[2017] 4 S.C.R. 78 A ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.· v... UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (I.A. Nos, 45538, 45540 and 45542 of2017) B PEOPLE'S UNIVERSITY· ... APPLICANT . with (LA. Nos. 45855, 45856 and '45859 of 2017) MALWANCHAL UNIVERSITY INDORE ... APPLICANT c Ill (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 76.of2015) JUNE 09, 2017 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND DEEPAKGU.PTA, JJ,]

D Education/ Educational Institutions: · Admission to Medical Colleges - Counselling for admission in Post-Graduate Courses - Applications seeking extension of time for completing the counselling in accordance with the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 such that unfilled seats in the Applicants' E Units be filled up - Submissions by the State that the first and second counsellings were completed within time, MOP-up counselling was . also conducted and completed on 31.05:2017 and admissions have been completed and some seats could not be filled up because no student opted for those seats, thus, no growid to grant any extension F of time beyond 31.05.2017 - Held: Order dated 09.05.2017 is confined to admission to Under-Graduate Courses only and not related to PG Courses - In order dated 09. 05.2017, the State Government was directed to determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter, to forward a list of students in order of merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seals to the Medical G College such that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any College, the said seat may be filled up from the said list- Jn admission to the PG Courses both merit and preference of candidates are looked into - Had the Court by issuance of direction in order dated 09.05.2017 intended the sending often times the number of vacancies H 78

ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 79 of each PG Courses,· there would have been further elaboration A pertaining to discipline and drawing of inter se merit - Furthermore, when the order dated 09. 05.2017 is itself not applicable to PG . Courses, the Government Circular dated 26.05.2017 issued in misconception that order dated 09.05.2017 iS applicable to PG · Courses, is also not effective - Thus, the applications are unfounded Band applicants not entitled to any relief . · CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: l.A. Nos. 45538, 45540 and 45542of2017 WITH I.A. Nos. 45855, 45856 and 45859 of20 I 7 in Writ Petition (Civil) c No. 76 of2015. Under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. for the·Petition'ers. S. S. Shamshery, AAG., Ajit Sinha, Salman Khurshid, Sr. Advs., D Ajay Sharma, Ms. Rekha Pandey, R. K. Rathore, G. S. Makker, Ravi Kant, Ranjay Kumar Pandey, Amit Sharma, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advs. for the ,Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered by E ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. I. These applications have been filed by two private Universities, namely, People's University and Malwanchal University Indore. In both the applications Applicants have made identical prayers which are to the following effect: "In view of the above it is most respectfully prayed that this . F Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to: a) Allow the present application for intervention; b) Permit the applicant to intervene in the presellf Petition; and

c) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon 'ble Court G may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. " 2. The case of the Applicants is that the State ofMadhya Pradesh conducted counselling for admission in Postgraduate Medical Courses H 80 . SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.' A as per·schedule dated 03.05.2017. It is stated that there was delay in ··holding first and second counselling. Two counsellings were completed, first between 11.05.2017 to 20.05.2017 and second between 23.05.2017 to 29.05.2017. 3. Reliance has been placed by the Applicants on orc!er dated · 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of20l 7 and the circularB dated 26'h May, 2017 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare consequent to the aforesaid order of this Court dated 09.05.2017. It is contended thatthere was an order of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No.7900 of2017 dated 29.05.2017. Before the High Comt the State.·Government has submitted that cou11sell ing will c be completed on 31.05.2017 as per directions of this Court.

4. Learned counsel submits that as per order dated 09.05.2017 for manual admission process after ascertainment of the number of seats vacant, only 30 minutes time was left between I 1.30 PM and 12 PM on · 31.05.2017. It is further stated that revised schedule which was published D on 30.05.2017 does not indicate that the compliance of the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 was ensured. It was further contended that no list of the students as contemplated by order dated 09.05.2017 was provided by the State, consequently 17 seats in Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, I 0 seats in Peoples College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre and 12 seats in Peoples Dental Academy E could not be filled. It is useful to refer to the avennents made in paragraph 10 of the People's University Application to the: following .e.ffect:. . . . . . . . "JO. That afte~ the aforesaid order, i;lated 29.05.2017, passed . in IBP. No. 790012017, the State Government issued the order, d(lted 29. 05,2017, prescribing inter alia that as per the F circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health .· ·. · ' and Fainily·Welfare, the seats would be filled up on 31.05.2017 after 7 PM ·However, ·the aforesaid schedule was further revised on 30.05.2017 and now only 30 minutes lime i.e. 11:30 PM to 12 PM on 31.05.2017 is given to the applicant and otl1el· colleges io fill up the vacant seats as perthr: notification G dated 26.05.2017, · · . ' . '

