Uttarakhand High Court

Shri Harmeet Singh Kohli v. Mohd Raghib

2026:UHC:5016 · WPMS/1847/2026

Decision date
2026-06-17
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

UKHC010104732026 2026:UHC:5016 Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or SL. No. Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/1847/2026 Shri Harmeet Singh Kohli --Petitioner Versus Mohd Raghib --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Petitioner filed a Suit for injunction along with temporary injunction application. He also moved application under Rule 13 of General Rules (Civil), claiming that the Suit be entertained during summer vacation and prayer for temporary injunction may also be considered during vacation. 3. The application filed under Rule 13 was rejected by the Trial Court. Petitioner has challenged the said order dated 11.06.2026. 4. Since the Civil Courts would reopen on 01.07.2026, therefore the writ petition is disposed of with a request to the Court concerned to entertain the suit immediately upon reopening of the Courts, after vacation and to consider petitioner’s prayer for interim relief, as per law. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.06.2026 Mahinder/