Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Dat or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. e and Registrar’s order with Signatures UKHC010121082026 WPMS/2102/2026 Jishant Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Riddhi Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent nos. 1 to 4. 3. Mr. Abhilash Nainwal and Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocates for respondent no. 5. 4. Petitioner was given a license for retail sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor at a particular place. Respondent no. 5 has been permitted to open a retail shop of Indian Made Foreign Liquor in near vicinity of petitioner’s shop. Petitioner wants that shop to be removed from his vicinity. 5. The relief as claimed, cannot be granted in a writ petition. 6. Since petitioner has a remedy under Section 11(2) of the Excise Act, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to avail that remedy. Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court, if his revision is decided against him. Respondent no. 5 shall also be given reasonable opportunity of hearing before deciding petitioner’s revision. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.07.2026 Navin

CHANDRAUTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, st=UTTARAKHAND,OF NAVEEN CHANDRA DigitallyDN:2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15,postalCode=263001,serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5,cn=NAVEENDate:c=IN,2026.07.15signedo=HIGHCHANDRAby19:20:53COURTNAVEEN +05'30'