As directed, the representatives of the applicant were present at the scheduled time. but no list of student was given and the State of MP. has not only violated this Hon. Court's order, dated 09.05.2017 passed in WP.(C)No.26712017 read with H ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF JNDIA AND OTHERS 81 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.] circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health A and Family Welfare but the ordeY,. dated 29.05.2017 passed by the Hon. High Court of MP in WP No. 790012017 as well. ·As the consequences were inevitable, following seats are still lying vacant: B S.NO. .. NAME OF CONSTITUENT NUMBER OF UNIT VACANT SEATS 1. Peoples College ofMedical 17 seats Science~ and Research Centre c 2. Peoples College ofDental JO seats Sciences and Research Centre 3. Peoples Dental Academy 12 seats D 5. In.the applicati~n filed on behalf ofMalwanchal University Indor~ also si;nilar averments were 1nade and it is further stated that in the Constituent Unit of the University that is Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, 17 seats could not be filled up. E 6. Learned counsel fotthe Applicants- on the aforesaid premise prayed that the time for completing the counsellin·g in accordance with the order dated 09.05.2017 be extended so that un,tfoed seats in the Applicants' Units be filled up.

7. Learned coui1sel for State of Madhya Pradesh refuted the F submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicants. It is contended thatthe first and second counsellings were completed within time. Mop-up counselling was also conducted and completed on 31" May, 2017 and admissions have been completed. Some seats could not ·be filled up because no student opted for those seats. It is subniitted that there is absolutely i10 ground to grantany extension of time beyond 31" a· May, 2017 as .prayed by the Applicants. 8. Shri Gaurav Sharma, learned comiselappearing for the Medical Council oflndia submits that order dated 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.267of2017 relied on by the Applicants does not relate H 82 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R. A to admission ii1 PG Courses. He submits that order dated 09.05.2017 was issued with regard to admission in MBBS Courses. Hence, very basis of the Application is unfounded. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred to order dated 03.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition(C) No.261and292 of 2017, and other Writ PetitiOns which, according to him, dearly mentioned that matter was further directed to be listed on 4ih May, 2017 for B considering the procedure for admission in Under-Graduate Courses. He submits that order dated 09.05.2017 has to be confined to admission to the MBBS Courses only and not relating to Postgraduate Courses. 9. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the records.c

I 0. The very basis of the Applications filed by both the Universities, is the order dated 09.05.2017 passed by this Court in Writ Petition(C) No.267of2017 and other Writ Petitions reliance has been placed by the learned counsel on the direction No. 7 which is to the following effect: "7. In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remainD vacant after the counselling the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government shall conduct manual counselling for allot111e11t of students. After the completion counselling, the State Government shall determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall E forward a list of students in order of merit, equaling to ten times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the said seat may be filled up from the said list. " 11. Applicants have also relied on circular issued by the Government F oflndia, Ministry ofHealth and Family Welfare dated 26.05.2017 which is to the following effect: "Sub: Counseling for admission in PG Course in Medical Colleges - regarding Sir /Madam G In continuation to this Ministry s letter of even number dated JI. 05.20I 7 on the subject mentioned, I am directed to reproduce para-7 of the order of Hon 'ble Supreme Court passed on 09:05.20I7 in WP© No. 26712017 in the matter of DAR· US-Slam Educational Trust Vis Medical Council of India: H ASHISH RANJAN v, UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 83

. [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.) , "In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remain A vacant after the counseling the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government shall conduct manual counselling for allotment of students. After the completion counselling, the State Government shall determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall B forward a list of students in order of merit, equalling "to ten times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so · that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the said seat may be filled up from the said list," 2. In view of the above, all the State/UT Governments are c requested to conduct mop-up round of counseling first. After the completion of mop-up counseling, the number of seats . that are still vacant may be determined and list of students in order of merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seats shall then be forwarded to the medical colleges concerned. In any case, last date of admission i.e. 31.05.2017 D will remain unchanged. ·Yours. sincerely, Sd/- (D. V. K. Rao) Under Secretary to the Government of India E Tele: 011-2306 2959" 12. One of the issues which has been raised in these Applications is with regard to the applicability of the order dated 09.05.2017 with regard to the Postgraduate Courses.

13. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred to order dated 03.05:2017 F passed in Writ Petition (C) No.261 of2017 and other Writ Petitions where this Court afterhearing learned counsel for the parties has passed the following directions: "Having heard learned counsel/or the parties and keeping in view our earlier order passed in W.P.(C) No.270 of 2017 G on 27th Marc'h, 2017, it is directed as under:- (a) The concerned State.s which have been arrayed as respondents herein, shall carry out the counseling and the authorized representatives of the colleges who are the H 84 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20.17] 4 S.C.R. A petitioners herein, shali remain present at the time of counseling. (b) When the counseling co1)lmences, the authorized representatives who have been directed to remain personally present, 1iiay assist the counseling authorities for allocation B of students to their colleges from a11101igst the minorities on the basis of their merits. (c) The decision taken in the. counseling committee shall be implemented .by the colleges so that har111017y is maintained. (d) The representatives of the colleges shall identify the f:tatus c of minority, but what will ultimately prevail is that the candidate belonging to minority candidate must fit into the compartment of merits. To clarify, if a student is meritorious and beiongs to the minority community, he shall hai>e priority in admission.

D (e) The 70% of the seats shall be filled up fi'om amo11gst the minority stude11ts and bala11ce shall be.filled up by the general 'category. In case, there are il~adequate students meeting the criteria, that is, minority status and merit,· then the same shall be filled up on consent.from other cat1:;gories. E The aforesaid order covers filling up of posts in .the post graduate courses. As there is dual prayer i11 these writ petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses, let the \vrit petitio11s be listed on 4th May, 2017, only for the said relief" . F 14. A perusal of the aforesaid order indicates that the next date that is 41h May, 2017 was fixed for consideration of relief pertaining to . Urider-Graduate <:;ourses .. Shri .SJ1arma submits that the matter could ' not be heard on 04.05.2017 on which date it was adjourned to 08.05.20.17 and ultimately order was passed Oli 09:05.2017.A perusal of the diredion .· Nos:&, 9'and 10 indicate that the directions pertain to admlssion of theG students belonging to minority community which directions have be.en quoted below: "8. In the applica,tions submitted by the stude1its belonging to the minority community they should con.firm their minority status as well as the fact that they fulfill other conditions which H · · ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 85 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.]

may be prescribed by the minority institutions. Accordingly. A the DGHS as well as the State Government shall prepare a separate list of minority students seeking admissions in the respective minority institutions in order of merit. The competent authorities of the College present during counseiling shall check/verify the minority status of the candidate. This B arrangement is only meant for the State Quota. 9. During the common counselling conducted by the State Government, the representatives of the ·medical colleges particularly representative of minority institutions should be a part of the admission/counselling committee as the case may c be. 10. Common counselling conducted by the DGHS/State Government will not in any manner a.ffectthe rights of m,inority institutions to admit students of their respective minority community. The ·minority quota seats, if any, in institutions D run by minorities will be filled up by minority students only. Therefore, the rights of minority· institutions are fully ·protected. "

15. A perusal of directions issued on 03.05.2017 clearly indicate that with regard to admi.ssion of candidates belonging to minority community several directions were already issued with regard to the E admission in Post-graduate courses as per order dated 03.05.2017. When this Court has already issued an order ensuring students of minority conimunity be admitted after proper verificatio11on03.05.20i7 itself, there was no occasion to issue further directions on the saine subject on. 09.05.2017, ifboth the orders relate to Post-graduate admissions. This F clearly gives support to the submission made by the learned counsel of Medical Counsel of India that order dated 09.05.2017 confines to admission to Under-Graduate Courses. 16.ln order dated 03.05.2017 following was specifically mentioned: " "The aforesaid order covers filling zip of posts in rhe post . G · • graduate courses. As there is dual prayer in these writ petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses. let the writ petitions be listed on 4'" May, 2017, only for the said relief" · H 86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.

