Uttarakhand High Court

Anchal Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

2026:UHC:5228 · WPMS/1905/2026

Decision date
2026-07-01
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

UKHC010107592026 2026:UHC:5228 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/1905/2026 Anchal Devi --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Aakash Sanyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Mohan, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for the University/respondent No. 2. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent No. 02 to conduct the backlog exam of the petitioner for two subjects i.e. Business Communication & Law of Contract in the academic session 2026-27 and declare the result of the petitioner and issue degree to the petitioner for BBA. LLB course. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to make representation to the competent authority in the University. UKHC010107592026 2026:UHC:5228 4. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel appearing for University submits that he has no objection if writ petition is disposed of in terms of prayer made by petitioner’s counsel.

5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If he makes representation within 10 days from today, decision thereupon shall be taken by Registrar of Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Utarakhand Technical University, as per law, within six weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 01.07.2026 Mahinder/