⚖
Loading…
Loading…
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2017) 9 SCC 1
Manifest arbitrariness is an independent constitutional ground to invalidate primary and subordinate legislation under Article 14. Triple Talaq (Talaq-e-biddat) struck down as manifestly arbitrary.
Indian case law by case name, citation, provision or legal issue, with the case summary, the judgment text where we hold it and the provisions it applies.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2017) 9 SCC 1
Manifest arbitrariness is an independent constitutional ground to invalidate primary and subordinate legislation under Article 14. Triple Talaq (Talaq-e-biddat) struck down as manifestly arbitrary.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2017) 10 SCC 1
Unanimously affirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right emanating from Article 21 and the right to personal liberty, protecting spatial, decisional, and informational privacy.
Supreme Court of India2007Cited by 1
(2007) 2 SCC 1
Laws included in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 do not enjoy blanket immunity; subject to judicial review against the basic structure test and Part III golden triangle.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(1994) 3 SCC 1
Secularism is an essential feature of the Basic Structure of the Constitution; mixing politics with religion is impermissible and justifies imposition of President's Rule under Article 356.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(1980) 3 SCC 625
Limited amending power is itself basic; clauses excluding judicial review of amendments struck down; harmony between Parts III and IV.
Supreme Court of India1975
1975 Supp SCC 1
Clause (4) of Article 329A struck down; democracy, rule of law, equality, free and fair elections, and power of judicial review are inviolable components of the Basic Structure.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 2
(1973) 4 SCC 225
Established Basic Structure Doctrine; Parliament has wide power to amend any part of the Constitution under Article 368, but cannot alter, damage, or destroy its Basic Structure.
Supreme Court of India1967
AIR 1967 SC 1643
Held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights (prospective overruling); later overruled by Kesavananda Bharati.
Supreme Court of India1965
(1965) 1 SCR 933
Seventeenth Amendment upheld; forerunner to Golaknath on amendability of rights.
Supreme Court of India1951
(1951) SCR 89
First Amendment upheld; Parliament could amend fundamental rights (later overruled on this point).
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(2017) 10 SCC 1
Unanimously affirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right emanating from Article 21 and the right to personal liberty, protecting spatial, decisional, and informational privacy.
Supreme Court of India2007Cited by 1
(2007) 2 SCC 1
Laws included in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 do not enjoy blanket immunity; subject to judicial review against the basic structure test and Part III golden triangle.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(1994) 3 SCC 1
Secularism is an essential feature of the Basic Structure of the Constitution; mixing politics with religion is impermissible and justifies imposition of President's Rule under Article 356.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 1
(1980) 3 SCC 625
Limited amending power is itself basic; clauses excluding judicial review of amendments struck down; harmony between Parts III and IV.
Supreme Court of India1975
1975 Supp SCC 1
Clause (4) of Article 329A struck down; democracy, rule of law, equality, free and fair elections, and power of judicial review are inviolable components of the Basic Structure.
Supreme Court of Indiaundefined undefined NaNFull textCited by 2
(1973) 4 SCC 225
Established Basic Structure Doctrine; Parliament has wide power to amend any part of the Constitution under Article 368, but cannot alter, damage, or destroy its Basic Structure.
Supreme Court of India1967
AIR 1967 SC 1643
Held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights (prospective overruling); later overruled by Kesavananda Bharati.
Supreme Court of India1965
(1965) 1 SCR 933
Seventeenth Amendment upheld; forerunner to Golaknath on amendability of rights.
Supreme Court of India1951
(1951) SCR 89
First Amendment upheld; Parliament could amend fundamental rights (later overruled on this point).
Also on Law on Tips: Bare Acts · Legal news and analysis