A 17. Above order dated 03 .05.2017 clearly indicates that matter was to be further listed on 04.05.2017 for considering the relief relating to Under-Graduate Courses. On 4m May, 2017 matter could not be taken up and adjourned to 08.05.2017 and ultimately order was issui:d on 09.05.2017. Thus, order dated 09.05.2017 has been reproduced above in reference to above paragraph. The above paragraph of order datedB 03 .05.2017 clearly supports the contention ·of Shri Shanria that order dated 09.05.2017 relates to admission of Under-Graduate. 18. The order passed by this Cou1t on 27'h April, 2017 in Writ Petition {C) No.270 of2017 when read with order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) Nos.267, 292, 270 of2017 alsoc leads to the same conclusion. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 in Writ Petition(C)No.270 of2017 also contains various directions for academic year 2017-2018 in reference to Post-graduate admissions. In Writ Petition (C) No.270 of20l 7 following order was passed: "W.P. CC) No.27012017 D Heard Mr. Sun/I Gupta, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Romy Chacko, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel along with M1: Gaurav .Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents. As stated on the earlier occasion, memoral1da have beenE filed by both the parties indicating solutions. The solutions that ha\Je been arrived at after due deliberation for the present academic year i.e. 2017-2018 are as follows:-

(i) The authorized representatives of the colleges, who are petitioners herein, shall remain present at the time of F counseling. We have used the. word 'counseling' as Mr. Gupta, teamed senior counsel has submitted that the first counseling has not yet been done in respect of these colleges. Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel would submit that when there . is a C0/111110n counseling, ·(he question of ho/ding counse/ing G for four. institutions does not arise. Be that as it may, that need not be adverted to at the pr.esent. (ii) The second counseling is going to take place on 11th May, 2017. On that day, the authorized representative of the petitioner-colleges shall remain present and students shall be H AS HI SH RAN JAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND. OTHERS 87 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.] allocated to their colleges on the basis of merits: Needless to A say, t~e counseling shall be done by the State or anx university or authority that has been nominated by the State. (iii) At the time of counseling, the candidates who are inclined to take admission in these colleges shall furnish an undertaking that they will do service in the Mission Hospitals B connected with the present colleges after completion of the post-graduate course for a period WP(C) 261117 7 of one . year.

(iv) Th~ aforesaid prescription shall only be applicable to the minority students admitted by the petitioner-colleges on the c basis of the common counseling. The representative of the colleges shall identify the status of minority, but what will ultimately prevail is that the minority candidate must fit into the compartment of merits. To clarify, if a studei1t is meritorious · and belongs to the minority community, he shall have the D priority in admission. · (v) The decision taken in the counseling committee shall bi implemented by the colleges so that harmony is maintained. . The present order shall apply only to the post graduate admissions. E As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is concerned, Mr. Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come up with set up of solutions. Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4 th May, 2017." F 19. Writ Petition (C) No.270of2017 along with other Writ Petitions were listed on 4rh May, 2017, as directed on which date matter was adjourned to 8'h May, 2017. Ultim~tely, order dated 9rh May, 2017 was passed in Writ Petition (C)Nos.267, 292, 270, 227 and 258 of2017. It has already been referred to above. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 as G extracted above specifically mentioned: " .... The present order shall apply only to ·the postgraduate admissions. As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is H 88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.

concerned, Ml: Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come up with set up of solutions. Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4'h May, 2017." 20. Thus, 41h May, 2017 which was fixed and ultimately \vhen order dated 91h May, 2017 was passed same was only in reference to B Under-Graduate Course. 21. There is one more reason for coming up to the aforesaid conclusion. In order dated 09.05.2017, the State Government has been directed to determine the number of seats that are still vacant and . thereafter is to forward a list of students i~ prderofmerit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seats to the Medical College so that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any College the said seat may be filled up from the said list. Jn admission to the Post-graduate Courses both merit and preference of candidates are looked into. Had the Court vide direction No.7 of the order dated 09.05.2017 intended the sending of ten times the number of vacancies of each Post-graduate Courses,D there would have been further elaboration pertaining to discipline and drawing of inter se merit. 22. We are, thus, of the considered view that order dated 09.05.2017 does not relate to admissio.n into Post-graduate Courses and is confined to admission in Under-Graduate Courses as noted above.E

23. Coming to circular issued by the Government oflndia, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare dated 26'h May, 2017, the said circular has been issued on the strength of the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of2017. It appears that the said circular has . been issued by Government ·of lndia, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in misconception that order dated 09.05.20 I 7 is applicable to the admission to the Post-graduate Courses. When the order dated 09.05.2017 is itself not applicable to Post-graduate Courses, circular dated 26.05.2017 is not effective. 24, W,e are, thus, of the view that very basis of the ApplicationsG filed by the Applicants is unfounded and Applicants are not entitled to any relief in these Applications. All the IAs are rejected. . . Nidhi Jain IAs. rejected.

[2017] 4 S.C.R. 78 A ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.· v... UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (I.A. Nos, 45538, 45540 and 45542 of2017) B PEOPLE'S UNIVERSITY· ... APPLICANT . with (LA. Nos. 45855, 45856 and '45859 of 2017) MALWANCHAL UNIVERSITY INDORE ... APPLICANT c Ill (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 76.of2015) JUNE 09, 2017 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND DEEPAKGU.PTA, JJ,]

D Education/ Educational Institutions: · Admission to Medical Colleges - Counselling for admission in Post-Graduate Courses - Applications seeking extension of time for completing the counselling in accordance with the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 such that unfilled seats in the Applicants' E Units be filled up - Submissions by the State that the first and second counsellings were completed within time, MOP-up counselling was . also conducted and completed on 31.05:2017 and admissions have been completed and some seats could not be filled up because no student opted for those seats, thus, no growid to grant any extension F of time beyond 31.05.2017 - Held: Order dated 09.05.2017 is confined to admission to Under-Graduate Courses only and not related to PG Courses - In order dated 09. 05.2017, the State Government was directed to determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter, to forward a list of students in order of merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seals to the Medical G College such that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any College, the said seat may be filled up from the said list- Jn admission to the PG Courses both merit and preference of candidates are looked into - Had the Court by issuance of direction in order dated 09.05.2017 intended the sending often times the number of vacancies H 78

ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 79 of each PG Courses,· there would have been further elaboration A pertaining to discipline and drawing of inter se merit - Furthermore, when the order dated 09. 05.2017 is itself not applicable to PG . Courses, the Government Circular dated 26.05.2017 issued in misconception that order dated 09.05.2017 iS applicable to PG · Courses, is also not effective - Thus, the applications are unfounded Band applicants not entitled to any relief . · CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: l.A. Nos. 45538, 45540 and 45542of2017 WITH I.A. Nos. 45855, 45856 and 45859 of20 I 7 in Writ Petition (Civil) c No. 76 of2015. Under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. for the·Petition'ers. S. S. Shamshery, AAG., Ajit Sinha, Salman Khurshid, Sr. Advs., D Ajay Sharma, Ms. Rekha Pandey, R. K. Rathore, G. S. Makker, Ravi Kant, Ranjay Kumar Pandey, Amit Sharma, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advs. for the ,Respondents. The Order of the Court was delivered by E ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. I. These applications have been filed by two private Universities, namely, People's University and Malwanchal University Indore. In both the applications Applicants have made identical prayers which are to the following effect: "In view of the above it is most respectfully prayed that this . F Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to: a) Allow the present application for intervention; b) Permit the applicant to intervene in the presellf Petition; and

c) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon 'ble Court G may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. " 2. The case of the Applicants is that the State ofMadhya Pradesh conducted counselling for admission in Postgraduate Medical Courses H 80 . SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.' A as per·schedule dated 03.05.2017. It is stated that there was delay in ··holding first and second counselling. Two counsellings were completed, first between 11.05.2017 to 20.05.2017 and second between 23.05.2017 to 29.05.2017. 3. Reliance has been placed by the Applicants on orc!er dated · 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of20l 7 and the circularB dated 26'h May, 2017 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare consequent to the aforesaid order of this Court dated 09.05.2017. It is contended thatthere was an order of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No.7900 of2017 dated 29.05.2017. Before the High Comt the State.·Government has submitted that cou11sell ing will c be completed on 31.05.2017 as per directions of this Court.

4. Learned counsel submits that as per order dated 09.05.2017 for manual admission process after ascertainment of the number of seats vacant, only 30 minutes time was left between I 1.30 PM and 12 PM on · 31.05.2017. It is further stated that revised schedule which was published D on 30.05.2017 does not indicate that the compliance of the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 was ensured. It was further contended that no list of the students as contemplated by order dated 09.05.2017 was provided by the State, consequently 17 seats in Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, I 0 seats in Peoples College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre and 12 seats in Peoples Dental Academy E could not be filled. It is useful to refer to the avennents made in paragraph 10 of the People's University Application to the: following .e.ffect:. . . . . . . . "JO. That afte~ the aforesaid order, i;lated 29.05.2017, passed . in IBP. No. 790012017, the State Government issued the order, d(lted 29. 05,2017, prescribing inter alia that as per the F circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health .· ·. · ' and Fainily·Welfare, the seats would be filled up on 31.05.2017 after 7 PM ·However, ·the aforesaid schedule was further revised on 30.05.2017 and now only 30 minutes lime i.e. 11:30 PM to 12 PM on 31.05.2017 is given to the applicant and otl1el· colleges io fill up the vacant seats as perthr: notification G dated 26.05.2017, · · . ' . '

As directed, the representatives of the applicant were present at the scheduled time. but no list of student was given and the State of MP. has not only violated this Hon. Court's order, dated 09.05.2017 passed in WP.(C)No.26712017 read with H ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF JNDIA AND OTHERS 81 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.] circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health A and Family Welfare but the ordeY,. dated 29.05.2017 passed by the Hon. High Court of MP in WP No. 790012017 as well. ·As the consequences were inevitable, following seats are still lying vacant: B S.NO. .. NAME OF CONSTITUENT NUMBER OF UNIT VACANT SEATS 1. Peoples College ofMedical 17 seats Science~ and Research Centre c 2. Peoples College ofDental JO seats Sciences and Research Centre 3. Peoples Dental Academy 12 seats D 5. In.the applicati~n filed on behalf ofMalwanchal University Indor~ also si;nilar averments were 1nade and it is further stated that in the Constituent Unit of the University that is Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, 17 seats could not be filled up. E 6. Learned counsel fotthe Applicants- on the aforesaid premise prayed that the time for completing the counsellin·g in accordance with the order dated 09.05.2017 be extended so that un,tfoed seats in the Applicants' Units be filled up.

7. Learned coui1sel for State of Madhya Pradesh refuted the F submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicants. It is contended thatthe first and second counsellings were completed within time. Mop-up counselling was also conducted and completed on 31" May, 2017 and admissions have been completed. Some seats could not ·be filled up because no student opted for those seats. It is subniitted that there is absolutely i10 ground to grantany extension of time beyond 31" a· May, 2017 as .prayed by the Applicants. 8. Shri Gaurav Sharma, learned comiselappearing for the Medical Council oflndia submits that order dated 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.267of2017 relied on by the Applicants does not relate H 82 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R. A to admission ii1 PG Courses. He submits that order dated 09.05.2017 was issued with regard to admission in MBBS Courses. Hence, very basis of the Application is unfounded. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred to order dated 03.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition(C) No.261and292 of 2017, and other Writ PetitiOns which, according to him, dearly mentioned that matter was further directed to be listed on 4ih May, 2017 for B considering the procedure for admission in Under-Graduate Courses. He submits that order dated 09.05.2017 has to be confined to admission to the MBBS Courses only and not relating to Postgraduate Courses. 9. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the records.c

I 0. The very basis of the Applications filed by both the Universities, is the order dated 09.05.2017 passed by this Court in Writ Petition(C) No.267of2017 and other Writ Petitions reliance has been placed by the learned counsel on the direction No. 7 which is to the following effect: "7. In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remainD vacant after the counselling the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government shall conduct manual counselling for allot111e11t of students. After the completion counselling, the State Government shall determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall E forward a list of students in order of merit, equaling to ten times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the said seat may be filled up from the said list. " 11. Applicants have also relied on circular issued by the Government F oflndia, Ministry ofHealth and Family Welfare dated 26.05.2017 which is to the following effect: "Sub: Counseling for admission in PG Course in Medical Colleges - regarding Sir /Madam G In continuation to this Ministry s letter of even number dated JI. 05.20I 7 on the subject mentioned, I am directed to reproduce para-7 of the order of Hon 'ble Supreme Court passed on 09:05.20I7 in WP© No. 26712017 in the matter of DAR· US-Slam Educational Trust Vis Medical Council of India: H ASHISH RANJAN v, UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 83

. [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.) , "In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remain A vacant after the counseling the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government shall conduct manual counselling for allotment of students. After the completion counselling, the State Government shall determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall B forward a list of students in order of merit, equalling "to ten times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so · that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the said seat may be filled up from the said list," 2. In view of the above, all the State/UT Governments are c requested to conduct mop-up round of counseling first. After the completion of mop-up counseling, the number of seats . that are still vacant may be determined and list of students in order of merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seats shall then be forwarded to the medical colleges concerned. In any case, last date of admission i.e. 31.05.2017 D will remain unchanged. ·Yours. sincerely, Sd/- (D. V. K. Rao) Under Secretary to the Government of India E Tele: 011-2306 2959" 12. One of the issues which has been raised in these Applications is with regard to the applicability of the order dated 09.05.2017 with regard to the Postgraduate Courses.

13. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred to order dated 03.05:2017 F passed in Writ Petition (C) No.261 of2017 and other Writ Petitions where this Court afterhearing learned counsel for the parties has passed the following directions: "Having heard learned counsel/or the parties and keeping in view our earlier order passed in W.P.(C) No.270 of 2017 G on 27th Marc'h, 2017, it is directed as under:- (a) The concerned State.s which have been arrayed as respondents herein, shall carry out the counseling and the authorized representatives of the colleges who are the H 84 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20.17] 4 S.C.R. A petitioners herein, shali remain present at the time of counseling. (b) When the counseling co1)lmences, the authorized representatives who have been directed to remain personally present, 1iiay assist the counseling authorities for allocation B of students to their colleges from a11101igst the minorities on the basis of their merits. (c) The decision taken in the. counseling committee shall be implemented .by the colleges so that har111017y is maintained. (d) The representatives of the colleges shall identify the f:tatus c of minority, but what will ultimately prevail is that the candidate belonging to minority candidate must fit into the compartment of merits. To clarify, if a student is meritorious and beiongs to the minority community, he shall hai>e priority in admission.

D (e) The 70% of the seats shall be filled up fi'om amo11gst the minority stude11ts and bala11ce shall be.filled up by the general 'category. In case, there are il~adequate students meeting the criteria, that is, minority status and merit,· then the same shall be filled up on consent.from other cat1:;gories. E The aforesaid order covers filling up of posts in .the post graduate courses. As there is dual prayer i11 these writ petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses, let the \vrit petitio11s be listed on 4th May, 2017, only for the said relief" . F 14. A perusal of the aforesaid order indicates that the next date that is 41h May, 2017 was fixed for consideration of relief pertaining to . Urider-Graduate <:;ourses .. Shri .SJ1arma submits that the matter could ' not be heard on 04.05.2017 on which date it was adjourned to 08.05.20.17 and ultimately order was passed Oli 09:05.2017.A perusal of the diredion .· Nos:&, 9'and 10 indicate that the directions pertain to admlssion of theG students belonging to minority community which directions have be.en quoted below: "8. In the applica,tions submitted by the stude1its belonging to the minority community they should con.firm their minority status as well as the fact that they fulfill other conditions which H · · ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 85 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.]

may be prescribed by the minority institutions. Accordingly. A the DGHS as well as the State Government shall prepare a separate list of minority students seeking admissions in the respective minority institutions in order of merit. The competent authorities of the College present during counseiling shall check/verify the minority status of the candidate. This B arrangement is only meant for the State Quota. 9. During the common counselling conducted by the State Government, the representatives of the ·medical colleges particularly representative of minority institutions should be a part of the admission/counselling committee as the case may c be. 10. Common counselling conducted by the DGHS/State Government will not in any manner a.ffectthe rights of m,inority institutions to admit students of their respective minority community. The ·minority quota seats, if any, in institutions D run by minorities will be filled up by minority students only. Therefore, the rights of minority· institutions are fully ·protected. "

15. A perusal of directions issued on 03.05.2017 clearly indicate that with regard to admi.ssion of candidates belonging to minority community several directions were already issued with regard to the E admission in Post-graduate courses as per order dated 03.05.2017. When this Court has already issued an order ensuring students of minority conimunity be admitted after proper verificatio11on03.05.20i7 itself, there was no occasion to issue further directions on the saine subject on. 09.05.2017, ifboth the orders relate to Post-graduate admissions. This F clearly gives support to the submission made by the learned counsel of Medical Counsel of India that order dated 09.05.2017 confines to admission to Under-Graduate Courses. 16.ln order dated 03.05.2017 following was specifically mentioned: " "The aforesaid order covers filling zip of posts in rhe post . G · • graduate courses. As there is dual prayer in these writ petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses. let the writ petitions be listed on 4'" May, 2017, only for the said relief" · H 86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.

