[2011] 6 S.C.R. 820 A AMAR NATH ROY AND ORS. v. ARUN KUMAR KEDIA AND ANR. Contempt Petition (C) No. 139 of 2011 IN B Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 MAY 13, 2011 [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] C Rent control and eviction: Eviction order - Tenant's appeal dismissed by Supreme Court - Tenant granted nine months time from the date of dismissal of appeal to vacate the tenanted premises - Tenant D did not vacate the tenanted premises even after the period ·I granted - Contempt petition - Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition directing eviction of tenant by police force - Contempt of Court. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Contempt Petition E No. 139 of 2011. h Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004. F From the Judgment & Order dated 12.3.2004 of the High Court Calcutta in F.A.No. 23 of 2000. Jaideep Gupta, Sarad Kumar Singhania for the Appellant G Ramesh Singh (for O.P. Khaitan & Co) for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered 820H AMAR NATH ROY AND ORS. v. ARUN KUMAR 821 KEDIA AND ANR. ORDER A Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this cas~. the tenant's appeal being Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 was dismissed by this Court by our order dated November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months' time B from that date to vacate the premises in question. Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on March 25, 2010.

I We are informed that the tenant has not vacated the c premises in question. Hence, this contempt petition. Accordingly, we direct that the tenant-Anderson Wright & Co. shall be evicted from 7, Red Cross Place, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001 forthwith by police force. D The Contempt Petition is disposed of. D.G. Contempt Petition disposed of.

[2011] 6 S.C.R. 820 A AMAR NATH ROY AND ORS. v. ARUN KUMAR KEDIA AND ANR. Contempt Petition (C) No. 139 of 2011 IN B Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 MAY 13, 2011 [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] C Rent control and eviction: Eviction order - Tenant's appeal dismissed by Supreme Court - Tenant granted nine months time from the date of dismissal of appeal to vacate the tenanted premises - Tenant D did not vacate the tenanted premises even after the period ·I granted - Contempt petition - Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition directing eviction of tenant by police force - Contempt of Court. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Contempt Petition E No. 139 of 2011. h Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004. F From the Judgment & Order dated 12.3.2004 of the High Court Calcutta in F.A.No. 23 of 2000. Jaideep Gupta, Sarad Kumar Singhania for the Appellant G Ramesh Singh (for O.P. Khaitan & Co) for the Respondent. The following Order of the Court was delivered 820H AMAR NATH ROY AND ORS. v. ARUN KUMAR 821 KEDIA AND ANR. ORDER A Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this cas~. the tenant's appeal being Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 was dismissed by this Court by our order dated November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months' time B from that date to vacate the premises in question. Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on March 25, 2010.

I We are informed that the tenant has not vacated the c premises in question. Hence, this contempt petition. Accordingly, we direct that the tenant-Anderson Wright & Co. shall be evicted from 7, Red Cross Place, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001 forthwith by police force. D The Contempt Petition is disposed of. D.G. Contempt Petition disposed of.