ovo Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar Hearing Bench-3 2-Complaint BSAM:-NCR/O7/440722/2023 Shubham Projects Private Limited versus Messrs Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited Date:- 28/42/2023 The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On call, learned advocate Mr. saat Jain [?] appeared on behalf of the complainant. Learned advocate Mr. wore wer [?] appeared on behalf of the opposite party. It was stated by the complainant before the Bench that the builder / project in question is not registered with RERA. Arguments of the complainant were heard and all documents / evidence available on the file were perused. From perusal of all evidence available on the file, it is evident that the builder / project in question "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." is not registered under RERA at present. In this regard, it would be appropriate to refer to Para-33 of the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.-6745-6749 / 2024 "Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. versus State of U.P. and others" decided on date 44.44.2024:-

"33. Under Chapter II of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to_take its place under _subSection (l) of Section 3, it was made statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects."

From the aforesaid observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is clear that any relief can be granted by the Authority to the complainant under the RERA Act only when the builder / project has been registered with RERA. In the present case, the builder / project "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." is not registered with RERA. Since the said builder / project "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." is not registered with RERA, the complainant's said complaint is not maintainable under Section-34 of the RERA Act. Due to the said builder project "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." not being registered with RERA, jurisdiction is not available to grant the relief claimed by the complainant. Considering all the facts and circumstances, there is no jurisdiction and justification to pass any order without registration under the RERA Act read with Section-34 in respect of the builder in question "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited.". Therefore, the said complaint is referred to the Legal Advisor, U.P. RERA for further action on the point of registration. £2 beso” Harish Tripathi (Adjudicating Officer) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

ovo भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर सुनवाई पीठ-3 2-शिकायत BSAM:-NCR/O7/440722/2023 शुभम प्रोजेक्ट्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड बनाम मेसर्स महावीर हनुमान डेवलपर्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड दिनांक:- 28/42/2023 शिकायतकर्ता का वाद वीडियो कॉन्फेसिंग के माध्यम से सुनवाई हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर शिकायतकर्ता की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री saat जैन उपस्थित। विपक्षी की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री wore wer उपस्थित। | पीठ के समक्ष शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा कहा गया है कि प्रश्नगत बिल्डर / परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत नहीं है। शिकायतकर्ता के cel को सुना गया एवं पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध समस्त अभिलेखों /साक्ष्यों का अवलोकन किया गया। पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध समस्त साक्ष्यों का अवलोकन करने से यह विदित है कि प्रश्नगत बिल्डर /परियोजना " M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." वर्तमान समय में रेरा के अन्तर्गत पंजीकृत नहीं है। इस सम्बन्ध में माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा सिविल अपील संख्या-6745-6749 / 2024 kn न्यूटेक प्रोमोटर्स एंड डेवलपर्स wo feo बनाम उ0प्र0 राज्य व अन्य” निर्णीत दिनांक 44.44. 2024 में दिये गये निर्णय के प्रस्तर-33 का उल्लेख किया जाना समीचीन होगा:-

"33. Under Chapter II of the Act 206, registration of real estate projects became mandatory and to make the statute applicable and to_take its place under _subSection (l) of Section 3, it was made statutory that without registering the real estate project with a real estate regulatory authority established under the Act, no promoter shall advertise, market, book, sell or offer for sale, or invite persons to purchase in any manner a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be in any real estate project but with the aid of proviso to Section 3(), it was mandated that such of the projects which are ongoing on the date of commencement of the Act and more specifically the projects to which the completion certificate has not been issued, such promoters shall be under obligation to make an application to the authority for registration of the said project within a period of three months from the date of commencement of the Act. With certain exemptions being granted to such of the projects covered by subsection (2) of Section 3 of the Act, as a consequence, all such home buyers agreements which has been executed by the parties inter se has to abide the legislative mandate in completion of their ongoing running projects."

माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के उपरोक्त सम्प्रेक्षण से यह स्पष्ट है कि रेरा अधिनियम के अधीन प्राधिकरण द्वारा शिकायतकर्ता को कोई भी अनुतोष तभी प्रदान किया जा सकता है, जबकि बिल्डर / परियोजना रेरा में पंजीकृत करायी गयी हो। प्रश्नगत प्रकरण में बिल्डर ,/“ परियोजना " M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." &T में पंजीकृत नहीं है। चूंकि WT बिल्डर / परियोजना "M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." WT में पंजीकृत न होने के कारण शिकायतकर्ता की wera शिकायत रेरा अधिनियम की धारा-34 के अधीन ग्राह्य नहीं है। wera बिल्डर परियोजना " M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." रेरा में पंजीकृत न होने के कारण शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा याचित अनुतोष स्वीकार करने की अधिकारिता प्राप्त नहीं है। समस्त तथ्यों एवं परिस्थितियों को देखते हुए प्रश्नगत बिल्डर " M/s Mahavir Hanuman Developers Private Limited." @ ffeg रेश अधिनियम की ais सपठित धारा-34 के अन्तर्गत बिना पंजीयन के कोई भी आदेश पारित करने की अधिकारिता एवं औचित्य नहीं है। अत: werd शिकायत पंजीकरण के बिन्दु पर अग्रिम कार्यवाही हेतु विधि सलाहकार, vo प्र0 रेरा को संदर्भित की जाती है। £2 beso” हरीश qe (न्यायनिर्णायक अधिकारी) उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण