396 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 396 [2021] 4 S.C.R. A UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LTD. v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. M.A. No. 175/2021 B In (Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020) FEBRUARY 02, 2021 [S. ABDUL NAZEER AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] C Judgment/Order – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted from paragraph 4 of the judgment in UMC Technologies Private Limited versus Food Corporation of India & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020, dated 16.11.2020 reported in D [2020] 13 SCR 1175 – Rest of the order remain as it is – Application allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : M.A. No. 175 of 2021 in Civil appeal no. 3687 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2019 of the High Court E of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 2778 of 2019. Sahil Tagotra, Subhro P. Mukherjee, Mohit Pandey, Advs. for Appellant. The Order of the Court was passed : F ORDER Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer made by the appellant/ applicant. Accordingly, the Application is allowed. The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted G from the paragraph 4 of the Judgment dated 16.11.2020. Rest of the order to remain as it is. Ankit Gyan Application allowed. H 396

396 SUPREME COURT[2021]REPORTS4 S.C.R. 396 [2021] 4 S.C.R. A UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LTD. v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. M.A. No. 175/2021 B In (Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020) FEBRUARY 02, 2021 [S. ABDUL NAZEER AND SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.] C Judgment/Order – Typographical error in the judgment – Correction of – The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted from paragraph 4 of the judgment in UMC Technologies Private Limited versus Food Corporation of India & Anr. Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020, dated 16.11.2020 reported in D [2020] 13 SCR 1175 – Rest of the order remain as it is – Application allowed. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : M.A. No. 175 of 2021 in Civil appeal no. 3687 of 2020. From the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2019 of the High Court E of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 2778 of 2019. Sahil Tagotra, Subhro P. Mukherjee, Mohit Pandey, Advs. for Appellant. The Order of the Court was passed : F ORDER Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer made by the appellant/ applicant. Accordingly, the Application is allowed. The words “including an employee of the appellant” stand deleted G from the paragraph 4 of the Judgment dated 16.11.2020. Rest of the order to remain as it is. Ankit Gyan Application allowed. H 396