Uttarakhand High Court
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India
2026:UHC:6376 · WPSS/1948/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-07-27
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Pankaj Purohit
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
UKHC010126932026 2026:UHC:6376 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 1948 of 2026 27 July, 2026 Sanjeev Kumar And Others --Petitioners Versus Union Of India and Others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------Presence:- Ms. Nipush Mola Joshi, learned counsel for petitioners. Mr. Saurav Adhikari, learned C.G.S.C. for the Union of India/respondent No.1. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3-University, through V.C. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel for respondent No.4-U.G.C. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) Petitioners are serving as a Daily Wager in Gurukul Kangri (Deemed to be University) at Haridwar since 2004-2024. The grievance raised by the petitioners is that despite availability of work, their claim for regularization is not being considered. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the work is perennial in nature, therefore, availability of post has to be presumed, even if no post was formally sanctioned. 3. Learned counsel for parties submit that the present matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 24.07.2026 passed by this Court in WPSS No.1960 of 2026 Anup Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others. 4. However, learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners made representations to Vice Chancellor of the University on different dates, but, the same are rejected by the impugned order dated 1 UKHC010126932026 2026:UHC:6376
15.06.2026 by the respondent-University. 5. Learned counsel for respondent-University made a statement at Bar that the Competent Authority shall consider the said representations submitted by petitioners afresh neglecting the impugned rejection order dated 15.06.2026. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and it is provided that Competent Authority shall take a decision on representations submitted by petitioners afresh, sympathetically, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Services of the petitioners shall not be dispensed with only on the ground that they have made claim for their regularization. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 27.07.2026 PN OF NEGIUTTARAKHAND,PREETI st=UTTARAKHAND, DigitallyDN:ou=HIGH2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab,postalCode=263001,serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC,cn=PREETIDate:c=IN,2026.07.27signedCOURTo=HIGHNEGI by14:17:49OFCOURTPREETIUTTARAKHAND, +05'30'NEGI 2