Uttarakhand High Court

Bansidhar Gayal v. State of Uttarakhand

2026:UHC:5691 · WPMS/2076/2026

Decision date
2026-07-13
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

UKHC010119312026 2026:UHC:5691 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/2076/2026 Bansidhar Gayal …Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand …Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. Mr. D K Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 & 5. 4. According to the petitioner, he moved an application before District Magistrate, Nainital with a request to revisit the order dated 02.02.2023, whereby he was declared to be unauthorisedly occupying public land. Such application was reportedly moved by petitioner on 10.02.2023. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Nainital to consider and dispose of petitioner’s application dated 10.02.2023 (annexure 7 to the writ petition), one way or the other, within six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 13.07.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH DigitallyDN:UTTARAKHAND,2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3,serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0,Date:c=IN,2026.07.13postalCode=263001,signedo=HIGHby04:47:17COURTNITIcn=NITIRAJOF-07'00'SINGHRAJst=UTTARAKHAND,UTTARAKHAND,SINGHASWALASWALou=HIGH COURT OF ASWAL