Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Preeti Sahu v. Kanpur Development Authority KDA Compound
Complaint No. 10201822483
- Decision date
- Not recorded
- Text availability
- Full text
- Bench
- Adjudicating Officer Lucknow
Source: UP RERA order
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
i lt frfrqrffi srfu-{ur, qtql T-rrqil s+q qfiq qfi, c[.'q Fr*qq sRrH, o-rf,rs'io-{ Ets*i dsFfi5-226007 | 66 fqnr<. fis-or(q), (ewa) scfufr :- fr srfiq grn Rrfr€rfl Tfqt : ,to2o1a224gg *ffisr* 128l5e H-Wr4, q.n, F;-ca{ ff'rqg{ | ffi iliTIrT onWfeors Heo.qul, ff{gq frqft +trfid.6'rqg{l sTrtqr gnr te qfucn ao-gB erc T-su-s oI dcrrfi{ oqr gs ffi q5 fuqma sftR-s|tTl ortgv fr-ors qrtrfr{q d ft-s-€ friari qri di sr{+T g
t o1 t tn crDFqq of erm-gr A €rd.fd dfud 'rfr gRI sTci Rrdrq-d d qE 3ifrtd fu-ql rrqr t fu ssi ridq d "ctrffgdqt d 3i(r.fd gf, wrd i- {dd' arc-oz/zos frqf6 3o'01'2or+ o) go q-a otqd vo 17,33,400.00 (v+e aru t-fi-s gen qn ssi o-{nn Qrr M qrq) efir ET{t s-o 1e,44,ooo.oo (s{fts drEI qqrfis rcn sq} ffi oe.oz. 316fc+ qt d e-wt-s d sEqR qtql frqr+' qrl) at srffflft o1 Tfr I a* qsq|-d -s tqq+q El qri A q{g dIFT{T 05 sq @T fi 2ols fi?D o-ffi Fqr qFTI efi, 'oLJ erqfu or qrq o1 zrqr Rd iflTi fr €rssd ser t ffi i oqr \.q fr-dq
t qrrr o1 * lgreq qjfuo- frtd BTqft fuorqa d wqei{ fr ftq66- ffi sRr +. (r.- qfft e{r+-q qr o1 utqffit r-flqefr gt.{r R-{io o3.o7.2o14 d z-erc\TRr g.rf,Iq c|{[T,ft +t qqfii t e-frqet Er{r qffi fr-nqq o1 stqlqfr t q qrE_f,i'T gRT urgd s-f,iur q fun-@ 2s.oi.2ots d frqeft w {d erTteT qrRd fu'qr qqr err fu-€'d oqq< frqefr \-o.qffq flffi o€ gv qTITTFFI d vlqa Re rrsr-rezo+ efrqongq fuf,ls qrtrf,iur gxr qr. so qT. 27.0s.2o'ts ol nqzore ilfud of fui s. qrrrTerq ErT ffi6 'ffi sIr*T crfud fu-q .d t-
"Be that as it may, the impugned order dated 29.01.2019 is an ex parte order we therefore set aside the same and direct the respondent no.l- Secretary, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, U.P. Lucknow to decide the matter afresh after fixing a date and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent no.2 as well as filing whatever documents they be passed may want to file and thereafter the final order shall in accordance with law expeditiously. The writ petition stands allowed. " qr. sqi-fr enAeT R-qro 27.os.201s d Gmo}fi rJ qa rqq alot t' fu qrrriqru gV s.q. tn cTD@-{ur, dq{6 o}sq Grricr o) ercrq o€ i Rd ei-i frqqfi o-rq< fi-ors qTkmiq ois-fr{oT ol cc ftit t aq o€ d fu 3Trt€T qIRd o-{i tg ft{Rm fuqIgrqr{ or ertrcf{ e<Iq oril gq uernts w t'r
cpl ftqi6'oz.tz.zoto qEffiIt ol gr: frEw FFtd frd .d, ffi sq{rf, cpl rrqr, q6 qfrfrqfr Erqt ftfud sTftoen rqa fuvr 1M ffi q-ff{ of TSt ozlz.zots tf qE oifo-d frqr Iiqefr Erqr Erfud frfud elR-fierq ffi er-firRT eioc vo 1e.44.ooo.o0 (s+s drs.rqr fu ffi gnr eg Eqr< Fcrq tr-t) a1 or<r+rft o1 TS t t ffi 4i Ffu "-qrd-s 3Tft-€r;dl of enstwwr_27rou cTl.iFd fu-qr rr,qr B't gs riGiel it 3Tffi oa.os.zorz d ergnn xhiko qffiq{r frtqrt'i er{I frd w {B ffT-{ffi4 qr{r qrs r$r fr;qrfd-drs Q qqrft-d 6ti d on"r qMs-{r g gors o-d {"f q or fiqqr< qqw did qr r-a €.r frqai i qa rft oifu-d fuq t fu X-e-s
qrqd rdr=T urw elefdr .ro F-c-{rt tg E-d-qR oEcr Etnt sqffir di T-qo.s er-.ie-{ qr qs.fr er-+.ro o-qrqr 3ildA qR qrd d t fuFfld eTRfttr frc&fr i d qqrat yrd r{wpo d ergwn eil?t8 crtffi oqd sm T-q'-s d qs d' vr+-ot B t eiltiaq-qtilrilfu e) mqtgsn ft^s€ d sc d srcs d TKr{-6 q {6 sffu-a t fu- ?rqv/T-su€ orcor ffi aI om t al t ffi ffi qfr fuqr at*77 ga or ena?q ffi ?fr Eztr I ffio T-sre qelfr d lrm e( frqr qrnTr" vqr eqvPr pq7 ffi qE siRtd fuqT iqqefr t fr 3Tqi ftfud elFo'sr{ d q-K{-z q i
qqrw f+eIE frfusqd a.r * d ceqm ffirasr+.ro or fu-sn t frtr6 "fE got B YogoT ongq frors srfu+{ur oI qq-e wn rft ffn fuqr w t cq d-qri BTd Ftitrq ig Wlsq d t^ -. t\rP q{ srrefer ceil d gcl ae'l qrt{fr sr-q-do{ fo-fi , ffi crffi or qe q-E enentroeTffi d ci-rdf,{ t wq t fu ffifufl ft=st w Efo' a.- r. eq ftqefr of qMocT fra-fu-a 3r-qD d ere.rqr r$r, qR d d) fu-s i tusz erer-dr r$r? z. qqr d.9.9. s-rn erqB ti oi$ R-frq' qd o'r cTffi t
er-qB ererqr emirfu qri mr qffi a. eq 1M ffid d ft{ t T6T/ fi-wxur ft-{rE fug r: qS ao qMqcr q fudq or cv;T t, Gnrie-{ qa d y-rss-s q cifu-d t qratf,fu qqq/ qws or lqtiqc or q{ d fuqr qi},Tl orrr.{-c-{ fr 6-cr qr. vql,q qFrmq ErqrqETq o-{i of ot$ qqe frfl$ eifu-d q e]i d o'x"r M/s. FORTUNE |NFRASTRUCTURE Vs TREVOR DLTMA & Ons. d sr( fr oifu-d t(I)qt 6:- 15. Moreover, a person cannot be made to warr indefinitely for the possession of the flats allotted to tnem and they are entitled to seek the refund of the amount paid by them, along with compensation. Although we are aware of the fact that when there was no delivery period stipulated in the agreement, a reasonable time has to oe taken into consideration. In the facts and circumstances of this case, a time period of 3 years would have been reasonable for completion of the contract i.e., the possession was required to be given by last quarter of
2014. Further there is no dispute as to the fact that until now there is no redevelopment of the property. Hence, in view of the above discussion, which draw us to an irresistible conclusion that there is deficiency of service on is the part of the appellants and accordingly the issue answered. When once this Court comes to the conclusion that, there is deficiency of services, then the question is is what compensation the respondents/complaina nts entitled to ? q trf,{uii qE Frw{ trol-dr arl sfdl t fr fu{ sq-t-m d cTrdlo t q-ET rft rrrrw qRR{rRrdi o)Frqfq of oH nf$ q fi fr .d d Efurrd rqi
t @T frETfiq efifd-d t 03 s{ qt qo fficd sqllsfuEC q-fi-l{ @-ql frqis oe.oz.zotz erde{ q-T ffiq os.oz.zo14 6t t q w rrqr etTt frqfr ertr fooq d qq+r i o-ar t fu ffi dilfi frqr qFII os.oz. gcTr e-.FT{ ffiofudK d orqq qffiqqr d F;qtur od t fuf,q t | {€ qrft ctEfu fu6rq 3f,qB2017 qtfuo o-sr 3frw oG fu frf}. d-s o1 t fl\',ft t ftwrcq fu{rE fuS z:
eierqr qd a-o sqc d.$.c. srb smfq t ot{ ftdE qri or 3Tffi t griT sTes erffi erEqf,I d dPs d sqelc q o|$qfr, gs squ d frqefr erF-s=dr of enqrqfud TS frrn Tn d r frqefi g;q1 fiT1qr rrqr fu' srffi ergwrc sqBc qMq-TI frtrltrT griT frti qr € frqtoqRqio oa.os.zorz d fu-qr ctcT riTE TS orsq qMq-{r if ft-ots od Wffd-qrc d eqrtrd di d q or ft-+rq qqrw di frqefi id q w t'r qe,fr,'166 ftvr t fu 5u-s gf,-qR o-{{l EirTrllflr{e wFr dqt Fd-€"T ig sqf,€T di qrK srQrqr T-srs srqD ii ot q{ a-o o1 fr qlfr sfud ereafl d frc ftqefr of fuq Wsffi o+ qS fr ocuil cEl=I eil, q{g 3ilt Tod,ft r Cs q-srs frqS of Sfui.r frfq t
q'1 Rqiq' os.oz.ze1g fr 6o1 3frw o-{iT$ fuqr .rqr t t M of cffiqfl qr$,tftfS ro ffid or+ I O f d- ftwnq ffirE f{E s: qri or }- qd n-o qq{ ffi fufud cmfu d ftr ffid.qrq d scd-eT sTffii d entrn qq qa we dor srffi t eieril rfr, w q.qq g.crrc qlK TS qE fif, qri d fi dqr ftqefr em 1M o) 6-i t fu ero, *ins-fi6//frqqfr fudq d ftc R=i sdwffi e orm TrrT t t sq t fo frcefr cw ssd Er<r wgd ild 3iltrm${ treTfu+rc} t qa.fr ww t fu
ft-a"rq srs$d qrr B I ffi o) o-qr qrrd' oari t *i d wsrc {i ft6rs) cTEftqq zoro d qsd o-rssq frcfr Rrd vee 6nqqq sft efiqT- 18 d er-f,rfd s-mwrfr t'l ,- i-iT cfe of erriT re (r) fr elfurrc t fuJ Section 18 (1) "If the promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an apartrnent, plot or building, in accordance with the terms of the agreement for sale or, as the case may be, duly completed by the date specified therein; or (b) due to discontinuance of his business as a developer on account of suspension or revocation of the registration under this Act or for any other reason, he shall be liable on demand to the allottees, in without case the allottee wishes to withdraw from the project, prejudice to alry other remedy available, to return the amount
received by him in respect ofthat apartment, plot, building, as the f case may be, with interest at such rate as may be prescribed in this behalf including compensation in the manner as provided under this Act:
Provided that where an allottee does not intend to withdraw from every the project, he shall be paid, by the promoter, interest for month of delay, till the handing over of the possession, at such rate as rnay be prescribed. qE oTBfi'R qR s-+ \=ftqe d ergwu oqr qfr {fl eflr{ ddr d t fu ererqr cTqft qqr q+qrRr oi qro qtrf, sTft-s -ii.T sfi-i S frcl.ar d T6 ffid erqfu or qTGr sTqT ovi gv qM.-ocT tt ci €t J 1 .> (/ er+<rRr s-s-d Er{r wil o1 d frqfr d Xa tS fufr { ffi qd d qq+l fr gg fua< d ftrn qro qri or eiffi aedr o-qr fr$.rfi t 9Lpt. rrsqcr ii qto qerqrF B@ qTqTeFI d fic-oqo ffi eeerftt t gs q qfftT'[rr fuqt o1onR q-qn *i t w ed {fuq-{ sfrw. {trsqr o1 qrfumT rrql el fu :-
Section 18(1Xb) lays down that if the promoter fails to possession of an complete or is unable to give apartment due to discontinuance of his business as a developer on account of suspension or revocation of the registration under the Act or for any other reason, he is liable on demand to the allottees, in case the allottee wishes to withdraw from the project, without prejudice in this behalf including compensation. If the allottee does not intent to withdraw from the project he shall be paid by the promoter interest for every month's delay till handing over of the possession. The requirement to pay interest