I [321s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION Nos. 10224.10216. 5868, 11092.11093. 11094. 11095 11096 11100 11101 11103 11104 11105 11106 11107 11108 12142 12143 12144 12145 12146 12147 12148 12145 12150 12151 12152 12153 '|.2154 12155 12156 12157 12159 12160, 14625.14627.14629 &14630 0F 2021 i i.' WRIT PETITION NO: 102240F 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerosp ace SEZ, Plot No 1/D, S No. 656,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy District, vT elangana 301510 Represented by its Senior Manager. Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada ...PETITIONER AND S.Venkatesham, S/o Salla Anjaiah Ag e 28 years, Occ. Associate, Fyo H. No 2-18,Pothanpally, Chegunta Mandal, Medak Districl' 502247 ...RESP.NDENT ' Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 1 .A. No. 78 of 2o21and LA.passed by the Hon.ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in No. 79 of 2021 in T.D. No. 31 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 2

lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 1810212021 in l.A. No.78 of 2021 and l.A. No. 79 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 'f OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l-D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No- 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed tn W.P. No. 10224 of 2021 until further order. 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T ANAND SUBRAMANIAM Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 10216 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. '1lD, Sy No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana -501510 Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada ...PET|TIONER AND Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, Ryo. Plot No 122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-'t, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 76 of 2o21and l.A. No. 77 of 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 181O212021 in l.A. No. 76 of 2021 and l.A. No. 77 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition. 1 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2O.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 09.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 1O216 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Between: Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, R/o. Plot No.122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. 1/D, S No. 656, elanganaAditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, t - Rep. by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1021612021 on 2010412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAM 5 Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 5868 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Ad itya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, T elangana Represented by its General lvlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swamy, Aged about 29 years, R/o.37-76,77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 18 of 2021, l.A. No. 143 of 2019, l.A. No. 71 of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 73 ot 2017 daled 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 1A NO: 1 OF 2!21 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 and stay all further proceedings in l.A. No. 18 of 2021,1.A. No. 143 of 20'19, l.A. No. 7'l of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 73 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order 6 f ile of Labour Court-|, atdated 20.'1 1 .2023 passed in lD No.73 of 2017 on the Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 73 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 2112.2023 passed in W.P. No. 5868 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swam v, Rr/o. 37-76, 77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga R eddy District, Telangana ...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne .,.RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 25lOBl2O21 in W.P.No. 5868 of 2021 on 3010612021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN l WRIT PETITION NO: 11092OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PET|TIONER AND Anand Balasaheb Jadhav, S/o. Balasaheb Umaji Jadhav, Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H.No. 102-2, Old Gram Panchayath, Badangpet, Saroornagar (M) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 5ooo58 ...RESP.NDENT Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 134 ol 2021, and l.A. No. 135 of 2021 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 135 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 134 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 8 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 7 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - I, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11092 of 2021 until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11093 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Teiangana Represented by its General Manager, ltr'lr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Vinod Sahebro More S/o Sahebrao More, Age 27 yearc, Occ: Associate, Rl/o. PlotNo 86/P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058 ...RES'ONDENT

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No.86 ot 2021, l.A. No. 87 of 2021 in l.D. No. 27 oI 2019 daled 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 9 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l.A. No. 86 of 2021 and l.A. No. 87 ol 2O21in LD. No. 27 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing lhe additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D-No.27 ot 2O19 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 F 2024

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 27 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 1 1093 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM l0 WRIT PETITION NO: 11094 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by ils General Manager, It4r. Arjtm Myne ...PETITIONER AND Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: about 34 years, Occupation: Associate, R/o-H.No-1-103/'1, Sama Street-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,1.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 1OO ot 2021 and lA. No. 48 of 2021 in LD. No. 97 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardshrp and loss. IA O:'l F 2021 Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,l.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 100 of 2021 and l.A. No. 48 of 2021 in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 97 ot 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ll lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11094 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: 34 years, Occ: Associate, R/o. H.No-1-103/1, Sama Stieet-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.65O Ndltyq Nagar, Adibatla (V)lbrahimpatnam Mandal,'Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep by itsGenerai Manager' Mr' Arjtm Myne pETraoNER ...REspoNDENTMRrr Petition under Section '15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1094vacate the order dated: 27 .04.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 ol 2021 in W.P.No. of 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM ) WRIT PETITION NO: 11095 OF 202't Between:

M/s- Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Lokesha A, S/o Anjainappa, Aged: about 36 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o. Plot No. 33, H.No.1-68/4 Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District-500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1.A. No.88 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 89 of 2021 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 dated 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of justice and equtty, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l-A. No.88 of 2021 and l.A. No. 89 o'f 2021 in l.D. No. 26 ot 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evrdence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. t3 lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11095 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: - WR]T PETITION No 11096 0F 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, Aged: about 34 years, Occupation. Specialist, Fl/o Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District' Telangana' ...RES'.NDENT

Petition under pi.ticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in LA. No.43 ol 2021,1.A. No. 105 of 2021, l.A. No. 1O4 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. l4 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 in LA. No.43 of 2021,l.A. No. 105 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 104 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. IANO:1OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11096 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, RJo. Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. ...PETITION EFYRESPONDENT AND l5 M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dishict -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun lr,lyne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flled in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in W.P.No. 1106of 2021 on 27.04.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11100 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Rl/o.C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, Aged about 35 years, Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Honorable Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in LA. No.3of 2021,l.A. No. 146 ot 2021,1.A. No. 147 of 2021 and l.A. No.4 of 2021 in l.D. No. 76 ot 2017 daled 1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 3 of 16 2021, l.A.No.4 of 2019, LA. No. 146 of 2021,l.A No. 147 of 2021 in LD. No.76of 2017 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-l , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.76 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pelition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20j1.2023 on behalf of the I,Respondent Workman in lD No 76 of 2O17 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 21 .122023 passed in W.P. No. 11'100 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, R/o. Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District. ...PET|IONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep. by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER I7

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2O21 in W.P.No. 11100 ol 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11101OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne AND ...PET|TTONER Manish Kumar, S/o Munshilal Choudhari R/o H.No. 6-801111, SLNS Colony, BalapurX Roads, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500053 ...RES,ONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indla praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in lhe nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 45 ot 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021, l.A. No. 1O2 of 2021 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 dated 18.O2.2O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 45 of 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021,1.A. No. 102 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lri lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 1'l 101 of 202'l until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11'103 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagql, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Ivlr. Arjun lt/yne ...PETITIONER AND Dibyapratap Mohanta, S/o Birendra Mohanta Age 23 years, Occ.Associate, R/o H. No 6-i 1-9/A, Annapurna nagar Colony, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be l9 pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and to quash and set aside the common order dated 18.02.202'1 passed 85 ofby the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 84 of 2021and l A No 2021 in LD. No. 28 oI 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No' 84 of 2021 and l.A. No. 85 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 28 ot 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad IANO:2 OF 2024 Petition under section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1 103 of 2021 until furtherextend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in w.P. No. order. ZO lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between Dibyapratap S/o Birendra Mohanta,Rl/o H. No 6-1 1-9/A, Annapurna Nagar Colony, Badangpet,^/ohanta,Hyderabad- 500058 ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne ...RESpoNDENT/vlrRrr pETrroNER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 2510812021 in W.P.No. 1 'l 103 of 2021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11104 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PET|T|ONER AND Naresha, S/_o _ Nagireddy, Aged about 33 years, Rl/o. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornaga(M) Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 ot 2021, l.A. No. 149 of 2019, l.A. No. 148 ot 2021 and l.A. No.2 ot 2021 in LD. No. 75 o'f 2017 dated 1810212O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, olherwise the petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 2t lA NO: 1 oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 'l ofsuspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 2021,l.A. No. 149 of 2019,1.A. No. 148 of 2021 and l.A. No.2 of 2021 in LD. No. 75 of 2017 dated 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Cou(-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Pelition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.75 of 2017 on the file of Labour Courf l, at Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 75 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. tA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P. No. 11104 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Naresha, S/o Nagireddy, Ryo. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornagar (M) Ranga Reddy District ...pETrrroNER/REspoNDENT AND 22 M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by its General ltlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.No.1 1104 of 2021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11105 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Dileep, S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aged: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Rl/o. H.No.1-76, Neelam Yadagiri Bui lding, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 51 of 2021, l.A. No. 97 of 2021,l.A. No. 96 of 2021 and l.A. No. 52 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 'l OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in LA. No. 51 of 23 2021,1.A. No.97of 2021,1.A. No.96of 2021 and l.A.No.52of 2021 inl.D.No. 99 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad IA NO: 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in lD No 99 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. . lA NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1 105 of 2021 until further extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. orders. IA NO: 20F 2021 Between: Dileeo. S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aqed: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Fl/o. H.No:i-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...PETITIONERvRESPONDENT AND

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne pETrroNER ...RES'.NDENTMR.r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Z4 '1 1 105vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 o'f 2021 in W.P.No. of 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11106 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy. No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) 501510, Telangana. Represented bylbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne. ...PETTT|ONER AND

Srihari Kandregula S/o. Venkata Ramana, aged about 33 years, Rl/o. C.No.:P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029. ...RES'ONDENT Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in 1.A.No.117 of 2021, and |.A.No.116 of 2021 in lD No.84 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise,the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, pending disposal of the present writ petition, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.O2.2O21 in 1.A.No.117 of 2O21 and 1.A.No.116 of 2021 in l.D.No.84 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass 25

orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o11 -2023 on behalf of the RespondentWorkmaninlDNoE4of2OlEonthefileofLabourCourt-|, Hyderabad. IA NOi 2OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy and Xerox copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 84 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' IANO:3O F 24 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to 1 1 106 of 2021 until furtherextend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in w.P. No. orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: -- WRIT PETITION NO: 11107 OF 2021 Between: Adibatla Nagar, Sy.No-.656, Limited, Systems Tata Advanced ,(V)M/s. ^Aditya Dy Represente6 Telangana - 501 510, District Ranga Reddy Mandal,ibrahimoatnam its General Manager, Mr. Arjun MYne ...PETITIONER i AND

Usr,Tl&!:','ifihl;"''"?1,%3j,;llll*&''"xin"*3:/"&'ibo"f;loi,'"83[8iHil[ *Gopalapuram, Vishakapatnam-S3O027 ...RES,ONDENT PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and to quash and set aside the common order dated 18.02.2021 passed 73 ofbythe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No 72of 2021 andlA No 2021 in l.D. No. 44 of 2O1g with regard to additional evidence and received 26 documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. IAN oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 72 of 2021 and l.A. No. 73 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 44 ol 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2O23 in I.D. No. 44 ol 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 44 ot 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 in W.P. No. 11107 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Naresh Chilakalapalli, s/o ch. Mangayyaa, Fl/o. H.No.58-18-23/3, lndiraPriyadarshani Colony Near NAD Road, Butchirajupalem Gopalapuram, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONE R/RESPONDENT 27 AND Mis. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1110712021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIO HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11108 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne i aro ...PETITIONER R. Ambareesha, S/o Ramakrishna ppa, aged about 25 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o Flat No.'12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021, l.A. No. 108 of 2021 and l.A. No. 40 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additlonal documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: I OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 28

suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 108 ot 2021 and l.A. No.40 of 2021 in l.D.No. 93 of 2018 daled 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11108 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12142 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, TelanganaRepresented by its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar ...pETlroNER AND 29 Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Aged: about 34 ears, Occ: Ex.Associate R/o C/o: P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTU AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089,3rd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 50002 vc,I ,..RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212O21 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No.37 of 2021,l.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 38 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Pelitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No.37 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 of 2021 and l.A. No. 38 of 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 24 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 30 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12142 ot 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Fl/o C/o: P. Damodqr Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'o floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i' M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Represented bv its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar ...RESpoNDENT/wRrr pETrroNER Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214212021 on 0110612021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO:'12143 OF 2021 Between: M/s Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...PETITlONER AND J-Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra Mahadeva, Aged 29 years Occ: Specialist Rl/o Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District, Telangana ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 3l

pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 41 of 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021' IA. No. 1OG of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of .iustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 'l OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of a certified copy of order in l.A. No. 41 of 2021' l.A. No. 1O7 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in -the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 181O212021 passed in l.A. No. '41 ot 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the 32 Respondent Workman in LD. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 '1 Petition under Section 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12143 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Between: I J.Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra lvlahadeva, Aged: 29 years Occ: Specialist, Fl/o. Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT i AND M/s Tata Lockheed lrr'lartin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50'1510, TelanganaRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar r . ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETIT]ONER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state_d in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No.2 ot 2021 in W.P.No.12143 of 2021 in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12144 OF 202'l Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND 33 lvlohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, agpd about 28 years, R/o C/o P. Damoda!' Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Naray-nguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 115 of 2O21, 1.A. No. 33ot2021,1.A. No. 114 ol 2O21 and I.A. No.34 ol 2021 in l.D. No.85of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.202'1 in l.A. No. 115 of 2021,1.A. No.33of 2021,1.A. No. 114ot2021 and 1.A.No.34ol 2O21 inl.D.No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. IANO:1OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court-Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.1'l .2023 in l.D. No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 34 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12144 ot 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Mohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, Fl/o. C/o. P. Damodar R eddy, organizing s6ii6tirv, iurUc,-Ap 6no reta'ngana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. i; ...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT AND t. ir M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section ',l51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214412021 on 01lOOl2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PET!TION NO: 12145 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana iRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Hemant A Paqare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H No.86 P Shiva Sainagdr, Badangpet, Saroomagar(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...RESPONDENT 35 Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set astde the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in I.A. No. 137 of 2021 , l.A No. 1,5 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021 and l.A. No.16 oi 2021 ia l.D. No.6 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 137 of 2021, l.A. No. 15 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021 and l.A. No.16 of 2021 in l.D. No.6 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 'f OF 2024

