UKHC010173112023 2026:UHC:5734 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/3016/2023 Rekha Jaiswal --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the respondent. 2. According to petitioner, she has made a representation to the Joint Secretary, Mussorrie Dehradun Development Authority (MDDA), who may be directed to take decision thereupon. 3. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel appearing for MDDA submits that although it appears to be a private dispute between petitioner and the builder; however, he has no objection if writ petition is disposed of in terms of the prayer made by petitioner’s counsel. 4. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned UKHC010173112023 2026:UHC:5734 counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to make fresh representation. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If she makes representation within two weeks, decision thereupon shall be taken within eight weeks thereafter. 6. It goes without saying that the persons who are likely to be affected by the decision may also be heard. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.07.2026 Mahinder/