U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautam Buddha Nagar. Rectification Order Bench-04 Attendance :- Dr. Deepak Swarup Saxena, Member Attendance :- T. Venkatesh, Member Complaint Number :-- Sect-39//320932794 M/s Krishna Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Promoter) vs Anju Singh and Randeep Singh (Allottee) The present file has been submitted under Section-39 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 20:6, which provides as follows: "The Authority may, at any time within a period of two years from the date of the order made under this Act, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it, and shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by the parties: Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal has been preferred under this Act: Provided further that the Authority shall not, while rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend the substantive part of the order made under the provisions of this Act." The complainant (promoter)'s case under Section-39 was presented through video conferencing on date 06.04.2023. On call, both parties appeared. An application for amendment / review was submitted by the complainant (promoter) to the effect that zero period as force majeure be included in the order previously passed by the Bench. Arguments of both parties were heard and evidence available on record perused.

From perusal of all records and evidence filed on record, it is evident that in the said matter, the order dated 43.08.2049 passed by the Bench under Section-31 and the order dated 24.44.2022 passed under Section-63 were passed on merits. From perusal of all facts, it is clear that the application for amendment submitted by the complainant (promoter) does not fall within the ambit of Section-39 of the RERA Act. In such circumstance, it would not be proper to make any amendment in the orders passed in the said matter. Hence, the application of the complainant (promoter) is not fit to be accepted. On the basis of the stated facts, the application for amendment submitted by the complainant (promoter) is dismissed. Accordingly, the file be consigned to record. Order be uploaded on portal. (Dr. Deepak Swarup Saxena) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (T. Venkatesh) (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority

U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Regional Office, Gautambuddh Nagar. Rectification Order Bench–01 Present :– Dr. Deepak Swaroop Saxena, Member Present :– T. Venkates, Member Complaint No. :– Sect-39/1/3201932794 M/s Krishna Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Promoter) Versus Anju Singh and Randeep Singh (Allottees) The present file has been presented under Section–39 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, which provides as follows :– The Authority may, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it, within a period of two years from the date of the order made under this Act, and shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by the parties. Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal has been preferred under this Act. Provided further that the Authority shall not, while rectifying any mistake apparent from record, amend substantive part of the order passed under the provisions of this Act. The case of the complainant (promoter) under Section–39 was presented through video conferencing on 06.01.2023. On call, both parties appeared. 1 An application for amendment/review has been presented by the complainant (promoter) to the effect that a zero period be included as force majeure in the order passed earlier by the Bench. The arguments of both parties were heard and the evidence available on the file was perused.

From perusal of all the records and evidence filed on the file, it is evident that in the said matter the order dated 13.08.2019 passed by the Bench under Section–31 and the order dated 21.11.2022 passed under Section–63 were passed on merits. From perusal of all the facts, it is clear that the application for amendment given by the complainant (promoter) does not fall within the scope of Section–39 of the RERA Act. In such circumstances, it would not be proper to make any amendment in the orders passed in the said matter. Therefore, the application of the complainant (promoter) is not fit to be accepted. On the basis of the stated facts, the application for amendment given by the complainant (promoter) is rejected. Accordingly, the file be consigned to the record room. The order be uploaded on the portal. [signature] 21/02/23 T. Venkatesh (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority [signature] 21.02.23 Dr. Deepak Swaroop Saxena (Member) U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority 2 * * * उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण, क्षेत्रीय कार्यालय, गौतमबुद्धनगर। रेक्टिफिकेशन आदेश पीठ-04 उपस्थिति :- डा० दीपक स्वरूप सक्सेना, सदस्य उपस्थिति :- टी० वेंकटेस, सदस्य शिकायत संख्या :-- Sect-39//320932794 मैसर्स कृष्णा एस्टेट डेवलपर्स प्रा0 लि0 (प्रमोटर) बनाम अंजू सिंह एवं रनदीप सिंह (आवंटी) प्रस्तुत पत्रावली भू-सम्पदा (विनियमन और विकास) अधिनियम, 20:6 की धारा-39 के अन्तर्गत प्रस्तुत की गयी है, जोकि निम्नवत्‌ प्राविधान्वित है :-

आधिकरणु अगभिलेखों से प्रकट किसी गलती को छुधारने की दृष्टि ज्रे इस अधिनियम की अधीन किये यये आदेश की तारीख से at वर्ष की अवधि को भीतर किसी समय उसके arr पारित किसी आदेश को wend कर wear और यदि पद्षकारों द्वार उसके ध्यान में गलती लायी जाती है तो ऐसा संशोधन BT | परन्चु ऐसा ald संशोधन किसी आदेश के सम्बंध में 'जिस्रके free इस अधिनियम के अधीन अपील mgd की ययी & नहीं किया जायेगा। wy यह कि प्राधिकरण अभिलेख से प्रकट किसी गलती का छुघार करते स्रमय इस अधिनियय को उपबन्ध को अधीन WRI आदेश को स्राखान्‌ भाग का सथोधन नहीं BIT | शिकायतकर्ता (प्रमोटर) का वाद धारा-39 के अन्तर्गत वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग के माध्यम से दिनांक 06.04.2023 को प्रस्तुत किया गया। पुकार पर उभयपक्ष उपस्थित हुए। शिकायतकर्ता (प्रमोटर) द्वारा संशोधन / पुनर्विलोकन हेतु प्रार्थना पत्र इस आशय से प्रस्तुत किया गया है कि पीठ द्वारा पूर्व में पारित आदेश में फौर्स मैज्योर के रूप में शून्य अवधि को सम्मिलित किया जाए। उभयपक्ष के तर्कों को सुना गया व पत्रावली पर उपलब्ध साक्ष्यों को अवलोकन किया।

पत्रावली पर दाखिल समस्त अभिलेखों एवं साक्ष्यों के अवलोकन से fata है कि उक्त प्रकरण में पीठ द्वारा ona के अन्तर्गत पारित आदेश दिनांकित 43.08.2049 एवं धारा-63 के अन्तर्गत पारित आदेश दिनांकित 24.44.2022 गुण-दोष के आधार पर पारित किये गये हैं। समस्त तथ्यों के अवलोकन से यह स्पष्ट है कि शिकायतकर्ता (प्रमोटर) द्वारा दिया गया संशोधन हेतु प्रार्थना पत्र रेश अधिनियम की धारा-39 की परिधि के अन्तर्गत नहीं आता है। ऐसी दशा में उक्त प्रकरण में पारित आदेशों में कोई संशोधन किया जाना उचित नहीं होगा। अतः शिकायतकर्ता (प्रमोटर) का प्रार्थना पत्र स्वीकार किये जाने योग्य नहीं है। वर्णित तथ्यों के आधार पर शिकायतकर्ता (प्रमोटर) द्वारा दिया गया संशोधन हेतु प्रार्थना पत्र खारिज किया जाता है। तदनुसार पत्रावली दाखिल दफ्तर हो। आदेश पोर्टल पर अपलोड किया जाए। ae 2 zvuolaD bus Slo दीपक स्वरूप सक्सेना (सदस्य) (सदस्य) उ0प्र0 भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण उ0प्र0 'भू-सम्पदा विनियामक प्राधिकरण