P"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in, I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in l.D.No.06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. I lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 36 extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12145 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Hemant A Pagare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, R/o. H.No. 86 P Shiva Sainagar, Badangpet, Saroomaga(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENTM'RIT PETITIONER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214512021 on 01.06.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12146 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, TelanganaRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar i ...PETITIONER AND Nagaraju Mahadeva, S/o Mahadeva, a ged about 23 years, RYo . H.No.1-103/4, Samas Street, Bhishmanagar Colony, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ..RESPONDENT Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the aFfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by lhe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad l.A. No. 1 1 of 2O21,1.A. No. 12 37 of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No. 141 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: I OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 of in l.A. No. 11 of 2021,1.A. No. 12 of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No.'14'l of 2021 in ID. No. 93 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 024 in I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 93 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 in.. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' IANO 30F 2024 ; I e"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in w.P. No. 12146 of 2021 until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM 38 WRIT PETITION NO: 12147 OF 2021 Between:

M/s- Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lr/r. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER : AND V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, aged about 30 years, Fl/o C/o. P-DaqoQg,r Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor. Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RES'ONDENT Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in :the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 125 ol 2021, l.A. No. 27 of 2021, l.A. No. 124 of 2021 and l.A. No. 28 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 with 'andregard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to rl suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 125 of 2021,l.A. No. 27 of 2021,l.A. No. 124 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 28 of 2021 in l.D. No. ]1 6 of 201 8 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. i lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. '16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 39 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12147 of 2021 until fu(her order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, R/o C/o. P. Damod.ar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Telangana Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ,..RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021 on O1lOOl2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN -10 WRIT PETITION NO: 12148 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adit ya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND

Sangamesh, S/o lvlanohar, Aged about 30 years, R/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, Narayanguda' Hyderabad - 500029 ...RE''.NDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 121 of 2021, l.A.,No. 29 of 2021,l.A. No. 120 of 2021 and 1.A. No. 30 of 2021 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documlnts and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, ottrerwise f the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 passed in l.A. No. 121 of 2021,1.A. No. 29 of 2021,1.A. No. 120 of 2021 and l.A. No. 30 oI 2O21 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -t, Hyderabad. 4l lA NO: 2 OF 2024 in ; r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1 .2023 in LD. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12148 of 2021 until fu(her orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: 'sangamesh, S/o Manohar, R/o C/o. P. Darlgdar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ... PETITION ER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by itssenior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar ...REspoNDENT/wRrr ,ETITT'NER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214812O21 on01.06.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12149 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255, Aditya Na gar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ..,PETITIONER AND Sri Venkatesh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28 years, Ri/o. Damodar Reddy, Organising Secretary,H.No. 3-5-1089, 3'" Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in LA. No. 133 of 2021, l.A. No. 19 of 2021 , 1.A. No. 132 of 2021 and l.A. No.20 of 2O21 in LD. No. 12 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. IANO:1O 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2O21 in l.A- No. 133 of 2021,1.A. No. 19 of 2021,1-A. No. 132 ot 2021 and l.A. No.20 of 2021 in l.D No 12 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket older daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 43 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P No. 12149 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 202'l Between:

'Sri Venkate S h Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28 years, Ri/o. Damodar Reddy, H.No. 3-5-1089, 3' d Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ii ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND ...M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Telangana hdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Rep. by iti Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 1r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in W.P.No. 12149 oi 2021 in the :nterests of Justice. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12150 OF 2021 Between: ya Nagar, M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adit Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Telangana Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Khandappa Kasinath, S/o Kasinath, aoed about 27 vea$. Rl/o C/o P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AF-ino feiangaria Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ..RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in: the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and sel aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 19 of 2021 , l.A. No. No. 83 of 2018with31 ol 2O21 ,l.A No. 118 ot 2021 and I.A No.32of 2021 in l.D. regard to amendment of Claim Statement, recerving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpug ned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 1 I 9 of 2021, l.A. No. 31 of 2021, l.A. No. 118 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2O21 in l.D. No 83 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of ithe Respondent Workman in l.D.No.83 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court'- l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to 45 extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12150 of 2021 until further orders. r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: -- .il WRIT PETITION NO: 12151OF 2021 B etw een M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Na gar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND y.e.ar9,. Occ: Associate, Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/o Kasheem Bagayat, Age 2l R/o. H. No 13-173l1fokayukta Colony, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ...RESPONDENT ,, the Constitution of lndia praying that in the r Petition under Article 226 of ",I. r'iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ,.. l

Iliileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of '-tertiorari 18.O2-2O2O1 and to quash and set aside the Common order dated i:assed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 57 of 2021, l.A. No. 58 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 90 ot 2021 and I.A. No. 91 ot 2O21 in I.D. No. 102 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 't! lA NO: { OF 2021 I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18-02.2021 in l.A- No. 57 of 2021,1.A. No.58of 2021, l.A. 90 of 2021 and l.A. No. 91 of 2021 in l.D. No. 102 of ,f2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. r,) 16 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass . theorders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 1O2 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 102 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court l, i-Hyderabad. 'l. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated_ in t: . tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased th erextend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12151 of 2021 until fur.l lorders. a lA NO: 2 OF 2O2'l Between: Ameer Kasheem B agayat, S/o Kasheem Bhagayat, Rl/o. H.No.13-173/1, Lokayukta Colony, Badangpet , Ranga Reddy District. l ...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its Senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar ...RESpoNDENT/wRrr pET:TroNER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased .lo vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215112O21 on 01.06.2021 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA I 47 .Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12152OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District 50 1510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lvlr. Nitin Kumar .,.PETITIONER AND Rames h Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged about 27 yearc, Rl/o C/o P. Damodar 'secretaiy, Redd v, Organizing INTUC,-AP and Telarigana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd r-rfloor, N aratanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the !*iii,.':cl rcumstances stated in the affidavlt filed therewith, the High Court may be ij:leased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of t ,*bertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 {:!l't. bythe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 127 of 2021,1-4.No. ',:"passed ',7s of zOz't,l.A. No. 126 of 2021 and I.A. No. 26 of 2o21 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 with to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and ,.,li"SrrO i':rbvidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner ': will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,:llANO: 1 oF 2021

; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in i ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 Is'uspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 127 of tt=iozl, te. No. 25 0f 2021,1.A. No. 126 0l 2021 and l.A. No. 26 0f 2021 in l.D. No. 1 , Hyderabad. ' '.!1's or zo t e on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in lD No 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. { t 48 IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12152 of 2021 until fu er orders. I I IlA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

Ramesh Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged: 27 yearc, Ryo. P. Damodar_- Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND I M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 5015'10, Telangana Rep by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar .,,RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER I Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12152 of 2021 in the interests of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM I 49 WRlT PETITION NO: 12153 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed l\,lartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...'ETITIONER ;i AND ..1 ,1 Milind Tidka, S/o. Ashok Shankar Tidka, Age 29 years, Occ. Specialist, Rl/o Plot No. 86P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ..RESPONDENT rt

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the be . aircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may . iileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated '18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 74 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 75 of . :.2021 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received ''documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer rlt r ,{grave hardship and loss. ',xt :NO: 1 OF 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in to :'.the affidavit filed in supPort of the petition, the High Court may be pleased .-iuspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No- 74 oflrt t rr. :Yd2l ana l.A. No. 75 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in rl'i :l I' the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.'11.2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in l.D.No.33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -,HYd erab ad , t{,l:I t'l,'t ,l I l I I I 50 lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased , to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. IA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12153 of 2021 until further ' i:order. I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: - I .-, ir. WRIT PETITION NO: 12154 OF 2021 'ri. t: /t,I ! Between: ll M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),I lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by Iits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar AND ...PETITIONER i Shiva Kumar JK, Sio. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 yea.s, Rl/o. 1 -68, Sri Maha lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornaga(M), Ranga Reddy Diskict - 500058. ...RESPONDENT i.

Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18/02/2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 7 of 2O21 , l.A. No.8 of 2021, l.A. No, 142 of 2021 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 with regard to ir amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave Ihardship and loss. 51 t fA NO: 'f OF 2021 '1 in lli Petition under Section 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated lthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .,guspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l.A. No. 7 of :,2021,1.A. No.8 of 2021, LA. No. 142 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ;.; l:' l!he. affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to jiiispense , with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order lidated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - [, Hyderabad. .*:r :?. i:;lANo:2oF2024 .;11

.' eetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in {,..r. *$he-,affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass ,.!{tl .:l I tbrders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o.11 .2023 on behalf of the .Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, 'lHyderabad.'a.i,l . '.]tt . lA NO: 3 OF 2024 praying that in the circumstances stated in . , Petition under Section 151 CPC the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ,$xtend the order daled 12-0'l-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12154 ot 2021 until further ...iorder. ittl itA No; 2 oF 2021 ,1, i l Between: ,.Shiva Kumar JK, S/o. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 years, Rl/o.1-68, Sri Maha :lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District - 500058. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND a,i :,t & 52 M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its senior Manager' It'4r' Nitin Kumar pETrroNER ...RES'.NDENTMR,r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in W.P-No. 12154 of 2021 in the interests of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1215s OF 2021 i Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed lrtlartin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...PETITIONER AND ,,,,ii Rajendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, Aged: about 32 years, Occ. Associate Fl./ti. New Synergy Homet6lony, Turkayanjal, Rangareddy Didtrict, Telangana i ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that.,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of wljt, of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 53 ot 2Q21,l.A. No. 95 of 202'l and LA.,No. 94 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 daled 181O212021 dated 1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving addttional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer :grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in LA. No. 53 of i I t 53 l,':':

2021,1.A. No. 95 of 2O21 and I.A. No. 94 of 202'l in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in :i: Petition under Section the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass .orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the )rl I ,1.$espondent Workman in lD No 100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. NO:2 oF 2024 ..i;r.r: .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to '.r.,1'dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order ' ,..1 dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ; lA NO: 3 OF 2024 praying that in the circumstances stated in,{t,r, Petition under Section 151 CPC 'itthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . 'tuxtend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12155 of 202'1 until further , ,drders. *{. N 2 F 2021 :'1 .{between: :, Raiendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, R/o. New Synergy Home Colony, Tuikayanial, Rangareddy District, Telangana ]: ...PETITIoNER/RESPoNDENT AND il .'*:

'..M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER :aIi rii .l .l :.,*l,.'t ' .''1\l I I _tl 1.! al Petrtion under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to j .vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215512021 on 01 .06.2021 . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12156 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Tippanna Kantli, S/o Rachappa, aged about 31 years, Rl/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Oigianizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, | 'Naiayanglda, Hyderabad - 5ooo29 ...RESPONDENT l. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in!the I

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, - the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18lO2l2O2O1 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-!, Hyderabad in lA. No. 131 of 2O21, l.A. No. 2'1 of 2021, l.A. No.130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ln the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 181021202'1 in LA. No. 131 of 2021, l.A. No. 21 of 2021, l.A. 130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on the file of li Honorable Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. ..', ,.: 55 ! , lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 'l!i;': Petition under the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass ,,brders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the il'"Respondent l, Workman in lD No 13 ol 2018 on the file of Labour Court -I t{yderabad. :IANO:2OF2 024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ., the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ilispense with the filing of Ce(ified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. NO: 3 OF 24 .l stated in t:.. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to n d the order daled 12-01-2O24 passed in W.P. No. 12156 of 202'1 until further ,,8ti",. IA NO: 2 OF 2021 ,lriBetw een: ,rl Telangana Tippanna Kantli, Sig Rachappa, aged: 31 years, R/o. INTUC, AP & Branch, 3-5-1089,3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND iI {! Nagar' 1lM/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya rAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana .Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ! a ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER ri r P Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ivacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in LA.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12156 \of 2021 in the interests of Justice. 56 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12157 OF 2021 Between:

tvl/s. Tata Lockheed l\4artin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar r ...PETITIONER AND I H. Santosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 35 years, Ryo. H.No.6-191, S.L: N.S Colony, Balapur X Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana tb I ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in1 the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 13 of 2021, l.A. No. 14 of 2O21,1.A. No. 138 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 139 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 passed in l.A. No. 119 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 31 of 2021,1.A. No. 118 of 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2021 in l.D. No. 83 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be please d o i I I 57 dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of 20'17 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 ':l p"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in . the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass r'iriirders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the ,, ,'il.espondent Workman in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, 'i, .j.Hyderabad.! I ll'{i '. IA'NO: 3 OF 2024 i tl ,: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ,-!he affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ''':: bxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 12157 of 2021 until further order !.t,l lA NO: 2 OF 202 'Between:

. H.rSantosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, Fyo. H.No.6-191, S.L. N.S. Colony, Balapur X 'Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. I I ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT L! '}l, AND f: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, :,.lAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - ' 'Represented 50 1510, Telangana by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar rr : I ...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNER ,ti:i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . .vacale interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021 on 01 .06.2021 raCounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN , 58 WRIT PETITION NO: 12159 OF 2021 Between: tvl/s. Tata Lockheed lviartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represerlted :by'its Senior lt/anager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy, S/o Gaurang Charm Mohanth y, aged about 26 years, R/o C/o. P. Dangodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Bra.1ch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maylbe tr pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 129 of 2021 ,' l.A. rNo. .li 23 of 2O21,l.A. No. 128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 14 ot 2018 ,rt,r., with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise lthe I Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,l i lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta,tld" in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18-02.2021 in l.A. No. 129 of 2021,l.A. No. 23 of 2021, LA. No. '128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in l.D: ,No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. It:ll lA NO: 1 OF 2024 I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasef to , dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. j I II i :, 59 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 ,ri.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in :rl 'the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass : orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, I $espondent Workman in l.D. No. 14 ol r.:Hyderabad.,ii, lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in .-l :t:!he affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .iixtend the order daled 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12159 of 2021 until further i:rder. : ri.Cou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA tl **Cou nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN i' 'll WRIT PETITION NO: 121 60 0F 2021 r'l' ' 1'Between: ,l ,:tM/31. tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, 501510, Telangana XAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - '-l::Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...'ET.T,ONER AND G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Aged about 24 years, Ryo.H.No. l-77, Srilatha Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ,Building, ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly on in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1-A. No. 5 of 2021, l.A. No. 6 of ...2021, l.A. No. 144 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 145 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 77 of 2O17 with 'ibgard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner .ririll suffer grave hardship and loss. i,: 60 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Order dated 18.02.2021 passed in l.A. No. 145 ot 2021,1.A. No. 5 of 2021,1.A. No. 144 ol 2021 and l.A. No' 6 of 2021 in .D. No. 77 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ASSthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hlgh Court may be pleased to orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No.77 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. ;.tri :: ',llA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanc€s statOd in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may U" oru"."f!to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket grder dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No 77 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hrd"ilbfld lA NO: 3 OF 2024 lll: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stateldi in . tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased i extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12160 ot 2021 until further order. i i lA NO: 2 OF 2021 i 1,. Between: G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Rl/o.H.No.1-77, Srilatha Building, Badangpet, Saroornagar [\,4andal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. : l, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT :,:l''i AND I , '..1; i li I l: .1, 'I 6l ,ti , M/s. Tata Lockheed [/artin Aeroskuctures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, fvlr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER ' '.. i,i Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ln :'aI the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .Vacate the interim orders passed in WP No.121601 2021, dt.01.06.2021. 1:,lbou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA ;r, rlii , nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN lr "iou xl Ii WRIT PETITION NO: 14625 OF 2021

: Between: riirlls. fata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by Iits General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETrroNER AND il.Ramanianeyulu, S/o. B.Raju Aged about 32 years, R/o H.No. 6-44, Ayodhya 'Nagar, Mberpbt, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad, 500097 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the r] '.tircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 'pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ,jC<i*iorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 12.04.2021 passed :ll Liy the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 179 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 180 Jdt'zozl in l.D. No. 121 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ll1, i ,. , iddCuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer .'. grave hardship and loss. 1, ,, IANO: oF 2021 praying that in the circumstances stated in ,: Petition under Section 151 CPC the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 179 of 2021 and l.A. No. 180 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 12'1 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. .. ti il: ttitit il 62 N i 10F 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order l,dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 121 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court '-IHyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SS orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf ,of ] th e r;.1 Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 121 ol 2O18 on the file of Labour Court] al "{ Hyderabad. tit I i I ,'.:.l ilA NO: 3 OF 2024 i tiitrl Petition under Section 'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta tn : the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleas ed rto 'rl extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14625 of 2021 until further order. " f t Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA I Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI B. KRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: 14627 OF 2021 rt I t4 Between: li j M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No 1iD, Sy t',to:'OSO, Aditya Nagar, Aijibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (lvl) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -501510 Represented by its Deputy General lvlanager, Mr. Mandar Ravinder Pha{ke ...PETITIONER

AND :S.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. S. Satyam, Aged about 29 years, R/o H.No. 6-348, PlotI oOld Balaji Nagar, lvleerpet Saroornagar, Hyderabad 500097 if ...RESPONDENT :l' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in:the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court ma Y1 .be { rl *k --1 63 , pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of and to quash and set aside the common order dated 12.04.2o21 passed .certiorari r: by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 187 of 202land l.A' No 188 rl , -!6f zozl in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ..ttocuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer it girave hardship and loss. IA:NO: oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to f$usnenA the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 12.04.2021 in l.A. No. 187 of :,"zoz't and l.A. No. 188 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 ': Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 6..affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dpense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order I, ated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 125 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court -fderabad. t

r't NO 2 F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ' ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass 'il , .r".&rders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 125 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad 1A NO: 3 OF 2024 Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in il Petition under i*[re affiOavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .lfJxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14627 of 2021 until further Uro.r. ttl 1 64 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: 14629 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya NagaI, Adibatlal (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma t ...PETITIONER I AND V. Gangadhar Rao, S/o. Ramakrishna Rao, Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. Huda Colony, Chandanagar, Hyderabad - 500050 ...RESPONDENT l"

Petition under Adicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that'inf the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1210412021 palsed 'll by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,l.A. No.186 of 2021 ln l.D. No. 124 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statempnt, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of juslice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. i ll 'l' lA NO: 1 OF 2021 i,l. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,1.A. No.186 of 2021 in l.D. No.124 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble LaCour Court - 1, Hyderabad. i I lA NO: 1 OF 2024 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the :t Respondent Workman in 1.D.No.124 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court t Hyderabad. {I t I ,lf i, .:: :t 65 ri lA NO: 2 OF 2024

!i' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 124 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,:i' Ii+, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in riihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to i$Jri!"0 the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14629 of 2021 until further riJ.aer ir. t i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA 'dt l .i;S,Qounsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA 1t '' WRIT PETITION NO: 14630 OF 2021 l_lBetween: t*l r: -ll't/d. tata Sikorskv Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Genirral Manager. Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma ...PETITIONER AND 'Rajesh Chaganti, S/o. lssac, Aged about 34 years, Fl/o. 5-1-16/1'01d Meerpet i - Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT 4i

ilf praying that in the i, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia ll r. , ,IJircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be Ijt"aseO to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .iCertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 121O412021 passed lr 'kiy the Hon'ble Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 177 ol 2021' l.A. No.178 of 2021 in l.D. No. 12O of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, 'receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice !, 'Cnd equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ;l rl tiil *+ ll I 66 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1210412021 in l.A. No. 1 77. of 2021, l.A. No 178 of 2021 in l.D. No.120 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 i I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to t dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the d ef daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 120 oI 2018 on the file of Labour t, Hyderabad lA NO: 2 OF 2024 i

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf.offthe Respondent Workman in LD. No. 12O of 2018 on the file of Labour Courtlj I, Hyderabad. l I lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,'{l I I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may Ue Ofeaseflto extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 14630 of 2021 until furlher order. ',I'lifi counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA li Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA l' I i I The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I T : i"* THE HONOI'RABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI W.P.Nos. 1O224 102L6 5868 1to92 11093 LLO94 11095. 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 111()4, 11105, 11106, tlto7. rI108, 12142, 12143, 12L44, 12145, L2146, L2147, L2L4A L2L49 12150 t2t5t 12152 12153 L2154 12155 12L56, t2 157. 12159, 12160, 14625, 14627, L4629 & L+630 0F 2021 COMMON ORDER:

In these writ petitions, petitioner management is seeking a writ of certiorari, to quash and set aside the common order passed by the Labour Court- 1, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2021 in the interlocutory applications filed in the batch of ID's filed by the workmen of the petitioner company, such as in I.A.No.18 of 2O21, I.A.No.143 of 2019, I.A.No.7l of 2027 & I.A.No. 150 of 2O2l in I.D.No.73 of 2017, dated 18.02.2021, allowing the amendment of Claim petition, receipt of additional documents and evidence on record as bad in law, in the interest ofjustice, equality and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Similar orders have been challenged in the other Writ Petitions which are forming part of this batch. 2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ petitions are that the respondents were all employees of the petitioner company. On the ground that the workmen were 2 TMD,J W-P.No- 70224 of 2O21 & baach

unauthorizedly absent for a period of ten to srxteen days, the petitioner company has initiated disciplinary proceedings against some of the workmen. Out of 500 employees, who abstained from duties, for the charges of unauthorized absence, some were let off with deduction of 18 days wages, while 100 employees were charge sheeted, while some others were let off with minor punishment of with-holding two annual increments and continuity of service and some others were removed from service. The workmen, who have been removed from service therefore, filed IDs before the Labour Court challenging the removal order and during the pendency of ID, the petitioner in W.P.No.5868 of 2O2l has filed I.A.No. 143 of 2Ol9 to condone the delay and permit certain documents (as per the list enciosed there with) to be brought on record. The said I.A., rvas frled on 15.07.2019 and thereafter, the Labour Court has considered the contentions of both parties about the validity of domestic enquiry and has upheld the validity of domestrc enqurry. It is thereafter that the Tribunal has taken up I.A.No.143 of 2079 and also I.A.No.18 of 2021- which was filed by the respondents workmen to amend the claim petition, I.A.No.71 of 2O2L to adduce additional evidence and I.A.No.15O of 2021 to adduce two more documents. 3 TIVD'J W.P-No. 70224 of 2021 & ba.ch

has raised objections to said I.As., 3. The Management on the ground that since the domestic enquiry has been held to be valid, the workmen cannot now lead any new evidence on 11(A) of therecord as it is barred by the Proviso to Section Industrial Disputes Act. The Management had also relied upon certain judgments of the Hontrle Supreme Court in support of their contentions. However, the Labour Court has allowed the TlreI.As., by way of a common order dated 18.02.2027. Management has thus, challenged the orders dated l8-O2.2O21 by frling the present writ petitions and vide interim order dated 30.06.2021, the order d,ated' L8.O2.2021 passed by the Labour Court was suspended. However, relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Another Vs. Central Bureau of Investigationt wherein the Hon'lcle Supreme Court had held that an interim order of any Court shall be in force for a period of six months only unless extended by the Court, and since the interim order dated 18.02.2021 was not extended by this court, the Labour Court proceeded with the matter and examined the witnesses and marked documents as W1 to W29 and the matter is now stated to be posted for arguments. I (2018)16 scc 299 4 TMD'J W.P.No. 10224 of 2021 & bcach

4. l,r:arne d counsel appearing for the petitloner management, i.r,hile reiterating the above submissrons, submitted th.it the Proviso to Section 1 1(A) of the ID Act prohibits bringing on record of any new material, unless the Tribunal or Labour Court has held the domestic enqulry to be not valid. It is submitted that in cases where domestic enquiry has been held to be not validly conducted, it is for the management empioyer to .lead the evidence and it is in such circumstances that the employee also gets an opportunity to file evidence contrary to the evidence of the employer. It is submitted that in this case, the employee has not challenged the order of the Labour Court upholding the validity of domestic enquiry and therefore, it is the workmen who are precluded from frling any applications for bringing on record any fresh material. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to following case laws in support of his contentions: (lf Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh Singhz. for the proposition that it is only where the 2 (19721 r scc s9s 5 TMD,J W.P.No. 10224 oJ 2o2l & bstch preliminary issue is decided against the management that the employer can be given an opportunity to file additional evidence and also to give similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence per contra.

