IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No. 26967 of 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010551962026) DATED : 02.09.2026 Between: Bachu Sravanthi … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and three others … Respondents ORDER: Sri Kavali Vishnu Kanth, learned counsel appears for petitioner. Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader appears for respondents. 2. The instant Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “…..in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Order of Detention bearing SB.ID.No.2/PD-SDPT/2026 dated 25.07.2026, passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 3(1) and (2) of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, together with the Grounds of Detention and the material relied upon thereunder and all consequential proceedings, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 22(5) of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside/quash the same and direct the Respondents to release the detenu, Bachu Ratnakar, forthwith, if he is not required in any other case.”

3. Since Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026 has been filed in the nature of Habeas Corpus petition against the same cause of action initiated under the provisions of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, upon the 2 HCJW.P.No.26967(AKrS, J) & GMM,of 2026J detention of the husband of the petitioner, the present Writ Petition filed earlier in point of time by the same petitioner is sought to be withdrawn, on instructions by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pendency of the present Writ Petition was brought to the notice of the learned Division Bench in Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026, whereafter only, the present Writ Petition is directed to be withdrawn. Filing of multiple petitions for the same cause of action in the same Court would amount to abuse of process of the Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner however seeks apology and submits that pendency of the present Writ Petition was indicated in Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026. His inadvertence may be pardoned. 6. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in view of the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ____________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ _____________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026 kvni

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No. 26967 of 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010551962026) DATED : 02.09.2026 Between: Bachu Sravanthi … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and three others … Respondents ORDER: Sri Kavali Vishnu Kanth, learned counsel appears for petitioner. Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader appears for respondents. 2. The instant Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “…..in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Order of Detention bearing SB.ID.No.2/PD-SDPT/2026 dated 25.07.2026, passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 3(1) and (2) of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, together with the Grounds of Detention and the material relied upon thereunder and all consequential proceedings, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 22(5) of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside/quash the same and direct the Respondents to release the detenu, Bachu Ratnakar, forthwith, if he is not required in any other case.”

3. Since Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026 has been filed in the nature of Habeas Corpus petition against the same cause of action initiated under the provisions of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, upon the 2 HCJW.P.No.26967(AKrS, J) & GMM,of 2026J detention of the husband of the petitioner, the present Writ Petition filed earlier in point of time by the same petitioner is sought to be withdrawn, on instructions by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pendency of the present Writ Petition was brought to the notice of the learned Division Bench in Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026, whereafter only, the present Writ Petition is directed to be withdrawn. Filing of multiple petitions for the same cause of action in the same Court would amount to abuse of process of the Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner however seeks apology and submits that pendency of the present Writ Petition was indicated in Writ Petition No.28164 of 2026. His inadvertence may be pardoned. 6. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in view of the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ____________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ _____________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026 kvni