t 3303l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPIEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13381 OF 2026 Between: Advocate Jahed Ali, lbrahim @ Jamed, S/o. Mohd Yakub Ali, Aged about 39 Years, Occ. Practicing Advocate, R/o. H No. 19-5-321131N6/2, Mohamood Nagar, Kishanbagh, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by" its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ... Respondent 2. Neha Begum, Wo. Mohammed lbrahim, Aged about 37 Years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Nizamnagar, Kishanbagh, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUDefacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash in FIR No. 226 of 2026, dated 01/08i2026 on the File of the P.S Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 226 of 2026, dated 01.08.2026 on the File of the P.S Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Crl. Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ind upon healng the arguments of Sri Ambedkar Dunna' iao Veeramalla, learned AdditionalAdvocate for the Petitioner'and Sri Jii'hender Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEIANGANA AT I{YDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI ruSTICE J. SRIENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13381 of 2026 (CNR No. HBHC0 10s60232O26) DATE: 07.09.2026 Between : Advocate Jahed Ali, Ibrahim @ Jamed ....Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana and another ..Respondents :ORDER: This criminal petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.226 of 2026 of Bahadurpura Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 324, 329(3), 79 and 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard Mr. Dunna Ambedkar, Iearned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Iearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 state. with their consent, the criminal petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated in the present crime only on the ground that he filed a suit in O.S.No.l639 of 2025 on behalf of Mohd. Khaja, who is the plaintiff, against respondent No.2 and another seeking calcellation of the registered -- gift deed dated 04.02.2017 and consequently declare the registered gift deed dated 30.06.2020 as null and void and not binding on the IANo 654 ofplaintiff therein and aiong with the said suit, he filed 2025 seeking ad lnterim iniunction and the learned XVIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Citl' Cir'il Court at Hyderabad' Eiranted ad interim injunction on I0.02.202ti. Aggrieved by the said order' respondent No.2 and another filed C.NI.A.No 13 of 2026 and tLLe same is pending before the XXIV Additional Chief Judge, Citl' Civil Court' Hyderabad' Respondent No.2, by making omnibus allegations' implicated the are ci\il disputes r'vhich petitioner as an accusecl only to'settle the O'S'Nc''1639 of 2025 by pencling between her and the plaintiff in giving criminai colour and the same is clear abuse of the process of Iaw,

Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that 4. Per contra,learned the there are specific allegations levelled against the petitioner in 2 into the property of respondent No compiaint regarding trespass the prinn facie attract ancl other allegations. The said allegations ingredientsoftheoffencesundersections324,3:19(3)'79and351(2) readwlth3(5)oftheBNS'Whethertheallegationslevelledinthe complaint are true or not, the same has to be revealed during the course of investigation. Holfever, as the imprisonment prescribed for the off'enccs is less than seven years, the Investigating Officer has already servecl a notice under Section 35(3) of ttLe BNSS on accused --- 3 same No.2 and the Investigating Officer will follow the very procedure in respect of the petitioner. However, the petitioner has BNSS been avoicling receiving the notice under Section 35(3) of the and has not been cooperatmg with the rnvestigation.

petitioner, by way of reply, submitted 5. Learned counsel for the that.the petitioner will cooperate w'rth the investigation. submissions made by the 6. Having considered the rival on respective parties and upon perusal of the material available record, it reveals that the offences levelled against the petitioner are Even punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. Prosecutor, the accordhg to the Iearned Additional Public 3 5(3) of Investigating Officer has already served notice under Section same the BNSS on accused No.2 and he intends to follow the very procedure in respect of the petitioner. directed to issue notice 7. Hence, the Investigating Officer is the under Section 35(3) of BNSS to the petitioner and follow guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs' State of Bihar'. that the petitioner is entitled to put B. It ls needless to mention forth his grievance upon receipt of the notice under Section 35(3) of '(20 r 4) 8 scc 273 rr- + the BNSS and is also entitlcd to submit the documents, if any, which are in his custody. is 9. Subject to the above directions, the Criminal Petition disposed of Ntiscelianeous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ) SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The special Judiciar First crass lr/agistrate For Exr:ise cases at Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer, Bahadurpura police Station Hyderabad.

3. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri Ambedkar Dunna, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CD Copies GNK/BA 1. HIGH COURT DATED: 0710912026 ,tffi S'fATE 1t\I 9 q 1 sstP 2$28 o,o C1lif i o i DET;i'Pfi ORDER CRLP.No.1338'l of 2026 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION B'*liis llcls Lilla1

t 3303l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPIEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13381 OF 2026 Between: Advocate Jahed Ali, lbrahim @ Jamed, S/o. Mohd Yakub Ali, Aged about 39 Years, Occ. Practicing Advocate, R/o. H No. 19-5-321131N6/2, Mohamood Nagar, Kishanbagh, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by" its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ... Respondent 2. Neha Begum, Wo. Mohammed lbrahim, Aged about 37 Years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Nizamnagar, Kishanbagh, Hyderabad. ...RespondenUDefacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash in FIR No. 226 of 2026, dated 01/08i2026 on the File of the P.S Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 226 of 2026, dated 01.08.2026 on the File of the P.S Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Crl. Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition ind upon healng the arguments of Sri Ambedkar Dunna' iao Veeramalla, learned AdditionalAdvocate for the Petitioner'and Sri Jii'hender Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEIANGANA AT I{YDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI ruSTICE J. SRIENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13381 of 2026 (CNR No. HBHC0 10s60232O26) DATE: 07.09.2026 Between : Advocate Jahed Ali, Ibrahim @ Jamed ....Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana and another ..Respondents :ORDER: This criminal petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.226 of 2026 of Bahadurpura Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 324, 329(3), 79 and 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Heard Mr. Dunna Ambedkar, Iearned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Iearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 state. with their consent, the criminal petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated in the present crime only on the ground that he filed a suit in O.S.No.l639 of 2025 on behalf of Mohd. Khaja, who is the plaintiff, against respondent No.2 and another seeking calcellation of the registered -- gift deed dated 04.02.2017 and consequently declare the registered gift deed dated 30.06.2020 as null and void and not binding on the IANo 654 ofplaintiff therein and aiong with the said suit, he filed 2025 seeking ad lnterim iniunction and the learned XVIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Citl' Cir'il Court at Hyderabad' Eiranted ad interim injunction on I0.02.202ti. Aggrieved by the said order' respondent No.2 and another filed C.NI.A.No 13 of 2026 and tLLe same is pending before the XXIV Additional Chief Judge, Citl' Civil Court' Hyderabad' Respondent No.2, by making omnibus allegations' implicated the are ci\il disputes r'vhich petitioner as an accusecl only to'settle the O'S'Nc''1639 of 2025 by pencling between her and the plaintiff in giving criminai colour and the same is clear abuse of the process of Iaw,

Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that 4. Per contra,learned the there are specific allegations levelled against the petitioner in 2 into the property of respondent No compiaint regarding trespass the prinn facie attract ancl other allegations. The said allegations ingredientsoftheoffencesundersections324,3:19(3)'79and351(2) readwlth3(5)oftheBNS'Whethertheallegationslevelledinthe complaint are true or not, the same has to be revealed during the course of investigation. Holfever, as the imprisonment prescribed for the off'enccs is less than seven years, the Investigating Officer has already servecl a notice under Section 35(3) of ttLe BNSS on accused --- 3 same No.2 and the Investigating Officer will follow the very procedure in respect of the petitioner. However, the petitioner has BNSS been avoicling receiving the notice under Section 35(3) of the and has not been cooperatmg with the rnvestigation.

petitioner, by way of reply, submitted 5. Learned counsel for the that.the petitioner will cooperate w'rth the investigation. submissions made by the 6. Having considered the rival on respective parties and upon perusal of the material available record, it reveals that the offences levelled against the petitioner are Even punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years. Prosecutor, the accordhg to the Iearned Additional Public 3 5(3) of Investigating Officer has already served notice under Section same the BNSS on accused No.2 and he intends to follow the very procedure in respect of the petitioner. directed to issue notice 7. Hence, the Investigating Officer is the under Section 35(3) of BNSS to the petitioner and follow guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs' State of Bihar'. that the petitioner is entitled to put B. It ls needless to mention forth his grievance upon receipt of the notice under Section 35(3) of '(20 r 4) 8 scc 273 rr- + the BNSS and is also entitlcd to submit the documents, if any, which are in his custody. is 9. Subject to the above directions, the Criminal Petition disposed of Ntiscelianeous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ) SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The special Judiciar First crass lr/agistrate For Exr:ise cases at Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer, Bahadurpura police Station Hyderabad.

3. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri Ambedkar Dunna, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CD Copies GNK/BA 1. HIGH COURT DATED: 0710912026 ,tffi S'fATE 1t\I 9 q 1 sstP 2$28 o,o C1lif i o i DET;i'Pfi ORDER CRLP.No.1338'l of 2026 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION B'*liis llcls Lilla1