UKHC010126922023 2026:UHC:5726 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/2231/2023 Ram Kumar Saini --Petitioner Versus Union of India and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Mohan, Brief Holder for the State Mr. C.S. Rawat, Advocate for respondent No. 5. Mr. Atul Bhatt, Standing Counsel for Union of India/respondent No. 1. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs: “I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondent no.5 and 6 from plying their vehicles in the petitioner's routes i.e. Dehradun-Vikasnagar-Dakpatthar of which the respondent no.5 and 6 are not authorized. II. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the official respondent i.e. respondent no. 4 to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the respondent no.5 and 6 for illegal operation of the vehicle on the petitioner's route. 3. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent development, UKHC010126922023 2026:UHC:5726 especially order passed by Additional Transport Commissioner, Uttarakhand on 07.07.2026, petitioner do not want to press the writ petition, therefore he may be permitted to withdraw the same.

4. In view of the prayer made by petitioner’s counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.07.2026 Mahinder/