(2f The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,l Limited Vs. The Management & Othersa, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the power of the Tribunal to interfere with its frnding of misconduct recorded in the domestic enquiry unless one or other infirmities as pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Iron and Steel Compang Limited, existed and it was held that the earlier the Tribunal had no power to interfere unless the finding was perverse or the punishment was so harsh as to lead to be an inference of victimization or unfair labour practice, but after insertion of Section 11(A), the position is that the employer is entitled to adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal even if he had held no enquiry or the enquiry held by him is found to be defective. It is thereafter that an opportunity will have to be given to the workman to lead evidence contra. It was further observed that even after 1 1(A), the employer as well as theintroduction of Section 3 (1973) r scc 813 6 TMD,J w.P.No- 10224 of 2o27 & bdtch employee can adduce evidence regarding the legalitv or validity of the domestrc enquiry, if one had been held by an employer.

Further in the case of The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.'f Limited (cited supra) t}re Honble Supreme Court has considered the scope of the Proviso expressionto Section i 1(A) of the Act and has held that be"materials on record", occurring in the proviso, cannot confined oniy to the materials which were available at the domestic enquiry, but they aiso take in: (1) the evidence taken by the management at the enquiry and the proceedings of t he enquiry, or (2) the above evidence and in addition, any further evidence led before the Tribunal, or (3) evidence placed before the Tribunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as weli as the evidence adduced by the workmen contra. It was held that the expression fresh evidence has to be read in the context in which it appears namely, as distinguished from the expression materials on record. the 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that Proviso only emphasizes that the Tribunal has to satisff itself one way or the other regarding misconduct, the punishment and the relief to be granted to workmen only on the basis of the 7 TMD,J w.P.No. 10224 of2o21 E bdtch

materials on record before it and what those materials comprise theof have been mentioned earlier and the Tribunal for purposes referred to above, cannot call for further or fresh evidence, as an appellate authority may normally do under a particular statute, when considering the correctness or otherwise of an order passed by a subordinate body and the ormatter in the proviso refers to the order of discharge dismissal that is being considered by the Tribunal. placed 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner further reliance upon the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs Bharat Iron \llorks Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & Othersa and also in the case Karnataka State Road &Transport Corporation Vs. Lakshmidevamma (SMf) Anothets, though the facts and circumstances in the said case are distinguishable, therefore, according to him, the reliance on these decisions to grant relief and in allowing the petitions frled by the workman is misplaced. Thus, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner the order of the Labour Court in all the I.As., is liable to be set aside. a (1926) r scc sra s qzoorl s scc +a: 8 TMD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2021 a bdtch

8. Learned counsel for the workman, on the other hand, submitted that the petitioner management had resorted to victimization only because the workman had formed into a Union and the management wanted to suppress the unity of the workman. He tried to bnng out the instalces where 500 workmen had abstained from duties, but only felv workmen have been punished with punishment of removal from service, whereas others were let off with lesser punishments or let off with only deducting their salaries for a period of eighteen days. It is submitted that as soon as the respondents were removed from service, the IDs were filed challenging the removal orders and subsequently, when the petitioners realized that the management has resorted to victimization and differentia-l treatment was given to different employees, the petitioners have gathered the information and have hled I.A-No.143/2019 to permit documents to be taken on record only to demonstrate the victimization. It is submitted that though the petition has been fiIed prior to the order validating the domestic enquiry, the said petition was taken up subsequent thereto, but the said circumstances alone cannot determine the power of the Tribunal to admit additional documents which are only in relation to the issue involved in the ID. It is submitted that the 9 TMD,J WP.No. 10224 of2021 & botch

docr.rments Iiled by the workmen were only in relation to the issue of victimization and no new facts have been brought on record and therefore, it is part of material on record. He submitted that the Labour Court has taken into consideration the powers of the Tribunal in allowing the material to be brought on record only for protecting the workmen from the unfair labour practice adopted by the management and it was in these lines that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs Bharat Iron Works (cited supra) ald also in the case of Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-l has been considered. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the workmen, the orders of the Labour Court are justified and no interference is called for. the 9. Having regard to the rival contentions and material on record, this Court finds that the only issue to be decided in this writ petition is whether the Tribunal under Section 1 1 (A) of Industrial Disputes Act is prohibited from entertaining the evidence filed by the workmen after frling of the ID. In this case the workmen have been removed from service on the ground of an unauthorized absence for a period of 10 days. In the ID's, the workmen have raised the ground of unfair 10 TfltD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2O27 & baach

labour practice, but could not file the relevant documents along with the ID. It is subsequent to the filing of the ID ald before hearing of the parties on the validity of the domestic enquiry, that the I.A.No. 143/2021 has been filed to bring the documents on record. The Proviso to Section 11(A) prohibits bringing on record any fresh evidence other than the material on record. 10. The Hon'trle Supreme Court in the case of The Workmen of M/s.Firestone \rre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,f Limited, (cited supra), has clearly brought out as to what is to be considered as "material on record" ald what is "fresh evidence"? For the purpose of ready reference, the relevant paragraphs are re-produced here under: '48-49. We are not inclined. to accept the aboue contention of Mr.Deshmukh. The Prouiso specifies motters uhich the Tribunal shall take into account as also matters tuhich it shall not. The expression 'mateials on record', occurring in the Prouiso, in our opinion, connot be conflned onlA to the mateials uthich Luere auailable at the domestic enquiry. On the other hand, the 'mateials on record' in the Prouiso must be held to refer to mateials on record before the Tibunal. Theg take in- (1) the euidence taken bg the management cLt the eruryiry and the proceedings of the enquiry, or (2) the aboue euidence and in ctddition, ang furlher euidence led before the Tnbunal, or

(3) euidence placed before the Tibunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as utell as the euidence adduced bg the uorkmen contra. The aboue items bg and large should be considered to be the 'mateiab on record' as specified in the Prouiso. We are not inclined to limit thot expression as meaning onlg that mateial thot has been placed in a domestic enqu[ry. 11 TMD,J W.P.No. ,0224 oJ 2o21 A. batch

Tlrc Prouiso only confines the Tibunal to the mateials on record before it os spectfted aboue, uhen consideing the jusfirtcafion or otherluise of the order of discharge or dismissa/. It is only on the basis of these mateials thot the Tibunal is obliged. to consider uhether the misconduct is proued and the Jurther question u.thether the proued misconduct justifies the punishment of dismissal or discharge. It also prohibits the Tibunal from taking ang fresh euidence either for satisfging itself regarding the misconduct or for alteing the puni-shment. From the Prouiso it is not certainlg possible to come to the conclusion that tahen once it is held that an enquiry has not been held or is found to be dekctiue, dn order reinstating the uorkman tt-till haue to be made bg the Tibunol. Nor does it follou-t thot the Prouiso depiues an employer of his ight to adduce The euidence for the first time before the TibunaL expression fresh euidence' has to be read in the context in the u.thich it dppears namelg, as distinguished from expression 'mateials on record'. If so read, the Prouko does not present ang dfficultg at all. 50. The legislation in Section 11-A has made a departure in certain respects in the lau.t as laid doun by a this Court. For the first time, pouer has been giuen to Tibunal to satisfg itself u-thether misconduct is proued.

This is particttlarlg so, as alreadg pointed out bA us, regarding euen findings arriued at bg an emploger in an enquiry properlg held. The Tibunal has also been giuen thepouer, also for the first time, to interkre withpunishment imposed bg an employer. When such uide potaers haue been nout conferred on Tribunals, tte legislafi.ce obuiously felt that some restrictions haue to be imposed regarding uhat matters could be taken into Prouiso. Theaccount. Such restictions are found in the Prouiso onlg empLnsises that the Tibunol has to satisfg itself one uaA or other regarding misconduct, the punishment and the relief to be granted to uorkmen onlg on the basis of the 'mateiols on record' before it. Wlnt those mateials comprise of hdue been mentioned eorlier. The Tibunal for the purposes rekrred to aboue, cannot coll for further or fresh euidence, as an appellate authoitg mag normallg do under a particular stotute, when consideing the correctness or otheruise of an order passed bg a subordinate bodg. The 'matter' in the Prouiso rekrs to the order of discharge or dismissal that is being considered bg the Tibunal.' t2 TMI',J W.P.No- 10224 of 2027 & bdtch Further in the case of Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company (cited supra), the Delhi High Court has also observed as under: 61. From the aboue deci.sions the follouing principles broadlg emerge - (1) xxxx (2) xx,xx (3) xxxx

(4) When a domestic enquiry has been held bg the managenlent and the management relies on the same, it is open to the latter to request the Tibunal to try the ualidity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary issue and also the ask for an oppor1tnitA to adduce euidence before Tribunal, if the finding on the preliminary issue is against the management. Houeuer elaborate and cumbersome the procedure mag be, under such circumstances, it is open to the Tibunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary on issue the ualidity oJ the domestic enqtiry. If its finding the preliminary issue is in fauour of the management, then no additional euidence need be cited by the management.

Bu[ if the finding on the preliminary issue is ogainst the mdnagement, the Tibunal uill haue to giue the emploger an opportunitg to cite addihonal euidence and also giue a similar opportunitg to the employee to lead euidence contra, as the request to adduce euidence Lnd been made by the management to the Tribunal duing the course of the proceedings ond before the tial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided against th.e management th-e and tLre latter leads euidence before tle Tibunal, position, under such circumstaruces, uill be, tlnt the management is depiued of the benefit of hauing the finding of the domestic Tibunal being accepted as pima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the other hond, the management utll haue to proue, by adducing proper euidence, tLnt the taorkman is guiltg of misconduct and that tl9 action taken bg it is proper. It uill not be just and fair either to the management or to the uorkman thot the Tibunal should refuse to toke euidence and thereby osk ctpplication, after tlle management to make a further holding a proper enquiry, and depiue the utorkman of the benefit oJ the Tibunal itself being satisfied, on euidence adduced before it, that he LUas or Luas not guiltg of the alleged misconduct. 13 TMD,J W.P-No. 10224 of 2021 &. bdkn

11. In the batch of these cases, it is observed that the Tribunal has already upheld the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted by the management and therefore, the Tribunal has to necessarily go into merits of the order of verdict passed by the management. It is in these circumstances, that the respondent employees have filed applications for taking on record, the additional documents which were come to their knowledge after filing of the IDs. The Labour Court has conside'red all the relevalt judicial precedents on issue and a-lso the legal position i.e., proviso of Section 11(A) of ID Act before allowing the claim I I petition and has allowed to bring on record the relevant documents. In the order upholding the validity of the I proceedings, the Tribunal could not have gone into the merits of I the issue and it is only in the subsequent proceedings that the Tribunal/Labour Court will go into the merits of the issue and the documents now frled by the respondent workmen are in respect of merits of the issue and therefore, the Tribunal was right in allowing the documents to be brought on record. The petitioner management will get an opportunity to rebut or reply to the documents filed by the petitioners being taken on record L4 AMD,J W.P-No. 10221 of 2027 d. batch i 'I

I by the Labour Court during the subsequcnt procee<lings and hence there is no violation of the principles of Natural Justice and no prejudice, what-so-ever is caused to the maDagement by the above order of the Labour Court. 12. With these remarks, this Court does not find any merit in these writ petitions fiied by the management. 13. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. li There shall be no order as to costs. 14. Miscellaneous petitions, if a-ny, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed. SD/. T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS i /TTRUE COPY// I { I.lt SECTIO OFFICER o;li 1. One CC to SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAI\4, Advocate [OPUC]I CC to Mr. ABID HUSSAIN; Advocate [OPUC] I 2. One I 3. One CC to SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAIVI, Advocate [OPUC] '1 4. Advocate [OPUC] I *# 5. One CC to SRI B. KRISHNA, 6. One CC to SRI T.V. RAMESH, Advocate [OPUC] t*. cD coPies i ftJ P !LS I i I fir ) I I 68 '; 1 fii ii HIGH COURT tls !li-i rt DATED:0310612024 f EL4 r C, rl \ k, .$ + o f. I ;I C s C) ,/\i I i_ s' J ,.L t I Hi .t ti 9r/citl*t II ) fit, COMMON ORDER 1ItI i W.P. Nos. 10224, 10216,5868, 11092, 1 1093, 11094, $ 11095, 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 11104,11105, 11 108, 12142, 12143, 12144, 12145, fl,11 106, 11107, rt, 'l 12146, 12147, 12148, 12149, 12150, 12151, 12152, i rltlrl 12153, 12154, 12155, 12156,',12157, 12159, 12160, ', 14625,14627,14629 & 14630 0F 2021 tl ii E ft + t t i*s7: i. I

