Uttarakhand High Court

Anshul Jagwan v. State of Uttarakhand

BA1/864/2026

Decision date
2026-06-30
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rakesh Thapliyal

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedingsSL. Date or COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERSNo. directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures UKHC010085952026 BA1/864/2026 With MCRC 1/2026 (For Modification Application) Anshul Jagwan --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Shivam Rana, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The modification application has been moved for seeking modification in the order dated 30.06.2026. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant in addition to the section already specified in the current bail order some more sections namely section 64(2)(m), 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 and section 5L/6 of the POCSO Act be added in the order dated 30.06.2026. 5. Modification application is allowed. 6. The order dated 30.06.2026 be modified accordingly. 7. This order be treated as part of the order dated 30.06.2026. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 08.07.2026 PR