A 17. Above order dated 03 .05.2017 clearly indicates that matter was to be further listed on 04.05.2017 for considering the relief relating to Under-Graduate Courses. On 4m May, 2017 matter could not be taken up and adjourned to 08.05.2017 and ultimately order was issui:d on 09.05.2017. Thus, order dated 09.05.2017 has been reproduced above in reference to above paragraph. The above paragraph of order datedB 03 .05.2017 clearly supports the contention ·of Shri Shanria that order dated 09.05.2017 relates to admission of Under-Graduate. 18. The order passed by this Cou1t on 27'h April, 2017 in Writ Petition {C) No.270 of2017 when read with order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) Nos.267, 292, 270 of2017 alsoc leads to the same conclusion. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 in Writ Petition(C)No.270 of2017 also contains various directions for academic year 2017-2018 in reference to Post-graduate admissions. In Writ Petition (C) No.270 of20l 7 following order was passed: "W.P. CC) No.27012017 D Heard Mr. Sun/I Gupta, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Romy Chacko, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel along with M1: Gaurav .Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents. As stated on the earlier occasion, memoral1da have beenE filed by both the parties indicating solutions. The solutions that ha\Je been arrived at after due deliberation for the present academic year i.e. 2017-2018 are as follows:-

(i) The authorized representatives of the colleges, who are petitioners herein, shall remain present at the time of F counseling. We have used the. word 'counseling' as Mr. Gupta, teamed senior counsel has submitted that the first counseling has not yet been done in respect of these colleges. Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel would submit that when there . is a C0/111110n counseling, ·(he question of ho/ding counse/ing G for four. institutions does not arise. Be that as it may, that need not be adverted to at the pr.esent. (ii) The second counseling is going to take place on 11th May, 2017. On that day, the authorized representative of the petitioner-colleges shall remain present and students shall be H AS HI SH RAN JAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND. OTHERS 87 [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.] allocated to their colleges on the basis of merits: Needless to A say, t~e counseling shall be done by the State or anx university or authority that has been nominated by the State. (iii) At the time of counseling, the candidates who are inclined to take admission in these colleges shall furnish an undertaking that they will do service in the Mission Hospitals B connected with the present colleges after completion of the post-graduate course for a period WP(C) 261117 7 of one . year.

(iv) Th~ aforesaid prescription shall only be applicable to the minority students admitted by the petitioner-colleges on the c basis of the common counseling. The representative of the colleges shall identify the status of minority, but what will ultimately prevail is that the minority candidate must fit into the compartment of merits. To clarify, if a studei1t is meritorious · and belongs to the minority community, he shall have the D priority in admission. · (v) The decision taken in the counseling committee shall bi implemented by the colleges so that harmony is maintained. . The present order shall apply only to the post graduate admissions. E As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is concerned, Mr. Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come up with set up of solutions. Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4 th May, 2017." F 19. Writ Petition (C) No.270of2017 along with other Writ Petitions were listed on 4rh May, 2017, as directed on which date matter was adjourned to 8'h May, 2017. Ultim~tely, order dated 9rh May, 2017 was passed in Writ Petition (C)Nos.267, 292, 270, 227 and 258 of2017. It has already been referred to above. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 as G extracted above specifically mentioned: " .... The present order shall apply only to ·the postgraduate admissions. As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is H 88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.

concerned, Ml: Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come up with set up of solutions. Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4'h May, 2017." 20. Thus, 41h May, 2017 which was fixed and ultimately \vhen order dated 91h May, 2017 was passed same was only in reference to B Under-Graduate Course. 21. There is one more reason for coming up to the aforesaid conclusion. In order dated 09.05.2017, the State Government has been directed to determine the number of seats that are still vacant and . thereafter is to forward a list of students i~ prderofmerit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seats to the Medical College so that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any College the said seat may be filled up from the said list. Jn admission to the Post-graduate Courses both merit and preference of candidates are looked into. Had the Court vide direction No.7 of the order dated 09.05.2017 intended the sending of ten times the number of vacancies of each Post-graduate Courses,D there would have been further elaboration pertaining to discipline and drawing of inter se merit. 22. We are, thus, of the considered view that order dated 09.05.2017 does not relate to admissio.n into Post-graduate Courses and is confined to admission in Under-Graduate Courses as noted above.E

23. Coming to circular issued by the Government oflndia, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare dated 26'h May, 2017, the said circular has been issued on the strength of the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017 in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of2017. It appears that the said circular has . been issued by Government ·of lndia, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in misconception that order dated 09.05.20 I 7 is applicable to the admission to the Post-graduate Courses. When the order dated 09.05.2017 is itself not applicable to Post-graduate Courses, circular dated 26.05.2017 is not effective. 24, W,e are, thus, of the view that very basis of the ApplicationsG filed by the Applicants is unfounded and Applicants are not entitled to any relief in these Applications. All the IAs are rejected. . . Nidhi Jain IAs. rejected.