ovo Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 34-Complaint Number:-90/२444/06/409950/2023 Rajendra Pratap Singh v. Sunshine Infrawell Private Limited Date:- 28/2/2023 The complainant's suit was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Ms. Shalu Sharma present on behalf of the complainant and learned counsel Mr. Ritul Tandon present on behalf of the respondent. Before the Bench, it was stated by the complainant that the builder project in question is not registered with RERA. The arguments of the complainant were heard and all records/evidence available on the file were perused. From the perusal of all evidence available on the file, it is known that the builder/project in question " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" is not registered under RERA at the ad4M time. In this regard, it would be appropriate to mention paragraph-33 of the judgment delivered on date 44.44. 2024 4 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6745-6749 / 2024 "M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. and others":-

"33. Under Chapter Il of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to_take its place under subSection () of Section 3, it was made statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects."

From the above observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is clear that any relief can be granted to the complainant by the Authority under the RERA Act only when the builder/project has been registered in RERA. In the matter in question, the builder/project " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" is not registered in RERA. Since the builder/project in question is not registered in " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED", the complainant's complaint in question is not maintainable under Section-34 of the RERA Act. Due to non-registration of verre builder/project " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED", jurisdiction is not available to accept the relief sought by the complainant. Looking at all facts and circumstances, there is no jurisdiction and justification to pass any order without registration under Section-48 read with aRT-34 of the Resha Act against the usa builder " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED". Therefore, the werd complaint is referred to the Legal Advisor, vo Yo RERA for further proceedings on the point of registration. bss Kv ‘ VA Harish AP (Adjudicating Officer) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

ovo भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 34-शिकायत संख्या:-90/२444/06/409950/2023 राजेंद्र प्रताप सिंह बनाम सनशाइन इन्फ्रावेल प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक:- 28/2/2023 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो कॉन्फेसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता सुश्री शालू शर्मा उपस्थित एवं विपक्षी की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री रितुल टंडन उपस्थित | पीठ के समक्ष शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा कहा गया है कि प्रश्नगत बिल्डर परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत नहीं है। शिकायतकर्ता के तर्कों को सुना गया एवं पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध समस्त अभिलेखों / साक्ष्यों का अवलोकन किया गया। पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध समस्त साक्ष्यों का अवलोकन करने से यह विदित है कि प्रश्नगत बिल्डर /परियोजना " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED"ad4M समय में रेरा के अन्तर्गत पंजीकृत नहीं है। इस सम्बन्ध में माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा सिविल अपील संख्या-6745-6749 / 2024 “मैसर्स न्यूटेक प्रोमोटर्स एंड डेवलपर्स प्रा० लि0 बनाम उ0प्र0 राज्य व अन्य” निर्णीत दिनांक 44.44. 2024 4 दिये गये निर्णय के प्रस्तर-33 का उल्लेख किया जाना समीचीन होगाः- "33. Under Chapter Il of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to_take its place under subSection () of Section 3, it was made

statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects." माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के उपरोक्त सम्प्रेक्षण से यह स्पष्ट है कि रेरा अधिनियम के अधीन प्राधिकरण द्वारा शिकायतकर्ता को कोई भी अनुतोष तभी प्रदान किया जा सकता है, जबकि बिल्डर / परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत करायी गयी हो। प्रश्नगत प्रकरण में बिल्डर ,/परियोजना " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" रेरा में पंजीकृत नहीं है।

चूंकि प्रश्नगत बिल्डर,/परियोजना " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" में पंजीकृत न होने के कारण शिकायतकर्ता की प्रश्नगत शिकायत रेरा अधिनियम की धारा-34 के अधीन ग्राह्य नहीं है। verre बिल्डर /परिय " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" में पंजीकृत न होने के कारण शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा याचित अनुतोष स्वीकार करने की अधिकारिता प्राप्त नहीं है। समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए usa बिल्डर " SUNSHINE INFRAWELL PRIVATE LIMITED" विरूद्र रेश अधिनियम की धारा-48 सपठित aRT-34 के अन्तर्गत बिना पंजीयन के कोई भी आदेश पारित करने की अधिकारिता एवं औचित्य नहीं है। अतः werd शिकायत पंजीकरण के बिन्दु पर अग्रिम कार्यवाही हेतु विधि सलाहकार, vo Yo रेरा को संदर्भित की जाती है। bss Kv ‘ VA हरीश AP (न्यायनिर्णायक अधिकारी) उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण