taken to s…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41220 · WP/1160/2026
2026:BHC-AUG:41220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1160 OF 2026 SUBHASH SHAKHARAM SHEJWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Avinash Rangnathrao Salve, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JO…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/572/2021
12 Cri.WP-572.2021.odt the petitioner, and therefore, nothing is remained in this petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by pointing out some portion of the aforesaid order submits that it was open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps for the prosecution. However, it is only an opinion expressed by th…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
WP/5966/2016
1 20-wp-5966-2016.doc 4. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of. No costs. 5. The Revisional Authority shall decide the revision application within a period of six months from today, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
IA/8756/2025
35-IA-8756-2025=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8756 OF 2025 IN Digitally FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17704 OF 2025 signed by UDAY UDAYSHIVAJI SHIVAJI JAGTAP Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mumbai … Applicant JAGTAP Date:2026.09…
Bombay High Court7 Sep 2026Full text
2026:BHC-AUG:41175 · APPLN/296/2026
1. This Criminal Revision Application has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the CrPC') challenging the judgment and order dated 27.10.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Jalna, in Criminal Appeal No.30/ 2022, whereby the learn…
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis