IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13732 of 2026 DATE: 01.09.2026 BETWEEN: Shivashankar Bhujwa …..Petitioner-Accused No.1 And The State of Telangana, Through P.S. Patancheru. …..Respondent-Complainant ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail who is arrayed as accused No.1 in connection with FIR No.882 of 2026 of Patancheru Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 49 of BNS, Sections 5 and 6, 16 and 17 of POCSO Act, 2012, Sections 9, 10 and 22 of Child Marriage Act. 2 2. Heard Smt. Megha Rani Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner-A1 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-A1 is innocent and he has not committed any of offence as alleged by the prosecution. De-facto complainant has falsely implicated the petitioner-A1 and the contents of the complaint are contrary to the offence leveled against the petitioner-A1. A2 and A3 are enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Court on 21.08.2026, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-A1 on bail.

4. Notice got issued to the de-facto complainant is served, proof is filed to that effect. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that charge sheet is filed before the concerned Court and SC number is awaited. 6. Petitioner-A1 has filed Crl.M.P.No.665 of 2026 in Crime No.882 of 2026 before the learned Sessions Judge which came to be dismissed vide order dated 31.07.2026 holding that there is every chance to tamper the prosecution evidence and he may cause obstruction to the progress of investigation. 3 7. Petitioner-A1 is arrested and produced before the concerned Magistrate on 19.06.2026, since then he is in judicial custody. 8. A2-D. Parashram Mutkalwad and A3-A. Necha have filed Crl.M.P.No.750 of 2026 in Crime No.882 of 2026 before the learned Sessions Judge which came to be allowed on 21.08.2026 and were enlarged on bail on executing bond. 9. Since charge sheet is already filed, SC number is awaited, the question of the petitioner-A1 influencing the witnesses does not arise. Hence, petitioner-A1 is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy. ii. The petitioner-A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

iii. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty 4 to file an application for cancellation of the bail. 10. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 01.09.2026 TU 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13732 of 2026 Date: 01.09.2026 TU

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13732 of 2026 DATE: 01.09.2026 BETWEEN: Shivashankar Bhujwa …..Petitioner-Accused No.1 And The State of Telangana, Through P.S. Patancheru. …..Respondent-Complainant ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail who is arrayed as accused No.1 in connection with FIR No.882 of 2026 of Patancheru Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 49 of BNS, Sections 5 and 6, 16 and 17 of POCSO Act, 2012, Sections 9, 10 and 22 of Child Marriage Act. 2 2. Heard Smt. Megha Rani Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner-A1 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-A1 is innocent and he has not committed any of offence as alleged by the prosecution. De-facto complainant has falsely implicated the petitioner-A1 and the contents of the complaint are contrary to the offence leveled against the petitioner-A1. A2 and A3 are enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Court on 21.08.2026, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-A1 on bail.

4. Notice got issued to the de-facto complainant is served, proof is filed to that effect. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that charge sheet is filed before the concerned Court and SC number is awaited. 6. Petitioner-A1 has filed Crl.M.P.No.665 of 2026 in Crime No.882 of 2026 before the learned Sessions Judge which came to be dismissed vide order dated 31.07.2026 holding that there is every chance to tamper the prosecution evidence and he may cause obstruction to the progress of investigation. 3 7. Petitioner-A1 is arrested and produced before the concerned Magistrate on 19.06.2026, since then he is in judicial custody. 8. A2-D. Parashram Mutkalwad and A3-A. Necha have filed Crl.M.P.No.750 of 2026 in Crime No.882 of 2026 before the learned Sessions Judge which came to be allowed on 21.08.2026 and were enlarged on bail on executing bond. 9. Since charge sheet is already filed, SC number is awaited, the question of the petitioner-A1 influencing the witnesses does not arise. Hence, petitioner-A1 is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy. ii. The petitioner-A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

iii. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty 4 to file an application for cancellation of the bail. 10. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 01.09.2026 TU 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.13732 of 2026 Date: 01.09.2026 TU