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS I t\21 ,l-l rlt) ;J

I [321s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION Nos. 10224.10216. 5868, 11092.11093. 11094. 11095 11096 11100 11101 11103 11104 11105 11106 11107 11108 12142 12143 12144 12145 12146 12147 12148 12145 12150 12151 12152 12153 '|.2154 12155 12156 12157 12159 12160, 14625.14627.14629 &14630 0F 2021 i i.' WRIT PETITION NO: 102240F 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerosp ace SEZ, Plot No 1/D, S No. 656,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy District, vT elangana 301510 Represented by its Senior Manager. Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada ...PETITIONER AND S.Venkatesham, S/o Salla Anjaiah Ag e 28 years, Occ. Associate, Fyo H. No 2-18,Pothanpally, Chegunta Mandal, Medak Districl' 502247 ...RESP.NDENT ' Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 1 .A. No. 78 of 2o21and LA.passed by the Hon.ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in No. 79 of 2021 in T.D. No. 31 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 2

lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 1810212021 in l.A. No.78 of 2021 and l.A. No. 79 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 'f OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l-D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No- 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed tn W.P. No. 10224 of 2021 until further order. 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T ANAND SUBRAMANIAM Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 10216 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. '1lD, Sy No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana -501510 Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada ...PET|TIONER AND Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, Ryo. Plot No 122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-'t, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 76 of 2o21and l.A. No. 77 of 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 181O212021 in l.A. No. 76 of 2021 and l.A. No. 77 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition. 1 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2O.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 09.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 1O216 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Between: Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, R/o. Plot No.122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. 1/D, S No. 656, elanganaAditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, t - Rep. by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1021612021 on 2010412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAM 5 Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 5868 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Ad itya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, T elangana Represented by its General lvlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swamy, Aged about 29 years, R/o.37-76,77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 18 of 2021, l.A. No. 143 of 2019, l.A. No. 71 of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 73 ot 2017 daled 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 1A NO: 1 OF 2!21 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 and stay all further proceedings in l.A. No. 18 of 2021,1.A. No. 143 of 20'19, l.A. No. 7'l of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 73 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order 6 f ile of Labour Court-|, atdated 20.'1 1 .2023 passed in lD No.73 of 2017 on the Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 73 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 2112.2023 passed in W.P. No. 5868 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swam v, Rr/o. 37-76, 77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga R eddy District, Telangana ...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne .,.RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 25lOBl2O21 in W.P.No. 5868 of 2021 on 3010612021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN l WRIT PETITION NO: 11092OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PET|TIONER AND Anand Balasaheb Jadhav, S/o. Balasaheb Umaji Jadhav, Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H.No. 102-2, Old Gram Panchayath, Badangpet, Saroornagar (M) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 5ooo58 ...RESP.NDENT Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 134 ol 2021, and l.A. No. 135 of 2021 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 135 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 134 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 7 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 8 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 7 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - I, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11092 of 2021 until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11093 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Teiangana Represented by its General Manager, ltr'lr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Vinod Sahebro More S/o Sahebrao More, Age 27 yearc, Occ: Associate, Rl/o. PlotNo 86/P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058 ...RES'ONDENT

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No.86 ot 2021, l.A. No. 87 of 2021 in l.D. No. 27 oI 2019 daled 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 9 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l.A. No. 86 of 2021 and l.A. No. 87 ol 2O21in LD. No. 27 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing lhe additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D-No.27 ot 2O19 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 F 2024

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 27 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 1 1093 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM l0 WRIT PETITION NO: 11094 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by ils General Manager, It4r. Arjtm Myne ...PETITIONER AND Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: about 34 years, Occupation: Associate, R/o-H.No-1-103/'1, Sama Street-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,1.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 1OO ot 2021 and lA. No. 48 of 2021 in LD. No. 97 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardshrp and loss. IA O:'l F 2021 Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,l.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 100 of 2021 and l.A. No. 48 of 2021 in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 97 ot 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ll lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11094 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: 34 years, Occ: Associate, R/o. H.No-1-103/1, Sama Stieet-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.65O Ndltyq Nagar, Adibatla (V)lbrahimpatnam Mandal,'Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep by itsGenerai Manager' Mr' Arjtm Myne pETraoNER ...REspoNDENTMRrr Petition under Section '15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1094vacate the order dated: 27 .04.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 ol 2021 in W.P.No. of 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM ) WRIT PETITION NO: 11095 OF 202't Between:

M/s- Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Lokesha A, S/o Anjainappa, Aged: about 36 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o. Plot No. 33, H.No.1-68/4 Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District-500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1.A. No.88 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 89 of 2021 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 dated 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of justice and equtty, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l-A. No.88 of 2021 and l.A. No. 89 o'f 2021 in l.D. No. 26 ot 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evrdence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. t3 lA NO: 2 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11095 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: - WR]T PETITION No 11096 0F 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, Aged: about 34 years, Occupation. Specialist, Fl/o Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District' Telangana' ...RES'.NDENT

Petition under pi.ticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in LA. No.43 ol 2021,1.A. No. 105 of 2021, l.A. No. 1O4 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. l4 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 in LA. No.43 of 2021,l.A. No. 105 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 104 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. IANO:1OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11096 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, RJo. Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. ...PETITION EFYRESPONDENT AND l5 M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dishict -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun lr,lyne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit flled in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in W.P.No. 1106of 2021 on 27.04.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11100 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Rl/o.C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, Aged about 35 years, Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Honorable Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in LA. No.3of 2021,l.A. No. 146 ot 2021,1.A. No. 147 of 2021 and l.A. No.4 of 2021 in l.D. No. 76 ot 2017 daled 1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 3 of 16 2021, l.A.No.4 of 2019, LA. No. 146 of 2021,l.A No. 147 of 2021 in LD. No.76of 2017 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-l , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.76 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the pelition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20j1.2023 on behalf of the I,Respondent Workman in lD No 76 of 2O17 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 21 .122023 passed in W.P. No. 11'100 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, R/o. Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District. ...PET|IONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep. by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER I7

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2O21 in W.P.No. 11100 ol 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11101OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne AND ...PET|TTONER Manish Kumar, S/o Munshilal Choudhari R/o H.No. 6-801111, SLNS Colony, BalapurX Roads, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500053 ...RES,ONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indla praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in lhe nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 45 ot 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021, l.A. No. 1O2 of 2021 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 dated 18.O2.2O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 45 of 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021,1.A. No. 102 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lri lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 1'l 101 of 202'l until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11'103 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagql, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Ivlr. Arjun lt/yne ...PETITIONER AND Dibyapratap Mohanta, S/o Birendra Mohanta Age 23 years, Occ.Associate, R/o H. No 6-i 1-9/A, Annapurna nagar Colony, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be l9 pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and to quash and set aside the common order dated 18.02.202'1 passed 85 ofby the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 84 of 2021and l A No 2021 in LD. No. 28 oI 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No' 84 of 2021 and l.A. No. 85 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 28 ot 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad IANO:2 OF 2024 Petition under section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1 103 of 2021 until furtherextend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in w.P. No. order. ZO lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between Dibyapratap S/o Birendra Mohanta,Rl/o H. No 6-1 1-9/A, Annapurna Nagar Colony, Badangpet,^/ohanta,Hyderabad- 500058 ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne ...RESpoNDENT/vlrRrr pETrroNER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 2510812021 in W.P.No. 1 'l 103 of 2021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11104 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PET|T|ONER AND Naresha, S/_o _ Nagireddy, Aged about 33 years, Rl/o. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornaga(M) Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 ot 2021, l.A. No. 149 of 2019, l.A. No. 148 ot 2021 and l.A. No.2 ot 2021 in LD. No. 75 o'f 2017 dated 1810212O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, olherwise the petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 2t lA NO: 1 oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 'l ofsuspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 2021,l.A. No. 149 of 2019,1.A. No. 148 of 2021 and l.A. No.2 of 2021 in LD. No. 75 of 2017 dated 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Cou(-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Pelition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.75 of 2017 on the file of Labour Courf l, at Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 75 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. tA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P. No. 11104 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Naresha, S/o Nagireddy, Ryo. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornagar (M) Ranga Reddy District ...pETrrroNER/REspoNDENT AND 22 M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by its General ltlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.No.1 1104 of 2021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11105 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETITIONER AND Dileep, S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aged: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Rl/o. H.No.1-76, Neelam Yadagiri Bui lding, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 51 of 2021, l.A. No. 97 of 2021,l.A. No. 96 of 2021 and l.A. No. 52 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 'l OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in LA. No. 51 of 23 2021,1.A. No.97of 2021,1.A. No.96of 2021 and l.A.No.52of 2021 inl.D.No. 99 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad IA NO: 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in lD No 99 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. . lA NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 1 105 of 2021 until further extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. orders. IA NO: 20F 2021 Between: Dileeo. S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aqed: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Fl/o. H.No:i-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...PETITIONERvRESPONDENT AND

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne pETrroNER ...RES'.NDENTMR.r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Z4 '1 1 105vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 o'f 2021 in W.P.No. of 2021 in the interests of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11106 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy. No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) 501510, Telangana. Represented bylbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne. ...PETTT|ONER AND

Srihari Kandregula S/o. Venkata Ramana, aged about 33 years, Rl/o. C.No.:P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029. ...RES'ONDENT Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in 1.A.No.117 of 2021, and |.A.No.116 of 2021 in lD No.84 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise,the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, pending disposal of the present writ petition, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.O2.2O21 in 1.A.No.117 of 2O21 and 1.A.No.116 of 2021 in l.D.No.84 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass 25

orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o11 -2023 on behalf of the RespondentWorkmaninlDNoE4of2OlEonthefileofLabourCourt-|, Hyderabad. IA NOi 2OF 2024 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy and Xerox copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 84 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' IANO:3O F 24 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to 1 1 106 of 2021 until furtherextend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in w.P. No. orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: -- WRIT PETITION NO: 11107 OF 2021 Between: Adibatla Nagar, Sy.No-.656, Limited, Systems Tata Advanced ,(V)M/s. ^Aditya Dy Represente6 Telangana - 501 510, District Ranga Reddy Mandal,ibrahimoatnam its General Manager, Mr. Arjun MYne ...PETITIONER i AND

Usr,Tl&!:','ifihl;"''"?1,%3j,;llll*&''"xin"*3:/"&'ibo"f;loi,'"83[8iHil[ *Gopalapuram, Vishakapatnam-S3O027 ...RES,ONDENT PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and to quash and set aside the common order dated 18.02.2021 passed 73 ofbythe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No 72of 2021 andlA No 2021 in l.D. No. 44 of 2O1g with regard to additional evidence and received 26 documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. IAN oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 72 of 2021 and l.A. No. 73 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 44 ol 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2O23 in I.D. No. 44 ol 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 44 ot 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 in W.P. No. 11107 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Naresh Chilakalapalli, s/o ch. Mangayyaa, Fl/o. H.No.58-18-23/3, lndiraPriyadarshani Colony Near NAD Road, Butchirajupalem Gopalapuram, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONE R/RESPONDENT 27 AND Mis. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1110712021 on 2710412021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIO HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 11108 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne i aro ...PETITIONER R. Ambareesha, S/o Ramakrishna ppa, aged about 25 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o Flat No.'12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500058 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021, l.A. No. 108 of 2021 and l.A. No. 40 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additlonal documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: I OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 28

suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 108 ot 2021 and l.A. No.40 of 2021 in l.D.No. 93 of 2018 daled 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11108 of 2021 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12142 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, TelanganaRepresented by its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar ...pETlroNER AND 29 Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Aged: about 34 ears, Occ: Ex.Associate R/o C/o: P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTU AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089,3rd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 50002 vc,I ,..RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212O21 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No.37 of 2021,l.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 38 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Pelitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No.37 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 of 2021 and l.A. No. 38 of 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 24 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 30 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12142 ot 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Fl/o C/o: P. Damodqr Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'o floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i' M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Represented bv its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar ...RESpoNDENT/wRrr pETrroNER Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214212021 on 0110612021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO:'12143 OF 2021 Between: M/s Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...PETITlONER AND J-Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra Mahadeva, Aged 29 years Occ: Specialist Rl/o Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District, Telangana ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 3l

pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 41 of 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021' IA. No. 1OG of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of .iustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 'l OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of a certified copy of order in l.A. No. 41 of 2021' l.A. No. 1O7 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in -the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 181O212021 passed in l.A. No. '41 ot 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the 32 Respondent Workman in LD. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 '1 Petition under Section 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12143 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Between: I J.Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra lvlahadeva, Aged: 29 years Occ: Specialist, Fl/o. Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT i AND M/s Tata Lockheed lrr'lartin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50'1510, TelanganaRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar r . ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETIT]ONER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state_d in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No.2 ot 2021 in W.P.No.12143 of 2021 in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12144 OF 202'l Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND 33 lvlohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, agpd about 28 years, R/o C/o P. Damoda!' Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Naray-nguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 115 of 2O21, 1.A. No. 33ot2021,1.A. No. 114 ol 2O21 and I.A. No.34 ol 2021 in l.D. No.85of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.202'1 in l.A. No. 115 of 2021,1.A. No.33of 2021,1.A. No. 114ot2021 and 1.A.No.34ol 2O21 inl.D.No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. IANO:1OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court-Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.1'l .2023 in l.D. No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 34 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12144 ot 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Mohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, Fl/o. C/o. P. Damodar R eddy, organizing s6ii6tirv, iurUc,-Ap 6no reta'ngana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. i; ...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT AND t. ir M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER Petition under Section ',l51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214412021 on 01lOOl2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PET!TION NO: 12145 OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana iRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Hemant A Paqare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H No.86 P Shiva Sainagdr, Badangpet, Saroomagar(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ...RESPONDENT 35 Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set astde the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in I.A. No. 137 of 2021 , l.A No. 1,5 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021 and l.A. No.16 oi 2021 ia l.D. No.6 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 137 of 2021, l.A. No. 15 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021 and l.A. No.16 of 2021 in l.D. No.6 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 'f OF 2024

P"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in, I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in l.D.No.06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. I lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 36 extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12145 of 2021 until further order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Hemant A Pagare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, R/o. H.No. 86 P Shiva Sainagar, Badangpet, Saroomaga(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENTM'RIT PETITIONER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214512021 on 01.06.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12146 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, TelanganaRepresented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar i ...PETITIONER AND Nagaraju Mahadeva, S/o Mahadeva, a ged about 23 years, RYo . H.No.1-103/4, Samas Street, Bhishmanagar Colony, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ..RESPONDENT Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the aFfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by lhe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad l.A. No. 1 1 of 2O21,1.A. No. 12 37 of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No. 141 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: I OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 of in l.A. No. 11 of 2021,1.A. No. 12 of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No.'14'l of 2021 in ID. No. 93 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: I OF 024 in I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in lD No 93 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 in.. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad' IANO 30F 2024 ; I e"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in w.P. No. 12146 of 2021 until further order. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM 38 WRIT PETITION NO: 12147 OF 2021 Between:

M/s- Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lr/r. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER : AND V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, aged about 30 years, Fl/o C/o. P-DaqoQg,r Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor. Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RES'ONDENT Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in :the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 125 ol 2021, l.A. No. 27 of 2021, l.A. No. 124 of 2021 and l.A. No. 28 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 with 'andregard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to rl suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 125 of 2021,l.A. No. 27 of 2021,l.A. No. 124 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 28 of 2021 in l.D. No. ]1 6 of 201 8 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. i lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. '16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 39 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l,Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12147 of 2021 until fu(her order. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, R/o C/o. P. Damod.ar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Telangana Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ,..RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021 on O1lOOl2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN -10 WRIT PETITION NO: 12148 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adit ya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND

Sangamesh, S/o lvlanohar, Aged about 30 years, R/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, Narayanguda' Hyderabad - 500029 ...RE''.NDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 121 of 2021, l.A.,No. 29 of 2021,l.A. No. 120 of 2021 and 1.A. No. 30 of 2021 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documlnts and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, ottrerwise f the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 passed in l.A. No. 121 of 2021,1.A. No. 29 of 2021,1.A. No. 120 of 2021 and l.A. No. 30 oI 2O21 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -t, Hyderabad. 4l lA NO: 2 OF 2024 in ; r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1 .2023 in LD. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12148 of 2021 until fu(her orders. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: 'sangamesh, S/o Manohar, R/o C/o. P. Darlgdar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. ... PETITION ER/RESPONDENT AND M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by itssenior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar ...REspoNDENT/wRrr ,ETITT'NER

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214812O21 on01.06.2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12149 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255, Aditya Na gar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ..,PETITIONER AND Sri Venkatesh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28 years, Ri/o. Damodar Reddy, Organising Secretary,H.No. 3-5-1089, 3'" Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in LA. No. 133 of 2021, l.A. No. 19 of 2021 , 1.A. No. 132 of 2021 and l.A. No.20 of 2O21 in LD. No. 12 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. IANO:1O 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2O21 in l.A- No. 133 of 2021,1.A. No. 19 of 2021,1-A. No. 132 ot 2021 and l.A. No.20 of 2021 in l.D No 12 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket older daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. 43 lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P No. 12149 of 2021 until further orders. lA NO: 2 OF 202'l Between:

'Sri Venkate S h Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28 years, Ri/o. Damodar Reddy, H.No. 3-5-1089, 3' d Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ii ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND ...M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Telangana hdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Rep. by iti Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 1r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in W.P.No. 12149 oi 2021 in the :nterests of Justice. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12150 OF 2021 Between: ya Nagar, M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adit Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Telangana Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Khandappa Kasinath, S/o Kasinath, aoed about 27 vea$. Rl/o C/o P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AF-ino feiangaria Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ..RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in: the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and sel aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 19 of 2021 , l.A. No. No. 83 of 2018with31 ol 2O21 ,l.A No. 118 ot 2021 and I.A No.32of 2021 in l.D. regard to amendment of Claim Statement, recerving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpug ned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 1 I 9 of 2021, l.A. No. 31 of 2021, l.A. No. 118 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2O21 in l.D. No 83 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of ithe Respondent Workman in l.D.No.83 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court'- l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to 45 extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12150 of 2021 until further orders. r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: -- .il WRIT PETITION NO: 12151OF 2021 B etw een M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Na gar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND y.e.ar9,. Occ: Associate, Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/o Kasheem Bagayat, Age 2l R/o. H. No 13-173l1fokayukta Colony, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ...RESPONDENT ,, the Constitution of lndia praying that in the r Petition under Article 226 of ",I. r'iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ,.. l

Iliileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of '-tertiorari 18.O2-2O2O1 and to quash and set aside the Common order dated i:assed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 57 of 2021, l.A. No. 58 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 90 ot 2021 and I.A. No. 91 ot 2O21 in I.D. No. 102 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. 't! lA NO: { OF 2021 I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18-02.2021 in l.A- No. 57 of 2021,1.A. No.58of 2021, l.A. 90 of 2021 and l.A. No. 91 of 2021 in l.D. No. 102 of ,f2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. r,) 16 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass . theorders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 1O2 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 102 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court l, i-Hyderabad. 'l. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated_ in t: . tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased th erextend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12151 of 2021 until fur.l lorders. a lA NO: 2 OF 2O2'l Between: Ameer Kasheem B agayat, S/o Kasheem Bhagayat, Rl/o. H.No.13-173/1, Lokayukta Colony, Badangpet , Ranga Reddy District. l ...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its Senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar ...RESpoNDENT/wRrr pET:TroNER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased .lo vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215112O21 on 01.06.2021 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA I 47 .Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12152OF 2021 Between:

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District 50 1510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lvlr. Nitin Kumar .,.PETITIONER AND Rames h Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged about 27 yearc, Rl/o C/o P. Damodar 'secretaiy, Redd v, Organizing INTUC,-AP and Telarigana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd r-rfloor, N aratanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the !*iii,.':cl rcumstances stated in the affidavlt filed therewith, the High Court may be ij:leased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of t ,*bertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 {:!l't. bythe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 127 of 2021,1-4.No. ',:"passed ',7s of zOz't,l.A. No. 126 of 2021 and I.A. No. 26 of 2o21 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 with to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and ,.,li"SrrO i':rbvidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner ': will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,:llANO: 1 oF 2021

; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in i ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 1 Is'uspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 127 of tt=iozl, te. No. 25 0f 2021,1.A. No. 126 0l 2021 and l.A. No. 26 0f 2021 in l.D. No. 1 , Hyderabad. ' '.!1's or zo t e on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in lD No 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad. { t 48 IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12152 of 2021 until fu er orders. I I IlA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between:

Ramesh Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged: 27 yearc, Ryo. P. Damodar_- Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND I M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 5015'10, Telangana Rep by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar .,,RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER I Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12152 of 2021 in the interests of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM I 49 WRlT PETITION NO: 12153 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed l\,lartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...'ETITIONER ;i AND ..1 ,1 Milind Tidka, S/o. Ashok Shankar Tidka, Age 29 years, Occ. Specialist, Rl/o Plot No. 86P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District - 500058 ..RESPONDENT rt

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the be . aircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may . iileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated '18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 74 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 75 of . :.2021 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received ''documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer rlt r ,{grave hardship and loss. ',xt :NO: 1 OF 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in to :'.the affidavit filed in supPort of the petition, the High Court may be pleased .-iuspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No- 74 oflrt t rr. :Yd2l ana l.A. No. 75 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in rl'i :l I' the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.'11.2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in l.D.No.33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -,HYd erab ad , t{,l:I t'l,'t ,l I l I I I 50 lA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased , to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. IA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12153 of 2021 until further ' i:order. I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: - I .-, ir. WRIT PETITION NO: 12154 OF 2021 'ri. t: /t,I ! Between: ll M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),I lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by Iits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar AND ...PETITIONER i Shiva Kumar JK, Sio. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 yea.s, Rl/o. 1 -68, Sri Maha lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornaga(M), Ranga Reddy Diskict - 500058. ...RESPONDENT i.

Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18/02/2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 7 of 2O21 , l.A. No.8 of 2021, l.A. No, 142 of 2021 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 with regard to ir amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave Ihardship and loss. 51 t fA NO: 'f OF 2021 '1 in lli Petition under Section 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated lthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .,guspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l.A. No. 7 of :,2021,1.A. No.8 of 2021, LA. No. 142 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ;.; l:' l!he. affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to jiiispense , with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order lidated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - [, Hyderabad. .*:r :?. i:;lANo:2oF2024 .;11

.' eetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in {,..r. *$he-,affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass ,.!{tl .:l I tbrders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o.11 .2023 on behalf of the .Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, 'lHyderabad.'a.i,l . '.]tt . lA NO: 3 OF 2024 praying that in the circumstances stated in . , Petition under Section 151 CPC the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ,$xtend the order daled 12-0'l-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12154 ot 2021 until further ...iorder. ittl itA No; 2 oF 2021 ,1, i l Between: ,.Shiva Kumar JK, S/o. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 years, Rl/o.1-68, Sri Maha :lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District - 500058. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND a,i :,t & 52 M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its senior Manager' It'4r' Nitin Kumar pETrroNER ...RES'.NDENTMR,r Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in W.P-No. 12154 of 2021 in the interests of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1215s OF 2021 i Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed lrtlartin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...PETITIONER AND ,,,,ii Rajendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, Aged: about 32 years, Occ. Associate Fl./ti. New Synergy Homet6lony, Turkayanjal, Rangareddy Didtrict, Telangana i ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that.,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of wljt, of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 53 ot 2Q21,l.A. No. 95 of 202'l and LA.,No. 94 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 daled 181O212021 dated 1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving addttional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer :grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in LA. No. 53 of i I t 53 l,':':

2021,1.A. No. 95 of 2O21 and I.A. No. 94 of 202'l in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in :i: Petition under Section the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass .orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the )rl I ,1.$espondent Workman in lD No 100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. NO:2 oF 2024 ..i;r.r: .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to '.r.,1'dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order ' ,..1 dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ; lA NO: 3 OF 2024 praying that in the circumstances stated in,{t,r, Petition under Section 151 CPC 'itthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . 'tuxtend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12155 of 202'1 until further , ,drders. *{. N 2 F 2021 :'1 .{between: :, Raiendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, R/o. New Synergy Home Colony, Tuikayanial, Rangareddy District, Telangana ]: ...PETITIoNER/RESPoNDENT AND il .'*:

'..M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER :aIi rii .l .l :.,*l,.'t ' .''1\l I I _tl 1.! al Petrtion under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to j .vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215512021 on 01 .06.2021 . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN WRIT PETITION NO: 12156 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar,Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Tippanna Kantli, S/o Rachappa, aged about 31 years, Rl/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Oigianizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, | 'Naiayanglda, Hyderabad - 5ooo29 ...RESPONDENT l. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in!the I

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, - the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18lO2l2O2O1 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-!, Hyderabad in lA. No. 131 of 2O21, l.A. No. 2'1 of 2021, l.A. No.130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ln the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 181021202'1 in LA. No. 131 of 2021, l.A. No. 21 of 2021, l.A. 130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on the file of li Honorable Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. ..', ,.: 55 ! , lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 'l!i;': Petition under the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass ,,brders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the il'"Respondent l, Workman in lD No 13 ol 2018 on the file of Labour Court -I t{yderabad. :IANO:2OF2 024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ., the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ilispense with the filing of Ce(ified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. NO: 3 OF 24 .l stated in t:.. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to n d the order daled 12-01-2O24 passed in W.P. No. 12156 of 202'1 until further ,,8ti",. IA NO: 2 OF 2021 ,lriBetw een: ,rl Telangana Tippanna Kantli, Sig Rachappa, aged: 31 years, R/o. INTUC, AP & Branch, 3-5-1089,3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND iI {! Nagar' 1lM/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya rAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana .Represenieil by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ! a ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER ri r P Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ivacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in LA.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12156 \of 2021 in the interests of Justice. 56 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12157 OF 2021 Between:

tvl/s. Tata Lockheed l\4artin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar r ...PETITIONER AND I H. Santosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 35 years, Ryo. H.No.6-191, S.L: N.S Colony, Balapur X Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana tb I ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in1 the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 13 of 2021, l.A. No. 14 of 2O21,1.A. No. 138 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 139 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 passed in l.A. No. 119 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 31 of 2021,1.A. No. 118 of 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2021 in l.D. No. 83 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be please d o i I I 57 dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of 20'17 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 ':l p"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in . the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass r'iriirders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the ,, ,'il.espondent Workman in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, 'i, .j.Hyderabad.! I ll'{i '. IA'NO: 3 OF 2024 i tl ,: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ,-!he affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to ''':: bxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 12157 of 2021 until further order !.t,l lA NO: 2 OF 202 'Between:

. H.rSantosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, Fyo. H.No.6-191, S.L. N.S. Colony, Balapur X 'Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. I I ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT L! '}l, AND f: M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, :,.lAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - ' 'Represented 50 1510, Telangana by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar rr : I ...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNER ,ti:i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . .vacale interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021 on 01 .06.2021 raCounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN , 58 WRIT PETITION NO: 12159 OF 2021 Between: tvl/s. Tata Lockheed lviartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represerlted :by'its Senior lt/anager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...PETITIONER AND Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy, S/o Gaurang Charm Mohanth y, aged about 26 years, R/o C/o. P. Dangodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Bra.1ch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029 ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maylbe tr pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 129 of 2021 ,' l.A. rNo. .li 23 of 2O21,l.A. No. 128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 14 ot 2018 ,rt,r., with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise lthe I Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,l i lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta,tld" in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18-02.2021 in l.A. No. 129 of 2021,l.A. No. 23 of 2021, LA. No. '128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in l.D: ,No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. It:ll lA NO: 1 OF 2024 I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasef to , dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. j I II i :, 59 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 ,ri.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in :rl 'the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass : orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, I $espondent Workman in l.D. No. 14 ol r.:Hyderabad.,ii, lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in .-l :t:!he affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .iixtend the order daled 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12159 of 2021 until further i:rder. : ri.Cou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA tl **Cou nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN i' 'll WRIT PETITION NO: 121 60 0F 2021 r'l' ' 1'Between: ,l ,:tM/31. tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, 501510, Telangana XAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - '-l::Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar ...'ET.T,ONER AND G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Aged about 24 years, Ryo.H.No. l-77, Srilatha Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -500058 ,Building, ...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly on in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1-A. No. 5 of 2021, l.A. No. 6 of ...2021, l.A. No. 144 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 145 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 77 of 2O17 with 'ibgard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner .ririll suffer grave hardship and loss. i,: 60 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Order dated 18.02.2021 passed in l.A. No. 145 ot 2021,1.A. No. 5 of 2021,1.A. No. 144 ol 2021 and l.A. No' 6 of 2021 in .D. No. 77 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ASSthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hlgh Court may be pleased to orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No.77 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. ;.tri :: ',llA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanc€s statOd in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may U" oru"."f!to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket grder dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No 77 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hrd"ilbfld lA NO: 3 OF 2024 lll: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stateldi in . tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased i extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12160 ot 2021 until further order. i i lA NO: 2 OF 2021 i 1,. Between: G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Rl/o.H.No.1-77, Srilatha Building, Badangpet, Saroornagar [\,4andal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. : l, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT :,:l''i AND I , '..1; i li I l: .1, 'I 6l ,ti , M/s. Tata Lockheed [/artin Aeroskuctures Limited, Sy.No.255, Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, fvlr. Nitin Kumar ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER ' '.. i,i Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ln :'aI the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .Vacate the interim orders passed in WP No.121601 2021, dt.01.06.2021. 1:,lbou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA ;r, rlii , nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN lr "iou xl Ii WRIT PETITION NO: 14625 OF 2021

: Between: riirlls. fata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by Iits General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne ...PETrroNER AND il.Ramanianeyulu, S/o. B.Raju Aged about 32 years, R/o H.No. 6-44, Ayodhya 'Nagar, Mberpbt, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad, 500097 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the r] '.tircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 'pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ,jC<i*iorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 12.04.2021 passed :ll Liy the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 179 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 180 Jdt'zozl in l.D. No. 121 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ll1, i ,. , iddCuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer .'. grave hardship and loss. 1, ,, IANO: oF 2021 praying that in the circumstances stated in ,: Petition under Section 151 CPC the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 179 of 2021 and l.A. No. 180 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 12'1 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. .. ti il: ttitit il 62 N i 10F 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order l,dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 121 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court '-IHyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SS orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf ,of ] th e r;.1 Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 121 ol 2O18 on the file of Labour Court] al "{ Hyderabad. tit I i I ,'.:.l ilA NO: 3 OF 2024 i tiitrl Petition under Section 'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta tn : the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleas ed rto 'rl extend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14625 of 2021 until further order. " f t Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA I Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI B. KRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: 14627 OF 2021 rt I t4 Between: li j M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No 1iD, Sy t',to:'OSO, Aditya Nagar, Aijibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (lvl) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana -501510 Represented by its Deputy General lvlanager, Mr. Mandar Ravinder Pha{ke ...PETITIONER

AND :S.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. S. Satyam, Aged about 29 years, R/o H.No. 6-348, PlotI oOld Balaji Nagar, lvleerpet Saroornagar, Hyderabad 500097 if ...RESPONDENT :l' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in:the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court ma Y1 .be { rl *k --1 63 , pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of and to quash and set aside the common order dated 12.04.2o21 passed .certiorari r: by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 187 of 202land l.A' No 188 rl , -!6f zozl in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ..ttocuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer it girave hardship and loss. IA:NO: oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to f$usnenA the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 12.04.2021 in l.A. No. 187 of :,"zoz't and l.A. No. 188 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad lA NO: 1 ': Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 6..affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dpense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order I, ated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 125 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court -fderabad. t

r't NO 2 F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ' ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass 'il , .r".&rders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalf of the l, Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 125 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court -Hyderabad 1A NO: 3 OF 2024 Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in il Petition under i*[re affiOavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .lfJxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14627 of 2021 until further Uro.r. ttl 1 64 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: 14629 OF 2021 Between: M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya NagaI, Adibatlal (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma t ...PETITIONER I AND V. Gangadhar Rao, S/o. Ramakrishna Rao, Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. Huda Colony, Chandanagar, Hyderabad - 500050 ...RESPONDENT l"

Petition under Adicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that'inf the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1210412021 palsed 'll by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,l.A. No.186 of 2021 ln l.D. No. 124 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statempnt, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of juslice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. i ll 'l' lA NO: 1 OF 2021 i,l. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,1.A. No.186 of 2021 in l.D. No.124 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble LaCour Court - 1, Hyderabad. i I lA NO: 1 OF 2024 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the :t Respondent Workman in 1.D.No.124 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court t Hyderabad. {I t I ,lf i, .:: :t 65 ri lA NO: 2 OF 2024

!i' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 124 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,:i' Ii+, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in riihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to i$Jri!"0 the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14629 of 2021 until further riJ.aer ir. t i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA 'dt l .i;S,Qounsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA 1t '' WRIT PETITION NO: 14630 OF 2021 l_lBetween: t*l r: -ll't/d. tata Sikorskv Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Genirral Manager. Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma ...PETITIONER AND 'Rajesh Chaganti, S/o. lssac, Aged about 34 years, Fl/o. 5-1-16/1'01d Meerpet i - Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT 4i

ilf praying that in the i, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia ll r. , ,IJircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be Ijt"aseO to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .iCertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 121O412021 passed lr 'kiy the Hon'ble Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 177 ol 2021' l.A. No.178 of 2021 in l.D. No. 12O of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, 'receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice !, 'Cnd equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ;l rl tiil *+ ll I 66 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1210412021 in l.A. No. 1 77. of 2021, l.A. No 178 of 2021 in l.D. No.120 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 i I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to t dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the d ef daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 120 oI 2018 on the file of Labour t, Hyderabad lA NO: 2 OF 2024 i

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf.offthe Respondent Workman in LD. No. 12O of 2018 on the file of Labour Courtlj I, Hyderabad. l I lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,'{l I I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may Ue Ofeaseflto extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 14630 of 2021 until furlher order. ',I'lifi counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA li Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA l' I i I The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I T : i"* THE HONOI'RABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI W.P.Nos. 1O224 102L6 5868 1to92 11093 LLO94 11095. 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 111()4, 11105, 11106, tlto7. rI108, 12142, 12143, 12L44, 12145, L2146, L2147, L2L4A L2L49 12150 t2t5t 12152 12153 L2154 12155 12L56, t2 157. 12159, 12160, 14625, 14627, L4629 & L+630 0F 2021 COMMON ORDER:

In these writ petitions, petitioner management is seeking a writ of certiorari, to quash and set aside the common order passed by the Labour Court- 1, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2021 in the interlocutory applications filed in the batch of ID's filed by the workmen of the petitioner company, such as in I.A.No.18 of 2O21, I.A.No.143 of 2019, I.A.No.7l of 2027 & I.A.No. 150 of 2O2l in I.D.No.73 of 2017, dated 18.02.2021, allowing the amendment of Claim petition, receipt of additional documents and evidence on record as bad in law, in the interest ofjustice, equality and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Similar orders have been challenged in the other Writ Petitions which are forming part of this batch. 2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ petitions are that the respondents were all employees of the petitioner company. On the ground that the workmen were 2 TMD,J W-P.No- 70224 of 2O21 & baach

unauthorizedly absent for a period of ten to srxteen days, the petitioner company has initiated disciplinary proceedings against some of the workmen. Out of 500 employees, who abstained from duties, for the charges of unauthorized absence, some were let off with deduction of 18 days wages, while 100 employees were charge sheeted, while some others were let off with minor punishment of with-holding two annual increments and continuity of service and some others were removed from service. The workmen, who have been removed from service therefore, filed IDs before the Labour Court challenging the removal order and during the pendency of ID, the petitioner in W.P.No.5868 of 2O2l has filed I.A.No. 143 of 2Ol9 to condone the delay and permit certain documents (as per the list enciosed there with) to be brought on record. The said I.A., rvas frled on 15.07.2019 and thereafter, the Labour Court has considered the contentions of both parties about the validity of domestic enquiry and has upheld the validity of domestrc enqurry. It is thereafter that the Tribunal has taken up I.A.No.143 of 2079 and also I.A.No.18 of 2021- which was filed by the respondents workmen to amend the claim petition, I.A.No.71 of 2O2L to adduce additional evidence and I.A.No.15O of 2021 to adduce two more documents. 3 TIVD'J W.P-No. 70224 of 2021 & ba.ch

has raised objections to said I.As., 3. The Management on the ground that since the domestic enquiry has been held to be valid, the workmen cannot now lead any new evidence on 11(A) of therecord as it is barred by the Proviso to Section Industrial Disputes Act. The Management had also relied upon certain judgments of the Hontrle Supreme Court in support of their contentions. However, the Labour Court has allowed the TlreI.As., by way of a common order dated 18.02.2027. Management has thus, challenged the orders dated l8-O2.2O21 by frling the present writ petitions and vide interim order dated 30.06.2021, the order d,ated' L8.O2.2021 passed by the Labour Court was suspended. However, relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Another Vs. Central Bureau of Investigationt wherein the Hon'lcle Supreme Court had held that an interim order of any Court shall be in force for a period of six months only unless extended by the Court, and since the interim order dated 18.02.2021 was not extended by this court, the Labour Court proceeded with the matter and examined the witnesses and marked documents as W1 to W29 and the matter is now stated to be posted for arguments. I (2018)16 scc 299 4 TMD'J W.P.No. 10224 of 2021 & bcach

4. l,r:arne d counsel appearing for the petitloner management, i.r,hile reiterating the above submissrons, submitted th.it the Proviso to Section 1 1(A) of the ID Act prohibits bringing on record of any new material, unless the Tribunal or Labour Court has held the domestic enqulry to be not valid. It is submitted that in cases where domestic enquiry has been held to be not validly conducted, it is for the management empioyer to .lead the evidence and it is in such circumstances that the employee also gets an opportunity to file evidence contrary to the evidence of the employer. It is submitted that in this case, the employee has not challenged the order of the Labour Court upholding the validity of domestic enquiry and therefore, it is the workmen who are precluded from frling any applications for bringing on record any fresh material. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to following case laws in support of his contentions: (lf Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh Singhz. for the proposition that it is only where the 2 (19721 r scc s9s 5 TMD,J W.P.No. 10224 oJ 2o2l & bstch preliminary issue is decided against the management that the employer can be given an opportunity to file additional evidence and also to give similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence per contra.

(2f The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,l Limited Vs. The Management & Othersa, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the power of the Tribunal to interfere with its frnding of misconduct recorded in the domestic enquiry unless one or other infirmities as pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Iron and Steel Compang Limited, existed and it was held that the earlier the Tribunal had no power to interfere unless the finding was perverse or the punishment was so harsh as to lead to be an inference of victimization or unfair labour practice, but after insertion of Section 11(A), the position is that the employer is entitled to adduce evidence for the first time before the Tribunal even if he had held no enquiry or the enquiry held by him is found to be defective. It is thereafter that an opportunity will have to be given to the workman to lead evidence contra. It was further observed that even after 1 1(A), the employer as well as theintroduction of Section 3 (1973) r scc 813 6 TMD,J w.P.No- 10224 of 2o27 & bdtch employee can adduce evidence regarding the legalitv or validity of the domestrc enquiry, if one had been held by an employer.

Further in the case of The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.'f Limited (cited supra) t}re Honble Supreme Court has considered the scope of the Proviso expressionto Section i 1(A) of the Act and has held that be"materials on record", occurring in the proviso, cannot confined oniy to the materials which were available at the domestic enquiry, but they aiso take in: (1) the evidence taken by the management at the enquiry and the proceedings of t he enquiry, or (2) the above evidence and in addition, any further evidence led before the Tribunal, or (3) evidence placed before the Tribunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as weli as the evidence adduced by the workmen contra. It was held that the expression fresh evidence has to be read in the context in which it appears namely, as distinguished from the expression materials on record. the 6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that Proviso only emphasizes that the Tribunal has to satisff itself one way or the other regarding misconduct, the punishment and the relief to be granted to workmen only on the basis of the 7 TMD,J w.P.No. 10224 of2o21 E bdtch

materials on record before it and what those materials comprise theof have been mentioned earlier and the Tribunal for purposes referred to above, cannot call for further or fresh evidence, as an appellate authority may normally do under a particular statute, when considering the correctness or otherwise of an order passed by a subordinate body and the ormatter in the proviso refers to the order of discharge dismissal that is being considered by the Tribunal. placed 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner further reliance upon the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs Bharat Iron \llorks Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & Othersa and also in the case Karnataka State Road &Transport Corporation Vs. Lakshmidevamma (SMf) Anothets, though the facts and circumstances in the said case are distinguishable, therefore, according to him, the reliance on these decisions to grant relief and in allowing the petitions frled by the workman is misplaced. Thus, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner the order of the Labour Court in all the I.As., is liable to be set aside. a (1926) r scc sra s qzoorl s scc +a: 8 TMD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2021 a bdtch

8. Learned counsel for the workman, on the other hand, submitted that the petitioner management had resorted to victimization only because the workman had formed into a Union and the management wanted to suppress the unity of the workman. He tried to bnng out the instalces where 500 workmen had abstained from duties, but only felv workmen have been punished with punishment of removal from service, whereas others were let off with lesser punishments or let off with only deducting their salaries for a period of eighteen days. It is submitted that as soon as the respondents were removed from service, the IDs were filed challenging the removal orders and subsequently, when the petitioners realized that the management has resorted to victimization and differentia-l treatment was given to different employees, the petitioners have gathered the information and have hled I.A-No.143/2019 to permit documents to be taken on record only to demonstrate the victimization. It is submitted that though the petition has been fiIed prior to the order validating the domestic enquiry, the said petition was taken up subsequent thereto, but the said circumstances alone cannot determine the power of the Tribunal to admit additional documents which are only in relation to the issue involved in the ID. It is submitted that the 9 TMD,J WP.No. 10224 of2021 & botch

docr.rments Iiled by the workmen were only in relation to the issue of victimization and no new facts have been brought on record and therefore, it is part of material on record. He submitted that the Labour Court has taken into consideration the powers of the Tribunal in allowing the material to be brought on record only for protecting the workmen from the unfair labour practice adopted by the management and it was in these lines that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs Bharat Iron Works (cited supra) ald also in the case of Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-l has been considered. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the workmen, the orders of the Labour Court are justified and no interference is called for. the 9. Having regard to the rival contentions and material on record, this Court finds that the only issue to be decided in this writ petition is whether the Tribunal under Section 1 1 (A) of Industrial Disputes Act is prohibited from entertaining the evidence filed by the workmen after frling of the ID. In this case the workmen have been removed from service on the ground of an unauthorized absence for a period of 10 days. In the ID's, the workmen have raised the ground of unfair 10 TfltD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2O27 & baach

labour practice, but could not file the relevant documents along with the ID. It is subsequent to the filing of the ID ald before hearing of the parties on the validity of the domestic enquiry, that the I.A.No. 143/2021 has been filed to bring the documents on record. The Proviso to Section 11(A) prohibits bringing on record any fresh evidence other than the material on record. 10. The Hon'trle Supreme Court in the case of The Workmen of M/s.Firestone \rre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,f Limited, (cited supra), has clearly brought out as to what is to be considered as "material on record" ald what is "fresh evidence"? For the purpose of ready reference, the relevant paragraphs are re-produced here under: '48-49. We are not inclined. to accept the aboue contention of Mr.Deshmukh. The Prouiso specifies motters uhich the Tribunal shall take into account as also matters tuhich it shall not. The expression 'mateials on record', occurring in the Prouiso, in our opinion, connot be conflned onlA to the mateials uthich Luere auailable at the domestic enquiry. On the other hand, the 'mateials on record' in the Prouiso must be held to refer to mateials on record before the Tibunal. Theg take in- (1) the euidence taken bg the management cLt the eruryiry and the proceedings of the enquiry, or (2) the aboue euidence and in ctddition, ang furlher euidence led before the Tnbunal, or

(3) euidence placed before the Tibunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as utell as the euidence adduced bg the uorkmen contra. The aboue items bg and large should be considered to be the 'mateiab on record' as specified in the Prouiso. We are not inclined to limit thot expression as meaning onlg that mateial thot has been placed in a domestic enqu[ry. 11 TMD,J W.P.No. ,0224 oJ 2o21 A. batch

Tlrc Prouiso only confines the Tibunal to the mateials on record before it os spectfted aboue, uhen consideing the jusfirtcafion or otherluise of the order of discharge or dismissa/. It is only on the basis of these mateials thot the Tibunal is obliged. to consider uhether the misconduct is proued and the Jurther question u.thether the proued misconduct justifies the punishment of dismissal or discharge. It also prohibits the Tibunal from taking ang fresh euidence either for satisfging itself regarding the misconduct or for alteing the puni-shment. From the Prouiso it is not certainlg possible to come to the conclusion that tahen once it is held that an enquiry has not been held or is found to be dekctiue, dn order reinstating the uorkman tt-till haue to be made bg the Tibunol. Nor does it follou-t thot the Prouiso depiues an employer of his ight to adduce The euidence for the first time before the TibunaL expression fresh euidence' has to be read in the context in the u.thich it dppears namelg, as distinguished from expression 'mateials on record'. If so read, the Prouko does not present ang dfficultg at all. 50. The legislation in Section 11-A has made a departure in certain respects in the lau.t as laid doun by a this Court. For the first time, pouer has been giuen to Tibunal to satisfg itself u-thether misconduct is proued.

This is particttlarlg so, as alreadg pointed out bA us, regarding euen findings arriued at bg an emploger in an enquiry properlg held. The Tibunal has also been giuen thepouer, also for the first time, to interkre withpunishment imposed bg an employer. When such uide potaers haue been nout conferred on Tribunals, tte legislafi.ce obuiously felt that some restrictions haue to be imposed regarding uhat matters could be taken into Prouiso. Theaccount. Such restictions are found in the Prouiso onlg empLnsises that the Tibunol has to satisfg itself one uaA or other regarding misconduct, the punishment and the relief to be granted to uorkmen onlg on the basis of the 'mateiols on record' before it. Wlnt those mateials comprise of hdue been mentioned eorlier. The Tibunal for the purposes rekrred to aboue, cannot coll for further or fresh euidence, as an appellate authoitg mag normallg do under a particular stotute, when consideing the correctness or otheruise of an order passed bg a subordinate bodg. The 'matter' in the Prouiso rekrs to the order of discharge or dismissal that is being considered bg the Tibunal.' t2 TMI',J W.P.No- 10224 of 2027 & bdtch Further in the case of Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company (cited supra), the Delhi High Court has also observed as under: 61. From the aboue deci.sions the follouing principles broadlg emerge - (1) xxxx (2) xx,xx (3) xxxx

(4) When a domestic enquiry has been held bg the managenlent and the management relies on the same, it is open to the latter to request the Tibunal to try the ualidity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary issue and also the ask for an oppor1tnitA to adduce euidence before Tribunal, if the finding on the preliminary issue is against the management. Houeuer elaborate and cumbersome the procedure mag be, under such circumstances, it is open to the Tibunal to deal, in the first instance, as a preliminary on issue the ualidity oJ the domestic enqtiry. If its finding the preliminary issue is in fauour of the management, then no additional euidence need be cited by the management.

Bu[ if the finding on the preliminary issue is ogainst the mdnagement, the Tibunal uill haue to giue the emploger an opportunitg to cite addihonal euidence and also giue a similar opportunitg to the employee to lead euidence contra, as the request to adduce euidence Lnd been made by the management to the Tribunal duing the course of the proceedings ond before the tial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided against th.e management th-e and tLre latter leads euidence before tle Tibunal, position, under such circumstaruces, uill be, tlnt the management is depiued of the benefit of hauing the finding of the domestic Tibunal being accepted as pima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the other hond, the management utll haue to proue, by adducing proper euidence, tLnt the taorkman is guiltg of misconduct and that tl9 action taken bg it is proper. It uill not be just and fair either to the management or to the uorkman thot the Tibunal should refuse to toke euidence and thereby osk ctpplication, after tlle management to make a further holding a proper enquiry, and depiue the utorkman of the benefit oJ the Tibunal itself being satisfied, on euidence adduced before it, that he LUas or Luas not guiltg of the alleged misconduct. 13 TMD,J W.P-No. 10224 of 2021 &. bdkn

11. In the batch of these cases, it is observed that the Tribunal has already upheld the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted by the management and therefore, the Tribunal has to necessarily go into merits of the order of verdict passed by the management. It is in these circumstances, that the respondent employees have filed applications for taking on record, the additional documents which were come to their knowledge after filing of the IDs. The Labour Court has conside'red all the relevalt judicial precedents on issue and a-lso the legal position i.e., proviso of Section 11(A) of ID Act before allowing the claim I I petition and has allowed to bring on record the relevant documents. In the order upholding the validity of the I proceedings, the Tribunal could not have gone into the merits of I the issue and it is only in the subsequent proceedings that the Tribunal/Labour Court will go into the merits of the issue and the documents now frled by the respondent workmen are in respect of merits of the issue and therefore, the Tribunal was right in allowing the documents to be brought on record. The petitioner management will get an opportunity to rebut or reply to the documents filed by the petitioners being taken on record L4 AMD,J W.P-No. 10221 of 2027 d. batch i 'I

I by the Labour Court during the subsequcnt procee<lings and hence there is no violation of the principles of Natural Justice and no prejudice, what-so-ever is caused to the maDagement by the above order of the Labour Court. 12. With these remarks, this Court does not find any merit in these writ petitions fiied by the management. 13. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. li There shall be no order as to costs. 14. Miscellaneous petitions, if a-ny, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed. SD/. T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS i /TTRUE COPY// I { I.lt SECTIO OFFICER o;li 1. One CC to SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAI\4, Advocate [OPUC]I CC to Mr. ABID HUSSAIN; Advocate [OPUC] I 2. One I 3. One CC to SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAIVI, Advocate [OPUC] '1 4. Advocate [OPUC] I *# 5. One CC to SRI B. KRISHNA, 6. One CC to SRI T.V. RAMESH, Advocate [OPUC] t*. cD coPies i ftJ P !LS I i I fir ) I I 68 '; 1 fii ii HIGH COURT tls !li-i rt DATED:0310612024 f EL4 r C, rl \ k, .$ + o f. I ;I C s C) ,/\i I i_ s' J ,.L t I Hi .t ti 9r/citl*t II ) fit, COMMON ORDER 1ItI i W.P. Nos. 10224, 10216,5868, 11092, 1 1093, 11094, $ 11095, 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 11104,11105, 11 108, 12142, 12143, 12144, 12145, fl,11 106, 11107, rt, 'l 12146, 12147, 12148, 12149, 12150, 12151, 12152, i rltlrl 12153, 12154, 12155, 12156,',12157, 12159, 12160, ', 14625,14627,14629 & 14630 0F 2021 tl ii E ft + t t i*s7: i. I

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS I t\21 ,l-l rlt) ;J