qfr{qt,

qr-d, -rqr qr. rkl yg w rros q7 s-t q-{fr-mn o-{'fl ftsfr qcrtd o-{Tqr FqqT t fu G{fi-dq B+Rl-flnT fr frB-d qfif, €gil' 1tz/zoz2 e-d H-d+fl E=rrrr o{q--f, g{wrd ffi qr.fr. a-qq of TI-fr Ersq qI +lfidq o{lffr-{ur ERr gq-dr-€ uwrd ffi--f, oz.o+.zozq d 3{Teqr qTkd fuut rqT fusf,r q1urirftq Giqr frgf,( e'- "Learned counsel for respondent admits that the completion of the appellant's unit as well as other amenities and facilities will take about 7 to 8 months, it will reach to a conclusion that the , impugned order has been passed without application of mind and without appreciating the correct facts. Simultaneously we are also of the view that the respondent ought to have informed this fact during the execution proceedings and it was duty of the respondent to move an application to the Regulatory Authority for extension of time for possession on account of nun availability of OC/CC and for completion for other necessary work in the project including the unit of the appellant. ln view of the aforesaid facts that the Unit is not in a position to be offered by the respondent to the appellant and in the absence of OC/CC, no legal offer of possession can be given even in pursuance to the order of the Regulatory Authority dated 17.12.2020, We set aside the impugned order dated 23.L2.202t and remand back the matter to the Regulatory Authority to Process the execution proceedings afresh."

3t-d: urfiff ERI qI. G{fi-dq Gllq-f,-{nT gRT qrPld qreqr &'m-q fr qzT{fr qr. fid-oz &.vqer Barufudel.rfrtr qI. q6iqqT, qie I ?-qrrT uPdd fr{qr tfl REq \'{rR€ o} qTeRrd fuqr qrdr B fu Rrnqd riq-W. w/ sdErsdEr sil-qsil-q .rtwtf,*rwtf, gqETCgqETC qr.fr.qr.fr. olol tnn-ostnn-os &.& MM npt{Oi@1)zs/oz/solss/zozos/oz/sorss/zozo&-dA-d ffiffi -.,. rSISS** m{ 1 0 06 202s st fiTd o-in gBl*-d st vr-dri fu n-ai* -N,Vaue- u -,-----t"l.,^d li- be*e-