Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Sushila Sharma and Deepali Sharma v. Project Category-Un-Register Imperia Structures Ltd

Complaint No. NCR144/02/105819/2023

Decision date
Not recorded
Text availability
Machine-read (OCR) text, unverified
Bench
Bench 2

Source: UP RERA order

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

English translation. Machine translation from the Hindi by AI (Gemini 3.8 Flash, Antigravity), not reviewed. The original order below is the authoritative text.

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar. Hearing Bench-04A 44-Complaint No.-NCR44/02/0589/2023 Sushila Sharma and Deepali Sharma versus Imperia Structures Limited 29.03.2023 The complainant's case was presented through video conferencing. On call, learned counsel Ms. Malini appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel Shri Harsh Pratap appeared on behalf of the respondent. The complainant states that the respondent's project in question is unregistered with RERA. In this regard, in the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.-6745-6749 /202 "M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. versus State of U.P. and others", it has been clearly mentioned that :-

33. Under Chapter II of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to take its place under sub-Section () of Section 3, it was made statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects.

From the above it is clear that the provisions of the RERA Act shall apply only when the project is registered with RERA, and registration of the project is mandatory. In the case in question, the respondent's project in question is not registered with RERA. In the described situation, due to the project in question not being registered with RERA, the complainant's complaint is not maintainable under the RERA Act and the complainant is not entitled to receive any relief sought. In view of all the facts and circumstances, there is no justification for passing any order against the respondent under the RERA Act at the present time. In this matter, the Secretary, RERA, after issuing notice to both parties and on the basis of other necessary records, shall determine whether this project was required to be registered with RERA or not. Taking further action accordingly, this file be presented again with the outcome within the next 3 months. The complaint of the complainant is currently kept in abeyance. The order be uploaded on the portal. Accordingly, the file be sent to the Secretary, RERA, Uttar Pradesh. 54.0323 (Rajeev Kumar) (Chairman) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Original order

उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर | सुनवाई पीठ-04ए 44-शिकायत WITI-NCR44/02/0589/2023 सुशीला शर्मा एवं दीपाली शर्मा बनाम इम्पीरिया स्ट्रक्‍्चर्स लिमिटेड 29.03.2023 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो कॉन्फेसिंग द्वारा प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता सुश्री मालिनी उपस्थित हुईं। विपक्षी की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री हर्ष प्रताप उपस्थित हुए | शिकायतकर्ता का कहना है कि विपक्षी की प्रश्नगत परियोजना रेरा में अपंजीकृत है। इस सम्बन्ध में माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा सिविल अपील संख्या-6745-6749 /202 “ed न्यूटेक प्रोमोटर्स एंड डेवलपर्स wo feo बनाम उ0प्र0 राज्य व अन्य” में दिये गये निर्णय में स्पष्ट रूप से उल्लिखित किया गया है कि :-

33. Under Chapter II of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to take its place under _sub- Section () of Section 3, it was made statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects ay covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects.

उपरोक्त से यह स्पष्ट है कि रेरा अधिनियम के प्राविधान तभी लागू होंगे, जब परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत करायी गयी हो और परियोजना का पंजीयन कराना अनिवार्य है। प्रश्नगत प्रकरण में विपक्षी की प्रश्नगत परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत नहीं है। वर्णित स्थिति में प्रश्नगत परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत न होने के कारण शिकायतकर्ता की wert शिकायत रेरा अधिनियम के aia mea नहीं है और शिकायतकर्ता कोई याचित अनुतोष प्राप्त करने का अधिकारी नहीं है। समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए विपक्षी के विरूद्द रेश अधिनियम की ois के अन्तर्गत वर्तमान समय में कोई आदेश पारित करने का औचित्य नहीं है। इस प्रकरण में सचिव, रेरा इस बिन्दु का दोनों पक्षों को नोटिस देकर व अन्य आवश्यक अभिलेखों के आधार पर यह विनिश्चय कर लें कि an यह परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत कराई जानी अपेक्षित थी अथवा नहीं | TER अग्रेतर कार्रवाई कराकर यह पत्रावली आगामी 3 माह में पुनः परिणाम सहित प्रस्तुत की जाये। शिकायतकर्ता की शिकायत वर्तमान में Abeyance में रखी जाती है। आदेश पोर्टल पर अपलोड किया जाये। तद्नुसार पत्रावली सचिव रेरा, उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित की जाये। Aves YW. 54.0323 (राजीव कुमार) (अध्यक्ष) उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण