Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra
(1976) 1 SCC 828
- Decision date
- 1975
- Text availability
- Summary or case record only
- Bench
- 3-Judge Bench
Source: landmark_precedents seed
Principle
Only that precise portion of information which relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered is admissible under Section 27; extraneous confessional statements excluded.
Connected provisions and cases
Related judgments
- Perumal Raja v. State · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 12 · 2024 · 1 shared provision
- Selvi v. State of Karnataka · (2010) 7 SCC 263 · 2010 · 1 shared provision
- State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad · AIR 1961 SC 1808 · 1961 · 1 shared provision
- Pulukuri Kottaya v. King Emperor · AIR 1947 PC 67 · 1946 · 1 shared provision
Judgment text
Full judgment text is not available in this record.