(2014) 14 S.C.R. 1633 MAHESH CHAND SHARMA A v. STATE OF RAJASTHANAND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4287 of 2014) B APRIL 01, 2014 [T. S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Service Law -Appointment/Selection - The issues in question, decided in terms ofjudgment passed in Manmohan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., reported in [2014] 14 C S.C.R. 1610. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4287 of 2014. ·From the judgment and order dated 13.05.2011 of the D High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in SBCWP No. 4133 of 2011. WITH . Civil Appeal Nos. 4288, 4289-4290 and 4291 of 2014. E M. M. Kashyap,Adv., for the Appellant. Rishi Malhotra, Adv., for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed by T. S. THAKUR, J. 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. F 2. The points that fall for consideration in these appeals are squarely answered by our judgment delivered today in Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.27829 of 2012 etc. etc. titled Manmohan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. For the reasons set out in that judgment, we dispose G of these appeals on terms similar to those_ set out in the judgment leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Kalpana K. Tripathy Appeals disposed of. H 1633

(2014) 14 S.C.R. 1633 MAHESH CHAND SHARMA A v. STATE OF RAJASTHANAND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4287 of 2014) B APRIL 01, 2014 [T. S. THAKUR AND C. NAGAPPAN, JJ.] Service Law -Appointment/Selection - The issues in question, decided in terms ofjudgment passed in Manmohan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., reported in [2014] 14 C S.C.R. 1610. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4287 of 2014. ·From the judgment and order dated 13.05.2011 of the D High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in SBCWP No. 4133 of 2011. WITH . Civil Appeal Nos. 4288, 4289-4290 and 4291 of 2014. E M. M. Kashyap,Adv., for the Appellant. Rishi Malhotra, Adv., for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed by T. S. THAKUR, J. 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. F 2. The points that fall for consideration in these appeals are squarely answered by our judgment delivered today in Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.27829 of 2012 etc. etc. titled Manmohan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. For the reasons set out in that judgment, we dispose G of these appeals on terms similar to those_ set out in the judgment leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Kalpana K. Tripathy Appeals disposed of. H 1633