is not a penalty as the payment of interest is compensatory in nature in the light of the delay suffered by the allottee who has paid for his apartment but has not received possession of it. pay The obligation imposed on the promoter to interest till such time as the apartment is handed over to him is not unreasonable. The interest is merely compensation for use of moneY. iqr d wFqrcT d €n'il'td eTiT: g.qttr Fpfq d 3ilfrfi n qd lqg t fu RerR e"'i q qHe{ s ddT d fi-q frti €i offfi cRI Nre q 'rq qslT tt gil tm{rRr q{ qrq es +rt, Tqtfu eM€rJT€T d ergsv fuauo o1
tET{r str rf{irRT or sqsilIl fu-qr rrqi t qMq{r ii q-drq-fr frqsfr of d erq-*o-o t lqe * fu ffi i eII tl-flTRT of srqTq'ft qqq fr+rqre;i- Htc-l2/zos ritrfiur o<rqt \s swf qS o1 6d-fr o{ eTd, frcei o1 qMocT d qd fr"rq ii or fr of qr got t r ero, qR eTEmt t t Rrfl-q-f,f,df ffifl qrq qri or ssT d fuc ts qffisfl qffi eft, ot sE o1 €mfu dsm{ Rcid m.07.a oe sf i fr ntrsv t o1 cnqfu 6 6q frEiq zore d .r< q rfifuo zFqT sfrw 6ti a1 frfu oo aqrq fu *{rt
grcr (frfrqr{ qrq rr{6n qd e-o tq qro (t oT c$T t, d T-qEfEI 17.10.2018 o1 *1-vwcr (frfrqq-{ q,ti F=51qr) oTEF-qq zoro d Gtfi{ ffirF 1::t+nro"ft zore etfr-qpo o1 r-fr tt .il-q fuoTq) @na7v€T d ftr ow) q cribq d trKr{ e ffi gs.t rid.{fi d sq i Rd.ri funqlw ffis d qkrq e (ii) pere vl6aq (Events of default) q ffie{ d qRTrRo t, ffit 6 BsrE{ Eti o1 Rprfr q oildA id crRqrF-d t fu,-! The Allottee shall have the option of terminating the Agreement in which case the Promoter shall be liable to refund the entire money paid by the Allottee under any head whatsoever towards the purchase of the apartment, along with interest at the rute equal to MCLR (Marginal Cost of Lending Rate) on home loan of State Bank of India +1olo unless provided otherwise under the Rules, within forty-five days of receiving the termination notice: q I .fr nr+q e (iii) frErffud t qfr u* effiftET d srcT fusr€ o1 R{rh i q{ gv sild8 o) McLR+l qfrsn 01 qTq ({ qrRqrq of su Sfurd wd
t qro qFa trr-drq$ frrqr qrfl q-dfua r0-o *f,r t e.m-{q srrArT qrRd fu\ qrd B ,- q frq ilqsrr {s erqs ordyr of frfu t +s Rc d r. frqefr oi GTrtRrfl fu'qr qror t fu vrqT tb-t ifrilS g_tr \ti ftqqgsT( lzlqg@ ffi t *s frfi-f,
. ____\ \ a q1 @enIT qEl{ O{{I __6_a_gr-rRScl 4t tr1 BE?F | Tf, EOt{ . ,( d-8 2. e?DquT ii, tr{i6 03.07.20"t8 d o-qT efrw d{i of frf* oo d "nft6 o1 qqr er+qrRr w MCLR+I sfrvro ilfilo qrq 66ro &, ffi qq rr frriq qro tq dr|rt q{, ea-5ex fudq d ior aq qIsT s. l-n GTFF=qq of ernl z Qa) (i) d eTQrfd MCLR+I qrffifi, qR sFR znt fr ot$ corqr dqr ai ES qq qrq{ oi tq d{rt qrrT Q +. qa srqE eiri$ s.c. t-qr d A-q *84 qq cTq-*s *i at ftf$ emqef qf,dr crgqrf,{ ffi-ti t frqeft sfi entcr or t d *fr r qR eiriel qE gtffott E)-'n fu qE s.q. t{r d ffqq * s-m ffi d qRqroq/foqr;ilfi o{r rrd-d I or (iqRqfi aen ft-om) 3TBfuqq zoto o1 B-.dqq T-s*rer 6r uder 6l qu-gfr-q d{TT tIINI-63 deIT eIaI CrfrFl;-qt d €nf,.fd Eq.rd proso su-*mrgsrc Rrffrd-o-df A o-t ft{fl{uT fuqr crar tteiricl qlfa w sTq-ds fuq qritt ffi-)y7t)-,/zozo {-f- n Jt''*>-
qc'c) fir$-c 3IEIET soco t-q*r{I frfuqmo qTtrf,t"T