Supreme Court of India
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
(1998) 8 SCC 1
- Decision date
- 1998
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- 2-Judge Bench
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
Alternative statutory remedy does not bar High Court writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where: (1) fundamental rights infringed, (2) natural justice violated, (3) proceedings without jurisdiction, or (4) challenge to vires.
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Shayara Bano v. Union of India · (2017) 9 SCC 1 · 2017 · 1 shared provision
- Shreya Singhal v. Union of India · (2015) 5 SCC 1 · 2015 · 1 shared provision
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India · (1994) 3 SCC 1 · 1994 · 1 shared provision
- Indra Sawhney v. Union of India · 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217 · 1992 · 1 shared provision
- M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case) · (1987) 1 SCC 395 · 1986 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.